Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oman J Ophthalmol ; 16(3): 516-523, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38059076

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of the study was to analyze orbitofacial anthropometric parameters such as inner and outer canthal distances (ICD and OCD), palpebral fissure length (PFL), interpupillary distance (IPD), and canthal index (CI) in children with pseudostrabismus and to compare the measured IPD (mIPD) with calculated IPD (cIPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of sixty children (6 months-18 years) with pseudostrabismus. ICD, OCD, PFL, and IPD were measured by digital Vernier caliper. The formula used was cIPD: 0.21+0.24 ICD+0.58°CD for males and 1.4+0.31 ICD+0.41°CD for females. Values measured by caliper were compared with that calculated by the formula. The formula used was CI: ICD × 100/OCD. Data were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The mean age was 6.66 ± 3.57 years. Telecanthus was the most common finding (55%). The mean ICD and OCD in males were 30.89 ± 3.33 mm and 87.96 ± 8.09 mm and in females were 30.91 ± 3.05 and 86.22 ± 6.81 mm, respectively. The mean right eye PFL in males was 28.53 ± 2.63 mm and in females was 27.66 ± 2.22 mm and left eye PFL in males was 28.53 mm ± 2.63 and in females was 27.66 ± 2.22 mm. CI in males was 35.10 ± 1.65 and in females was 35.84 ± 1.71. Mean mIPD and cIPD: male - 55.37 ± 4.75 mm and 58.56 ± 5.34 mm, female - 53.32 ± 4.74 mm and 46.26 ± 3.71 mm. A good agreement was found between mIPD and cIPD. CONCLUSION: This study helps in documenting the anthropometric pattern of the orbitofacial parameters in children with pseudostrabismus which can act as reference data. This helps in the management of orbitofacial, craniofacial syndromes/deformities and lid reconstructive surgeries in retaining ethnical features and obtaining better function. In children's spectacle frame 1 and lens making, where measuring IPD is difficult, cIPD can be a simple alternative.

2.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63(12): 1398-1407, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37563914

RESUMEN

Nutraceuticals like alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) may have potential benefits as prophylactic agents for adolescent migraine, with fewer adverse events than existing medications. The present study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of add-on ALA for prophylaxis in adolescent migraine. A randomized, open-label, add-on clinical trial was conducted with 60 adolescent migraineurs, who were randomized to receive flunarizine or flunarizine with an add-on ALA. A clinical evaluation of the frequency and severity of migraine, responder rate, Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS) scoring, serum thiol, and serum calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was performed both at baseline and following 12 weeks of treatment. The frequency of acute attacks of migraine decreased significantly (P = .001) in the test group compared with the control group. The responder rate was found to be significantly higher (80%) in the test group than in the control group (33.3%) (P = .001). The mean monthly migraine headache days in the test group showed a significant reduction (-7.7 days, 95%CI -9.1 to -6.3 days; P = .010). The severity of acute migraine attacks (mild, moderate, severe) also showed a significant reduction in the test group (P = .001). PedMIDAS scores showed significant improvement in the test group (P = .021), in comparison with the control group. Serum thiol levels were significantly increased in the test group (18 mmol/L, 95%CI 13.5 to 36.1 mmol/L; P = .001). Serum CGRP levels showed a significant reduction with adjunctive ALA therapy (-122.4 pg/mL, 95%CI -142.3 to -89.0 pg/mL; P = .006). Add-on ALA with flunarizine as a prophylactic agent for migraine in adolescents can improve clinical outcomes by improving clinical and biochemical parameters.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Ácido Tióctico , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Flunarizina/uso terapéutico , Ácido Tióctico/efectos adversos , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Sulfhidrilo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego
3.
J Oral Facial Pain Headache ; 36(3-4): 207­219, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445912

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults. METHODS: After a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases, reviewers extracted data from three relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of the findings. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size, and meta-regression was performed for variables with a likely influence on effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the comparison used in the included studies. RESULTS: Melatonin therapy in migraine was associated with a significantly higher responder rate when compared to both placebo and standard therapy (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.14; P = .03). The results of the meta-analyses indicated that melatonin can achieve a significant reduction in frequency of migraine attacks (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.98; P = .04), migraine attack duration (MD = 5.02; 95% CI: 0. 91 to 9.13; P = .02), use of analgesics (MD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.48; P = .008), and migraine severity (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.63; P < .0001) over placebo, but had no significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of common adverse drug reactions, such as drowsiness and fatigue, between the melatonin group and the comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin showed a beneficial prophylactic role in migraine, with a better responder rate in comparison to placebo in reducing migraine severity, mean attack duration, mean attack frequency, and analgesic use, but did not show significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate.


Asunto(s)
Melatonina , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Humanos , Melatonina/efectos adversos , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico
4.
World J Clin Cases ; 10(21): 7348-7355, 2022 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36158011

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sagittal alignment of the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities is essential for maintaining a stable and efficient posture and ambulation. Imbalance in any element can result in compensatory changes in the other elements. Knee flexion is a compensatory mechanism for spinopelvic sagittal alignment and is markedly affected in severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). The correction of knee flexion deformity (KFD) by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to complementary changes in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters (SSPs). AIM: To determine the SSP changes in patients with knee OA, with or without KFD undergoing TKA. METHODS: The study was conducted in 32 patients who underwent TKA. A neutral standing whole-spine lateral radiograph was performed before surgery and 3 mo after surgery in these patients. Subjects were divided into two groups (Group 1 obtained > 10° corrections in KFD; group B obtained < 10° correction). The pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. RESULTS: The median of change in PT, PI, SS, LL, and SVA was 0.20 mm, 1.00 mm, 2.20 mm, -0.40 mm, and 6.8 mm, respectively. The difference in the change in SSPs between the two groups was statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: SSPs, such as PI, PT, SS, LL, and SVA, do not change significantly following TKA in end-stage knee OA despite a significant correction (> 10°) in KFD.

5.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 61(12): 1534-1544, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34472095

RESUMEN

Monotherapy with triptans in acute migraine is ineffective in many patients and contraindicated in certain cardiovascular diseases where alternative therapeutic options are necessary to explore. This meta-analysis has evaluated the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan for the treatment of acute migraine in adults. After performing a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane databases, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from 4 relevant articles. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of findings. A random-effects model was used to estimate effect size. Quality assessment was done using the risk of bias assessment tool and meta-regression for probable variables affecting effect size. Subgroup analysis was done depending on the dose of lasmiditan. Lasmiditan use was associated with a significantly higher percentage of patients with pain freedom (odds ratio [OR], 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-2.39; P < .00001), sustained pain freedom (OR, 1.93; 95%CI, 1.55-2.39; P <.00001), headache response (OR, 2.05; 95%CI, 1.77-2.36; P < .00001), clinical disability level (OR, 1.36; 95%CI, 1.20-1.55; P < .00001), patients' global impression (OR, 1.88; 95%CI, 1.69-2.10; P < .00001), and significantly lower use of rescue medication (OR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.38-0.63; P < .00001) compared to placebo. Lasmiditan use was also associated with a higher likelihood of adverse effects like dizziness (OR, 6.54; 95%CI, 4.24-10.07; P < .00001), paresthesia (OR, 4.28; 95%CI, 2.97-6.17; P < .00001), and fatigue (OR, 5.67; 95%CI, 3.78-8.52; P < .00001) compared to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed a dose-dependent effect of lasmiditan on pain freedom, sustained pain freedom, patient's global impression, and occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Prediction probability for effect estimate favoring placebo was calculated to be 0.0017%. Lasmiditan has shown a favorable effect in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of an acute attack of migraine in comparison to placebo. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term safety, efficacy, and use in specific subgroups of patients. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42020177838.


Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...