RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is a popular form of long-acting reversible contraception. Although generally safe, one of the most serious complications of intrauterine device use is uterine perforation. Risk factors for perforation include position of the uterus, force exerted during intrauterine device insertion, postpartum period, and breastfeeding. This case is important and needs to be reported because it highlights the need to assess risk factors for uterine perforation. It adds to the medical literature because it examines the relationship between position of the uterus and the location of uterine perforation. This case report is unusual in that it describes the mechanism and specific location of uterine perforation in relation to the position of the uterus. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an intrauterine device found in the omentum of a 30-year-old white postpartum woman with a significantly retroverted uterus after the intrauterine device threads were not visualized on speculum examination during a 6-week placement check. The intrauterine device was located and removed via laparoscopy without complication. CONCLUSIONS: This case report will be of interest to women's health practitioners because it illustrates the importance of identifying patients with risk factors for uterine perforation, examining the relationship between uterine position and location of perforation. This is especially significant because the true incidence of perforation may be higher than the numbers reported in the literature. There is no specific diagnostic code for uterine perforation and it is unlikely that retrospective studies can accurately identify all cases.
Asunto(s)
Migración de Dispositivo Intrauterino/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía , Epiplón/diagnóstico por imagen , Epiplón/lesiones , Perforación Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Retroversión Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Radiografía Abdominal , Perforación Uterina/cirugía , Útero/diagnóstico por imagen , Útero/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine if pregnancies with an abnormal glucose challenge test (GCT) but a normal (GTT) are at increased risk for fetal macrosomia or an adverse pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective observational study matched women with an abnormal glucose challenge test and a normal GTT with the next patient with a normal GCT. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 107 women with abnormal GCT were matched with 107 women with normal GCT. Women with an abnormal GCT were older (27.3 vs. 24.7, p = 0.001) and less likely to be African-American (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.06-4.49) but no more likely to have an adverse pregnancy outcome. ROC curves could not differentiate between macrosomic vs non-macrosomic newborns using GCT values. CONCLUSION: Women with an abnormal GCT but a normal GTT are more likely to be older, less likely to be African-American, but no more likely to have an adverse pregnancy outcome or a macrosomic fetus.
Asunto(s)
Macrosomía Fetal , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo en Diabéticas , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Puntaje de Apgar , Maduración Cervical , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Trabajo de Parto , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Background. A prenatally diagnosed fetal anomaly that could compromise the fetal airway at delivery can be managed safely with the ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure. Case. A 26-year-old healthy primigravida was diagnosed during her midtrimester anatomic ultrasound survey with a fetal oropharyngeal cystic structure located at the base of the tongue. The neonatal airway was successfully secured intrapartum using the EXIT procedure. Conclusion. Maintenance of fetoplacental circulation until the fetal airway is secured has been described for a multitude of fetal anomalies including cystic hygroma and teratoma. The literature also recounts its use for the reversal of tracheal plugging for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A multidisciplinary approach to the antenatal and intrapartum care is essential for the successful management of these cases.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: An association between maternal hypoglycemia during pregnancy with fetal growth restriction and overall perinatal mortality has been reported. In a retrospective pilot study we found that hypoglycemia was linked with a greater number of special care/neonatal intensive care unit admissions and approached significance in the number of women who developed preeclampsia. That study was limited by its retrospective design, a narrow patient population and the inability to perform multivariate analysis because of the limitations in the data points collected. This study was undertaken to compare the perinatal outcome in pregnancies with hypoglycemia following a glucose challenge test (GCT) to pregnancies with a normal GCT. METHODS: Obstetric patients (not pre-gestational diabetics or gestational diabetes before 24 weeks were eligible. Women with a 1 hour glucose < or = 88 mg/dL (4.8 m/mol) following a 50-gram oral GCT were matched with the next patient with a 1 hour glucose of 89-139 mg/dL. Pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Over 22 months, 436 hypoglycemic patients and 434 normal subjects were identified. Hypoglycemia was increased in women < 25 (p = 0.003) and with pre-existing medical conditions (p < 0.001). Hypoglycemia was decreased if pre-pregnancy BMI > or = 30 (p = 0.008).Preeclampsia/eclampsia was more common in hypoglycemic women. (OR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.51 - 6.51, p = 0.002) but not other intrapartum and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Hypoglycemic patients are younger, have reduced pre-pregnancy weight, lower BMIs, and are more likely to develop preeclampsia than normoglycemic women.