RESUMEN
Background: Qalsody (tofersen), an intrathecal therapy (IT) antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), was granted accelerated approval by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of SOD1-mediated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) on April 25, 2023. Academic centers need to be prepared for expedited drug delivery. The purpose of this model was to predict the number of SOD1-ALS patients whom we expect to see at our center at the time of Qalsody approval and to use it to extrapolate to a model for a hypothetical sporadic IT ALS therapy. Recent Findings: We predicted that 6 symptomatic and 14 presymptomatic SOD1 patients would come to our center, whereas a sporadic therapy would generate 108 patients, creating excess office visits, lumbar punctures, and genetic counseling visits. Implications for Practice: As new therapies for neurologic diseases come to market, preparing for increased office volume and complex drug delivery are essential for optimal care.
RESUMEN
In behavioral-variant frontotemporal degeneration (bvFTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the presence of secondary motor or cognitive-behavioral symptoms, respectively, is associated with shorter survival. However, factors influencing the risk and hazard of secondary symptom development remain largely unexplored. We performed a retrospective evaluation of the entire disease course of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n=172) and behavioral-variant frontotemporal degeneration (n=69). Only individuals who had neuropathological confirmation of a TDP-43 proteinopathy at autopsy or had a C9orf72 repeat expansion were included for analysis. We examined the odds and hazard of secondary symptom development and assessed whether they were modified by the presence of a C9orf72 repeat expansion or initial clinical syndrome. Binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses revealed increased odds (OR=4.25 [1.97-9.14]; p<0.001) and an increased hazard (HR= 4.77 [2.33-9.79], p<0.001) for developing secondary symptoms in C9orf72 expansion carriers compared to noncarriers. Initial clinical syndrome (bvFTD or ALS), age at symptom onset, and sex were not associated with development of secondary motor or cognitive-behavioral symptoms. These findings highlight the need for clinician vigilance to detect the onset of secondary motor symptoms and cognitive-behavioral in patients carrying a C9orf72 repeat expansion, regardless of initial clinical syndrome, and may warrant dual referrals between cognitive and neuromuscular clinics in these cases.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Genetic testing is now the standard of care for many neurologic conditions. Health care disparities are unfortunately widespread in the US health care system, but disparities in the utilization of genetic testing for neurologic conditions have not been studied. We tested the hypothesis that access to and results of genetic testing vary according to race, ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status, and insurance status for adults with neurologic conditions. METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data from patients who underwent genetic evaluation and testing through our institution's neurogenetics program. We tested for differences between demographic groups in 3 steps of a genetic evaluation pathway: (1) attending a neurogenetic evaluation, (2) completing genetic testing, and (3) receiving a diagnostic result. We compared patients on this genetic evaluation pathway with the population of all neurology outpatients at our institution, using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2022, a total of 128,440 patients were seen in our outpatient neurology clinics and 2,540 patients underwent genetic evaluation. Black patients were less than half as likely as White patients to be evaluated (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, p < 0.001), and this disparity was similar after controlling for other demographic factors in multivariable analysis. Patients from the least wealthy quartile of zip codes were also less likely to be evaluated (OR 0.67, p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent evaluation, there were no disparities in the likelihood of completing genetic testing, nor in the likelihood of a diagnostic result after adjusting for age. Analyses restricted to specific indications for genetic testing supported these findings. DISCUSSION: We observed unequal utilization of our clinical neurogenetics program for patients from marginalized and minoritized demographic groups, especially Black patients. Among patients who do undergo evaluation, all groups benefit similarly from genetic testing when it is indicated. Understanding and removing barriers to accessing genetic testing will be essential to health care equity and optimal care for all patients with neurologic disorders.
