Yield of Adding chest CT to Abdominal CT to Detect COVID-19 in Patients Presenting With Acute Gastrointestinal Symptoms (SCOUT-3): Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incremental yield of standardized addition of chest CT to abdominal CT to detect COVID-19 in patients presenting with primarily acute gastrointestinal symptoms requiring abdominal imaging. Summary Background Data: Around 20% of patients with COVID-19 present with gastrointestinal symptoms. COVID-19 might be neglected in these patients, as the focus could be on finding abdominal pathology. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several centers have routinely added chest CT to abdominal CT to detect possible COVID-19 in patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the incremental yield of this strategy is unknown. METHODS: This multicenter study in 6 Dutch centers included consecutive adult patients presenting with acute nontraumatic gastrointestinal symptoms, who underwent standardized combined abdominal and chest CT between March 15, 2020 and April 30, 2020. All CT scans were read for signs of COVID-19 related pulmonary sequelae using the СО-RADS score. The primary outcome was the yield of high COVID-19 suspicion (СО-RADS 4-5) based on chest CT. RESULTS: A total of 392 patients were included. Radiologic suspicion for COVID-19 (СО-RADS 4-5) was present in 17 (4.3%) patients, eleven of which were diagnosed with COVID-19. Only 5 patients with СО-RADS 4-5 presented without any respiratory symptoms and were diagnosed with COVID-19. No relation with community prevalence could be detected. CONCLUSION: The yield of adding chest CT to abdominal CT to detect COVID-19 in patients presenting with acute gastrointestinal symptoms is extremely low with an additional detection rate of around 1%.

Automated versus subjective assessment of spatial and temporal MRI small bowel motility in Crohn's disease.

AIM: To investigate whether subjective radiologist grading of motility on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is as effective as software quantification, and to determine the combination of motility metrics with the strongest association with symptom severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and five Crohn's disease patients (52 male, 53 female, 16-68 years old, mean age 34 years old) recruited from two sites underwent MRE, including a 20 second breath-hold cine motility sequence. Each subject completed a Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) symptom questionnaire. Five features within normally appearing bowel were scored visually by two experienced radiologists, and then quantified using automated analysis software, including (1) mean motility, (2) spatial motility variation, (3) temporal motility variation, (4) area of motile bowel, (5) intestinal distension. Multivariable linear regression derived the combination of features with the highest association with HBI score. RESULTS: The best automated metric combination was temporal variation (p<0.05) plus area of motile bowel (p<0.05), achieving an R2 adjusted value of 0.036. Spatial variation was also associated with symptoms (p<0.05, R2 adjusted = 0.034); however, when visually assessed by radiologists, none of the features had a significant relationship with the HBI score. CONCLUSION: Software quantified temporal and spatial variability in bowel motility are associated with abdominal symptoms in Crohn's disease. Subjective radiologist assessment of bowel motility is insufficient to detect aberrant motility. Automated analysis of motility patterns holds promise as an objective biomarker for aberrant physiology underlying symptoms in enteric disorders.

The development of a magnetic resonance imaging index for fistulising Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for assessment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (CD). The Van Assche index is the most commonly used MRI fistula index. AIMS: To assess the reliability of the Van Assche index, and to modify the instrument to improve reliability and create a novel index for fistulising CD. METHODS: A consensus process developed scoring conventions for existing Van Assche index component items and new items. Four experienced radiologists evaluated 50 MRI images in random order on three occasions. Reliability was assessed by estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Common sources of disagreement were identified and recommendations made to minimise disagreement. A mixed effects model used a 100 mm visual anologue scale (VAS) for global severity as outcome and component items as predictors to create a modified Van Assche index. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) for intra-rater reliability of the original and modified Van Assche indices and the VAS were 0.86 (0.81-0.90), 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.86 (0.82-0.89). Corresponding ICCs for inter-rater reliability were 0.66 (0.52-0.76), 0.67 (0.55-0.75) and 0.58 (0.47-0.66). Sources of disagreement included number, location, and extension of fistula tracts, and rectal wall involvement. A modified Van Assche index (range 0-24) was created that included seven component items. CONCLUSIONS: Although "almost perfect" intra-rater reliability was observed for the assessment of MRI images for fistulising CD using the Van Assche index, inter-rater reliability was considerably lower. Our modification of this index should result in a more optimal instrument.

Shortened oral contrast preparation for improved small bowel distension at MR enterography.

PURPOSE: Adequate small bowel distension in MR enterography is important for the evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease patients. While distension of the distal small bowel can be achieved using standard oral contrast preparation, proximal small bowel distension remains a common impediment. The aim of this study was to compare small bowel distension between a 60-min oral contrast preparation and a 45-min oral contrast preparation. METHODS: Fifty retrospectively included patients with a 60-min oral preparation protocol and 50 prospectively included patients with a 45-min three-portion oral preparation protocol were included in the study. Both groups gradually ingested a total of 1600 mL 2% Mannitol solution during the preparation time. Two observers independently graded distension of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and (neo-) terminal ileum. Total small bowel distension was calculated as the sum of all small bowel segment scores. Individual and averaged observer distension scores were compared between both groups of patients using χ 2 test for ordinal variables. RESULTS: Significant differences in distension for one of both observers in favor of the 45-min protocol were found for the stomach (p = 0.04), duodenum (p = 0.02), jejunum (p = 0.02), and total small bowel (p = 0.02). When distension scores were averaged between observers, the stomach, jejunum, and total small bowel showed a significant difference in favor of the 45-min protocol (p = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: We advise to use a 45-min three-portion oral preparation protocol for MR enterography for improved overall small bowel distension, proximal small bowel distension, and especially jejunal distension.

The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging.

OBJECTIVES: To develop guidelines describing a standardised approach to patient preparation and acquisition protocols for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) of the small bowel and colon, with an emphasis on imaging inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: An expert consensus committee of 13 members from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) and European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) undertook a six-stage modified Delphi process, including a detailed literature review, to create a series of consensus statements concerning patient preparation, imaging hardware and image acquisition protocols. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven statements were scored for agreement by the panel of which 129 statements (82 %) achieved immediate consensus with a further 19 (12 %) achieving consensus after appropriate modification. Nine (6 %) statements were rejected as consensus could not be reached. CONCLUSIONS: These expert consensus recommendations can be used to help guide cross-sectional radiological practice for imaging the small bowel and colon. KEY POINTS: • Cross-sectional imaging is increasingly used to evaluate the bowel • Image quality is paramount to achieving high diagnostic accuracy • Guidelines concerning patient preparation and image acquisition protocols are provided.

Grading of Crohn's disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the grading of Crohn's disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched (January 1983-March 2014) for studies evaluating CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy in grading Crohn's disease activity compared to endoscopy, biopsies or intraoperative findings. Two independent reviewers assessed the data. Three-by-three tables (none, mild, frank disease) were constructed for all studies, and estimates of accurate, over- and under-grading were calculated/summarized by fixed or random effects models. RESULTS: Our search yielded 9356 articles, 19 of which were included. Per-patient data showed accurate grading values for CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy of 86% (95% CI: 75-93%), 84% (95% CI: 67-93%), 44% (95% CI: 28-61%) and 40% (95% CI: 16-70%), respectively. In the per-patient analysis, CT and MRI showed similar accurate grading estimates (P = 0.8). Per-segment data showed accurate grading values for CT and scintigraphy of 87% (95% CI: 77-93%) and 86% (95% CI: 80-91%), respectively. MRI and US showed grading accuracies of 67-82% and 56-75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CT and MRI showed comparable high accurate grading estimates in the per-patient analysis. Results for US and scintigraphy were inconsistent, and limited data were available. KEY POINTS: • CT and MRI have comparable high accuracy in grading Crohn's disease. • Data on US and scintigraphy is inconsistent and limited. • MRI is preferable over CT as it lacks ionizing radiation exposure.