Prostatitis: A Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pathologies of the prostate in men are one of the most prevalent clinical conditions today [1]. Specifically, pelvic inflammatory disease such as prostatitis can cause symptoms and syndromes different from urological ones, such as bowel or nervous system manifestations. This has a largely negative impact on the quality of life of patients. Therefore, it is convenient to know and update the information about the therapeutic approach to prostatitis, which is a challenge that involves different medical specialties. The aim of this article is to provide summarized and focused evidence to help in the therapeutic approach of patients with prostatitis. A computer-based search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was used to perform a comprehensive literature review on prostatitis, with special interest in recent findings and latest therapeutic guideline recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent discoveries about the epidemiology and clinical classifications of prostatitis seem to incur in an increasingly individualized and directed management, with the aim of covering all the confluent factors in prostatic inflammatory pathology. In addition, the role of new drugs and combination with phytotherapy open up a range of new treatment possibilities, although future randomized studies will be necessary to better understand how to use all treatment modalities. Despite all the knowledge acquired about the pathophysiology of prostate diseases, and due to their interrelation with other pelvic systems and organs, there are still gaps that make it difficult for us to provide an optimal and standardized treatment in many of our patients. Being aware of the influence of all the factors potentially involved in prostate symptoms is crucial for a correct diagnosis and establishing an effective treatment plan.

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for variant histology bladder cancer: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence about the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC) in radical cystectomy (RC) candidates affected by variant histology (VH) bladder cancer. METHODS: A review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed, Scopus databases in May 2020. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for this systematic review. Keywords used were 'bladder cancer', 'bladder carcinoma', 'bladder tumour' and 'bladder cancer variants' and 'neoadjuvant chemotherapy'. Only original articles in English published after 2000 and reporting oncological outcomes a series of more than five patients with VH were included. We excluded series in which the oncological outcomes of patients with pUC and VH were undistinguishable. RESULTS: The literature search identified 2231 articles. A total of 51 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, with 17 eventually considered for systematic review, for a cohort of 450,367 patients, of which 5010 underwent NAC + RC. The median age at initial diagnosis ranged from 61 to 71 years. Most patients received cisplatin-gemcitabine, methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin, or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Only one study reported results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The median follow-up ranged from 1 to 120 months. The results showed that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is less sensitive to NAC than pUC and that SCC predicts poorer prognosis. NAC was found to be a valid approach in treating small cell carcinoma and may have potential benefit in micropapillary carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: NAC showed the best oncological outcomes in small cell variants and micropapillary carcinoma, while NAC survival benefit for SCC and adenocarcinoma variants needs further studies. Drawing definite considerations on the efficacy of NAC in VH is complicated due to the heterogeneity of present literature. Present results need to be confirmed in randomised controlled trials.

Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: Review of imaging agents, modalities, and current status. / Técnicas de imagen molecular en el cáncer de próstata: revisión de radiofármacos, modalidades y evidencia actual.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical course of Prostate cancer (PCa) are markedly diverse, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive disseminated disease. Molecular imaging techniques are playing an increasing role in early PCa detection, staging and disease recurrence. There are some molecular imaging modalities, radiotracers agents and its performance are important in current clinical practice PCa. OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the latest information regarding molecular imaging of PCa and is designed to assist urologists with ordering and interpreting these modalities and different radiotracers for different patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed-based literature search was conducted up to September 2019. We selected the most recent and relevant original articles, metanalysis and reviews that have provided relevant information to guide molecular imaging modalities and radiotracers use. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In this review, we discuss 3 main molecular imaging modalities and 7 radiotracer technologies available. CONCLUSIONS: The use molecular imaging modalities and radiotracers has a unique role in biochemical recurrence and diagnosis of ganglionar and bone progression of PCa. In the present time, no one of these molecular imaging modalities can be recommended over the classical work-up of abdominopelvic CT scan and bone scan, and large-scale and multi-institutional studies are required to validate the efficacy and cost utility of these new technologies.