Epicardial adipose tissue volume and density are associated with heart failure with improved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (EF, HFimpEF) is a distinct HF subtype, characterized by left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and myocardial functional recovery. Multiple cardiometabolic factors are implicated in this process. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), emerging as an endocrine and paracrine organ, contributes to the onset and progression of HF. However, the relation between EAT and the incidence of HFimpEF is still unclear. METHODS: A total of 203 hospitalized HF patients with reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF ≤ 40%) who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) during index hospitalization were consecutively enrolled between November 2011 and December 2022. Routine follow-up and repeat echocardiograms were performed. The incidence of HFimpEF was defined as (1) an absolute LVEF improvement ≥ 10% and (2) a second LVEF > 40% (at least 3 months apart). EAT volume and density were semiautomatically quantified on non-enhanced series of CCTA scans. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 8.6 (4.9 ~ 13.3) months, 104 (51.2%) patients developed HFimpEF. Compared with HFrEF patients, HFimpEF patients had lower EAT volume (115.36 [IQR 87.08 ~ 154.78] mL vs. 169.67 [IQR 137.22 ~ 218.89] mL, P < 0.001) and higher EAT density (-74.92 ± 6.84 HU vs. -78.76 ± 6.28 HU, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed lower EAT volume (OR: 0.885 [95%CI 0.822 ~ 0.947]) and higher density (OR: 1.845 [95%CI 1.023 ~ 3.437]) were both independently associated with the incidence of HFimpEF. Subgroup analysis revealed that the association between EAT properties and HFimpEF was not modified by HF etiology. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that lower EAT volume and higher EAT density are associated with development of HFimpEF. Therapies targeted at reducing EAT quantity and improving its quality might provide favorable effects on myocardial recovery in HF patients.

Long-term glycemic variability predicts compromised development of heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a cohort study.

Background: A substantial portion of heart failure (HF) patients adherent to guideline-directed medical therapies have experienced improved ejection fraction (EF), termed HFimpEF. Glycemic variability (GV) has emerged as a critical cardiometabolic factor. However, the relation between long-term GV and the incidence of HFimpEF is still unclear. Methods: A total of 591 hospitalized HF patients with reduced EF (HFrEF, EF≤ 40%) admitted from January 2013 to December 2020 were consecutively enrolled. Repeat echocardiograms were performed at baseline and after around 12 months. The incidence of HFimpEF, defined as (1) an absolute EF improvement ≥10% and (2) a second EF > 40% and its association with long-term fasting plasma glucose (FPG) variability were analyzed. Results: During a mean follow-up of 12.2 ± 0.6 months, 218 (42.0%) patients developed HFimpEF. Multivariate analysis showed FPG variability was independently associated with the incidence of HFimpEF after adjustment for baseline HbA1c, mean FPG during follow-up and other traditional risk factors (odds ratio [OR] for highest vs. lowest quartile of CV of FPG: 0.487 [95% CI 0.257~0.910]). Evaluation of GV by alternative measures yielded similar results. Subgroup analysis revealed that long-term GV was associated with HFimpEF irrespective of glycemic levels and diabetic conditions. Conclusions: This study reveals that greater FPG variability is associated with compromised development of HFimpEF. A more stable control of glycemic levels might provide favorable effects on myocardial functional recovery in HF patients even without diabetes.

HbA1c level is associated with the development of heart failure with recovered ejection fraction in hospitalized heart failure patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Due to advances in medical treatments, a substantial proportion of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF, HFrEF) have experienced partial or complete recovery of EF, termed HFrecEF, and markedly improved clinical outcomes. In the present study, we sought to investigate the relationship between glycemic control and the incidence of HFrecEF in hospitalized HFrEF patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 463 hospitalized T2DM patients with HFrEF were consecutively enrolled. Follow-up echocardiogram was performed after around 12 months. Patients who had an absolute EF improvement ≥10% and a second EF > 40% were classified into HFrecEF, and those who did not meet these criteria were defined as persistent HFrEF. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up, 44.5% of T2DM patients developed HFrecEF. Patients with HFrecEF had significantly lower HbA1c level than those with persistent HFrEF (6.5% [IQR 5.8% âˆ¼ 7.2%] vs. 6.7% [IQR 6.1% âˆ¼ 7.8%], P = 0.003), especially in HF of an ischemic etiology. HbA1c levels were inversely correlated with changes in EF during follow-up. After multivariate adjustment, every 1% increase in HbA1c conferred a 17.4% (OR: 0.826 [95% CI 0.701-0.968]) lower likelihood of HFrecEF. Compared to patients with good glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 6.2%), those with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.1%) had a 52.0% (OR: 0.480 [95% CI 0.281-0.811] decreased likelihood of HFrecEF. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that uncontrolled HbA1c level is associated with compromised development of HFrecEF in T2DM patients with HF, especially in those with an ischemic etiology.

Serum Uric Acid Is Associated with the Progression of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Apparently Healthy Subjects.

Background: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is the defining feature of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and predicts subsequent incident heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality. Mounting evidence reveals that cardiometabolic risk factors play critical roles in the development of LVDD. In this study, we sought to investigate the relation between serum uric acid (SUA) level and the progression of LVDD in apparently healthy patients. Methods: A total of 1082 apparently healthy subjects without diagnosed cardiovascular disease and LVDD were consecutively enrolled. SUA levels were measured, and repeat echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were performed at baseline and during 1-year follow-up. Results: By dividing the study population based on quartiles of SUA, we found subjects in higher quartiles had greater increases in TDI-derived early diastolic velocity (e') and E (peak LV filling velocity)/e' ratios during 1-year follow-up. After multivariate adjustment, high SUA persisted to be an independent predictor for the subsequent worsening of LVDD (odds ratio: 1.351 [95% CI 1.125~1.625], per 100 µmol/L SUA). Subgroup analysis suggested that the association between SUA and LVDD development was more pronounced in subjects without other cardiometabolic risk factors involved. Factor analysis demonstrated that high SUA was the major cardiometabolic attribute in patients with LVDD progression. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that high SUA is an independent cardiometabolic risk factor for the progression of LVDD in apparently healthy subjects.

Endothelial microparticles: A mechanosensitive regulator of vascular homeostasis and injury under shear stress.

Hemodynamic shear stress (SS), a frictional force generated by blood flow, regulates vascular homeostasis. High and steady SS maintains physiological function of endothelial cells while low and disturbed SS promotes disturbance of vascular homeostasis and the development of atherosclerosis. Endothelial microparticle (EMP), a vesicular structure shed from endothelial cells, has emerged as a surrogate biomarker of endothelial injury and dysfunction. EMP release is triggered by disturbed SS in addition to multiple inflammatory cytokines. This review systematically summarizes the impact of SS on EMPs and the role of EMPs under SS in modulating vascular homeostasis and injury, including endothelial survival, vasodilation, inflammatory response, vascular permeability, and coagulation system.

Insulin Resistance Is Associated With Heart Failure With Recovered Ejection Fraction in Patients Without Diabetes.

Background Because of advances in medical treatments, a substantial proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) have experienced recovery of ejection fraction (EF), termed HF with recovered EF (HFrecEF). Insulin resistance (IR) is prevalent in HF and tightly related with prognosis. This study investigates the relationship between IR and the incidence of HFrecEF in patients who are nondiabetic. Methods and Results A total of 262 patients with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) who were nondiabetic were consecutively enrolled. Patients were classified into HFrecEF (follow-up EF>40% and ≥10% absolute increase) or otherwise persistent HFrEF based on repeat echocardiograms after 12 months. IR was estimated by an updated homeostasis model assessment for IR (HOMA2-IR). The median HOMA2-IR level was 1.05 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.67-1.63) in our cohort of patients with HF who were nondiabetic. During follow-up, 121 (odds ratio [OR], 46.2% [95% CI 40.2-52.2]) patients developed HFrecEF. Compared with patients with HFrEF, patients with HFrecEF had significantly lower HOMA2-IR levels (0.92 [IQR, 0.61-1.37] versus 1.14 [IQR, 0.75-1.78], P=0.007), especially in nonischemic HF. Log2-transformed HOMA2-IR was inversely correlated to improvements in EF (Pearson's r=-0.25, P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, a doubling of HOMA2-IR was associated with a 42.8% decreased likelihood of HFrecEF (OR, 0.572 [95% CI, 0.385-0.827]). Conclusions This study reveals that IR is independently associated with compromised development of HFrecEF in patients who are nondiabetic.