The Role of Semaphorin 6D (Sema6D) in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-A Preliminary Study on Human Plasma and Urine.

The incidence of bladder cancer worldwide in the last three decades has been increasing in both men and women. So far, there is no established non-invasive bladder cancer biomarker in daily clinical practice. Semaphorin 6D (sema6D) is a transmembrane protein that belongs to the class VI semaphorins. The aim of this study was to evaluate for the first time the potential role of sema6D in bladder cancer. The study group consisted of 40 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and the control group of 20 patients without malignancies. There was a statistically significantly higher urinary sema6D concentration in patients than controls (p < 0.05) but no significant difference in plasma 6D. There were no statistically significant differences in urinary or plasma concentration of sema6D between low- or high-grade cancer and according to the tumor stage in TNM classification. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between plasma sema6D and age of patients (R = -0.6; p = 0.019). Plasma sema6D does not seem to be useful in the clinical practice at this point. However, the urinary sema6D concentration could potentially serve as a marker of NMIBC used for diagnostic purposes, monitoring, and early relapse detection or the assessment of the treatment efficacy. Urinary sema6D is probably not associated with the grading or staging of NMIBC, so it cannot be used for the prediction of disease prognosis.

Sexual dysfunctions in psoriatic patients.

Introduction: Psoriasis is one the most common skin diseases associated with a great decrease in the quality of patients' lives. Methods: We aimed to study sexual dysfunctions in psoriatic patients using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for women and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for men via an anonymous online survey. The study included 80 psoriatic patients and 75 controls without dermatoses. Results: There was a downward trend in the total IIEF score in psoriatic men compared to controls. 58% of male patients and 76% of controls had a normal IIEF score. There was no significant difference in IIEF between patients treated and not with systemic agents. 62% of female patients had a decreased FSFI score, whereas in the control group, the majority of subjects (54%) had a normal FSFI score. There was no significant difference in FSFI score between patients and controls. Female patients treated with systemic antipsoriatic agents had significantly worse lubrication, satisfaction with sexual life, and pain. Discussion: Our study has shown that the majority of questioned female psoriatic patients had sexual dysfunction according to FSFI, particularly they had worse satisfaction with sexual life and less sexual desire compared to women without psoriasis. The majority of male patients did not have sexual dysfunction according to IIEF, however, they had significantly worse overall satisfaction with sexual life and confidence to keep an erection. Systemic antipsoriatic treatment does not probably influence sexual dysfunctions in men but it does in women although we were not able to assess the severity or resolution of lesions after those treatments. However embarrassing, psoriatic patients should be questioned about their sexual lives by dermatologists, and more studies are needed to explore this matter.

Caspase 3 as a Novel Marker to Distinguish Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma from Oncocytoma.

Despite advances in our understanding of the biology of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO), the differential diagnosis among these tumors remains one of the most problematic in renal pathology. Today, CK7 is the most recommended marker to distinguish these entities, however it appears insufficiently accurate by itself. This study aimed to find an easily accessible IHC stain that might out-compete CK7 in this field. Expressions of CK7, cyclin D1, p16, survivin, CD138, Ki-67 and caspase 3 (CASP3) were analyzed in a total of 27 cases (20 ROs and 7 ChRCCs). Immunoreactivity was assessed based on a combined score of the extent and intensity of staining. Compared to RO, a higher percentage of the total ChRCCs stained positive for CK7 (67% vs. 22%, respectively) and CASP3 (86% vs. 25%) (P < 0.005). The differences in staining with cyclin D1, p16, survivin, CD138 and Ki-67 turned out to be statistically insignificant in differentiating ChRCC from RO. CASP3 is a promising marker in distinguishing ChRCC from RO and may represent an alternative for CK7. Cyclin D1, p16, survivin, CD138 and Ki-67 cannot be used to distinguish these neoplasms.