RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Wearable sensors are increasingly popular in concussion research because of their objective quantification of subtle balance deficits. However, normative data and minimum detectable change values are necessary to serve as a references for diagnostic use and tracking longitudinal recovery. OBJECTIVE: Identify normative values and minimal detectable change values for instrumented static and reactive balance tests, an instrumented static Mediolateral Root Mean Square (ML RMS) sway standing balance assessment, and the instrumented, modified Push & Release (I-mP&R), respectively. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Study. SETTING: Clinical Setting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Normative static ML RMS sway and I-mP&R data were collected on 377 (n=184 females) healthy National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes at the beginning of their competitive seasons. Test-retest data were collected in 36 healthy control athletes based on standard recovery timelines after concussion. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were calculated for primary outcomes of mediolateral (ML) root-mean-square (RMS) sway in a static double limb-stance standing on firm ground and a foam block, and time to stability and latency from the I-mP&R in single- and dual-task conditions. RESULTS: Normative outcomes across static ML RMS sway and I-mP&R were sensitive to sex and type of footwear. ML RMS sway demonstrated moderate reliability in the firm condition (ICC=0.73; MDC=2.7cm/s2), but poor reliability in the foam condition (ICC=0.43; MDC=11.1cm/s2). Single- and dual-task time to stability from the I-mP&R exhibited good reliability (ICC=0.84 and 0.80, respectfully; MDC=0.25s, 0.59s, respectfully). Latency from the I-mP&R had poor to moderate reliability (ICC=0.38, 0.55; MDC=107ms, 105ms). CONCLUSIONS: Sex-matched references should be used for instrumented static and reactive balance assessments. Footwear may explain variability in static ML RMS sway and time to stability of the I-mP&R. Moderate-to-good reliability suggest time to stability from the I-mP&R and ML RMS static sway on firm ground can be used for longitudinal assessments.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trunk movement compensation characterized as ipsilateral trunk lean and posterior rotation with respect to pelvis during stance phase of walking is common in people with hip osteoarthritis and a biomarker of deficits in physical function in older adults. However, the relationship between trunk movement compensation on deficits in physical performance, muscle strength and functional capacity is unknown. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. Two inertial measurement units were used to assess trunk movement compensation during the six-minute-walk-test. Knee extension, knee flexion and hip abduction strength were measured using hand-held dynamometer. Multivariate regression models, controlling for self-reported hip pain, were used to regress trunk movement compensation onto six-minute-walk-test and muscle strength measures. Pairwise t-tests were used to evaluate the difference trunk movement compensation has on functional capacity by comparing the first and last minute of the six-minute-walk-test. FINDINGS: Thirty-five participants (63.3 ± 7.4 years, 57% male, 28.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were enrolled. Greater trunk movement compensation was related to poorer six-minute-walk-test (p = 0.03; r = -0.46). Greater hip abduction weakness was related to increased trunk movement compensation in both the sagittal (p = 0.05; r = -0.44) and frontal (p = 0.04; r = -0.38) planes. Participants demonstrated greater frontal plane trunk movement compensation during the last minute compared to the first minute of the six-minute-walk-test (p < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Trunk movement compensation, identified by inertial measure units, is a clinically relevant measure and has a moderate-to-strong relationship on deficits in physical performance, muscle strength and functional capacity. Inertial measurement units can be used as a practical means of measuring movement quality in the clinical setting.
