RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The optimal duration of magnesium administration postpartum for prevention of eclampsia has not yet been established. Our objective was to investigate the effect of early discontinuation of postpartum magnesium on the rates of postpartum eclampsia compared to continuation for 24-hours postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Searches were performed using keywords related to "preeclampsia" and "magnesium sulfate" from inception of database until August 2023. Randomized controlled trials of women with preeclampsia were included if they received magnesium prior to delivery and were randomized to early discontinuation versus 24-hours of magnesium postpartum. The primary outcome was the rate of postpartum eclampsia. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 2183 women were included with five different magnesium administration time frames. In total, seven patients with postpartum eclampsia were reported in three studies. Eclampsia rates were not different between the two groups (5/1088 (0.5 %) after early discontinuation, versus 2/1095 (0.2 %) in the 24-hour group; RR 2.25, 95 % CI 0.5-9.9, I2 = 0 %, 8 studies, 2183 participants). A number needed to treat was calculated; 374 women would need to receive 24-hours of magnesium postpartum to prevent one episode of postpartum eclampsia. The early discontinuation group had a significant decrease in time to ambulation (-9.1 h, 95 % CI -14.7 - (-3.6), I2 = 98 %, 3 studies, 1509 participants) and breastfeeding (-8.4 h, 95 % CI -12.0 - (-4.8), I2 = 98 %, 2 studies, 1397 participants). CONCLUSIONS: Early magnesium discontinuation postpartum, usually ≤6 h or none at all, did not significantly increase the rate of postpartum eclampsia, however this study is likely underpowered to demonstrate a difference. The number needed to treat is similar to the number needed to treat for antepartum preeclampsia without severe features, for which magnesium is not recommended. The largest proportion of women did not receive magnesium postpartum after receiving at least 8 h of magnesium intrapartum (e.g., loading and maintenance dose). Thus, it is reasonable to consider not using magnesium postpartum, particularly if a woman has received similar adequate dose prior to delivery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) protocols improve patient safety and reduce utilization of blood products; however, few data exist on sustainability of PPH checklist use, how use affects care delivery, and variation of use among patient subgroups. This study aimed to (1) examine compliance with PPH checklist use during vaginal deliveries, (2) evaluate whether checklist use varied by patient and/or care team characteristics, and (3) evaluate whether checklist use was associated with increased use of recommended medications/interventions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a quality improvement study performed from April 2021 through June 2023. A multidisciplinary team developed a revised PPH checklist and used quality improvement methodology to increase checklist use following vaginal birth. Data were collected from medical records and clinician survey. Control charts were generated to track checklist use and evaluate special cause variation. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate variation in medications/interventions and across subgroups. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 342 cases of PPH at the time of vaginal birth. The checklist was used in 67% of PPH cases during the 20-month period after implementation in a setting where no checklist was previously being used. We found no statistically significant differences in checklist use by patient or health care team characteristics. Use of tranexamic acid, carboprost, and misoprostol were significantly associated with checklist use. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated successful implementation of a checklist protocol where no checklist was previously being used, with sustained use in an average of 67% of PPH cases over 20 months. Checklist use was consistent across subgroups and was associated with higher use of interventions shown to lower blood loss. KEY POINTS: · Our study showed sustainability of PPH checklist use over a 20-month period.. · PPH checklist use was associated with increased use of interventions known to reduce blood loss.. · Checklist was used consistently across patient subgroups; may help address inequities in obstetric outcomes..
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the significant disruption and health implications of preterm preeclampsia with severe features for birthing people, little is known about how the system of postpartum care might be strengthened for affected families. Multidisciplinary cardio-obstetric clinics are emerging; however, there is limited research on patient and healthcare provider perspectives. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient and healthcare provider perspectives of services in a cardio-obstetric clinic following preterm preeclampsia with severe features. STUDY DESIGN: Individuals who experienced preterm preeclampsia with severe features and presented to a cardio-obstetric clinic were approached for study participation. Providers were approached if they provided postpartum care to patients with preterm preeclampsia with severe features and considered a referral to the cardio-obstetric clinic. Participants completed a remotely conducted, semistructured interview between March 2022 and April 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and checked for accuracy. Responses were inductively coded for content analysis around the study questions of clinical referrals, patient education, visit expectations, and care coordination in relation to ambulatory clinical services. RESULTS: Twenty participants (n=10 patients and n=10 providers) completed interviews. Healthcare system navigation was difficult, particularly in the context of postpartum needs. When patients are informed about their diagnosis, the information could both increase anxiety and be useful for long-term healthcare planning. Language concordant care did not always occur, and both patients and providers described gaps in quality services. Within the theme of responsibility, patients described needing to be vigilant, and providers recognized the gaps in referral and care coordination systems. Comprehensible patient education provided with birthing parents' companions and enhanced systems for care coordination were areas for further improvement in providing postpartum cardio-obstetric care following preterm preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study identified patients' struggles with a confusing postpartum healthcare system and captured providers' concerns about maintaining consistent care and improving access to long-term healthcare services to improve outcomes for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.
Asunto(s)
Atención Posnatal , Preeclampsia , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Preeclampsia/terapia , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Adulto , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Derivación y Consulta , Personal de Salud/psicología , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The United States has seen a significant rise in maternal mortality and morbidity associated with cardiovascular disease over the past 4 decades. Contributing factors may include an increasing number of parturients with comorbid conditions, a higher rate of pregnancy among women of advanced maternal age, and more patients with congenital heart disease who survive into childbearing age and experiencing pregnancy. In response, national medical organizations have recommended the creation of multidisciplinary obstetric-cardiac teams, also known as pregnancy heart teams, to provide comprehensive preconception counseling and coordinated pregnancy management that extend through the postpartum period. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the development and implementation of a pregnancy heart team for parturients with cardiac disease at a southeastern United States tertiary hospital. STUDY DESIGN: This was a qualitative study that was conducted among healthcare team members involved during the pregnancy heart team formation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between April and May 2022, professionally transcribed, and the responses were thematically coded for categories and themes using constructs from The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Themes identified included intentional collaboration to improve outpatient and inpatient coordination through earlier awareness of patients who meet the criteria and via documented care planning. The pregnancy heart team united clinicians around best practices and coordination to promote the success and safety of pregnancies and not only to minimize maternal health risks. Developing longitudinal care plans was critical among the pathway team to build on collective expertise and to provide clarity for those on shift to reduce hesitancy and achieve timely, vetted practices without additional consults. Establishing a proactive approach of specialists offering their perspectives was viewed as positively contributing to a culture of speaking up. Barriers to the successful development and sustainability of the pregnancy heart team included unmet administrative needs and clinician turnover within a context of shortages in staffing and high workload. CONCLUSION: This study described the process of developing and implementing a pregnancy heart team at 1 institution, thereby offering insights for future multidisciplinary care for maternal cardiac patients. Establishing pregnancy heart teams can enhance quality care for high-risk patients, foster learning and collaboration among physician and nursing specialties, and improve coordination to manage complex maternal cardiac cases.
Asunto(s)
Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Sudeste de Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Adulto , Desarrollo de Programa/métodosRESUMEN
Our objective was to identify birth hospitalization severe maternal morbidity (SMM) diagnoses that were also coded during prior encounters and, thus, potentially falsely carried forward as de novo SMM events. This retrospective cohort study included pregnant patients with births between 2016 and 2020. We applied the SMM algorithm to the birth hospitalization and encounters occurring prepregnancy, antepartum, and postpartum. The primary outcome was the rate of SMM diagnoses recorded during the birth hospitalization that were also coded on previous encounters. There were 1,380 (1.8%) birthing patients with SMM. Of patients with SMM codes at the birth hospitalization, 19.0% had the same SMM code during a prior encounter. Certain SMM events may be prone to carry-forward errors and may not signify a de novo birth hospitalization event.
Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitalización , Hospitales , MorbilidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary hypertension have a high risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. It is unknown if a trial of labor carries a lower risk of morbidity in these patients compared to a planned cesarean delivery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of delivery mode with severe maternal morbidity events during delivery hospitalization among patients with pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Premier inpatient administrative database. Patients delivering ≥25 weeks gestation from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020, and with pulmonary hypertension were included. The primary analysis compared intended vaginal delivery (ie, trial of labor) to intended cesarean delivery (intention to treat analysis). A sensitivity analysis was conducted comparing vaginal delivery to cesarean delivery (as treated analysis). The primary outcome was nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion (4 or more units) and readmission to the delivery hospital within 90 days from discharge from delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 727 deliveries. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in nontransfusion morbidity between intended vaginal delivery and intended cesarean delivery groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.15). In secondary analyses, intended cesarean delivery was not associated with blood transfusion (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.50) or readmission within 90 days (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14). In the sensitivity analysis, cesarean delivery was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of nontransfusion morbidity compared to vaginal delivery (aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.54-3.93), a 3-fold higher risk of blood transfusion (aOR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.17-7.99), and a 2-fold higher risk of readmission within 90 days (aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09-4.46) compared to vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension, a trial of labor was not associated with a higher risk of morbidity compared to an intended cesarean delivery. One-third of patients who required an intrapartum cesarean delivery had a morbidity event, demonstrating the increased risk of adverse events in this group.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/epidemiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Cesárea/efectos adversos , PartoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women with cardiomyopathies are at risk for pregnancy complications. The optimal mode of delivery in these patients is guided by expert opinion and limited small studies. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to examine the association of delivery mode with severe maternal morbidity events during delivery hospitalization and readmissions among patients with cardiomyopathies. METHODS: The Premier inpatient administrative database was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with a diagnosis of a cardiomyopathy. Utilizing a target trial emulation strategy, the primary analysis compared outcomes among patients exposed to intended vaginal delivery vs intended cesarean delivery (intention to treat). A secondary analysis compared outcomes among patients who delivered vaginally vs by cesarean (as-treated). Outcomes examined were nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during the delivery hospitalization, blood transfusion, and readmission. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2,921 deliveries. In the primary analysis (intention to treat), there was no difference in nontransfusion morbidity (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.91-1.51), blood transfusion (aOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.81-1.98), or readmission (aOR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.73-1.44) between intended vaginal delivery and intended cesarean delivery. In the as-treated analysis, cesarean delivery was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of nontransfusion morbidity (aOR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.85-3.22) and blood transfusion (aOR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.34-3.81) when compared with vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiomyopathies, a trial of labor does not confer a higher risk of maternal morbidity, blood transfusion, or readmission compared with planned cesarean delivery.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Parto Obstétrico , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cardiomiopatías/epidemiología , Cardiomiopatías/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral absence of a pulmonary artery (UAPA) is a rare congenital malformation associated with hemoptysis, pulmonary hypertension, and infection. Little is known about the impact on pregnancy outcomes. We sought to synthesize the existing literature on pregnancy outcomes in patients with maternal UAPA. STUDY DESIGN: We report a case of maternal UAPA and performed a systematic review of the existing literature. Articles in English reporting pregnancy outcomes among women with unilateral absence or hypoplasia of the pulmonary artery were included. Articles were reviewed at the abstract level and, if eligible, at the full-text level by two independent reviewers with disagreements adjudicated by a third reviewer. Data were abstracted by two independent reviewers. Outcomes of interest were mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, intensive care admission, maternal death, and length of stay. Summary statistics for each outcome are presented. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, including the presented case, reporting outcomes in 22 pregnancies impacted by maternal UAPA. Median age at diagnosis was 21 years. Concurrent cardiac comorbidities were reported in 6/13 (46.2%) with pulmonary hypertension in 5/20 (25%) of cases where this information was reported. We observed high rates of preterm birth (4/12, 33.3%), cesarean delivery (10/15, 66.7%), and operative vaginal delivery (2/5, 40.0%). There was one maternal death occurring in the immediate postpartum period for a mortality rate of 4.5%. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a comprehensive review of existing literature on maternal UAPA. Our findings suggest increased rates of adverse outcomes and underscore the importance of early diagnosis, identification of pulmonary hypertension, and multidisciplinary care. KEY POINTS: · There may be increased adverse outcomes in maternal UAPA.. · Concurrent cardiac abnormalities are common in maternal UAPA.. · Early diagnosis, identification of pulmonary hypertension, and multidisciplinary care are important..
RESUMEN
Unacceptably high rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States and stark racial disparities in outcomes are generating efforts to improve both research capacity and quality improvement in obstetrical care. Comprehensive, high-quality datasets on which to build these efforts are crucial to the success of obstetrical quality improvement efforts. However, existing data sources in obstetrics have notable limitations. Other medical and surgical specialties have addressed similar challenges through the creation of national registries, and we argue that obstetrics must take the same approach to improve outcomes. In this article, we summarized the current availability and limitations of large-scale data in obstetrics research and compared the data with registries developed in other specialties. Moreover, we have outlined the guiding principles for the development of a national obstetrics registry and have proposed future directions.
Asunto(s)
Obstetricia , Embarazo , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Grupos Raciales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine endorse checklist use to improve obstetric care. However, there is limited research into development, implementation, and sustained use of perinatal emergency checklists to inform individual institutions. This study aimed to investigate the development and implementation of perinatal emergency checklists in diverse hospital settings in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted individually with clinicians from three health care systems. The participants developed and implemented institution-tailored perinatal emergency checklists. Interview transcriptions were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: The study sites included two health care systems and one individual hospital. Delivery volumes ranged from 3,500 to 48,000 deliveries a year. Interviews were conducted with all 10 participants approached. Checklists for 19 perinatal emergencies were developed at the three health care systems. Ten of the checklist topics were the same at all three institutions. Participants described the checklists as improving patient care during crises. The tools were viewed as opportunities to promote a shared mental model across clinical roles, to reduce redundancy and coordinate obstetric crisis management. Checklist were developed in small groups. Implementation was facilitated by those who developed the checklists. Participants agreed that simulation was essential for checklist refinement and effective use by response teams. Barriers to implementation included limited clinician availability. There was also an opportunity to strengthen integration of checklists workflow early in perinatal emergencies. Participants articulated that culture change took time, active practice, persistence, reinforcement, and process measurement. CONCLUSION: This study outlines processes to develop, implement, and sustain perinatal emergency checklists at three institutions. Participants agreed that multiple, parallel implementation tactics created the culture shift for integration. The overview and specific Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research components may be used to inform adaptation and sustainability for others considering implementing perinatal emergency checklists. KEY POINTS: · Perinatal emergency checklists reduce redundancy and coordinate obstetric crisis management.. · Perinatal emergency simulation is essential for checklist refinement and effective team use.. · Integrations of perinatal emergency checklists requires culture change and process measurement..
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if manual rotation, undertaken during labor, of fetuses in occiput posterior or occiput transverse position led to an increased rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the use of a combination of keywords and text words related to "occiput posterior," "occiput transverse," and "manual rotation" from inception of the databases to July 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials evaluating manual rotation of fetuses in the occiput posterior or occiput transverse position during labor. METHODS: The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to determine the relative risks or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 643 records were screened with inclusion of 6 articles and 1002 randomized patients. All included studies compared manual rotation of fetuses in occiput posterior or occiput transverse position, all confirmed using ultrasound examinations, after complete cervical dilation with either no rotation or a sham rotation procedure. There was no difference in the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery with manual rotation (relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.20) nor was there any difference in any other maternal or fetal outcomes. In a subgroup analysis of occiput posterior fetuses, there was a 12.80-minute decrease in the length of the second stage of labor in the manual rotation group (mean difference, -12.80; 95% confidence interval, -22.61 to -2.99). There were no significant differences in any other maternal or fetal outcomes in the occiput posterior subgroup and no differences in the occiput transverse subgroup. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic manual rotation of fetuses in occiput posterior or occiput transverse position, confirmed using ultrasound examination, did not increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery compared with no manual rotation. Manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetal head early during the second stage of labor was associated with a significant 12.8-minute decrease in the length of the second stage of labor with no changes in any other maternal or fetal outcomes. There were no differences demonstrated for fetuses rotated from occiput transverse position or for the combination of occiput posterior and occiput transverse fetuses. Because there is some evidence of benefit, prophylactic manual rotation can be offered to patients during the second stage of labor presenting with occiput posterior position of the fetal head documented during ultrasound examination.
Asunto(s)
Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Intimate partner violence is defined as any behavior within an intimate relationship that causes physical, psychological, or sexual harm to those in the relationship. Globally, women are disproportionately victims of intimate partner violence. The risk increases during pregnancy, with estimated rates of as high as 20% among pregnant persons. Intimate partner violence is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including perinatal and maternal death. Given that pregnancy is a period of frequent interaction with the healthcare system, it is an opportune time to screen and intervene for intimate partner violence. Universal screening at the first prenatal visit and subsequently every trimester is recommended, with either written or verbal validated tools. Pregnant persons experiencing intimate partner violence need nonjudgmental, compassionate, confidential, and trauma-informed care. The goal of this review is to outline pregnancy-specific care considerations.
Asunto(s)
Violencia de Pareja , Femenino , Humanos , Violencia de Pareja/prevención & control , Violencia de Pareja/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo , Parto , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Parejas Sexuales/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a reminder postpartum screening system, providing patients with laboratory requisition on the postpartum ward followed by a telephone reminder one week prior to their 6 weeks appointment, would increase the diabetes mellitus screening rate. METHODS: Parallel group, open label, multicenter randomized trial. Patients were recruited between July 2015 and March 2016. All women with gestational diabetes mellitus in their index pregnancy with access to a mobile or landline phone were eligible for participation. Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis was made with a one-hour 50 g OGTT ≥135 mg/dl, and a subsequent 3 h OGTT with ≥2 values above fasting 95 mg/dl, 1 h 180 mg/dl, 2 h 155 mg/dl, and 3 h 140 mg/dl. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to "reminder system" (intervention group) or to "routine care (control group)." Those assigned to the reminder system were provided with two reminders. The first was a laboratory requisition slip given to them while on the postpartum ward. The second was a telephone reminder on the fifth week postpartum, consisting of a standardized script to encourage contacted participants to complete the screening test during the sixth week postpartum. The primary outcome was completion of the two-hour 75 g OGTT 6-12 weeks postpartum. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight patients were randomized to the reminder system, and 37 patients were randomized to routine care. A total of 22 women (29.3%) completed the test. In the "reminder" group, 31.6% completed the test, and in the "routine care" group 27% of patients completed the test. This increase in screening uptake in the reminder group was not noted to be statistically significant (p=.8). When evaluating whether perinatal or sociodemographic factors influenced the effect of reminder systems on screening uptake, only insurance type was noted to have a statistically significant influence. Screening uptake was significantly increased in patients with public insurance assigned to "reminder group" (13.5%) compared to those assigned to "routine care" (0%). Of those women who completed the test, seven patients (31.8 %) were diagnosed with prediabetes and none with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone reminders were not found to have a significant impact on increasing postpartum screening for diabetes. The exception was among the publicly insured population. These findings suggest a targeted role for reminder systems, particularly among those with socioeconomic disadvantage.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Sistemas Recordatorios , Periodo Posparto , Tamizaje MasivoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine compliance with a guideline to reduce exposure to supplemental oxygen for category II fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings in normally oxygenated laboring patients. METHODS: All patients in labor in an urban academic medical center from January 1 to July 31, 2020 were assessed. The preintervention group included those who delivered from January 1 to March 19, 2020. On March 20, 2020, a new guideline took effect that recommended no maternal supplemental oxygen for category II FHR tracings. The postintervention group delivered from March 20 to July 31, 2020. Exclusion criteria were planned cesarean delivery, multiple gestations, delivery at less than 24 weeks of gestation, intrauterine fetal death, and patients who received supplemental oxygen for an oxygen saturation lower than 95%. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who received oxygen in labor analyzed by control charts and the rules of special cause variation. Chi-squared and t tests were used for secondary outcome assessment. P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 1,333 patients were included, 474 patients in the preintervention group and 859 in the postintervention group. Oxygen was administered to 22.6% of patients before guideline implementation, compared with 0.6% after the guideline. Special cause variation was detected with an 8-point shift starting the month that the guideline was implemented, indicating statistical significance. There were no differences in any studied secondary maternal or fetal outcomes, although our statistical power to detect differences in infrequent outcomes was limited. CONCLUSION: This quality-improvement study demonstrated significant adherence to the guideline that supplemental oxygen would no longer be given to patients with category II FHR tracings in the absence of maternal hypoxemia, with no significant change in maternal or perinatal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Trabajo de Parto , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Oxígeno , Saturación de Oxígeno , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if maternal intrapartum administration of oxygen altered the rate of cesarean delivery compared with room air. DATA SOURCES: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, OVID, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using a combination of key words related to "pregnant patients," "labor," "oxygen," "fetus," "newborn," and pregnancy outcomes from database inception until April 2020. The study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020162110). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials of maternal administration of oxygen compared with room air in labor. The exclusion criteria were quasi-randomized trials and oxygen administered for planned cesarean deliveries. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes, including cord gas values, were analyzed. METHODS: The Cochrane Handbook guidelines were used to assess bias in trials. To calculate the relative risk or mean differences with confidence intervals, a random-effects model was employed. Subgroup analyses were performed for women who received oxygen for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring or prophylactically. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials, including 768 women, were included in the meta-analysis, 3 using prophylactic oxygen and 2 using oxygen for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring. The risk of bias was generally considered low. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of cesarean delivery between patients administered oxygen and patients provided room air (16 of 365 [4.4%] vs 11 of 379 [2.9%]; risk ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-3.3). In addition, there were no statistically significant differencs in the rates of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring, operative vaginal deliveries, Apgar scores of <7, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, or cord blood gas values. There were no statistically significant difference when analyzing oxygen for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring alone or prophylactic oxygen alone. Data regarding FHT is mixed, with one study suggesting an improvement and three suggesting no change. CONCLUSION: Maternal intrapartum oxygen administration was not associated with any differences in the rate of cesarean delivery or any secondary outcomes compared with room air overall and in the subgroups of therapeutic (for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring) or prophylactic administration in this meta-analysis. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary to further examine any possible benefits or harms of oxygen administration in labor, particularly for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Oxígeno , Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Humanos , Recién Nacido , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Persistent occiput posterior and occiput transverse positions are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess if the use of hands-and-knees posturing increased the rate of occiput anterior position immediately after posturing during the second stage of labor or at the time of birth. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed from inception to September 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligibility criteria included all randomized controlled trials of singleton gestations at ≥36 weeks' gestation that were randomized to either the hands-and-knees posture group or control group. The primary outcome was a composite of occiput anterior positioning during the second stage of labor or at birth. Individual components of the composite were assessed as secondary outcomes. Additional secondary outcomes were a change to occiput anterior position immediately after the intervention, use of regional anesthesia, duration of labor, mode of delivery, third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration, neonatal birthweight, and Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes. METHODS: The methodological quality of all the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimmonian and Laird to produce a summary of the treatment effects in terms of relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of the 1079 studies screened, 5 met the inclusion criteria (n=1727 hands-and-knees posture vs n=1641 controls). When compared with the control group, patients who adopted the hands-and-knees posture had the same rate of occiput anterior positioning in the second stage of labor or at birth (81.2% vs 81.2%; relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.14), as well as immediately after the intervention (34.1% vs 18.0%; relative risk, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.90). On the basis of the post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with an ultrasound-diagnosed malposition before posturing, there was a higher rate of occiput anterior positioning immediately after the intervention (17.0% vs 10.3%; relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.52), but this relationship did not persist at delivery. The remainder of the subgroup analyses and secondary outcomes were not significant. CONCLUSION: Adopting a hands-and-knees posture does not increase the rate of occiput anterior positioning at time of delivery.
Asunto(s)
Mano , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Femenino , Feto , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Atención PrenatalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of perioperative (pre- or intraoperative) intravenous acetaminophen in improving postcesarean pain control in healthy women receiving regional anesthesia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus were searched from their inception to September 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all randomized placebo-controlled trials examining the effect of perioperative intravenous acetaminophen on postcesarean pain control and other postoperative outcomes. Included trials examined women who were healthy and received regional anesthesia before cesarean delivery at term. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative pain scores with movement as measured by the individual studies. Secondary outcomes included intravenous morphine milligram equivalents used postoperatively. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, to produce summary treatment effects in terms of mean difference with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Notably, 4 randomized placebo-controlled trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 190 in the intervention arm vs 174 women in the control group. Patients in the intervention group received 1000 mg intravenous acetaminophen in 3 of the studies and 2000 mg intravenous acetaminophen in 1 study. All patients received regional anesthesia before surgery. The medication was given anywhere from 1 hour before surgery to intraoperatively immediately after delivery of the fetus. Pain scores 24 hours after surgery were only available in 1 study. The use of opioids as measured by morphine milligram equivalents after surgery was similar for patients receiving perioperative intravenous acetaminophen and those receiving placebo (38.7 vs 42.55; mean difference, -2.54; 95% confidence interval, -9.24 to 4.16). Only 1 study showed decreased postoperative pain scores when using perioperative intravenous acetaminophen, and this was limited to the first 4 hours after surgery. Importantly, these patients did not receive long-acting neuraxial opioids, which may account for the finding of improved pain control in the early postoperative period. CONCLUSION: There are limited data available on the use of perioperative intravenous acetaminophen for cesarean delivery performed at term with regional anesthesia. The use of long-acting neuraxial opioids may make perioperative (pre- or intracesarean) intravenous acetaminophen unnecessary, whereas intravenous (or oral) acetaminophen may become more effective as neuraxial opioid analgesia wears off. More level-1 data are needed.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén , Dolor Postoperatorio , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is characterized by the elevation of total bile acids (TBAs). The primary concern in women with ICP is the increased risk of stillbirth. ICP is generally considered as "mild" when TBA levels range from 10 to 39 µmol/L and "severe" with levels greater than 40 µmol/L, although levels of TBA ≥100 µmol/L have been also considered as a further threshold of severity. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between different severities of ICP (TBA 10-39, 40-99, and ≥100 µmol/L) and perinatal death. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched from the inception of each database to February 2019. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, cohort, case-control, or case series studies reporting maternal and perinatal outcomes on women with ICP by the three prespecified TBA levels (10-39, 40-99, and ≥100 µmol/L) were included. We excluded multiple gestations and trials which included an intervention. The analysis was performed with Pearson chi-square and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Continuous outcomes were compared using metaregression with inverse variance weighting using reported sample sizes and standard deviations. Pairwise comparisons used a Bonferroni correction to control for multiple testing. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Six articles including 1280 singleton pregnancies affected by ICP were included in the systematic review. Out of the 1280 singleton pregnancies affected by ICP included, 118 had ICP with TBA ≥100 µmol/L. Perinatal death was more common in women with TBA ≥100 µmol/L (0.4% for TBA 10-39 µmol/L versus 0.3% for TBA 40-99 µmol/L versus 6.8% for TBA ≥ 100 µmol/L, p < .0001). Of the 8 perinatal deaths in the TBA ≥100 µmol/L group, 3 occurred ≥34 weeks. TBA ≥100 µmol/L increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) (5.4% versus 8.6% versus 18.2% respectively, p < .0001) and iatrogenic PTB (10.8% versus 21.6% versus 35.8% respectively, p<.0001) as well as meconium-stained amniotic fluid (9.0% versus 18.4% versus 31.6% respectively, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal TBA ≥100 µmol/L is associated with a 6.8% incidence of perinatal death, most of which (5.9% overall) are stillbirths, while TBA <100 µmol/L are associated with an incidence of perinatal death of 0.3%. It may be reasonable to consider late preterm delivery (at about 35-36 weeks) in women with TBA ≥100 µmol/L.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis Intrahepática , Muerte Perinatal , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Ácidos y Sales Biliares , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Muerte Perinatal/etiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the compliance with a patient-safety bundle for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) by comparing the implementation of the components of the patient-safety bundle in the pre- and post-protocol time periods as a quality improvement project. STUDY DESIGN: This is a before and after retrospective cohort study as a quality improvement report examining compliance with a multidisciplinary delivery approach for patients with suspected PAS between 2007 and 2018. This bundle involved a multidisciplinary approach with maternal-fetal medicine, gynecologic oncology, intervention radiology, obstetric anesthesia, neonatology, and blood bank. The primary outcome was incorporation of all six of the components of the bundle into a PAS procedure: (1) betamethasone, (2) gynecologic oncology intraoperative consult, (3) preoperative balloon catheters, (4) cell salvage technology in the operating room, (5) vertical skin incision, and (6) fundal or high transverse hysterotomy. Demographic, delivery, and patient outcome data were also collected. RESULTS: There were 39 patients included in the study, 17 were pre-protocol and 22 were post-protocol. Patients were more likely to have a PAS suspected in the antenatal period during post protocol period (23.5 versus 90.9%, p < .0001), as well as having a placenta previa (35.3 versus 81.8%, p = .003), and receive betamethasone prior to delivery (23.5 versus 86.3%, p < .0001). Patients were delivered at an earlier gestational age in post protocol period (36.8 ± 2.52 versus 33.87 ± 2.4, p = .001). The primary outcome, adherence to all components of the patient-safety bundle, was more likely to occur in the post protocol period (0 versus 40.9%, p < .0001). Maternal and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully implemented a patient-safety bundle for PAS and have standardized the execution of multidisciplinary management for PAS at our institution.