RESUMEN
In 2020, the coronavirus pandemic initially led to a significant decrease in elective endoscopic examinations in Germany. The main reasons for this were the hard lockdown and the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing procedures. Since then, international recommendations from professional societies on infection control in endoscopy have been published. The extent to which these have been implemented in Germany is unclear: during the 2nd and 3rd waves in 2020/2021, most endoscopy units remained open and the level of adherence to international protection guidelines was high. A uniform "standard procedure" has not yet been published. The exact role and effectiveness of testing procedures to protect patients and staff during endoscopy was unknown, and reliable figures on staff and patient infections acquired/transmitted in endoscopy units in Germany were lacking. Thus, the most important finding of this work is the determined rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in endoscopy facilities. The data show that the infection rate among staff in German clinics and practices in early 2021 averaged up to 5%; most of these were acquired in the private setting. Clinics with gastroenterological endoscopy units had significantly higher infection rates (10%) than, for example, dental and otolaryngology practices. This result indicates the need for continued PPE efforts. The most important factors for infection safety are fully vaccinated (or recovered) staff and patients, a decreasing prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the use of PPE and-although controversial-the consistent use of screening tests.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) are possible under strict hygiene and protective measures and are currently carried out regularly. This study examined how much additional work this involves. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured evaluation of 71 surgical procedures performed at the Augsburg University Hospital between 1 November 2020 until 31 December 2020 was carried out. The operations on COVID19 patients were compared to procedures on non-COVID19 patients with respect to temporal, structural and staff resources, exemplified by four interventions: transbrachial embolectomy, total hip arthroplasty (H-TEP), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A) and new implantations of cardiac pacemakers. RESULTS: The incision to suture times between the interventions in patients with COVID19 and non-COVID19 patients did not show any significant differences in any of the four interventions evaluated. The postoperative monitoring in the operating room, which is identified as time-consuming in many interventions, was often circumvented by postoperative transfer to the intensive care unit or by the use of local anesthetic procedures. For major operations, such as HTEP, the preparation time was shown to be significantly longer (pâ¯= 0.037). Furthermore, there was a significantly higher requirement for anesthesia nursing personnel of 1.5 vs. 1.0 (pâ¯= 0.02). CONCLUSION: A quantification of the additional effort of operative treatment is difficult due to the already complex care of COVID19 patients; however, it can be assumed that there is an increased need for additional human and structural resources due to the supply of material from outside the operating room, which is not documented in the standard recording.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Quirófanos , Periodo Posoperatorio , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide. Data on the impact on otolaryngological clinics and private practices is sparse. This study aimed to present data on healthcare worker (HCW) screening, status of HCW, pre-interventional testing, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the economic impact of the pandemic. METHODS: Otolaryngological private practices and hospital-based departments were surveyed nationwide using an online questionnaire. Participating facilities were recruited via the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and the German Association for Otolaryngologists in Bavaria. RESULTS: 365 private practices (2776 employees) and 65 hospitals (2333 employees) were included. Significantly more hospitals (68.7%) than practices (40.5%) performed pre-interventional testing in their outpatients (p < 0.00). Most inpatients were tested in practices and hospitals (100.0% and 95.0%; p = 0.08). HCW screening was performed in 73.7% of practices and in 77.3% of hospitals (p = 0.54). Significantly more HCW infections were reported in private practices (4.7%) than in hospital (3.6%; p = 0.03). The private or home environment was the most frequent source of infection among HCW in hospitals (44%) and practices (63%). The use of PPE increased over the course of the pandemic. The number of procedures and the revenue decreased in 2020. CONCLUSION: The rate of pre-interventional testing among outpatients in otolaryngological practices is low and HCW infections were found to be more frequent in practices than in hospitals. In addition, a high rate of infections in otolaryngological HCW seems to stem from the private or home environment.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Otolaringología , Pandemias , Práctica Privada , Alemania/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Ambiente en el Hogar , Hospitales , Humanos , Equipo de Protección PersonalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Following the regional outbreak in China, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread all over the world, presenting the healthcare systems with huge challenges worldwide. In Germany the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a slowly growing demand for health care with a sudden occurrence of regional hotspots. This leads to an unpredictable situation for many hospitals, leaving the question of how many bed resources are needed to cope with the surge of COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVE: In this study we created a simulation-based prognostic tool that provides the management of the University Hospital of Augsburg and the civil protection services with the necessary information to plan and guide the disaster response to the ongoing pandemic. Especially the number of beds needed on isolation wards and intensive care units (ICU) are the biggest concerns. The focus should lie not only on the confirmed cases as the patients with suspected COVID-19 are in need of the same resources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the input we used the latest information provided by governmental institutions about the spreading of the disease, with a special focus on the growth rate of the cumulative number of cases. Due to the dynamics of the current situation, these data can be highly variable. To minimize the influence of this variance, we designed distribution functions for the parameters growth rate, length of stay in hospital and the proportion of infected people who need to be hospitalized in our area of responsibility. Using this input, we started a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 runs to predict the range of the number of hospital beds needed within the coming days and compared it with the available resources. RESULTS: Since 2 February 2020 a total of 306 patients were treated with suspected or confirmed COVID-19â¯at this university hospital. Of these 84 needed treatment on the ICU. With the help of several simulation-based forecasts, the required ICU and normal bed capacity at Augsburg University Hospital and the Augsburg ambulance service in the period from 28 March 2020 to 8 June 2020 could be predicted with a high degree of reliability. Simulations that were run before the impact of the restrictions in daily life showed that we would have run out of ICU bed capacity within approximately 1 month. CONCLUSION: Our simulation-based prognosis of the health care capacities needed helps the management of the hospital and the civil protection service to make reasonable decisions and adapt the disaster response to the realistic needs. At the same time the forecasts create the possibility to plan the strategic response days and weeks in advance. The tool presented in this study is, as far as we know, the only one accounting not only for confirmed COVID-19 cases but also for suspected COVID-19 patients. Additionally, the few input parameters used are easy to access and can be easily adapted to other healthcare systems.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Pronóstico , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) is a well-established tool in the diagnosis and therapy of small bowel diseases. Ink tattooing of the small bowel is used to mark pathologic lesions or the depth of small bowel insertion. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, the detection rate, and the clinical relevance of ink tattooing during BAE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all 81 patients who received an ink tattooing during BAE between 2010 and 2015. RESULTS: In all patients, ink tattooing was performed with no complications. 26 patients received a capsule endoscopy after BAE. The tattoo could be detected via capsule endoscopy in 19 of these 26 patients. The tattoo of the previous BAE could be detected via opposite BAE in 2 of 11 patients. In 9 patients, ink tattooing influenced the choice of approach for reenteroscopy. In 7 patients, the tattoo was used for intraoperative localization and in 3 patients for intraoperative localization as well as for reenteroscopy. The intraoperative detection rate of the tattoo was 100%. CONCLUSION: Ink tattooing of the small intestine is a safe endoscopic procedure to mark the depth of scope insertion or a pathologic lesion during balloon-assisted enteroscopy.
RESUMEN
Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, excretion in an undamaged state after 30 hours, or radiological projection to the colon. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients with risk factors for CR, who received a PC from 02/2013 to 04/2015 at Klinikum Augsburg. Results. Sixteen of our 38 patients observed a natural excretion after a mean time of 34 hours past ingestion. However, only 8 patients observed excretion within 30 hours, as recommended by the company. In 20 patients passage of the PC into the colon was shown via RFID-scan or radiological imaging (after 33 and 45 hours, resp.). Only 2 patients showed a pathologic PC result. In consequence, 32 patients received the VCE; no CR was observed. Conclusion. Our data indicates that a VCE could safely be performed even if the PC excretion time is longer than 30 hours and the excreted PC was not screened for damage.