Transarterial Embolization for Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: Midterm Outcomes on Function and Pain Relief.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and potential effectiveness of transarterial embolization for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study analyzed consecutive adult patients with adhesive capsulitis referred for embolization between January 2018 and May 2023 after a poor response to treatment (symptoms and limitation of motion in ≥2 axes; ≤120° flexion, ≤50° external rotation and/or internal rotation with the shoulder abducted 90°) persisting for >3 months after having completed ≥6 weeks of analgesics and physical therapy. Different types of pain and mobility were measured before embolization and 1, 3, and 6 months after embolization. Overall upper limb function (Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and patient satisfaction were measured before and 6 months after embolization. Long-term follow-up comprised telephone interviews and clinical history reviews. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (12 [60%] women; median age, 50.7; interquartile ranges [IQR], 45‒55 years) were included; 6 (30%) had diabetes and 15 (75%) were off work. Median duration of symptoms before embolization was 39.4 weeks (IQR, 28‒49 weeks), and median duration of rehabilitation therapy was 12.8 weeks (IQR, 8‒16 weeks). Six months after embolization, significant improvements were observed in nocturnal pain (P = .003), pain on moving (P = .001), external rotation (P < .001), internal rotation (P < .001), active flexion (P < .001), passive flexion (P = .03), active abduction (P < .001), passive abduction (P < .001), and overall function (P < .001). Despite objective improvements, patient satisfaction was nearly unchanged. Only 1 patient experienced a mild adverse event. CONCLUSION: Transarterial embolization is safe and potentially effective in treating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder refractory to conventional treatment. Clinical improvements were maintained in the mid to long term.

[Post-covid syndrome after icu admission. Parameters related to a better physical recovery after 4 months.] / Síndrome pos-COVID tras ingreso en UCI. Parámetros relacionados con una mejor recuperación física a los 4 meses.

OBJECTIVE: Post-COVID syndrome can impact against every sphere of daily live. The objective of this work was to detect the factors correlated with a better or worse physical recovery four months after hospital discharge from a hospitalization in ICU due to COVID-19. METHODS: Prospective descriptive study of 125 patients valued by the Rehabilitation Service during hospitalization in ICU, from March 12th to December 31st, 2020. Data from 76 patients was analysed with clinical follow up after 1, 2 and 4 months of hospital discharge. Variables on personal, hospitalary, functional symptoms/signals and physical recovery were analysed with mean ± standard deviation, counting (percentage), T-student test and Fisher test. RESULTS: After one month, fatigue was observed in 60 (80%) patients and dyspnoea in 47 (62%). After two months, fatigue in 37 (55%), dyspnoea in 25 (33%), shoulder pain in 33 (43%), average QuickDASH was 22.7 (11.3-50), Sit-to-Stand Test in 30 seconds 11.5 (10-13) and 6-minute walk test 390 meters (326-445). In the fourth month, 25 (53%) had returned to work and had an average of the physical recovery of 79.1%±18.3%. There was no correlation between physical recovery ≥75% and the first month data, but there certainly was a correlation between some second month variables, such as fatigue (p=0.001), dyspnoea (p=0.035), QuickDASH (p=0.001) and 6-minute walk test (p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms (fatigue and dyspnoea) and functional scales (QuickDASH and 6-minute walk test) after 2 months predict a better/worsen physical recovery after 4 months of hospital discharge.

OBJETIVO: El síndrome pos-COVID puede impactar en todas las esferas de la vida diaria. El objetivo de este trabajo fue detectar qué factores se relacionan con una mejor/peor recuperación física a los 4 meses del alta hospitalaria tras ingreso en UCI por la COVID-19. METODOS: Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte de 125 pacientes valorados por Rehabilitación durante su ingreso en UCI, del 12 marzo al 31 diciembre del 2020. Las variables personales, hospitalarias, síntomas/signos funcionales y de recuperación física de los 76 pacientes que continuaron seguimiento al mes, 2 y 4 meses del alta hospitalaria fueron analizadas mediante media ± desviación estándar, contaje (porcentaje), test t-student y test de Fisher. RESULTADOS: En el primer mes, aquejaban fatiga 60 (80%) pacientes y disnea 47 (62%). En el segundo mes referían fatiga 37 (55%), disnea 25 (33%), dolor de hombro 33 (43%), la media de QuickDASH fue 22,7 (11,3-50), de sit to stand test en 30 segundos 11,5 (10-13) y de test 6 minutos marcha 390 metros (326-445). En el cuarto mes, se habían reincorporado laboralmente 25 (53%) y la media de recuperación física fue 79,1%±18,3%. No hay relación entre una recuperación física ≥75% y variables del primer mes, pero sí con variables del segundo mes, como la fatiga (p=0,001), disnea (p=0,035), QuickDASH (p=0,001) y Test 6 minutos marcha (p=0,021). CONCLUSIONES: Los síntomas (fatiga y disnea) y el QuickDASH y test 6 minutos marcha a los 2 meses predicen una mejor/peor recuperación física a los 4 meses tras el alta hospitalaria.

Síndrome pos-COVID tras ingreso en UCI. Parámetros relacionados con una mejor recuperación física a los 4 meses / Post-COVID syndrome after ICU admission. Parameters related to a better physical recovery after 4 months

Fundamentos: El síndrome pos-COVID puede impactar en todas las esferas de la vida diaria. El objetivo de este trabajo fue detectar qué factores se relacionan con una mejor/peor recuperación física a los 4 meses del alta hospitalaria tras ingreso en UCI por la COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte de 125 pacientes valorados por Rehabilitación durante su ingreso en UCI, del 12 marzo al 31 diciembre del 2020. Las variables personales, hospitalarias, síntomas/signos funcionales y de recuperación física de los 76 pacientes que continuaron seguimiento al mes, 2 y 4 meses del alta hospitalaria fueron analizadas mediante media ± desviación estándar, contaje (porcentaje), test t-student y test de Fisher. Resultados: En el primer mes, aquejaban fatiga 60 (80%) pacientes y disnea 47 (62%). En el segundo mes referían fatiga 37 (55%), disnea 25 (33%), dolor de hombro 33 (43%), la media de QuickDASH fue 22,7 (11,3-50), de sit to stand test en 30 segundos 11,5 (10-13) y de test 6 minutos marcha 390 metros (326-445). En el cuarto mes, se habían reincorporado laboralmente 25 (53%) y la media de recuperación física fue 79,1%±18,3%. No hay relación entre una recuperación física ≥75% y variables del primer mes, pero sí con variables del segundo mes, como la fatiga (p=0,001), disnea (p=0,035), QuickDASH (p=0,001) y Test 6 minutos marcha (p=0,021). Conclusiones: Los síntomas (fatiga y disnea) y el QuickDASH y test 6 minutos marcha a los 2 meses predicen una mejor/peor recuperación física a los 4 meses tras el alta hospitalaria.(AU)

Background: Post-COVID syndrome can impact against every sphere of daily live. The objective of this work was to detect the factors correlated with a better or worse physical recovery four months after hospital discharge from a hospitalization in ICU due to COVID-19. Methods: Prospective descriptive study of 125 patients valued by the Rehabilitation Service during hospitalization in ICU, from March 12th to December 31st, 2020. Data from 76 patients was analysed with clinical follow up after 1, 2 and 4 months of hospital discharge. Variables on personal, hospitalary, functional symptoms/signals and physical recovery were analysed with mean ± standard deviation, counting (percentage), T-student test and Fisher test. Results: After one month, fatigue was observed in 60 (80%) patients and dyspnoea in 47 (62%). After two months, fatigue in 37 (55%), dyspnoea in 25 (33%), shoulder pain in 33 (43%), average QuickDASH was 22.7 (11.3-50), Sit-to-Stand Test in 30 seconds 11.5 (10-13) and 6-minute walk test 390 meters (326-445). In the fourth month, 25 (53%) had returned to work and had an average of the physical recovery of 79.1%±18.3%. There was no correlation between physical recovery ≥75% and the first month data, but there certainly was a correlation between some second month variables, such as fatigue (p=0.001), dyspnoea (p=0.035), QuickDASH (p=0.001) and 6-minute walk test (p=0.021). Conclusions: Symptoms (fatigue and dyspnoea) and functional scales (QuickDASH and 6-minute walk test) after 2 months predict a better/worsen physical recovery after 4 months of hospital discharge.(AU)

Relación entre obesidad, diabetes e ingreso en UCI en pacientes COVID-19 / Relationship between obesity, diabetes and ICU admission in COVID-19 patients

No disponible

COVID19 ¿Cómo afecta a la realización de ejercicio físico en médicos? / Covid19. how does it affect to the physical exercise in physicians?

No disponible

Utilidad de la ultrasonografía en el diagnóstico de dolor de codo secundario a plica sinovial / Utility of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of elbow´s pain secondary to synovial plica

Introducción: El dolor en el epicóndilo lateral del codo es uno de los síntomas clínicos más frecuentes en la extremidad superior. La presencia de la plica sinovial como causa de chasquido doloroso en el codo fue descrito por primera vez por Clarke. Esta plica es una estructura anatómica normal, remanente del desarrollo embriológico de la membrana articular sinovial, pero cuando ésta se encuentra engrosada, es una causa potencial de dolor de codo. Caso clínico: Se presenta el caso clínico de un varón de 42 años, médico traumatólogo, sin antecedente de interés, con dominancia derecha, que practica de forma habitual el pádel y el golf. Diagnosticado de epicondilitis pero sin respuesta al tratamiento conservador durante 9 meses y tras estudio mediante ecografía y RM se objetiva la presencia de una plica sinovial en el codo, que mediante artroscopia se extirpó con buenos resultados. Discusión: La plica sinovial en el codo suele estar infradiagnosticada por tratarse de una entidad poco conocida para el clínico, lo que dificulta el diagnóstico diferencial. Además debido a las características del proceso, que produce escasos signos subjetivos y objetivos, suele etiquetarse erróneamente como epicondilitis lateral rebelde al tratamiento. Para conseguir los mejores resultados en el alivio del dolor y la recuperación de la funcionalidad articular, se debe descartar patología asociada y el tratamiento quirúrgico debe ir acompañado de una rehabilitación específica. Conclusión: La presencia de plica sinovial en el codo es una causa de dolor de codo habitualmente mal diagnosticada. La ultrasonografía es una herramienta útil para el diagnóstico de esta entidad (AU)

Introduction: Lateral elbow pain is one of the most common pain syndromes of the upper extremity. The presence of synovial fold or radial fringe as the cause of painful snapping elbow was first described by Clarke. This plica is a normal anatomic structure, embryological development like remaining articular synovial membrane, but when it is thickened, is a potential cause elbow pain. Case report: The case of a 42 year old male, orthopedic doctor has no history of interest, right dominance, practicing regularly paddle, tennis and golf. He was diagnosed as radial epicondylitis, but with no response to the conservatory management. Ultrasound and MR imaging found the presence of synovial fold in the elbow. This fold was removed arthroscopically, and resulting in pain relief. Discussion: The synovial fold in the elbow is often under diagnosed because it is a little known, making it difficult differential diagnosis. Also due to the characteristics of the process that produces few subjective and objective signs, often erroneous labeled as lateral epicondylitis resistant to treatment. For best results in relieving pain and recovery of joint function, exclude associated pathology and surgical treatment should be accompanied by a specific rehabilitation. Conclusion: The presence of synovial plica in the elbow is one of the most under-diagnosed causes of a painful elbow. The ultrasound is a useful tool for the diagnosis of this entity (AU)