Prevalence, Severity Patterns and Risk Factors of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants Younger than 32 Weeks of Gestation in a Tertiary Centre in Oman.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the rate and severity patterns of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and identify antenatal and postnatal factors associated with BPD in preterm infants <32 weeks of gestational age (GA). Methods: This retrospective observational study included preterm neonates <32 weeks of gestation admitted into the neonatal intensive care unit between January 2010 and December 2017 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. A data set of antenatal and perinatal factors were collected. BPD was defined as the need for oxygen and/or respiratory support at 36 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA). Infants with and without BPD were compared in their antenatal and perinatal factors. Results: A total of 589 preterm infants <32 weeks were admitted. Among them, 505 (85.7%) survived to 36 weeks' PMA and 90 (17.8%) had BPD. The combined BPD and mortality rate was 28.4%. Grades 1, 2 and 3 BPD constituted 77.8%, 7.8% and 14.4%, respectively. BPD was associated with lower GA, lower birth weight, need for intubation at resuscitation, lower Apgar scores, longer duration of ventilation, surfactant therapy and higher rates of neonatal morbidities. On binary logistic regression analysis, predictors of BPD were longer duration of ventilation, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Conclusion: In an Omani centre, 17.8% of preterm infants (<32 weeks GA) developed BPD. Various perinatal and neonatal factors were associated with BPD. However, longer duration of ventilation, IVH grades 1 and 2 and NEC stages II and III were significant predictors. Future multicentre research is necessary to provide the overall prevalence of BPD in Oman to help optimise the resources for BPD prevention and management in preterm infants.

Dissecting through the decade: a 10-year cross-sectional analysis of interprofessional experiences in the anatomy lab.

Interprofessional education (IPE) is prioritized as a critical component in preparing pre-licensure health professional students for effective teamwork and collaboration in the workplace to facilitate patient-centered care. Knowledge in anatomy is fundamental for healthcare professionals, making interprofessional anatomy education an attractive intervention for IPE and anatomy learning. Since 2009, the Education Program in Anatomy at McMaster University has offered an intensive 10-week IPE Anatomy Dissection elective to seven health professional programs annually. From 2011, students were invited to complete the Readiness for Interprofessional Scale (RIPLS) and Interprofessional Education Perception Scale (IEPS) before and after the elective. A total of 264 students from 2011 to 2020 completed RIPLS and IEPS. There were significant differences before and after the elective in students' total RIPLS scores and three of the four subscales: teamwork and collaboration, positive professional identity, and roles and responsibilities. Similarly, there were statistical differences in the total IEPS scores and two of three subscales: competency and autonomy and perceived actual cooperation. Statistically significant differences in RIPLS and IEPS total scores across several disciplines were also observed. This study demonstrates the elective's impact in improving students' IPE perceptions and attitudes, likely from the extended learning and exposure opportunity with other disciplines.

Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy: a qualitative description study.

Background: Respiratory therapists (RTs) are expected to stay updated on technology, treatments, research, and best practices to provide high-quality patient care. They must possess the skills to interpret, evaluate, and contribute to evidence-based practices. However, RTs often rely on research from other professions that may not fully address their specific needs, leading to insufficient guidance for their practice. Additionally, there has been no exploration of knowledge gaps and research needs from RTs' perspectives to enhance their practice and patient outcomes. The research questions guiding this study were: (i) what are the perceived practice-oriented knowledge gaps? and (ii) what are the necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession according to experts in respiratory therapy? Methods: A qualitative description study was conducted using semi-structured focus groups with 40 expert RTs from seven areas of practice across Canada. Data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: We identified four major themes relating to what these experts perceive as the practice-oriented gaps and necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession: 1) system-level impact of RTs, 2) optimizing respiratory therapy practices, 3) scholarship on the respiratory therapy profession and 4) respiratory therapy education. Discussion: The findings establish a fundamental understanding of the current gaps and the specific needs of RTs that require further investigation. Participants strongly emphasized the significance of research priorities that consider the breadth and depth of the respiratory therapy profession, which underscores the complex nature of respiratory therapy and its application in practice. Conclusion: The unique insights garnered from this study highlight the knowledge gaps and research needs specific to RTs. These findings pave the way for further exploration, discourse, and research aimed at understanding the specific contributions and requirements of RTs.

A cross-sectional survey on the effects of ambient temperature and humidity on health outcomes in individuals with chronic respiratory disease.

Rationale: Extremes of temperature and humidity are associated with adverse respiratory symptoms, reduced lung function, and increased exacerbations among individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: To describe the reported effects of temperature and humidity extremes on the health outcomes, health status and physical activity (PA) in individuals living with COPD. Methods: A cross-sectional self-reported survey collected the effects on health status (COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), PA, and health outcomes in 1) moderate/ideal (14 to 21°C, 30 to 50% relative humidity [RH]), 2) hot and humid (≥ 25°C, > 50% RH) and 3) cold and dry (≤ 5°C, < 30% RH) weather conditions. Participants were ≥ 40 years old with COPD or related chronic respiratory diseases (e.g., asthma, sleep apnea, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer) and residing in Canada for ≥ 1 year. Negative responders to weather extremes were a priori defined as having a change of ≥ 2 points in the CAT. Main Results: Thirty-six participants responded; the mean age (SD) was 65 (11) years, and 23 (64%) were females. Compared to ideal conditions, 23 (66%) and 24 (69%) were negatively affected by cold/dry and hot/humid weather, respectively. Health status was significantly lower, and PA amount and difficulty level were reduced in hot/humid and cold/dry conditions compared with ideal conditions. The number of exacerbations in hot/humid was significantly higher compared to ideal conditions. Conclusions: More participants were negatively affected by extremes of weather: health status worsened, PA decreased, and frequency of exacerbations was higher compared to ideal. Future prospective studies should directly and objectively investigate different combinations of extreme temperature and humidity levels on symptoms and PA to understand their long-term health outcomes.

A Non-Pharmacological Cough Therapy for People with Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Case Report.

Purpose: To explore the feasibility of a non-pharmacological cough control therapy (CCT) customized for a client with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Client Description: An 83-year-old female with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and chronic cough for 18 years treated previously with pharmacological treatment for the underlying lung disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease, as well as lozenges and breathing and relaxation strategies. Intervention: Four cough education and self-management sessions (45-60 minutes each) facilitated by a physiotherapist and speech-language pathologist via videoconference were conducted. Session topics included mechanisms of cough in ILD, breathing and larynx role in cough control, trigger identification, cough suppression and control strategies, and psychosocial support towards behaviour change using motivational interviewing. Measures and Outcome: The following assessments were conducted prior to and one week after the intervention: semi-structured interviews, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale, modified Borg Scale for severity and intensity of cough, and the Global Rating of Change Questionnaire. Implications: Implementing the CCT was feasible. The client reported increased perceived cough control, a reduction in exhaustion from coughing bouts, and a better understanding of the mechanisms behind cough management and suppression. Improvements were also observed in cough-related quality of life, severity, and intensity.

Objectif: explorer la faisabilité d'un traitement non pharmacologique de contrôle de la toux adapté à une cliente atteinte de Pneumopathie interstitielle (PPD). Description de la cliente: une femme de 83 ans atteinte d'une Pneumopathie d'hypersensibilité et d'une toux chronique depuis 18 ans, soignée auparavant par un traitement pharmacologique de la Pneumopathie sous-jacente et du reflux gastro-œsophagien pathologique, de même que par des pastilles et des stratégies de respiration et de relaxation. Intervention: un physiothérapeute et un orthophoniste ont facilité quatre séances d'éducation et d'autogestion de la toux (de 45 à 60 minutes chacune) par visioconférence. Les séances ont porté sur les mécanismes de la toux en cas de PPD, le rôle de la respiration et du larynx pour le contrôle de la toux, la détermination des déclencheurs, des stratégies de suppression et de contrôle de la toux et le soutien psychosocial pour un changement de comportement au moyen d'entrevues motivationnelles. Mesures et résultats cliniques: les évaluations suivantes ont été effectuées avant l'intervention, puis une semaine après: entrevues semi-structurées, questionnaire de Leicester sur la toux, court questionnaire de King sur la Pneumopathie interstitielle, échelle d'évaluation de la fatigue fonctionnelle découlant d'une maladie chronique, l'échelle de Borg modifiée pour la gravité et l'intensité de la toux et le questionnaire d'évaluation globale du changement. Conséquences: la mise en œuvre du traitement de contrôle de la toux était faisable. La cliente avait la perception de mieux contrôler sa toux, d'être moins épuisée à cause des crises de toux et de mieux comprendre les mécanismes de gestion et de suppression de la toux. Elle a également observé des améliorations à sa qualité de vie liée à la toux ainsi qu'une diminution de la gravité et de l'intensité de la toux.

Cognitive Interventions in Individuals With Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) may cause reduced oxygen availability to organs and body tissues, leading to an increased risk for ischemic damage, which can result in brain tissue injury. This damage can lead to a myriad of neurological symptoms contributing to cognitive decline. Cognitive interventions may attenuate cognitive deficits in people with CRDs; however, the effects have not yet been systematically summarized in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effects of cognitive interventions (including cognitive behavioral therapy and transcranial brain stimulation) on cognitive function (primary outcome), HRQL, self-management, symptoms, physical activity, physical function, ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), hospital admissions, functional capacity, functional performance, psychological and social outcomes, exacerbations, healthcare utilization, and survival in individuals with CRDs. METHODS: This review will be conducted in accordance with the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions and reported following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Searches will be performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL. Articles will be included if they focus on the effects of cognitive interventions on adults with CRDs, are published in peer-reviewed journals, and are written in English, French, or Portuguese. Risk of bias will be evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials, and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized studies. Meta-analyses will be performed if at least 2 studies provided sufficient data for a specific outcome. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) assessment will be used to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence. RESULTS: This systematic review was initiated in November 2022 and registered with PROSPERO in February 2023, prior to title and abstract screening. Full-text screening of articles will be completed in June 2023. Data extraction and drafting of the manuscript will occur from July 2023 to August 2023, with expected publication in February 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will summarize the effects of cognitive interventions on cognitive function in people with CRDs. It will guide health care professionals in selecting evidence-based strategies to enhance cognitive well-being and overall health outcomes for individuals with CRDs. Additionally, it will identify research gaps and highlight areas for future exploration, supporting researchers in advancing knowledge in this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023396234; https://tinyurl.com/mwjrfbxv. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/48235.

Mobile heath applications for self-management in chronic lung disease: a systematic review.

Integration of mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) into chronic lung disease management is becoming increasingly popular. MHealth apps may support adoption of self-management behaviors to assist people in symptoms control and quality of life enhancement. However, mHealth apps' designs, features, and content are inconsistently reported, making it difficult to determine which were the effective components. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the characteristics and features of published mHealth apps for chronic lung diseases. A structured search strategy across five databases (CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane) was performed. Randomized controlled trials investigating interactive mHealth apps in adults with chronic lung disease were included. Screening and full-text reviews were completed by three reviewers using Research Screener and Covidence. Data extraction followed the mHealth Index and Navigation Database (MIND) Evaluation Framework (https://mindapps.org/), a tool designed to help clinicians determine the best mHealth apps to address patients' needs. Over 90,000 articles were screened, with 16 papers included. Fifteen distinct apps were identified, 8 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (53%) and 7 for asthma (46%) self-management. Different resources informed app design approaches, accompanied with varying qualities and features across studies. Common reported features included symptom tracking, medication reminders, education, and clinical support. There was insufficient information to answer MIND questions regarding security and privacy, and only five apps had additional publications to support their clinical foundation. Current studies reported designs and features of self-management apps differently. These app design variations create challenges in determining their effectiveness and suitability for chronic lung disease self-management. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021260205). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13721-023-00419-0.

Features and characteristics of publicly available mHealth apps for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) may be able to support people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to develop the appropriate skills and routines for adequate self-management. Given the wide variety of publicly available mHealth apps, it is important to be aware of their characteristics to optimize their use and mitigate potential harms. Objective: To report the characteristics and features of publicly available apps for COPD self-management. Methods: MHealth apps designed for patients' COPD self-management were searched in the Google Play and Apple app stores. Two reviewers trialed and assessed the eligible apps using the MHealth Index and Navigation Database framework to describe the characteristics, qualities, and features of mHealth apps across five domains. Results: From the Google Play and Apple stores, thirteen apps were identified and eligible for further evaluation. All thirteen apps were available for Android devices, but only seven were available for Apple devices. Most apps were developed by for-profit organizations (8/13), non-profit organizations (2/13), and unknown developers (3/13). Many apps had privacy policies (9/13), but only three apps described their security systems and two mentioned compliance with local health information and data usage laws. Education was the common app feature; additional features were medication reminders, symptom tracking, journaling, and action planning. None provided clinical evidence to support their use. Conclusions: Publicly available COPD apps vary in their designs, features, and overall quality. These apps lack evidence to support their clinical use and cannot be recommended at this time.

Underrepresentation of Respiratory Therapists as Experts in Delphi Studies on Respiratory Practices and Research Priorities.

Delphi survey techniques are a common consensus method used to collect feedback from an expert panel to inform practices, establish guidelines, and identify research priorities. Collecting respiratory therapists' (RT) expertise and experiences as part of consensus-building methodologies is one way to ensure that they align with RT practices and to better influence respiratory care practice. This narrative review aimed to report the RT representation in expert panels of Delphi studies focused on respiratory therapy practices and research priorities. The research question that guided this review is: to what extent are RTs included as expert participants among published Delphi studies relate to respiratory therapy and research topics? We conducted a structured search of the literature and identified 23 papers that reported Delphi studies related to respiratory care practices and 15 that reported on respiratory-related research priorities. Delphi studies that focused on reporting consensus on respiratory care practices included the following: (1) mechanical ventilation, (2) high-flow nasal cannula therapy, (3) COVID-19 respiratory management, (4) home oxygen therapy, (5) cardiopulmonary monitoring, and (6) disease-specific guidelines. Delphi studies that focused on establishing respiratory research priorities included the following: (1) theory and practice-orientated knowledge gaps, and (2) priority research topics for empirical investigation. The results of this review suggest that RTs were rarely included as expert participants and, when involved, were minimally represented (5% to 33%). Given RTs' diverse and relevant experience in respiratory care, incorporating their perspectives to inform future education, respiratory care practices, and research priorities would allow evidence to better align with knowledge gaps deemed important for the respiratory therapy profession.

A Delphi Survey of Canadian Respiratory Therapists' Practice Statements on Pediatric Mechanical Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric mechanical ventilation practice guidelines are not well established; therefore, the European Society for Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) developed consensus recommendations on pediatric mechanical ventilation management in 2017. However, the guideline's applicability in different health care settings is unknown. This study aimed to determine the consensus on pediatric mechanical ventilation practices from Canadian respiratory therapists' (RTs) perspectives and consensually validate aspects of the ESPNIC guideline. METHODS: A 3-round modified electronic Delphi survey was conducted; contents were guided by ESPNIC. Participants were RTs with at least 5 years of experience working in standalone pediatric ICUs or units with dedicated pediatric intensive care beds across Canada. Round 1 collected open-text feedback, and subsequent rounds gathered feedback using a 6-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement; if consensus was unmet, statements were revised for re-ranking in the subsequent round. RESULTS: Fifty-two RTs from 14 different pediatric facilities participated in at least one of the 3 rounds. Rounds 1, 2, and 3 had a response rate of 80%, 93%, and 96%, respectively. A total of 59 practice statements achieved consensus by the end of round 3, categorized into 10 sections: (1) noninvasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy, (2) tidal volume and inspiratory pressures, (3) breathing frequency and inspiratory times, (4) PEEP and FIO2 , (5) advanced modes of ventilation, (6) weaning, (7) physiological targets, (8) monitoring, (9) general, and (10) equipment adjuncts. Cumulative text feedback guided the formation of the clinical remarks to supplement these practice statements. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to survey RTs for their perspectives on the general practice of pediatric mechanical ventilation management in Canada, generally aligning with the ESPNIC guideline. These practice statements considered information from health organizations and institutes, supplemented with clinical remarks. Future studies are necessary to verify and understand these practices' effectiveness.

Rapid access rehabilitation after exacerbations of COPD - A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Rehabilitation after acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is beneficial, but its feasibility is questionable. Feasibility is potentiated by stakeholder involvement during program development. We aimed to explore the perspectives of various stakeholders towards an innovative rapid access rehabilitation (RAR) program for patients immediately following hospitalization for an AECOPD. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients recently hospitalized for AECOPD, healthcare professionals (HCP) and policymakers providing care for such patients. Thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three patients (1 female; 62-89 years; GOLD D), ten HCP (3 females, 31-71 years) and three policymakers (3 females, 38-55 years) participated. Patients, HCP and policymakers shared similar visions for the development of a RAR program. Five main themes and ten subthemes were identified. They comprised: Pre-RAR aspects (Management properties, Eligibility), RAR program (Outcomes, Structure, Components), RAR optimization (Referral, Uptake), Partnership (Collaboration, Dedicated Coordinator) and COVID-19 (Adaptations). Essential elements included: identifying clear eligibility criteria, addressing patients' needs at the time of hospital discharge, having a structured education and self-management program and modifying to respond to unexpected events (e.g., COVID). Suggestions to optimize referrals included a clear referral pathway, improving program awareness, assigning dedicated care coordinators to provide patient support throughout the program and establishing strong partnerships among different care settings and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the essential program elements and approaches to optimize referrals, were considered to be key design approaches for success in establishing RAR.

Thiamin supplementation does not improve left ventricular ejection fraction in ambulatory heart failure patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Thiamin, a water-soluble B-complex vitamin, functions as a coenzyme in macronutrient oxidation and in the production of cellular ATP. Data suggest that thiamin depletion occurs in heart failure (HF). Therefore, thiamin supplementation in HF patients may improve cardiac function. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether oral thiamin supplementation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), exercise tolerance, and quality of life among patients with HF and reduced LVEF. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, eligible ambulatory patients with HF and reduced LVEF were recruited from 4 academic and community hospitals between 2010 and 2015. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 200 mg oral thiamin mononitrate per day or placebo for 6 mo. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (mean ± SD age: 64 ± 12 y; 83% men; LVEF: 37% ± 11%) were randomly assigned: 34 received placebo and 35 received thiamin supplementation. Erythrocyte thiamin pyrophosphate and urine thiamin concentrations were significantly higher in the supplemented group than in the placebo group at 6 mo (P = 0.02 and <0.001, respectively). At 6 mo, LVEF was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the thiamin group (38%; 95% CI: 36%, 39% compared with 35%; 95% CI: 33%, 37%, P = 0.047) after adjusting for baseline measurements. There were no significant differences in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score, distance walked in 6 min, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide concentrations between the 2 groups. One patient (2.9%) in the thiamin-supplemented group and none in the control group died at 6 mo. CONCLUSIONS: In ambulatory patients with HF and reduced LVEF, thiamin supplementation for 6 mo did not improve LVEF, quality of life, or exercise capacity, despite increases in thiamin concentrations. These findings do not support routine thiamin supplementation in the treatment of HF and reduced LVEF.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00959075.