Effect of Secukinumab and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors on Humoral Response to BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in Patients With Spondyloarthritis Compared to Immunocompetent Controls.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the humoral response to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine among patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving secukinumab (SEC) compared to those receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and immunocompetent controls. METHODS: Consecutive patients with psoriatic arthritis or axial SpA receiving SEC (n = 37) or TNFi (monotherapy, n = 109; + methotrexate [MTX], n = 16), immunocompetent controls (n = 122), and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving TNFi therapy (controls, n = 50) were vaccinated with 2 or 3 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. We evaluated humoral response, adverse events, and disease activity, and monitored for breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) postvaccination. RESULTS: The 2-dose vaccine regimen induced a comparable seropositive response in all study groups. S1/S2 antibody titers (in binding antibody units/mL; mean [SD]) were higher in the SEC group vs the TNFi + MTX-SpA and TNFi-RA groups (192.5 [68.4] vs 104.6 [46.9], P < 0.001, and 143.1 [81.9], P = 0.004). After 6 months, 96.3%, 96.6%, and 80.9% of the SEC, immunocompetent, and TNFi monotherapy-SpA groups (P = 0.10), respectively; 66.7% of the TNFi + MTX-SpA group (P = 0.03); and 63% of the TNFi-RA group (P = 0.004) remained seropositive. S1/S2 antibody titer decline was steeper in the TNFi groups than the SEC group. After the third dose, 100% of the SpA and immunocompetent and 88.9% of the TNFi-RA (P = 0.25) groups were seropositive. Rate of breakthrough COVID-19 infection was higher in the TNFi groups than in the SEC group (36-37.5% vs 10.8%). No significant between-group differences were observed for postvaccination disease activity and adverse events. CONCLUSION: SEC did not interfere with the immunogenic response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with SpA; however, TNFi therapy was associated with lower S1/S2-antibody titers, faster decline, and higher rate of breakthrough infections.

Efficacy of secukinumab on dactylitis in patients with active psoriatic arthritis from the FUTURE 5 study.

OBJECTIVES: Dactylitis is an important clinical domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) associated with significant burden of disease and impaired function. Post-hoc analysis of the FUTURE 5 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with dactylitis at baseline over 2 years. METHODS: Randomised patients received secukinumab 300mg with loading dose (LD)/150mg LD/150mg without loading dose/placebo. Assessment of dactylitis was based on Leeds Dactylitis Index. Exploratory analyses included resolution of dactylitis based on severity, time to first resolution of dactylitis (Kaplan-Meier estimate) and resolution of dactylitis (heatmap analysis). Clinical efficacy outcomes, composite domains of disease activity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and radiographic progression using van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score were assessed in patients with/without dactylitis at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 389/996 (39%) patients presented with dactylitis at baseline, had more active clinical disease and greater disease activity than those without dactylitis at baseline. Resolution of dactylitis was observed across all treatment groups at Week 104. Improvement in joints, enthesitis, skin psoriasis, nail outcomes, physical function and HRQoL were sustained over 2 years in patients with dactylitis at baseline. With secukinumab treatment, >80% of patients did not show structural radiographic progression. The proportion of non-structural radiographic progressors were comparable across patients with/without dactylitis at baseline with secukinumab treatment over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dactylitis at baseline were associated with higher burden of disease. Secukinumab provided sustained improvements across all clinical outcomes, QoL and inhibition of radiographic progression in PsA patients with dactylitis at baseline over 2 years.

Effect of Secukinumab on Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Inflammatory Biomarkers: Post Hoc Analyses of Pooled Data Across Three Indications.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and, more recently, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are important inflammatory biomarkers predictive of CV disease and CV disease-associated mortality. Here, we report the effect of interleukin (IL)-17A inhibition with secukinumab on CV risk parameters in patients with psoriasis, PsA, and axSpA over 1 year of treatment. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from phase 3/4 secukinumab studies in psoriasis, PsA, and axSpA. CV-related exclusion criteria included uncontrolled hypertension and congestive heart failure. Traditional risk factors assessed were body mass index (BMI) > 25, high fasting glucose and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), and high cholesterol (low-density lipoproteins [LDL], total cholesterol/HDL ratio, and triglycerides). Inflammatory CV risk parameters assessed were hsCRP and NLR. Statistical analysis was descriptive. Subgroup analyses were performed in high-risk patients defined as having baseline hsCRP > 4 mg/L (patients with psoriasis) and > 10 mg/L (patients with PsA/axSpA). RESULTS: In total, 9197 patients from 19 clinical trials (8 in psoriasis, n = 4742; 5 in PsA, n = 2475; 6 in axSpA, n = 1980) were included. All traditional CV risk parameters remained stable in secukinumab-treated patients through 1 year. Secukinumab rapidly reduced both hsCRP and the NLR compared with placebo at week 12 (psoriasis) or week 16 (PsA/axSpA) in the overall population and in high-risk patients (all P < 0.01). This reduction was maintained for at least 1 year of secukinumab therapy in all indications. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab led to a rapid and sustained reduction in hsCRP and the NLR in patients with IMIDs with a high systemic inflammatory burden. Traditional CV risk factors remained stable for at least 1 year in patients with psoriasis, PsA, and axSpA. Taken together, secukinumab had a favorable effect on systemic inflammation without impact on traditional CV risk factors. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01365455, NCT01358578, NCT01406938, NCT01555125, NCT01636687, NCT02752776, NCT02074982, NCT02826603, NCT01752634, NCT01989468, NCT02294227, NCT02404350, NCT02745080, NCT01863732, NCT01649375, NCT02008916, NCT02159053, NCT02896127, NCT02696031.

Secukinumab provides sustained improvement in nail psoriasis, signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis and low rate of radiographic progression in patients with concomitant nail involvement: 2-year results from the Phase III FUTURE 5 study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of secukinumab on nail psoriasis and other psoriatic disease manifestations in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with concomitant nail psoriasis from the FUTURE 5 study. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous secukinumab (300 mg load [300 mg], 150 mg load [150 mg], and 150 mg [no load]) or placebo weekly and then every 4 weeks starting Week 4. Key assessments through Week 104 in this post hoc analysis included modified Nail Psoriasis Severity (mNAPSI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90), resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and radiographic progression (assessed by vdH-mTSS). RESULTS: At baseline, 66.6% patients (663/996) had concomitant nail psoriasis. Baseline characteristics were balanced in the nail subset and comparable with the overall population. Secukinumab reduced mNAPSI score at Week 16 versus placebo: -8.71 (300 mg), -8.95 (150 mg), -7.55 (150 mg no load) versus -2.34 (placebo); all p<0.0001. Mean change from baseline in DLQI at Week 16 was -8.5 (300 mg), -7.4 (150 mg), -7.3 (150 mg no load) versus -2.4 (placebo); all p<0.0001. Overall, the improvements reported at Week 16 sustained through Week 104. The proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change from baseline in vdH-mTSS≤0.5) at Week 104 was 91.9% (300 mg) 78.9% (150 mg), and 82.4% (150 mg no load). CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab provided sustained improvements in nail disease, signs and symptoms of PsA, and a low rate of radiographic progression through 2 years in patients with concomitant nail psoriasis.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-sparing effect of secukinumab in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year results from the MEASURE 2, 3 and 4 phase III trials.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to reduce pain and inflammation, and are considered the cornerstone of pharmacological intervention in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA); however, the long-term use of NSAIDs is debatable due to their restricted therapeutic potential and the risk of side effects and complications. Therefore, reduction in NSAID intake is desirable in r-axSpA patients. Here, we report the long-term NSAID-sparing effect of secukinumab over 4 years in patients with r-axSpA. This post hoc analysis pooled data from 3 secukinumab trials (MEASURE 2-4) for each secukinumab maintenance dose of 150 and 300 mg, regardless of the loading dose regimen being i.v. or s.c. NSAID intake was evaluated prospectively using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID score. Patients with an ASAS-NSAID score > 0 at baseline were analysed. NSAID-sparing endpoints included the mean change in the ASAS-NSAID score, the proportion of patients achieving 50% reduction, and the proportion of patients with an ASAS-NSAID score < 10. Percentages of patients who achieved BASDAI ≤ 2 were also assessed. Overall, 562 patients were included in this pooled analysis (secukinumab: 150 mg, N = 467; 300 mg, N = 95). The mean ASAS-NSAID score decreased with time in both the secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg dose groups. The proportion of patients who achieved 50% reduction in the ASAS-NSAID score and clinically meaningful reduction of ASAS-NSAID score < 10 increased with time in both dose groups and in both low and high NSAID intake patients. The percentage of patients with a clinically relevant improvement (BASDAI ≤ 2) was consistently higher in patients with an ASAS-NSAID score < 10 than in patients with an ASAS-NSAID score ≥ 10. Secukinumab provided sustained, long-term NSAID-sparing effects in patients with r-axSpA for up to 4 years of treatment, as measured using the ASAS-NSAID score. Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01649375 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01649375 ); NCT02008916 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02008916 ); NCT02159053 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02159053 ).

Effects of secukinumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover biomarkers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year data from a phase 3 study, MEASURE 1.

BACKGROUND: Axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is characterized by chronic inflammation and new bone formation in the axial skeleton. On the other hand, bone loss, osteoporosis and an increased risk of vertebral fractures is known to frequently occur in AS. In the MEASURE 1 study, the clinically efficacious interleukin-17A inhibitor secukinumab was shown to have limited radiographic progression through 4 years in patients with active AS. Here we present a post hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of secukinumab on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover biomarkers over 2 years in this study. METHODS: BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. Spinal radiographs performed at baseline and Week 104 were assessed by modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) and analyzed in relation to BMD change, considering baseline syndesmophytes. Bone turnover biomarkers were assessed at baseline and at Weeks 52 or 104. RESULTS: Among 104 patients included in this analysis, 66% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 40.4 (12.3) years. In postmenopausal women and men ≥50 years of age (T-score), the proportion of patients having normal BMD at baseline and Week 104 were 54.5%/54.5% (lumbar spine), 31.6%/55.6% (total hip), and 42.1%/44.4% (femoral neck). Similarly, at baseline, the proportion of patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis was 31.8%/13.6% (lumbar spine), 57.9%/10.5% (total hip), 42.1%/15.8% (femoral neck), and 36.4%/9.1% (lumbar spine), 44.4%/0% (total hip) and 55.6%/0% (femoral neck) at Week 104, respectively. In premenopausal women and men < 50 years of age (Z-score), the proportion of patients having BMD below the expected range for age at baseline and Week 104 were 25.0%/21.2% (lumbar spine), 11.3%/17.8% (total hip), and 9.9%/8.9% (femoral neck). In relation to mSASSS change scores ≥2 over 2 years, the increase in lumbar spine BMD was not related to radiographic progression and syndesmophyte formation. No significant changes were observed in the bone turnover markers over time. CONCLUSION: The high proportion of AS patients with diminished BMD was confirmed in this study. An increase of BMD in the lumbar spine after 2 years of secukinumab treatment in patients with AS was found that was probably unrelated to radiographic progression. No relevant effects of secukinumab on bone turnover biomarkers were documented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MEASURE 1 (post hoc analysis) Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01358175 ; Registered, 23 May 2011.

Achievement of Remission Endpoints with Secukinumab Over 3 Years in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical remission in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been determined using composite indices such as the AS Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS-ID), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria partial remission (ASAS-PR), and low Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to evaluate the proportion of secukinumab-treated patients with AS achieving remission defined based on the ASDAS-ID (score < 1.3), ASAS-PR or BASDAI score ≤ 2. METHODS: The analysis pooled data from the MEASURE 1 and 2 studies over 3 years. The proportion of patients who achieved ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, or BASDAI ≤ 2 with secukinumab was compared with placebo at week 16; results for secukinumab-treated patients were summarized through week 156. Sustainability of each criterion was assessed from week 16 to 156 using shift analysis. The association between each of these criteria and specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life, function, fatigue, and work impairment, was also explored. RESULTS: At week 16, a higher proportion of secukinumab-treated patients versus placebo achieved ASDAS-ID (17.6 vs. 3.5%), ASAS-PR (15.4 vs. 4.1%), or BASDAI ≤ 2 (22.3 vs. 6.4%) criteria (all P < 0.0001), which were sustained through 156 weeks. Shift analysis showed that the majority of secukinumab-treated patients achieving remission at week 16 maintained their status at week 156 (ASDAS-ID, 57.1%; ASAS-PR, 68.0% and BASDAI ≤ 2, 74.3%). Remission was also associated with improved PROs over 156 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab-treated patients maintained ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, or BASDAI ≤ 2 from week 16 up to 3 years. Patients who achieved at least one of the three responses/states, reported improvement in PROs, which suggests an association of clinical remission/ID with PROs in patients with active AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01358175, NCT01863732, and NCT01649375.

Secukinumab efficacy on resolution of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies.

BACKGROUND: Enthesitis is one of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. Patients with enthesitis are associated with worse outcomes than those without enthesitis. The effect of secukinumab on the resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA was explored using pooled data from the FUTURE 2 and 3 studies. METHOD: Assessments of enthesitis through week 104 used the Leeds Enthesitis Index. These post hoc analyses included resolution of enthesitis count (EC = 0), median time to first resolution of enthesitis (Kaplan-Meϊer estimate), and shift analysis (as observed) of baseline EC (1, 2, or 3-6) to full resolution (FR), stable (similar or reduction of EC), or worse (EC > baseline). Efficacy outcomes (ACR, PASI, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and DAS28-CRP) were assessed in patients with or without baseline enthesitis. Results are reported for secukinumab 300 and 150 mg in the overall population and by prior TNFi treatment. RESULTS: A total of 65% (466/712) of patients had baseline enthesitis. In the overall population, FR was achieved as early as week 16 in 65% (300 mg) and 56% (150 mg) versus 44% (placebo) patients, with further improvements to 91% (300 mg) and 88% (150 mg) at week 104. The majority (89%) of patients without enthesitis at baseline maintained this status at week 104. Median days to resolution of EC were shorter with secukinumab 300 and 150 mg versus placebo (57 and 85 vs 167 days, respectively). In patients with EC of 1 or 2, shift analysis from baseline to week 24 showed that more patients achieved FR with secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, whereas no difference between secukinumab and placebo was shown in the more severe patients with EC of 3-6. Increases in proportions of patients with FR were observed with secukinumab irrespective of the severity of EC from baseline to week 104. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were similar in patients with or without enthesitis treated with secukinumab 300 mg. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab provided early and sustained resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA over 2 years. Secukinumab 300 mg provided higher resolution than 150 mg in patients with more severe baseline EC and showed similar overall efficacy in patients with or without enthesitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FUTURE 2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 (date of study registration: December 19, 2012), and EudraCT, 2012-004439-22 (date of study registration: December 12, 2012) FUTURE 3: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989468 (date of study registration: November 21, 2013), and EudraCT, 2013-004002-25 (date of study registration: December 17, 2013).

Impact of baseline C-reactive protein levels on the response to secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis: 3-year pooled data from two phase III studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the magnitude of response to secukinumab treatment over 3 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) grouped by baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in a pooled study of two pivotal phase III studies: MEASURE 1 (NCT01358175) and MEASURE 2 (NCT01649375). METHODS: This post hoc analysis pooled data from all patients with available baseline CRP in the two studies who received subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg (approved dose; N=197) or placebo (N=195). Assessed efficacy endpoints included Assessments of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20/40, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), BASDAI50, AS Disease Activity Score inactive disease and ASAS partial remission among patients grouped by baseline CRP based on central laboratory cut-off <5 mg/L (normal) or ≥5 mg/L (elevated) and a cut-off <10 mg/L or ≥10 mg/L. RESULTS: At baseline, 36.5% (143/392) patients had normal and 63.5% (249/392) had elevated CRP. At week 16, ASAS20/40 response rates were higher for secukinumab versus placebo in normal (56.9%/34.7% vs 28.2%/7.0%; p<0.01/p<0.001) and in elevated (63.2%/42.4% vs 29.0%/15.3%; both p<0.0001) CRP groups. Improvement was reported for all outcomes (p<0.05) in both groups, except for ASAS partial remission in the normal CRP group, where a numerical difference 12.5% vs 2.8%, p=0.07) was observed. Similar trends of improvement were observed in the <10 and ≥10 mg/L groups across all efficacy outcomes at week 16. Treatment responses to secukinumab in all CRP groups further improved over 156 weeks. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab 150 mg demonstrated rapid and sustained efficacy in patients with AS irrespective of baseline CRP, with greater magnitude of response in patients with more elevated CRP.

Prevalence and distribution of iron overload in patients with transfusion-dependent anemias differs across geographic regions: results from the CORDELIA study.

OBJECTIVES: The randomized comparison of deferasirox to deferoxamine for myocardial iron removal in patients with transfusion-dependent anemias (CORDELIA) gave the opportunity to assess relative prevalence and body distribution of iron overload in screened patients. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 10 yr with transfusion-dependent anemias from 11 countries were screened. Data were summarized descriptively, overall and across regions. RESULTS: Among 925 patients (99.1% with ß-thalassemia major; 98.5% receiving prior chelation; mean age 19.2 yr), 36.7% had myocardial iron overload (myocardial T2* ≤ 20 ms), 12.1% had low left ventricular ejection fraction. Liver iron concentration (LIC) (mean 25.8 mg Fe/g dw) and serum ferritin (median 3702 ng/mL) were high. Fewer patients in the Middle East (ME; 28.5%) had myocardial T2* ≤ 20 ms vs. patients in the West (45.9%) and Far East (FE, 40.9%). Patients in the West had highest myocardial iron burden, but lowest LIC (26.9% with LIC < 7 mg Fe/g dw) and serum ferritin. Among patients with normal myocardial iron, a higher proportion of patients from the ME and FE had LIC ≥ 15 than < 7 mg Fe/g dw (ME, 56.7% vs. 17.2%; FE, 78.6% vs. 7.8%, respectively), a trend which was less evident in the West (44.6% vs. 33.9%, respectively). Transfusion and chelation practices differed between regions. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of substantial myocardial and liver iron burden across regions revealed a need for optimization of effective, convenient iron chelation regimens. Significant regional variation exists in myocardial and liver iron loading that are not well explained; improved understanding of factors contributing to differences in body iron distribution may be of clinical benefit.

Clinical relevance of health-related quality of life outcomes with darifenacin.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical relevance of changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) treated with darifenacin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from three randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose, 12-week studies. After 2-week washout, treatment-free or placebo run-in periods, patients with OAB (n = 1059; 85% women; age 19-88 years) were randomized to 12 weeks' treatment with darifenacin controlled-release 7.5 mg (n = 337) or 15 mg once daily (n = 334) or placebo (n = 388). The King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) was used to assess HRQoL at baseline and Week 12. The clinical significance of changes in KHQ domain scores was assessed using the concept of minimum important difference (MID), using two different methods. RESULTS: Darifenacin treatment was associated with significantly greater improvements than placebo in six primary KHQ domain scores known to be of importance to patients with OAB. In addition, a significantly greater proportion of darifenacin-treated patients met or exceeded reference MID vs placebo in these domains (Incontinence Impact, Severity Measures, Role Limitations, Social Limitations, Emotions and Physical Limitations; P = 0.01). In darifenacin-treated patients, there were significant correlations between the reductions in incontinence episodes per week and improvements in KHQ scores (P < 0.001). The strongest correlations were in the Incontinence Impact, Social Limitations, Role Limitations, Severity Measures and Emotions domains. CONCLUSIONS: Darifenacin treatment was associated with significant, clinically relevant improvements in HRQoL in patients with OAB, shown using the concept of MID to interpret change in KHQ scores.

Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status.

BACKGROUND: The biological basis for the superior efficacy of neoadjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive locally advanced breast cancer was investigated by analyzing tumor proliferation and expression of estrogen-regulated genes before and after the initiation of therapy. METHODS: Tumor samples were obtained at baseline and at the end of treatment from 185 patients participating in a double blind randomized Phase III study of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These paired specimens were simultaneously analyzed for Ki67, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), trefoil factor 1 (PS2), HER1 (epidermal growth factor receptor), and HER2 (ErbB2 or neu) by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The treatment-induced reduction in geometric mean Ki67 was significantly greater with letrozole (87%) than tamoxifen (75%; analysis of covariance P = 0.0009). Differences in the average Ki67 reduction were particularly marked for ER-positive tumors that overexpressed HER1 and/or HER2 (88 versus 45%, respectively; P = 0.0018). Twenty-three of 92 tumors (25%) on tamoxifen and 14 of 93 on letrozole (15%) showed a paradoxical increase in Ki67 with treatment, and the majority of these cases was HER1/2 negative. Letrozole, but not tamoxifen, significantly reduced expression of the estrogen-regulated proteins PgR and trefoil factor 1, regardless of HER1/2 status (P < 0.0001). ER down-regulation occurred with both agents, although levels decreased more with tamoxifen (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Letrozole inhibited tumor proliferation to a greater extent than tamoxifen. The molecular basis for this advantage appears complex but includes possible tamoxifen agonist effects on the cell cycle in both HER1/2+ and HER1/2- tumors. A pattern of continued proliferation despite appropriate down-regulation of PgR expression with estrogen deprivation or tamoxifen was also documented. This observation suggests the estrogenic regulation of proliferation and PgR expression may be dissociated in endocrine therapy resistant cells.

Dose proportionality study of four doses of an estradiol transdermal system, Estradot.

OBJECTIVES: To establish dose proportionality among four doses of a new estradiol transdermal system (ETS), Estradot, in healthy postmenopausal women and to evaluate the wear and irritation properties of the ETS. METHODS: In an open label, single-dose, randomized, four-period crossover study, healthy postmenopausal women, age range 44-64 years, wore four different sizes of Estradot, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0 and 10.0 cm(2) that were expected to release estradiol at 0.025, 0.0375, 0.05 and 0.10 mg/day, respectively. Each patch was worn for 84 h with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Blood samples were drawn prior to medication, then at various time points following patch application. Serum concentrations of estradiol and estrone were determined by validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GS/MS) methods. Skin irritation, (erythema and edema), patch adherence and local skin reaction were assessed and recorded following patch removal. After removal, the patches were assayed for residual estradiol to estimate the apparent dose delivered. RESULTS: The baseline-corrected, mean maximum serum estradiol concentrations (C(max)) for the 2.5, 3.75, 5.0 and 10.0 cm(2) patches were 24.0, 34.8, 50.1 and 96.0 pg/ml, respectively, and for estrone were 10.5, 15.2, 21.8 and 41.0 pg/ml, respectively. The four Estradot patches adhered well during the study. No significant skin irritation was observed with any of the four treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a dose proportional relationship of increased serum concentrations of estradiol with increasing size of the Estradot patches. The four doses of Estradot demonstrated good systemic and local skin tolerability.

Effect of low-dose transdermal E2/NETA on the reduction of postmenopausal bone loss in women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a continuous-combined transdermal patch (estradiol/ norethisterone acetate [E(2)/NETA] 25/125; Estragest TTS, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) in the reduction of bone loss in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: In a 96-week, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel study, 124 healthy women with an intact uterus more than 4 years after menopause received either transdermal continuous-combined E(2)/NETA (0.025/0.125 mg/day) or placebo patch for 24 treatment cycles; diet was normalized for calcium intake. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) ranged from 0.969 to 0.805 g/cm2 with a mean annual BMD decrement ranging from 3% to 8% within the last 24 months. BMD at lumbar spine L(2)-L(4) (postero-anterior) and femur were assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry after 6, 12, and 24 cycles. Efficacy variables included measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover (3, 6, 12, and 24 months). RESULTS: BMD at lumbar spine was significantly higher at all time points in the E(2)/NETA group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Significant increases in BMD (P < 0.0008) from baseline were observed at all sites after 24 months in the E(2)/NETA group compared with placebo, which demonstrated a decrease from baseline. At endpoint, statistically significant decrements in the values of bone remodeling markers were observed (P < 0.05) with E(2)/NETA. CONCLUSIONS: E(2)/NETA 25/125 Estragest TTS was more effective than placebo in reducing the activation frequency of bone remodeling and in preventing bone loss at the spine and hip. Effects on the hip were similar to those observed for higher doses of estrogen.

Evaluation of irritation and sensitisation of two 50 microg/day oestrogen patches.

OBJECTIVES: To comparatively assess the irritation and sensitisation of the Estradot transdermal oestrogen patch, in healthy postmenopausal women, using the Menorest transdermal oestrogen patch, as a comparator. METHODS: In an open-label, single-centre, randomised, active-treatment, within-patient controlled study, 208 healthy postmenopausal women, age range 40-70 years, received and completed simultaneous treatment with a 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Estradot) and a 14.5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Menorest). The treatment was given for 72 h, then 96 h, for eight successive applications during an induction phase, and for 72 h during a challenge phase. There was a 14-day resting period between phases. Skin irritation (measured by erythema on a scale of 0-4), topical sensitisation, patch adherence and local skin reaction, were assessed and recorded immediately before or after removal of each patch, as appropriate. RESULTS: Most patients experienced a significant difference in irritation with Menorest than with Estradot (P < 0.0001) at the end of the induction phase. Patch loss was also significantly higher for Menorest as compared to Estradot (P = 0.0253) at the end of the induction phase. Most incidences of erythema were classified as slight (score of 1), and there was no significant difference in the percentage of topical sensitisation, or in the incidence of local skin reactions between Estradot and Menorest. Patch loss was low for both systems. CONCLUSIONS: Estradot demonstrates reduced skin irritation, superior adhesion and a lower rate of patch loss compared to Menorest.