Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
Headache ; 63(9): 1314-1326, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Melatonin is effective for migraine prevention in adults. We hypothesized that melatonin would also be effective for migraine prevention in children and adolescents. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind trial of melatonin (3 mg or 6 mg) versus placebo for migraine prevention in 10-17 year-olds with 4-28/28 headache days at baseline. Participants were recruited from the UCSF Child & Adolescent Headache Program, UCSF child neurology clinic, and social media advertisements. Migraine diagnosis was confirmed by a headache specialist. Participants completed an 8-week single-blind placebo run-in. Those meeting randomization criteria (≥4 headache days and ≥23/28 electronic diary entries during weeks 5-8) were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo:melatonin 3 mg:melatonin 6 mg nightly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was migraine days in weeks 5-8 of randomized treatment between melatonin (combined 6 mg + 3 mg) versus placebo. We aimed to enroll n = 210. RESULTS: The study closed early due to slow enrollment (n = 72). Two participants were in the single-blind phase when the study closed, therefore the meaningful n = 70. Sixteen percent (11/70) were lost to follow-up during the single-blind phase. An additional 21% (15/70) did not meet randomization criteria (<4 headache days: n = 5, <23/28 diary days: n = 7, both: n = 3). Sixty-three percent (44/70) were eligible to randomize, of whom 42 randomized (n = 14 per arm). Taking another preventive at enrollment (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 68.9) was the only variable associated with meeting randomization criteria. Of those randomized, 91% (38/42) provided diary data in the final 4-weeks. However, given the amount of missing data, only those with ≥21/28 diary days were analyzed-7/14 (50%) in the placebo group, and 20/28 (71%) in the melatonin groups combined. Median (IQR) migraine/migrainous days in weeks 5-8 of double-blind treatment was 2 (1-7) in the placebo group versus 2 (1-12) in the melatonin groups combined; the difference in medians (95% CI for the difference) was 0 days (-9 to 3). There were no differences in adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to recall at enrollment, headache days decreased across the single-blind placebo phase and the double-blind phase. There was no suggestion of superiority of melatonin; however, given the substantial portion of missing data, numerically higher in the placebo arm, and underpowering, this should not be interpreted as proof of inefficacy. Melatonin was generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Future migraine preventive trials in this age group may find this trial helpful for anticipating enrollment needs if using a single-blind placebo run-in. Enriching for those already on a migraine preventive may improve randomization rates in future trials, though would change the generalizability of results.


Asunto(s)
Melatonina , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Melatonina/farmacología , Melatonina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Simple Ciego , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea , Método Doble Ciego
2.
Neurol Clin ; 41(1): 177-192, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36400554

RESUMEN

The most common headache disorders in adolescents are tension-type headache, migraine, and posttraumatic headache. These disorders in adolescents may have different characteristics than in adults but can be similarly disabling. This review highlights the emerging abortive and preventive treatment options for the adolescent population. Although future high-quality headache studies in this age group are still needed, current evidence for the safety and efficacy of various treatment modalities is also discussed.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Cefalea Postraumática , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/terapia , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/terapia , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología
3.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 26(4): 281-288, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179724

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and neurofibromatosis (NF) are neurocutaneous disorders often encountered by neurologists in clinical practice. This article aims to familiarize adult and pediatric neurologists with common features of these disorders and headache specific evaluation and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Non-malignant intracranial tumors in TSC include cortical tubers (glioneuronal hamartomas), subependymal nodules or subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas (SEGA). Headache disorders in TSC are largely secondary and can cause headaches due to increased intracranial pressure, mass effect, obstructive hydrocephalus, or hemorrhage. Neurosurgical intervention is typically required for management of large SEGAs; however, in patients with increased surgical risk, newer treatment modalities may be offered such as neoadjuvant therapy with an mTOR inhibitor (mTORi). Newer studies indicate headache disorders are more prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Primary headache disorders can include migraine and tension-type headache, while secondary headache disorders can be due to associated neoplasms such as optic pathway gliomas or brainstem gliomas, or less commonly vasculopathies such as moyamoya syndrome. Selumetinib is an oral, small molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) agent with antineoplastic activity which is in ongoing trials for treatment of NF1-associated pediatric low-grade gliomas. NF1 stands out as having a higher association with primary headache disorders such as migraine. This association may be related to effects of mutation of the neurofibromin gene on pathways involved in pain and migraine genesis, however, warrants future study. Care should be taken when formulating a headache treatment plan to address comorbidities and avoid medications that may be contraindicated.


Asunto(s)
Astrocitoma , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Cefaleas Primarias , Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Neurofibromatosis 1 , Esclerosis Tuberosa , Adulto , Astrocitoma/genética , Astrocitoma/metabolismo , Astrocitoma/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Niño , Cefalea/complicaciones , Cefalea/terapia , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/complicaciones , Cefaleas Primarias/complicaciones , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Neurofibromatosis 1/complicaciones , Neurofibromatosis 1/genética , Neurofibromatosis 1/terapia , Esclerosis Tuberosa/complicaciones , Esclerosis Tuberosa/genética , Esclerosis Tuberosa/terapia
4.
Pediatr Res ; 90(5): 1044-1051, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33564129

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Benign paroxysmal torticollis (BPT) is characterized by attacks of head tilt associated with vomiting, irritability, and/or ataxia in early childhood. BPT is associated with migraine but risk factors are unknown. Impact on quality of life is also unknown. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of children with ongoing or resolved BPT participated in telephone interviews (n = 73). Those with ongoing BPT completed the Infant Toddler Quality of Life questionnaire (ITQoL). RESULTS: Median age of children at the time of interview was 2.9 years (range 0.25-23). BPT was ongoing in 52% (n = 38). Nineteen percent (n = 14) developed migraine (median age 9.25 years, range 2.5-23) and 63% (n = 46) developed another episodic syndrome associated with migraine. Proportion of patients who developed migraine was higher among those with certain migrainous symptoms during BPT attacks vs. those without: phonophobia (58 vs. 21%, p = 0.02), photophobia and phonophobia (55 vs. 23%, p = 0.05), and photophobia, phonophobia, and motion sensitivity (60 vs. 22%, p = 0.02). ITQoL results showed significant impact of BPT on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Children with BPT may develop migraine or other episodic syndromes associated with migraine. Presence of migrainous features during BPT episodes may increase likelihood of developing migraine. Though characterized as "benign," BPT can significantly impact children and families. IMPACT: Benign paroxysmal torticollis (BPT) is a rare condition of early childhood characterized by episodes of head tilt associated with vomiting, irritability, ataxia, pallor, and/or malaise. This cohort study describes the phenotypic spectrum of BPT, variable treatment, natural history and association with migraine, and impact on development and quality of life. Children with BPT may go on to develop migraine or episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine; presence of migrainous features during attacks may increase odds of developing migraine. BPT can have significant impact on quality of life, demonstrated by findings from the Infant Toddler Quality of Life questionnaire.


Asunto(s)
Fenotipo , Calidad de Vida , Tortícolis/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tortícolis/complicaciones , Tortícolis/fisiopatología
5.
Pediatr Neurol ; 114: 5-8, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189027

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of riboflavin in pediatric migraineurs. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on 42 patients (aged six to 18 years) with migraine who were evaluated from January to December 2019 at Dell Children's Medical Center in Austin, Texas. Weight-based dosing of riboflavin was recommended for migraine prevention. Descriptive statistics were used to study the population demographics. Nonparametric tests were used for inferential statistics to study the effect of riboflavin on headache frequency, intensity, and duration. RESULTS: Patients treated with riboflavin had a significant reduction in headache days per month (frequency) at the first follow-up visit at 2 to 4 months (T1) (11.07 ± 10.52 days) compared with the baseline T0 (21.90 ± 9.85 days); P < 0.001 in regard to the primary outcome in 42 patients (mean age, 13.38 ± 3.38). Mean headache intensity decreased from 8.85 (±6.41; T0) to 2.30 (±2.51; T1); P < 0.001 on a 0 to 10 scale. The headache duration also reduced significantly from 18.23 ± 17.07 hours (T0) to 10.18 ± 10.49 hours (T1); P = 0.001. There was a positive correlation between riboflavin efficacy and reduced use of acute medications (rs = 0.304; P = 0.05). Riboflavin was useful in reducing the frequency and intensity in two patients with new daily persistent headache. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with riboflavin had a reduction in headache frequency, use of acute medications, and days of school missed. Riboflavin prophylaxis also reduced migraine intensity and duration. Riboflavin is recommended as a safe, inexpensive, and effective nutraceutical in the treatment of pediatric migraine.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Riboflavina/farmacología , Complejo Vitamínico B/farmacología , Adolescente , Niño , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riboflavina/administración & dosificación , Complejo Vitamínico B/administración & dosificación
6.
Headache ; 60(8): 1712-1721, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32965037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine what dose of melatonin is most effective for treating migraine acutely in children and adolescents. BACKGROUND: Acute migraine medications may not work for all patients and may cause side effects. Melatonin is effective for migraine prevention in adults and has been used acutely for procedural pain in children. Our goal was to determine whether a "high" or "low" dose of melatonin is more effective for treating migraine acutely in youth. METHODS: In this pilot, randomized, open-label, single-center, dose-finding trial, children and adolescents aged 4-17 years with episodic migraine were randomized to "high-dose" or "low-dose" dose melatonin (<40 kg: 4 mg vs. 1 mg; ≥40 kg: 8 mg vs. 2 mg). The primary outcome measure was change in mean pain score between time 0 and 2 hours. Secondary outcomes included 2-hour pain-relief and pain-freedom rates. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants (n = 42 per group) were enrolled in this study. Mean (SD) participant age was 11.8 (3.5) years and 55% (46/84) were female. Mean (SD) headache days/month was 5.6 (3.8). Sixty-six (79%) participants provided outcome data and were included in the analyses, n = 24 in the high-dose group and n = 22 in the low-dose group. The drop-out rate was 43% (18/42) in the high-dose group vs. 48% (20/42) in the low-dose group. Mean (SD) change in pain intensity at 2 hours was -2.7 (2.1) cm in the high-dose group vs. -2.3 (2.1) cm in the low-dose group (p = .581), a difference of 0.4 cm (95% CI: -1.17 to 1.92). Two-hour pain-freedom rate was 41% (7/17) vs. 27% (4/15) in the high-dose vs. low-dose groups (p = .415), and 2-hour pain-relief rate was 94% (16/17) vs. 80% (12/15), (p = .482). There were no serious adverse events. Napping occurred in the majority (67% (14/21) high dose vs. 47% (9/19) low dose). Higher mg/kg dose of melatonin and napping were each independently associated with greater headache benefit. CONCLUSIONS: As an acute treatment for pediatric migraine, both low and high doses of melatonin were associated with pain reduction; however, study drop-out was high. Higher dose and napping after treatment predicted greater benefit.


Asunto(s)
Depresores del Sistema Nervioso Central/farmacología , Melatonina/farmacología , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Depresores del Sistema Nervioso Central/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melatonina/administración & dosificación , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto
8.
Pediatr Neurol ; 107: 1-6, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32192818

RESUMEN

Migraine is the leading cause of years lost due to disability in individuals aged 15 to 49 years. Much has changed over the last three decades about our understanding of this complex neurological disorder. Various phases of migraine have been characterized and are the focus of this review. The premonitory phase involves bothersome symptoms experienced hours to days before migraine pain. Behavioral changes and functional neuroimaging studies point toward hypothalamic involvement during the premonitory and other migraine phases. Migraine aura is a disruptive, reversible neurological phenomenon that affects up to one-third of all migraineurs, and can overlap with the headache phase. The mechanism responsible for this phase is thought to be cortical spreading depolarization through the cortex. This process leads to temporary disruptions in ion homeostasis and the ensuing neuronal dysfunction. The headache phase involves activation of the trigeminocervical complex. Neuropeptides are implicated in trigeminal activation, and calcitonin gene-related peptide in particular has become a promising target of therapeutic intervention for migraine. The final phase of migraine is the postdrome, the period of time from the resolution of headache symptoms until return to baseline following a migraine. People often report neuropsychiatric, sensory, gastrointestinal, and general symptoms during this time, which can limit activity. Elucidating the neuroanatomical, chemical, and neuroimaging correlates of these migraine phases allows for an improved comprehension of the underlying changes associated with migraine symptomatology and can assist with evaluation of arising therapeutics for migraine management.


Asunto(s)
Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/metabolismo , Trastornos Migrañosos/metabolismo , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Humanos
9.
Semin Neurol ; 40(3): 294-302, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32079031

RESUMEN

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a clinical-radiologic diagnosis that affects children and adolescents, but it is much more frequently reported in adults. Clinically, patients present with severe and commonly recurrent thunderclap headaches. Typical precipitating triggers include vasoactive substances, serotonergic agents, and the postpartum period. There may be associated neurologic complications at presentation or in the weeks following, such as convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, cerebral edema, cervical artery dissection (CeAD), and seizures. Angiographically, the cerebral arteries demonstrate segmental vasoconstriction and dilation, although imaging early in the clinical course may be normal. Work-up is performed to exclude intracranial disorders such as vasculitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysm, meningitis, and intracranial venous sinus thrombosis. Within 1 month of initial symptom onset, clinical symptoms such as severe headache have ceased, and within 3 months, the cerebral vasoconstriction is much improved or resolved. Management involves avoidance of precipitating triggers and potentially short-term pharmacotherapy with calcium channel blockers for patients with associated neurologic complications. Steroids are not recommended and may worsen the clinical outcome. Prognosis is excellent in the large majority of patients, and only 5% of patients experience a recurrence of RCVS.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefaleas Primarias/diagnóstico , Cefaleas Primarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstricción , Adolescente , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/fisiopatología , Niño , Cefaleas Primarias/etiología , Cefaleas Primarias/fisiopatología , Humanos
10.
Headache ; 59(7): 1014-1023, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31054199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, there have not been reliable biomarkers to identify impending migraine episodes. A prior study in adults with migraine demonstrated a reduction in the urinary metabolic substrate of melatonin (urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin; aMT6s) during a migraine. The aim of this study was to examine whether evening urinary melatonin metabolite levels could predict migraine the next day in children and adolescents with migraine. METHODS: Twenty-one children and adolescents with migraine (aged 5-17 years) were recruited to this observational study conducted at UC San Francisco to provide urine samples for 10 days and maintain a prospective headache diary during the same period. Nightly melatonin metabolite 6-sulfatoxymelatonin in urine was assayed and results from nights preceding migraine were compared to nights preceding a non-headache day. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) aMT6s levels the night prior to a migraine attack were 56.2 ± 39.0 vs 55.4 ± 46.6 ng/mL (P = .915), and mean melatonin metabolite levels the night following migraine were 55.5 ± 46.9 vs 57.0 ± 37.7 ng/mL (P = .841). However, in post hoc exploratory analyses, aMT6s levels were lower the night before a migraine in those who experienced aura or premonitory symptoms. CONCLUSION: While urinary melatonin metabolites do not predict migraine attacks in children and adolescents overall, they may be predictive in those who experience premonitory phase symptoms as part of their migraine attacks.


Asunto(s)
Melatonina/análogos & derivados , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/orina , Adolescente , Biomarcadores/orina , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melatonina/orina
11.
Am J Med Genet A ; 179(7): 1246-1252, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039288

RESUMEN

Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia (SIOD) is a multisystemic condition characterized by early arteriosclerosis and progressive renal insufficiency, among other features. Many SIOD patients have severe, migraine-like headaches, transient neurologic attacks, or cerebral ischemic events. Cerebral events could be exacerbated or precipitated by hypertension, and it is unclear how these are related to arteriosclerotic changes as dyslipidemia is also a feature of SIOD. The correlation between hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular risk in SIOD is unclear. Also, the etiology and management of headaches is not well characterized. Here we report our clinical observations in the management of SIOD in a patient who was diagnosed in school age despite early signs and symptoms. We describe biallelic variants, including a previously unreported c.1931G>A (p.Arg644Gln) variant in SMARCAL1. We specifically investigated whether migraine-like headaches and progressive nephropathy may be related to blood pressure dysregulation. We found a correlation between tighter blood pressure regulation using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and a subjective decrease in headache symptoms. We discuss blood pressure medication management in SIOD. We also characterize dyslipidemia relative to atherosclerosis risks and provide new management strategies to consider for optimizing care.


Asunto(s)
Arteriosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , ADN Helicasas/genética , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteocondrodisplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Arteriosclerosis/complicaciones , Arteriosclerosis/diagnóstico , Arteriosclerosis/genética , Atorvastatina/uso terapéutico , Benzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Niño , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Dislipidemias/complicaciones , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/genética , Femenino , Expresión Génica , Cefalea/complicaciones , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/genética , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/genética , Síndrome Nefrótico/complicaciones , Síndrome Nefrótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótico/genética , Osteocondrodisplasias/complicaciones , Osteocondrodisplasias/diagnóstico , Osteocondrodisplasias/genética , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/complicaciones , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/genética , Propranolol/uso terapéutico , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/genética
12.
Headache ; 58(10): 1658-1669, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324723

Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Receptores de Péptido Relacionado con el Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Adolescente , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Tamaño Corporal , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/fisiología , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/inmunología , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Cefalalgia Histamínica/prevención & control , Contraindicaciones de los Medicamentos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Cefalea Postraumática/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Neurology ; 90(19): e1702-e1705, 2018 05 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29626180

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to survey our patients about their experience with our clinic's telemedicine program to better understand telemedicine's utility for families, and to improve patient satisfaction and ultimately patient care. METHODS: This was a prospective survey study of patients and their families who had a routine telemedicine follow-up visit with the University of California San Francisco Pediatric Headache Program. The survey was administered to patients and a parent(s) following their telemedicine visit. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 69 surveys (74%) were completed. All (51/51) patients and families thought that (1) telemedicine was more convenient compared to a clinic visit, (2) telemedicine caused less disruption of their daily routine, and (3) they would choose to do telemedicine again. The mean round-trip travel time from home to clinic was 6.8 hours (SD ± 8.6 hours). All participants thought telemedicine was more cost-effective than a clinic visit. Parents estimated that participating in a telemedicine visit instead of a clinic appointment saved them on average $486. CONCLUSION: This prospective, pediatric headache telemedicine study shows that telemedicine is convenient, perceived to be cost-effective, and patient-centered. Providing the option of telemedicine for routine pediatric headache follow-up visits results in high patient and family satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Cefalea/terapia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Pediatría , Telemedicina/métodos , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cefalea/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Telemedicina/economía , Adulto Joven
14.
Headache ; 58(5): 724-731, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29528485

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, tolerability, and patient acceptability of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) for migraine prevention in adolescents in an open-label pilot study. BACKGROUND: Migraine is common in adolescents and can be disabling. Well tolerated preventative therapies that are safe and effective are needed. METHODS: This was an open-label prospective pilot feasibility study of sTMS for migraine prevention in adolescents aged 12-17 years. Participants used sTMS twice daily in a preventative fashion, as well as additional pulses as needed acutely. A 4-week baseline run-in period (weeks 1-4) was followed by a 12-week treatment period. Feasibility was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included tolerability and acceptability, as well as the change in headache days, number of moderate/severe headache days, days of acute medication use, and PedMIDAS (headache disability) scores between the run-in period (weeks 1-4) and the third month of treatment (weeks 13-16). RESULTS: Twenty-one participants enrolled. Nineteen completed the baseline run-in, and 12 completed the study. Using sTMS proved feasible and acceptable with overall high compliance once treatment administration was streamlined. Initially, for preventive treatment, participants were asked to give 2 pulses, wait 15 minutes, then give 2 additional pulses twice daily. This 15-minute delay proved challenging for adolescents, particularly on school days, and therefore was dropped. Study completion rate went from 4/13 (31%) to 7/8 (88%) once this change was made, P = .024. On average, participants used the device preventively between 22 and 24 days over a 28-day block. There were no serious adverse events. Two participants reported mild discomfort with device use. CONCLUSION: sTMS appears to be a feasible, well-tolerated, and acceptable nonpharmacologic preventive treatment for migraine in adolescents. In designing future trials of sTMS for migraine prevention in adolescents, streamlined treatment administration will be essential to minimize drop-out. Efficacy needs to be assessed in a larger trial.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/efectos adversos
15.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 22(3): 17, 2018 Feb 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476266

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headache phenotypes can differ between adults and children. While most headaches are due to primary headache disorders, in a small population, they can be an indication of a potentially life-threatening neurologic condition. The challenge lies in identifying warning signs that warrant further workup. This article reviews different types of pediatric headaches and headache evaluation in children and teens, and focuses on the approach for diagnosis of secondary headaches. RECENT FINDINGS: Common thought is that increased frequency and severity of headache may reflect secondary pathology; however, headache phenotype may not be fully developed and can evolve in adolescence or adulthood. Headache location, particularly occipital headache alone, does not necessarily signify secondary intracranial pathology. Certain warning signs warrant neuroimaging, but others only warrant imaging in certain clinical contexts. Brain MRI is the neuroimaging modality of choice, though there is a high rate of incidental findings and often does not change headache management. A stepwise approach is essential to avoid missing secondary headaches. There are several differences between adults and children in clinical manifestations of headache. Evaluation and diagnosis of pediatric headache starts with a thorough headache and medical history, family and social history, and identification of risk factors. A thorough physical and neurologic exam is important, with close attention to features that could suggest secondary headache pathology. Neuroimaging and other testing should only be performed if there is concern for secondary headache.


Asunto(s)
Cefalea/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Masculino
18.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 20(12): 69, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896587

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is sometimes assumed that children and adolescents with migraine have a psychiatric or behavioral comorbidity, a belief that can be stigmatizing. This review will examine the recent literature addressing this area to determine if pediatric and adolescent migraineurs are at increased risk for psychiatric comorbidity and to discuss management strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: A large systematic review of pediatric and adolescent studies concluded anxiety and depression were not associated with onset of recurrent headaches. Children with increasing migraine frequency have reduced school attendance. Pediatric migraineurs have mildly lower quality of life (QOL) scores than healthy peers but not abnormally low. Finally, children with higher migraine frequency as well as migraineurs with aura were more likely to report suicidal ideation. Migraine is a primary neurologic disorder. Migraine and psychiatric disorders may be comorbid; however, at this time, it can be difficult to clearly delineate some migraine features from psychiatric diagnoses with the current screening tools available. The majority of pediatric migraineurs do not have behavioral comorbidities; however, when such comorbidities occur, they should be addressed and appropriately managed. We need more accurate ways of delineating psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities from the migraine phenotype.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
19.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 20(5): 31, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27038970

RESUMEN

Infantile colic is a self-limiting disorder of excessive infant crying or fussiness that peaks at 6 weeks of age and typically improves by 3 months of age. The etiology of infantile colic has yet to be definitively elucidated, but there is increasing research to support its relationship to migraine. The aims of this review are to present recent research investigating the connection between infantile colic and migraine. The importance of identifying this connection is useful in reducing invasive and potentially harmful investigations and to identify age appropriate pharmacologic interventions that would be safe in this population.


Asunto(s)
Cólico/tratamiento farmacológico , Diciclomina/uso terapéutico , Dietoterapia , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Simeticona/uso terapéutico , Cólico/complicaciones , Cólico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico
20.
Pediatr Neurol Briefs ; 30(1): 5, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27004139

RESUMEN

Authors from the Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital present a narrative overview of preventive treatment for pediatric and adolescent migraine.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA