The effect of immunomodulators on seroconversion after BNT162b2 and AZD1222 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic and nonbiologic immunomodulators, used to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), could impair the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines and thus vaccine effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to investigate the association between biologic and nonbiologic immunomodulators and seroconversion following the first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IMIDs. METHODS: Serum samples were collected following the first or second dose of the BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines from patients receiving biologic and/or nonbiologic immunomodulators for one or more of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease or systemic lupus erythematosus. Seroconversion was defined as a positive Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (spike protein subunit S1/receptor binding domain) immunoassay (≥ 0.8 U mL-1). Association between immunomodulator exposure and seroconversion was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: After excluding those with prior COVID-19, post-first vaccine dose samples from 193 participants and post-second dose samples from 312 participants were included in the analysis. Following the first vaccine dose, 17.6% (n = 34) of participants did not seroconvert. Seroconversion was reduced for those on nonbiologic [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.69] or combined nonbiologic and biologic treatment (adjusted OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.045-0.45) compared with those on biologic monotherapy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated reduced odds of seroconversion in those on methotrexate (adjusted OR 0.097, 95% CI 0.19-0.49) or prednisolone treatment (adjusted OR 0.044, 95% CI 0.002-1.00) relative to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor monotherapy. No participants receiving rituximab (n < 5) seroconverted after the first vaccine dose. Following the second vaccine dose, 1.6% of all participants did not seroconvert. Non-seroconversion was associated with receiving rituximab (n = 3 of 4) compared with those receiving other therapies (n = 2 of 308, P < 0.001). Post hoc analyses demonstrated that non-seroconversion was associated with age [adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.037-0.93 for those aged 60 years and over (reference category age 18-39 years)], but not sex, ethnicity or vaccine type. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with nonbiologics, particularly methotrexate, is associated with impaired seroconversion following two BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccine doses, in patients with IMIDs. These findings are consistent with those of other published studies. While this could indicate reduced protection against COVID-19, the immunological parameters that correlate most closely with vaccine effectiveness need to be defined to reach this conclusion.

Female Immunity Protects from Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Cancer susceptibility and mortality are higher in males, and the mutational and transcriptomic landscape of cancer differs by sex. The current assumption is that men are at higher risk of epithelial cancers as they expose more to carcinogens and accumulate more damage than women. We present data showing women present with less aggressive primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and early strong immune activation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We explored clinical and molecular sexual disparity in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with primary cSCC (N = 738, N = 160), advanced-stage cSCC (N = 63, N = 20) and FVB/N mice exposed to equal doses of DMBA, as well as in human keratinocytes by whole-exome, bulk, and single-cell RNA sequencing. RESULTS: We show cSCC is more aggressive in men, and immunocompetent women develop mild cSCC, later in life. To test whether sex drives disparity, we exposed male and female mice to equal doses of carcinogen, and found males present with more aggressive, metastatic cSCC than females. Critically, females activate cancer immune-related expression pathways and CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltration independently of mutations, a response that is absent in prednisolone-treated animals. In contrast, males increase the rate of mitosis and proliferation in response to carcinogen. Women's skin and keratinocytes also activate immune-cancer fighting pathways and immune cells at UV radiation-damaged sites. Critically, a compromised immune system leads to high-risk, aggressive cSCC specifically in women. CONCLUSIONS: This work shows the immune response is sex biased in cSCC and highlights female immunity offers greater protection than male immunity.

Pituitary hyperplasia with Sertoli cell-only and 47,XYY syndromes: an uncommon triad.

We report the case history of a 32-year-old man with no phenotypical abnormalities who presented with infertility. Semen analysis revealed azoospermia and testicular biopsy confirmed Sertoli cell-only (SCO) syndrome. Karyotyping revealed 47,XYY and pituitary hyperplasia was found on MRI pituitary. In our patient, 47,XYY karyotype is likely to have given rise to SCO syndrome that in turn resulted in pituitary hyperplasia. The patient was evaluated by various members of the multidisciplinary team including the pituitary surgeon, endocrinologist and andrologist. The patient's partner successfully delivered a healthy baby via in vitro fertilisation with donor sperm. This triad of diagnoses (SCO syndrome, 47,XYY karyotype and pituitary hyperplasia) has not been reported previously. SCO syndrome should be considered in the presence of azoospermia, elevated follicle-stimulating hormone, low inhibin-B and normal testosterone levels. Our case report also highlights the importance of excluding genetic causes of infertility even when the patient has no phenotypical abnormalities.