Electrical Burns During Fruit Harvesting.

Electrocutions during tree trimming or fruit harvesting are occasionally reported in the public media, but the actual incidence is unknown. Some fruit trees (eg, mango and avocado) can exceed 30 feet, with dense foliage concealing the fruit and overlying power lines so burns associated with harvesting these fruits are often exacerbated with falls. However, there are limited data on this subject. To fill this gap, we provide some of the first information on this unique injury pattern. All electrocutions from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed at an ABA-verified burn center. Demographics, injury patterns, and complications were analyzed. Of 97 electrocutions, 22 (23%) were associated with fruit procurement. This population was aged 43 ± 14 years, 95% (n = 21) male, injury severity score of 15 ± 13, and total body surface area burned 4% [1%-9%]. Third-degree burns were present in 36% (n = 8). ICU admission was required in 59% (n = 13) and 39% of the survivors required operative interventions for the burn. Compartment syndrome occurred in 18% (n = 4) and 14% (n = 3) patients required amputations. Falls complicated the care in 50% (n = 11), with associated head, chest, and/or extremity trauma. Mortality was 32% (n = 7), with three patients presenting dead on arrival. All but 3 injuries occurred between June and December, coinciding with mango and avocado season. Electrocution during fruit picking is a seasonal injury often exacerbated by falls. Management is challenging, and favorable outcome depends on recognition of the complexity of the polytrauma.

Use of a warming catheter to achieve normothermia in large burns.

Maintaining burn patients' body temperature during surgery is a significant challenge. Although increasing the ambient operating room (OR) temperature and other passive rewarming methods help, such measures have limited effectiveness and prove taxing on OR personnel. Initial studies indicate that an intravascular warming catheter may improve and sustain burn patient body temperatures. The authors hypothesize that the warming catheter is similarly effective at maintaining normothermia despite a lower OR temperature than in a cohort of matched control burn patients. This is a retrospective case-control study involving patients with major burns treated between January 2006 and June 2011. Cases received an intravascular warming catheter, whereas controls receive traditional temperature conserving interventions. As the catheters maintained body temperature, the room temperature was gradually lowered to normal. Twenty-three patients were involved in 31 cases using the catheter, compared with 39 controls in 62 surgeries. The mean temperature deviation for each catheter group was -0.76 ± 1°C and -0.80 ± 0.9°C for the control group. Given 20-minute intervals throughout the operations, the mean patient temperature for cases and controls never deviated by more than 1°C. OR staff satisfaction has improved with decreased room temperatures. An intravenous warming catheter reliably maintained patient core body temperature during surgery. To date, this is the largest cohort study of such a catheter among burn patients. This system may be more effective than current warming techniques, with the potential to decrease the total number of procedures and the time to complete wound closure.

A new algorithm to allow early prediction of mortality in elderly burn patients.

INTRODUCTION: The elderly are the fastest growing population segment, and particularly susceptible to burns. Predicting outcomes for these patients remains difficult. Our objective was to identify early predictors of mortality in elderly burn patients. METHODS: Our Burn Center's prospective database was reviewed for burn patients 60+ treated in the past 10 years. Predictor variables were identified by correlative analysis and subsequently entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis examining survival to discharge. RESULTS: 203 patients of 1343 (15%) were eligible for analysis. The average age was 72 ± 10 (range 60-102) and the average total body surface area (TBSA) burned was 23 ± 18% (range 1-95). Age, TBSA, base deficit, pO(2), respiratory rate, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and Revised Trauma Score (RTS, based on systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and GCS) all correlated with mortality (p ≤0 .05). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, a model with age, TBSA and RTS was calculated, demonstrating: In this model, ß(0) is a constant that equals -8.32. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting outcomes in elderly burn patients is difficult. A model using age, TBSA, and RTS can, immediately upon patient arrival, help identify patients with decreased chances of survival, further guiding end-of-life decisions.

Tracking non-burn center care: what you don't know may surprise you.

The American Burn Association publishes a list of defined criteria for patients who require admission or transfer to a burn center. This study examines the extent to which those criteria are observed within a regional burn network. Hospital discharge data for 2008 were obtained for all hospitals within the South Florida regional burn network. Patients with International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision discharge diagnoses for burns were reviewed, and their triage destination was compared with the burn triage referral criteria to determine whether patients were inappropriately triaged. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Four hundred ninety-eight burn admissions were documented to non-burn center center hospitals, 269 (54%) of which were deemed inappropriate by burn triage referral criteria. Burn center patients had greater length of stay when compared with non-burn center patients (14 vs 7 days), but a greater percentage were discharged home for self-care (88 vs 57%). Thirty-three percent of the inappropriate admissions were in a neighboring county, whereas 27% were in the same county where the burn center is located. Inappropriate burn patient triage may be occurring to more than half of the burn patients within our regional burn network despite better functional outcomes at the burn center. This may be because of a lack of knowledge regarding triage criteria, patient insurance status, or other factors. Further studies are necessary to fully characterize the problem and implement education or incentives to encourage appropriate burn patient triage.