Preventing iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal surgery: a comprehensive and systematic review of the last 2 decades of literature and future perspectives.

Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery is a rare complication but related to a serious burden of morbidity. This comprehensive and systematic review aims to provide a critical overview of the most recent literature about IUI prevention techniques in colorectal surgery. We performed a comprehensive and systematic review of studies published from 2000 to 2022 and assessed the use of techniques for ureteral injury prevention and intraoperative localization. 26 publications were included, divided into stent-based (prophylactic/lighted ureteral stent and near-infrared fluorescent ureteral catheter [PUS/LUS/NIRFUC]) and fluorescent dye (FD) groups. Costs, the percentage and number of IUIs detected, reported limitations, complication rates and other outcome points were compared. The IUI incidence rate ranged from 0 to 1.9% (mean 0.5%) and 0 to 1.2% (mean 0.3%) in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC and FD groups, respectively. The acute kidney injury (AKI) and urinary tact infection (UTI) incidence rate ranged from 0.4 to 32.6% and 0 to 17.3%, respectively, in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC group and 0-15% and 0-6.3%, respectively, in the FD group. Many other complications were also compared and descriptively analyzed (length-of-stay, mortality, etc.). These techniques appear to be feasible and safe in select patients with a high risk of IUI, but the delineation of reliable guidelines for preventing IUI will require more randomized controlled trials.

Current practice with grafts with multiple renal arteries in kidney transplantation: role of the methylene blue in the lower pole.

Kidneys with multiple renal arteries (MRAs) from different patches, may provide to the surgeon additional technical difficulties that make kidney transplants very challenging. MRAs have been largely debated over the years whether to be anastomosed or not due to the disappointing outcomes when it comes to inappropriate ligation or anastomosis.  Some authors empirically reassure that smaller branches can be safely ligated and dissected without intraoperative and postoperative complications or compromising the functional recovery of the graft. Literature is poor about the possible differences in the management of superior and inferior polar arteries. Inferior polar arteries represent a topic of great interest as they may also supply the proximal ureter. The aim of this article is to merge the current knowledge about the management of inferior polar arteries and to highlight if there is any role of the methylene blue dye (MB) in the study of the ureteral vascularization in kidney transplantation. MB can be considered a safe and simple tool of vascular perfusion assessment in kidney transplantation. By injecting the dye-solution into the inferior MRA hidden ureteral branches can be unmasked and guide the surgeon to preserve important vessels. In view of their fundamental role in the vascularization of the ureter, the lower polar arteries of the graft, should be invariably studied by MB. It provides an objective, simple and fast tool for the evaluation of the ureteral vascularization when injected through the inferior MRA of the graft.

General surgery and COVID-19: review of practical recommendations in the first pandemic phase.

BACKGROUND: In March, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. The absence of previous knowledge of COVID-19 has made decision-making difficult for all in health care, including surgical departments. We reviewed the management recommendations for surgical activity and changes to surgical practice, identifying concordances and discrepancies, based on the literature published in the early phase of the pandemic. METHOD: We searched the electronic datasets, PubMed Database, Google, and Google Scholar, using the keywords "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19", "surgery", "recommendations", "guideline", and "triage". The search was limited to the first 2 months after the pandemic began and was closed on May 6, 2020. RESULTS: Twenty papers were included in the analysis and their recommendations are divided into the following categories: 1. general aspects, such as maintaining the safety of health personnel and indications for surgery. 2. The preoperative phase, with recommendations about activating different care pathways for COVID-19 positive patients. 3. The operative phase, with recommendations about activating safety measures for aerosol-generating procedures. 4. The postoperative phase, with recommendations for managing operating theatres and patient transfers. CONCLUSION: The recommendations proposed in the revised documents are considered good practices aimed at keeping patients and healthcare professionals safe. However, these recommendations must be contextualized in each individual hospital.