Something new about prognostic factors for lupus nephritis? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis (LN) affects 30-45% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and causes great morbidity and mortality. About 10-25% of patients will develop chronic kidney disease (CKD), and it has been described a mortality of 10-20% at 10 years. The contribution of clinical and biological markers to the prediction of outcome is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the factors, with measures of association, that predict the main outcomes of LN. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematic searched from inception up to Oct 2019, with a strategy that included synonyms of all targeted outcomes of LN: (kidney failure, response to treatment, cardiovascular events, and mortality). Only studies with longitudinal prospective design or with warranties of unbiased recollection of the prognostic factors, where LN was confirmed by biopsy were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the New Castle Ottawa scale. Predictive factors and their effect measures were collected from each study. RESULTS: From 1221 studies identified, 25 studies were included, of which 15 were retrospective, nine prospective, and one was a trial extension study (range from 3 months to 11 years). The main predictive factors of renal response were serum creatinine (SCr) and glomerular filtration rate C3 levels, titer of anti-C1q, and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Renal histological findings such as class type (IV or V), tubulointerstitial or vascular lesions and chronicity index were risk factors for development of chronic kidney disease. The factors associated with persistence of activity were proteinuria, anti-dsDNA, anticardiolipin, anti C1q antibodies, and complement values. The factors associated to cardiovascular events and mortality were age, smoking, amount of proteinuria, and histological findings, such as vascular lesions. Meta-analysis was precluded given the heterogeneity of designs definitions and effect measures. CONCLUSIONS: Nowadays, we do not have new biomarkers that establish the renal prognosis of patients with LN. Classical clinical, renal, and histological markers are used in most studies. It is worth noting the heterogeneity of studies in the definition of renal outcomes, which complicates risk stratification in these patients.

Resultados comparativos de la implementación en práctica diaria de un checklist de evaluación para pacientes con espondiloartritis axial y artritis psoriásica / Comparative results of the implementation in daily practice of an evaluation checklist for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis

Objetivo: Analizar y comparar los cambios en la recogida de variables clínicas tras la implementación en la práctica diaria de un checklist de evaluación para pacientes con espondiloartritis axial (EspAax) y artritis psoriásica (APs). Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional. Mediante revisión de historias médicas, se recogieron el número y el tipo de variables del checklist de evaluación que figuraban en las mismas. La primera revisión se realizó antes de la implementación del checklist, y la segunda, 6meses después de la implementación (pacientes diferentes) para poder comparar los cambios producidos con la misma. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo y bivariado. Resultados: Participaron 6 hospitales y 11 reumatólogos. Se revisaron un total de 83 y 68 historias médicas pre- y post-implementación del checklist. Tras la implementación, en la EspAax aumentó significativamente el registro en la historia clínica del consumo de alcohol, diarrea o enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) y la uretritis, diabetes mellitus, hiperlipidemia, depresión, obesidad o la gota/hiperuricemia, peso, talla, presión arterial, VGM, VGP, BASDAI y DAS28. Y en la APs el consumo de alcohol, HTA, diabetes mellitus, hiperlipidemia, enfermedad, gota/hiperuricemia, expansión torácica, rotación cervical, peso, talla, presión arterial, VGM, VGP, ASDAS, BASDAI y BASFI. Tanto pre- como post-implantación en general existe una tendencia a un mayor porcentaje de recogida de variables en pacientes con EspAax que en pacientes con APs. Conclusiones: La implementación de un checklist específico en la práctica diaria mejora la evaluación de los pacientes con EspAax y APs. Se debe seguir trabajando en la mejoría de la evaluación de los pacientes con EspA, pero especialmente en la APs.(AU)

Objective: To analyse and compare changes in the collection of clinical variables after the implementation in daily practice of an evaluation checklist for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods: An observational study was performed based on medical records review. The number and type of variables of the evaluation checklist in the medical records were collected. The first review was made before the implementation of the checklist, and the second one 6months after the implementation (in different patients). A descriptive and bivariate analysis was carried out. Results: Six hospitals and 11 rheumatologists participated. A total of 83 and 68 medical records were reviewed before and after the implementation of the checklist. After the implementation, in the axSpA patients, a significant increase was recorded in alcohol consumption, diarrhoea or IBD and urethritis, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, depression, obesity or gout/hyperuricaemia, weight, height, blood pressure, patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, BASDAI and DAS28. And, in the PsA patients, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, disease, gout/hyperuricaemia, thoracic expansion, cervical rotation, weight, height, blood pressure, patient and physician global assessments of disease, ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFI were recorded. In general, there was a trend towards greater recording in axSpA compared with PsA. Conclusions: The implementation of a specific checklist in daily practice improves the evaluation of patients with axSpA and PsA. More efforts are necessary to continue improving the evaluation of patients with axSpA, but especially of those with PsA.(AU)

Comparative results of the implementation in daily practice of an evaluation checklist for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse and compare changes in the collection of clinical variables after the implementation in daily practice of an evaluation checklist for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: An observational study was performed based on medical records review. The number and type of variables of the evaluation checklist in the medical records were collected. The first review was made before the implementation of the checklist, and the second one 6 months after the implementation (in different patients). A descriptive and bivariate analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Six hospitals and 11 rheumatologists participated. A total of 83 and 68 medical records were reviewed before and after the implementation of the checklist. After the implementation, in the axSpA patients, a significant increase was recorded in alcohol consumption, diarrhoea or IBD and urethritis, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, depression, obesity or gout/hyperuricaemia, weight, height, blood pressure, patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, BASDAI and DAS28. And, in the PsA patients, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, disease, gout/hyperuricaemia, thoracic expansion, cervical rotation, weight, height, blood pressure, patient and physician global assessments of disease, ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFI were recorded. In general, there was a trend towards greater recording in axSpA compared with PsA. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a specific checklist in daily practice improves the evaluation of patients with axSpA and PsA. More efforts are necessary to continue improving the evaluation of patients with axSpA, but especially of those with PsA.

Artritis idiopática juvenil y síndrome de Turner / Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Turner's syndrome

No disponible

Implementation of an assessment checklist for patients with spondyloarthritis in daily practice.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the feasibility and changes in the collection of clinical measures after the implementation in daily practice of a checklist designed for an optimal evaluation and monitoring of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: An observational prospective study was performed. The feasibility of the assessment checklist (paper/on-line format) for patients with SpA was tested (time to complete the checklist, simplicity, amenity clarity, usefulness). Through a medical files review, changes in the number of the checklist variables collected were analysed previous to the implementation of the checklist and 6 months later. A descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total 6 hospitals and 11 rheumatologists participated. The median time to checklist completion was 15 (12-20) minutes, and the mean scores for the rest of variables of the feasibility test were in general positives. A total of 83 and 68 medical files pre-implementation and post-implementation were reviewed respectively. We observed a significant increase in the collection of many of the checklist variables after the implementation. The record of BASDAI increased from 46.2% to 73.1% (p=0.001), physical activity from 48.2% to 88.2% (p<0.0001), physician global (VAS) from 28.0% to 73.5% (p<0.0001), patient global (VAS) from 48.8% to 85.3% (p<0.0001), morning stiffness from 62.8% to 84.8% (p=0.003), ASDAS from 12.2% to 32.8% (p=0.002), BASFI from 43.7% to 65.7% (p=0.008), or DAS28 from 24.7% to 46.3% (p=0.006). These changes were observed irrespectively of SpA classification. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an assessment checklist in daily practice is feasible and improves the assessment of SpA patients.