Variability in infection control measures for the percutaneous lead among programs implanting long-term ventricular assist devices in the United States.

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are a surgical treatment for heart failure. These devices may be implanted as a bridge to transplant or as destination therapy. After surgical recovery and education regarding device care, patients are discharged home. Meticulous care of the driveline must be taken to prevent infection and trauma of the site throughout the perioperative event and for the duration of support. Currently a standardized protocol for care of the driveline and exit site does not exist. VAD coordinators from across the country discussed the variability in care at different centers in the United States through a series of conference calls. A survey consisting of 16 questions was developed. The survey included questions on preoperative antibiotic recommendations, driveline placement and exit site suturing, frequency of dressing changes, and showering practices. VAD coordinators shared center-specific dressing protocols and any driveline success stories. This survey was sent to 73 centers; 38 centers (52%) responded. The purpose of the survey was to define current practice in order to move toward a standard of practice or protocol based on expert opinion for VAD driveline care and to assess the need for future studies.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and the right ventricle.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become accepted as treatment for heart failure as a result of improvements in diagnosing and treating left ventricular failure and limited donor availability. In the Pivotal Study of the HeartMate II in the bridge to transplantation population, the incidence of right ventricular failure without the implantation of a right ventricular assist device was 14%, with an additional 6% of the participants ill enough that they required implantation of a right ventricular assist device. This complication increases mortality, cost, and length of stay. This article reviews the screening of LVAD candidates for the probability of right ventricular failure postoperatively, the evaluation of right ventricular function in LVAD candidates, and the optimal management of the right ventricle during the perioperative care of LVAD patients.

Intraperitoneal pocket for left ventricular assist device placement.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of the HeartMate Implanted Pneumatic or Vented Electric Ventricular Assist Device requires that the pump be implanted either in the peritoneal cavity or in the abdominal wall. Both sites have been problematic. METHODS: We describe a new technique in which an intraperitoneal pocket is created, using Gore-Tex Dual Mesh Plus Biomaterial with Holes, to contain the ventricular assist device. This shields the ventricular assist device from the peritoneal contents and avoids abdominal wall dissection. Thirty consecutive patients who underwent implantation using this technique were compared with 16 patients who underwent implantation before this technique was in use. RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent implantation, and 2 of those patients underwent re-implantation because of device failure (16/30 HeartMate Implanted Pneumatic, 14/30 HeartMate Vented Electric, and 2/14 HeartMate Vented Electric replaced with the HeartMate Implanted Pneumatic). Twenty-five patients have undergone explantation. Pocket infections in patients who have had implanted devices for >1 month decreased from 4 of 13 before the pockets were used to 1 of 25 with the intraperitoneal pockets (Fisher's exact test p = 0.038). Two hernia repairs were required after explantation when the biomaterial pocket was used. A decrease in return to surgery for bleeding was noted after the pocket was used (7/16 without the pocket and 3/32 with the pocket; Fisher's exact test, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding complications and pocket infections decreased in this early experience. Further study is necessary to confirm the apparent decrease in complication rate by using this new technique in this small cohort of patients.

Effects of amino acids and glucagon on renal hemodynamics in type 1 diabetes.

Increased dietary protein and circulating amino acids raise glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and pressure. In diabetes, this glomerular hyperfiltration response is augmented. The purpose of this study was to determine whether glucagon mediates the augmented GFR response to amino acids in diabetes and whether the responses to amino acids and glucagon depend on prostaglandins. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (n = 12) and normal control subjects (n = 12) were studied in a series of six experiments, each on different occasions. Baseline GFR was not significantly increased, but filtration fraction was higher in diabetes. In response to amino acid infusion, GFR increased more and filtration fraction was greater among those with diabetes. Their augmented GFR response to amino acids was not inhibited by octreotide or indomethacin. Participants with diabetes also had enhanced GFR and renal plasma flow responses to glucagon infusion, both of which were inhibited by indomethacin. Glomerular hyperfiltration responses induced by amino acids or glucagon occur by divergent pathways in diabetes; only the response to glucagon is prostaglandin dependent.