Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 24(7): 665-70, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24112427

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major allergenic components of peanut from distinct geographical regions are widely dispersed. Most of the diagnostic studies are from countries with a high prevalence. There have been only few reports of allergen component sensitizations from countries with a low prevalence of peanut allergy. We aimed to investigate roles of component-resolved diagnostic (CRD) to differentiate peanut allergy and peanut tolerance in the Asian population from a country with low prevalence of peanut allergy. METHODS: Participants with peanut sensitization were enrolled. Clinical reactions were determined. Skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut and related allergen components were performed. RESULTS: Forty subjects with peanut sensitization were included. The mean wheal sizes of SPT and peanut sIgE were not good predictors for differentiating peanut reactions. SIgE to rAra h 2 was more often found in patients with peanut allergy and anaphylaxis. sIgE to rAra h 9 was also more frequent in the peanut-allergic group but not related to severe reactions. In the peanut-tolerant group, despite positive SPT and/or sIgE to peanut, 90% had negative sIgE to rAha h 2 and rAra h 9. Combining rAra h 2 and rAra h 9 resulted in high performance of the test with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 84%, 90%, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively. The ratio between rAra h 2 sIgE to peanut sIgE of 0.6 can be helpful in predicting patients who will develop severe reaction. SIgE to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) was exclusively found in the peanut-tolerant group (33.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies three allergen components: rAra h 2, rAra h 9, and CCD as important components in the diagnosis of peanut allergy in an Asian country with low prevalence. The ratio between rArah h 2 sIgE to peanut sIgE can be used for predicting patients who will develop anaphylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Albuminas 2S de Plantas/inmunología , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/inmunología , Glicoproteínas/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Proteínas de Plantas/inmunología , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Cutáneas , Tailandia
2.
Vaccine ; 29(29-30): 4735-8, 2011 Jun 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21570433

RESUMEN

The immunogenicity and safety of a pediatric dose of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine (Epaxal®) was evaluated in a group of 45 Thai children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, age 2-16 years. Vaccines were administered at 0 and 6 months. Anti-HAV antibody titers were measured at baseline (before injection) 1 and 7 months after primary vaccination. The prevalence of HAV protective antibody in 45 Thai HIV-infected children was 13.6%. The seroprotection rate was 71% at 1 month and 100% at 7 months. The booster dose increased geometric mean concentration (GMC) from 106.5 mIU/ml to 3486.1 mIU/ml. Higher CD4 lymphocyte counts at enrollment was a predictive factor for HAV antibody response. Both doses of Epaxal® were well tolerated. These preliminary data suggest that a pediatric dose of Epaxal® is an effective hepatitis A vaccine for HIV-infected children and should be considered for implementation on a larger scale in the pediatric HIV population.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/inmunología , Adolescente , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Anticuerpos de Hepatitis A/sangre , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inmunización/métodos , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Masculino , Tailandia , Vacunas de Virosoma/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Virosoma/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Virosoma/inmunología
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 61(4): 402-7, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18440177

RESUMEN

Controlled trials have demonstrated that liquid media culture (LMC) is superior to solid media culture for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), but there is limited evidence about its performance in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the performance of LMC in a demonstration project in Bangkok, Thailand. Sputum specimens from persons with suspected or clinically diagnosed tuberculosis were inoculated in parallel on solid (Lowenstein-Jensen [LJ]) and liquid (mycobacterial growth indicator tube [MGIT 960]) media. Biochemical tests identified isolates as MTB or nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM). Of 2566 specimens received from October 2004 to September 2006, 1355 (53%) were culture positive by MGIT compared with 1013 (39%) by LJ. Median time to growth for MGIT was significantly less than LJ: 11 versus 27 days. Of 1417 isolates detected by at least 1 media, 1255 (86%) were identified as MTB and 162 (11%) NTM. MGIT improved speed and sensitivity of MTB isolation and drug susceptibility testing, regardless of HIV status.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Medios de Cultivo , Mycobacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mycobacterium/clasificación , Mycobacterium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Mycobacterium/metabolismo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Esputo/microbiología , Tailandia , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA