Impact of Baseline Neuropathy Severity on Vutrisiran Treatment Response in the Phase 3 HELIOS-A Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv, v for variant) amyloidosis is a rare, progressive, fatal disease with multisystem manifestations, caused by pathogenic variants in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. Vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic that results in rapid TTR knockdown, improved neuropathy and quality of life (QOL) versus external placebo in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the phase 3 HELIOS-A study (NCT03759379). This post hoc analysis evaluates the impact of baseline neuropathy severity on response to vutrisiran treatment. METHODS: Patients were randomized (3:1) to vutrisiran (n = 122; 25 mg subcutaneous injection once every 3 months) or patisiran (n = 42; 0.3 mg/kg intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks), which served as a reference group. In this post hoc analysis, patients were grouped into quartiles of increasing baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS): Quartile (Q)1 ≥ 5.0 to ≤ 20.5; Q2 > 20.5 to ≤ 44.1; Q3 > 44.1 to ≤ 73.1; Q4 > 73.1 to ≤ 127.0. Mean change from baseline to Month 18 was summarized by quartile for a range of efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Across all baseline NIS quartiles, vutrisiran demonstrated benefit versus external placebo in measures of neuropathy severity (modified NIS + 7), QOL (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy), disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale), gait speed (10-m walk test), and nutritional status (modified body mass index). Overall, patients in lower versus higher NIS quartiles (less severe neuropathy) at baseline maintained better scores at Month 18. The external placebo group progressively worsened in all measures at Month 18. CONCLUSIONS: Vutrisiran demonstrated benefit in neurologic function and other key efficacy measures versus external placebo across all four baseline neuropathy severity quartiles. Patients initiating vutrisiran earlier in their disease course retained the highest neurologic function level after 18 months, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03759379.

Safety and Efficacy of Nipocalimab in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results From the Randomized Phase 2 Vivacity-MG Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in a phase 2 study the safety and efficacy of IV nipocalimab, a fully human, antineonatal Fc receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). METHODS: Patients with gMG with inadequate response to stable standard-of-care (SOC) therapy were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive either IV placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) or one of 4 IV nipocalimab treatments: 5 mg/kg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), 30 mg/kg Q4W, 60 mg/kg Q2W each for 8 weeks, or a 60 mg/kg single dose, in addition to their background SOC therapy. Infusions (placebo or nipocalimab) were Q2W in all groups to maintain blinding. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 57 in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total scores. Dose response of change at day 57 was analyzed with a linear trend test over the placebo, nipocalimab 5 mg/kg Q4W, nipocalimab 30 mg/kg Q4W, and nipocalimab 60 mg/kg Q2W groups. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (nipocalimab: n = 54; placebo, n = 14) were randomized; 64 patients (94.1%) were positive for antiacetylcholine receptor autoantibodies, and 4 patients (6%) were positive for antimuscle-specific tyrosine kinase autoantibodies. Fifty-seven patients (83.8%) completed treatment through day 57. The combined nipocalimab group compared with the placebo group demonstrated similar incidences of TEAEs (83.3% vs 78.6%, respectively) and infections (33.3% vs 21.4%, respectively). No deaths or discontinuations due to TEAEs and no TEAEs of special interest (grade ≥3 infection or hypoalbuminemia) were observed with nipocalimab treatment. A statistically significant dose response was observed for change from baseline in MG-ADL at day 57 (p = 0.031, test of linear trend). DISCUSSION: Nipocalimab was generally safe, well-tolerated, and showed evidence of dose-dependent reduction in MG-ADL scores at day 57 in this phase 2 study. These results support further evaluation of nipocalimab for the treatment of gMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03772587; first submitted December 10, 2018; EudraCT Number: 2018-002247-28; first submitted November 30, 2018; date of first patient dosed April 10, 2019. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with gMG, nipocalimab was well-tolerated, and it did not significantly improve MG-ADL at any individual dose but demonstrated a significant dose response for improved MG-ADL across doses.

Practical Guidance for the Use of Patisiran in the Management of Polyneuropathy in Hereditary Transthyretin-Mediated Amyloidosis.

Variant transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is an autosomal dominant inherited genetic disorder that affects 5000-10,000 people worldwide. It is caused by mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene and results in amyloid deposition in a variety of organs due to abnormal accumulation of TTR protein fibrils. Although this is a multisystem disorder, the heart and peripheral nerves are the preferentially affected organs. Over 150 TTR gene mutations have been associated with this disease and the clinical phenotype can vary significantly. Severe forms of the disorder can be fatal. Fortunately, the oligonucleotide-based therapy era has resulted in the development of several novel treatment options. Patisiran is a small interfering RNA (siRNA) encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle that targets both mutant and wild-type TTR and results in significant reductions of the TTR protein in the serum and in tissue deposits. Patisiran has been approved for treatment of adults with polyneuropathy due to hereditary TTR-mediated amyloidosis in both the United States (US) and European Union (EU). In this review, we will discuss the development of patisiran, the clinical trials that lead to treatment approval, and provide guideline parameters for use in clinical practice.  .

Impact of baseline polyneuropathy severity on patisiran treatment outcomes in the APOLLO trial.

OBJECTIVE: Assess how baseline polyneuropathy severity impacts response to patisiran regarding neurologic impairment and quality of life (QOL) in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (ATTRv amyloidosis). METHODS: This post hoc analysis grouped patients from the Phase 3 APOLLO study (n = 225) by baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) into quartiles: 6-<31; 31-<57; 57-<85.5; 85.5-141.6. Neurologic impairment (modified NIS+7 [mNIS+7], NIS total score), disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale [R-ODS]), gait speed (10-meter walk test [10-MWT]), grip strength, and QOL (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy [Norfolk QOL-DN] questionnaire) were assessed. RESULTS: Across all baseline NIS quartiles, patisiran improved several clinical markers of disease compared with placebo at 18 months. Patients in lower NIS quartiles, treated with patisiran earlier in the disease course, maintained better scores in mNIS+7, NIS total score, R-ODS, 10-MWT, grip strength, and Norfolk QOL-DN versus those in higher NIS quartiles, while placebo-treated patients experienced worsening of all functional measures after 18 months across all quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Patisiran treatment improved neurologic function and QOL across a wide range of baseline polyneuropathy severities versus placebo. Timing of treatment initiation in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis remains critical for the preservation of function.(ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01960348).

Phase 2 Trial of Rituximab in Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: The BeatMG Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rituximab is safe and potentially beneficial, warranting further investigation in an efficacy trial for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized MG (AChR-Ab+ gMG). METHODS: The B-Cell Targeted Treatment in MG (BeatMG) study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase-2 trial that utilized a futility design. Individuals 21-90 years of age, with AChR-Ab+ gMG (MG Foundation of America Class II-IV) and receiving prednisone ≥15 mg/day were eligible. The primary outcome was a measure of steroid-sparing effect, defined as the proportion achieving ≥75% reduction in mean daily prednisone dose in the 4-weeks prior to week 52 and with clinical improvement or no significant worsening as compared to the 4-week period prior to randomization. The co-primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included MG-specific clinical assessments. Fifty-two individuals were randomized (1:1) to either a two-cycle rituximab/placebo regimen, with follow-up through 52-weeks. RESULTS: Of the 52 participants included, mean (±SD) age at enrollment was 55.1 (±17.1) years; 23 (44.2%) were female, and 31 (59.6%) were MGFA Class II. The mean (±SD) baseline prednisone dose was 22.1 (±9.7) mg/day. The primary steroid-sparing outcome was achieved in 60% of those on rituximab vs. 56% on placebo. The study reached its futility endpoint (p=0.03) suggesting that the pre-defined clinically meaningful improvement of 30% due to rituximab over placebo was unlikely to be achieved in a subsequent, larger trial. No safety issues identified. CONCLUSIONS: While rituximab was safe and well-tolerated, these results suggest that there is a low probability of observing the defined clinically meaningful steroid-sparing effect over a 12-month period in a phase-3 trial of mild-moderately symptomatic AChR-Ab+ gMG. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for mild-to-moderate AChR-Ab+ gMG, compared with placebo, rituximab is safe but unlikely to reduce steroid use by an absolute difference of at least 30% at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02110706.

Electrodiagnostic Assessment of Motor Neuron Disease.

Motor neuron diseases involve degeneration of motor neurons in the brain (upper motor neurons), brain stem, and spinal cord (lower motor neurons). Symptoms vary depending on the degree of upper and lower neuron involvement, but progressive painless weakness is the predominant complaint. Motor neuron disease includes numerous specific disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, spinal bulbar muscular atrophy, and other inherited and acquired conditions. Abnormalities on nerve conduction studies, repetitive nerve stimulation, needle electromyography, and other electrodiagnostic techniques help to distinguish these disorders from each other, and from other disorders with progressive weakness.

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Ranging Trial Of Reldesemtiv In Patients With ALS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety, dose response, and preliminary efficacy of reldesemtiv over 12 weeks in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: Patients (≤2 years since diagnosis) with slow upright vital capacity (SVC) of ≥60% were randomized 1:1:1:1 to reldesemtiv 150, 300, or 450 mg twice daily (bid) or placebo; active treatment was 12 weeks with 4-week follow-up. Primary endpoint was change in percent predicted SVC at 12 weeks; secondary measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and muscle strength mega-score. Results: Patients (N = 458) were enrolled; 85% completed 12-week treatment. The primary analysis failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.11); secondary endpoints showed no statistically significant effects (ALSFRS-R, p = 0.09; muscle strength mega-score, p = 0.31). Post hoc analyses pooling all active reldesemtiv-treated patients compared against placebo showed trends toward benefit in all endpoints (progression rate for SVC, ALSFRS-R, and muscle strength mega-score (nominal p values of 0.10, 0.01 and 0.20 respectively)). Reldesemtiv was well tolerated, with nausea and fatigue being the most common side effects. A dose-dependent decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted, and transaminase elevations were seen in approximately 5% of patients. Both hepatic and renal abnormalities trended toward resolution after study drug discontinuation. Conclusions: Although the primary efficacy analysis did not demonstrate statistical significance, there were trends favoring reldesemtiv for all three endpoints, with effect sizes generally regarded as clinically important. Tolerability was good; modest hepatic and renal abnormalities were reversible. The impact of reldesemtiv on patients with ALS should be assessed in a pivotal Phase 3 trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03160898).

Patient Assisted Intervention for Neuropathy: Comparison of Treatment in Real Life Situations (PAIN-CONTRoLS): Bayesian Adaptive Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trial.

Importance: Cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN) is a common generalized slowly progressive neuropathy, second in prevalence only to diabetic neuropathy. Most patients with CSPN have significant pain. Many medications have been tried for pain reduction in CSPN, including antiepileptics, antidepressants, and sodium channel blockers. There are no comparative studies that identify the most effective medication for pain reduction in CSPN. Objective: To determine which medication (pregabalin, duloxetine, nortriptyline, or mexiletine) is most effective for reducing neuropathic pain and best tolerated in patients with CSPN. Design, Setting, and Participants: From December 1, 2014, through October 20, 2017, a bayesian adaptive, open-label randomized clinical comparative effectiveness study of pain in 402 participants with CSPN was conducted at 40 neurology care clinics. The trial included response adaptive randomization. Participants were patients with CSPN who were 30 years or older, with a pain score of 4 or greater on a numerical rating scale (range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating a higher level of pain). Participant allocation to 1 of 4 drug groups used the utility function and treatment's sample size for response adaptation randomization. At each interim analysis, a decision was made to continue enrolling (up to 400 participants) or stop the whole trial for success (80% power). Patient engagement was maintained throughout the trial, which helped guide the study and identify ways to communicate and disseminate information. Analysis was performed from December 11, 2015, to January 19, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive nortriptyline (n = 134), duloxetine (n = 126), pregabalin (n = 73), or mexiletine (n = 69). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a utility function that was a composite of the efficacy (participant reported pain reduction of ≥50% from baseline to week 12) and quit (participants who discontinued medication) rates. Results: Among the 402 participants (213 men [53.0%]; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [13.4] years; 343 White [85.3%]), the utility function of nortriptyline was 0.81 (95% bayesian credible interval [CrI], 0.69-0.93; 34 of 134 [25.4%] efficacious; and 51 of 134 [38.1%] quit), of duloxetine was 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.68-0.92; 29 of 126 [23.0%] efficacious; and 47 of 126 [37.3%] quit), pregabalin was 0.69 (95% CrI, 0.55-0.84; 11 of 73 [15.1%] efficacious; and 31 of 73 [42.5%] quit), and mexiletine was 0.58 (95% CrI, 0.42-0.75; 14 of 69 [20.3%] efficacious; and 40 of 69 [58.0%] quit). The probability each medication yielded the highest utility was 0.52 for nortriptyline, 0.43 for duloxetine, 0.05 for pregabalin, and 0.00 for mexiletine. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that, although there was no clearly superior medication, nortriptyline and duloxetine outperformed pregabalin and mexiletine when pain reduction and undesirable adverse effects are combined to a single end point. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02260388.

Long-term safety and efficacy of patisiran for hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: 12-month results of an open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis is a rare, inherited, progressive disease caused by mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. We assessed the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with patisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic that inhibits TTR production, in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label extension (OLE) trial enrolled patients at 43 hospitals or clinical centres in 19 countries as of Sept 24, 2018. Patients were eligible if they had completed the phase 3 APOLLO or phase 2 OLE parent studies and tolerated the study drug. Eligible patients from APOLLO (patisiran and placebo groups) and the phase 2 OLE (patisiran group) studies enrolled in this global OLE trial and received patisiran 0·3 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks with plans to continue to do so for up to 5 years. Efficacy assessments included measures of polyneuropathy (modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 [mNIS+7]), quality of life, autonomic symptoms, nutritional status, disability, ambulation status, motor function, and cardiac stress, with analysis by study groups (APOLLO-placebo, APOLLO-patisiran, phase 2 OLE patisiran) based on allocation in the parent trial. The global OLE is ongoing with no new enrolment, and current findings are based on the interim analysis of the patients who had completed 12-month efficacy assessments as of the data cutoff. Safety analyses included all patients who received one or more dose of patisiran up to the data cutoff. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02510261. FINDINGS: Between July 13, 2015, and Aug 21, 2017, of 212 eligible patients, 211 were enrolled: 137 patients from the APOLLO-patisiran group, 49 from the APOLLO-placebo group, and 25 from the phase 2 OLE patisiran group. At the data cutoff on Sept 24, 2018, 126 (92%) of 137 patients from the APOLLO-patisiran group, 38 (78%) of 49 from the APOLLO-placebo group, and 25 (100%) of 25 from the phase 2 OLE patisiran group had completed 12-month assessments. At 12 months, improvements in mNIS+7 with patisiran were sustained from parent study baseline with treatment in the global OLE (APOLLO-patisiran mean change -4·0, 95 % CI -7·7 to -0·3; phase 2 OLE patisiran -4·7, -11·9 to 2·4). Mean mNIS+7 score improved from global OLE enrolment in the APOLLO-placebo group (mean change from global OLE enrolment -1·4, 95% CI -6·2 to 3·5). Overall, 204 (97%) of 211 patients reported adverse events, 82 (39%) reported serious adverse events, and there were 23 (11%) deaths. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the APOLLO-placebo group (28 [57%] of 49) than in the APOLLO-patisiran (48 [35%] of 137) or phase 2 OLE patisiran (six [24%] of 25) groups. The most common treatment-related adverse event was mild or moderate infusion-related reactions. The frequency of deaths in the global OLE was higher in the APOLLO-placebo group (13 [27%] of 49), who had a higher disease burden than the APOLLO-patisiran (ten [7%] of 137) and phase 2 OLE patisiran (0 of 25) groups. INTERPRETATION: In this interim 12-month analysis of the ongoing global OLE study, patisiran appeared to maintain efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Continued long-term follow-up will be important for the overall assessment of safety and efficacy with patisiran. FUNDING: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals.

Correction to: Analysis of autonomic outcomes in APOLLO, a phase III trial of the RNAi therapeutic patisiran in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

Analysis of autonomic outcomes in APOLLO, a phase III trial of the RNAi therapeutic patisiran in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis.

Hereditary transthyretin-mediated (hATTR) amyloidosis is a progressive, debilitating disease often resulting in early-onset, life-impacting autonomic dysfunction. The effect of the RNAi therapeutic, patisiran, on autonomic neuropathy manifestations in patients with hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the phase III APOLLO study is reported. Patients received patisiran 0.3 mg/kg intravenously (n = 148) or placebo (n = 77) once every 3 weeks for 18 months. Patisiran halted or reversed polyneuropathy and improved quality of life from baseline in the majority of patients. At baseline, patients in APOLLO had notable autonomic impairment, as demonstrated by the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31) questionnaire and Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) questionnaire autonomic neuropathy domain. At 18 months, patisiran improved autonomic neuropathy symptoms compared with placebo [COMPASS-31, least squares (LS) mean difference, - 7.5; 95% CI: - 11.9, - 3.2; Norfolk QOL-DN autonomic neuropathy domain, LS mean difference, - 1.1; - 1.8, - 0.5], nutritional status (modified body mass index, LS mean difference, 115.7; - 82.4, 149.0), and vasomotor function (postural blood pressure, LS mean difference, - 0.3; - 0.5, - 0.1). Patisiran treatment also led to improvement from baseline at 18 months for COMPASS-31 (LS mean change from baseline, - 5.3; 95% CI: - 7.9, - 2.7) and individual domains, orthostatic intolerance (- 4.6; - 6.3, - 2.9) and gastrointestinal symptoms (- 0.8; - 1.5, - 0.2). Rapid worsening of all study measures was observed with placebo, while patisiran treatment resulted in stable or improved scores compared with baseline. Patisiran demonstrates benefit across a range of burdensome autonomic neuropathy manifestations that deteriorate rapidly without early and continued treatment.

Take two: Utility of the repeat skeletal muscle biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: The utility of repeat muscle biopsy has not been adequately evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 144 repeat muscle biopsies performed from 1980 to 2017. Repeat biopsy was considered clinically relevant if it provided a new diagnosis, changed the existing diagnosis, or led to treatment changes or further investigations. RESULTS: Repeat biopsy was abnormal in 118 cases, different from the initial biopsy in 67 cases, and specific in 40 cases. Factors with a significant effect on clinical relevance of the repeat biopsy (P < 0.05) were an abnormal, specific, or inflammatory initial biopsy, proximal muscle weakness, absence of myalgia, and a repeat biopsy that is different, specific, or consistent with polymyositis or inclusion body myositis. CONCLUSIONS: Utility of repeat biopsy was limited to weak patients whose initial biopsy showed inflammatory myositis. Ongoing advances in the diagnosis of immune inflammatory myopathies have led to evolution of the role of repeat biopsy. Muscle Nerve, 2019.

What is the diagnostic accuracy of single nerve conduction studies and muscle ultrasound to identify critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) is a major cause of weakness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but current diagnostic tests are limited. We evaluated the generalizability and validity of single nerve conduction studies (NCS) and muscle ultrasound testing to identify CIPNM, and we also assessed the ability of muscle ultrasound to prognosticate patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated medical, cardiac, surgical, and neurosurgical ICU patients. We performed weekly strength testing, NCS, electromyography (EMG), and muscle ultrasound. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and other test characteristics of single NCS and muscle ultrasound, and we used multivariable regression models to assess the prognostic ability of muscle ultrasound. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled. The incidence of probable CIPNM was 18% and did not differ significantly by type of ICU (p = 0.49). For diagnosing probable CIPNM, the peroneal motor NCS had a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71-100%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI 82-96%), the sural sensory NCS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 80-100%) and specificity of 42% (95% CI 31-54%), and abnormal muscle ultrasound echogenicity had a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 48-98%) and specificity of 57% (95% CI 43-70%). Abnormal echogenicity was associated with reduced likelihood of discharge to home (9% vs 50%, p = 0.0001), fewer ICU-free days (median 3 (interquartile range 0-15) days vs 16 (9.3-19.3) days, p = 0.0002), and increased ICU mortality (42% vs 12%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse cohort of critically ill patients, single NCS and muscle ultrasound achieved diagnostic accuracy for patients at risk for CIPNM. The routine utilization of these tests could be beneficial for all critically ill patients at risk for CIPNM.

Outcomes of ICU Patients With a Discharge Diagnosis of Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuromyopathy on health-related outcomes in a large cohort of patients requiring ICU admission. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort with propensity score-matched analysis. SETTING: Analysis of a large multihospital database. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients without preexisting neuromuscular abnormalities and a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy along with adult ICU propensity-matched control patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 3,567 ICU patients with a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy, we matched 3,436 of these patients to 3,436 ICU patients who did not have a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy. After propensity matching and adjusting for unbalanced covariates, we used conditional logistic regression and a repeated measures model to compare patient outcomes. Compared to patients without a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy, patients with a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy had fewer 28-day hospital-free days (6 [0.1] vs 7.4 [0.1] d; p < 0.0001), had fewer 28-day ventilator-free days (15.7 [0.2] vs 17.5 [0.2] d; p < 0.0001), had higher hospitalization charges (313,508 [4,853] vs 256,288 [4,470] dollars; p < 0.0001), and were less likely to be discharged home (15.3% vs 32.8%; p < 0.0001) but had lower in-hospital mortality (13.7% vs 18.3%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a propensity-matched analysis of a large national database, a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy is strongly associated with deleterious outcomes including fewer hospital-free days, fewer ventilator-free days, higher hospital charges, and reduced discharge home but also an unexpectedly lower in-hospital mortality. This study demonstrates the clinical importance of a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy and the need for effective preventive interventions.

A case of congenital spinal muscular atrophy with pain due to a mutation in TRPV4.

We present a patient with congenital spinal muscular atrophy associated with pain, subjective sensory loss, right talipes equinovarus, delayed walking, and progressive gait impairment. A sister and niece reportedly had Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A, but the patient's electromyogram showed an axonal motor neuropathy or neuronopathy. We identified a c.806G>A TRPV4 gene mutation causing an Arg269His amino acid substitution. TRPV4 mutations cause variable phenotypes including axonal sensorimotor neuropathy and motor neuropathy or neuronopathy. Associated features may include arthrogryposis, skeletal dysplasia, vocal cord paresis, sensorineural hearing loss and respiratory weakness. Skeletal X-rays can identify orthopedic causes of pain in patients with TRPV4 mutations, and imaging evidence of bone deformities in patients with suspected hereditary axonal neuropathy, pain and an unknown genetic diagnosis may help lead to a diagnosis of a TRPV4 mutation. Even when a patient's genetic diagnosis is presumed to be known, electrodiagnostic testing is warranted to verify the diagnosis.

Screening for critical illness polyneuromyopathy with single nerve conduction studies.

PURPOSE: The ability to diagnose patients with critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) is hampered by impaired patient sensorium, technical limitations, and the time-intensive nature of performing electrophysiological testing. Therefore, we sought to determine whether single nerve conduction studies (NCS) could accurately screen for CIPNM. METHODS: Critically ill patients at increased risk for developing CIPNM were identified. Bilateral NCS of six nerves, and concentric needle electromyography were performed within 24 h of meeting inclusion criteria, and subsequently on a weekly basis until CIPNM was diagnosed or the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were enrolled into the study. Patients who developed CIPNM had a higher hospital mortality (50 vs. 13%, p = 0.002), and fewer ICU-free days (0 vs. 11, p = 0.04). There were no differences between the right and left amplitudes (p = 0.59, 0.91, and 0.21) for nerves that could be simultaneously tested bilaterally (sural, peroneal, and tibial). The amplitudes for each of the six individual nerves were significantly diminished in patients with CIPNM when compared to patients without CIPNM. The nerves with the best diagnostic accuracy were the peroneal nerve [AUC = 0.8856; sensitivity = 94% (95% CI = 88-100%); specificity = 74% (95% CI = 63-85%)], and the sural nerve [AUC = 0.8611; sensitivity = 94% (95 % CI = 88-100%); specificity = 70% (95 % CI = 59-81%)]. The combined diagnostic accuracy for the amplitudes of the peroneal and sural nerves increased significantly [AUC = 0.9336; sensitivity = 100% (95% CI = 100-100%) and specificity = 81% (95% CI = 71-91%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral peroneal and sural NCS can accurately screen for CIPNM in ICU patients and detect a limited number of patients that would need concentric needle electromyography to confirm a diagnosis of CIPNM. These results identify a more streamlined method to diagnose CIPNM that may facilitate routine diagnostic testing and monitoring of weakness in critically ill patients.

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: implications for physical therapist management.

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) can develop a condition referred to as "ICU-acquired weakness." This condition is characterized by profound weakness that is greater than might be expected to result from prolonged bed rest. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness often is accompanied by dysfunction of multiple organ systems. Individuals with ICU-acquired weakness typically have significant activity limitations, often requiring physical assistance for even the most basic activities associated with bed mobility. Many of these individuals have activity limitations months to years after hospitalization. The purpose of this article is to review evidence that guides physical rehabilitation of people with ICU-acquired weakness. Included are diagnostic criteria, medical management, and prognostic indicators, as well as criteria for beginning physical rehabilitation, with an emphasis on patient safety. Data are presented indicating that rehabilitation can be implemented with very few adverse effects. Evidence is provided for appropriate measurement approaches and for physical intervention strategies. Finally, some of the key issues are summarized that should be investigated to determine the best intervention guidelines for individuals with ICU-acquired weakness.