[Renal Side Effects of Novel Molecular Targeted Oncologic Agents].

The introduction of innovative therapies has changed the scenario of complications. The delay in the recognition of kidney adverse effects is partly due to the timing of the development of the kidney damage which occurs later than the observation period of registration studies, and partly to the exclusion of patients with known kidney impairment from registration trials. Renal disease has a significant impact on the management of cancer patients and often leads to discontinuation of therapy. Histological evaluations of kidney disorders induced by targeted/immunotherapy are very limited. Renal biopsy is critical for the management of renal toxicities and should be especially encouraged for patients showing adverse renal effects to novel cancer agents. We recently examined the histological features of patients treated with new cancer agents who underwent renal biopsy for new onset renal failure and/or urinary abnormalities. The cohort included 42 patients. The most frequently administered therapies were immunotherapy (54.8%) and anti-angiogenic treatments (45.2%). The most common adverse effect was tubular interstitial nephritis in the first group and thrombotic microangiopathy in the second one. Based on histological findings, definitive discontinuation of treatment could be restricted to a very limited number of patients. All of them had anti-VEGF-related TMA. Treatment discontinuation was unneeded in patients treated with ICIs. In patients treated with multidrug therapy, the histological findings made it possible to identify the weight of drug-related specific injury. Based on this data, renal biopsy should be considered in every cancer patient who develops urinary abnormalities or shows a worsening of renal function during treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

Outcome of patients with severe AL amyloidosis and biopsy-proven renal involvement ineligible for bone marrow transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: AL amyloidosis is caused by a clone of plasma cell. Due to the impact of the disease on patient survival, careful evaluation of organ involvement is essential and treatment should be tailored to single patient's risk. AIM: We analyzed the clinical, laboratory and histological characteristics of 21 elderly patients (pts) (mean age 74.7 ± 7.97 years, range 55-81) with AL amyloidosis, including 17 patients (81%) with biopsy-proven renal involvement, who were ineligible for bone marrow transplantation, and evaluated the impact of renal impairment on survival. RESULTS: Cardiac and renal involvement was found in 14 (67%) cases. Among the 17 patients with renal involvement, 12 had renal failure with proteinuria, and one showed isolated renal failure and vascular amyloid deposition. Hematological response occurred in 57.1% after first line therapy (75% after three cycles). In six of the patients with renal involvement, proteinuria decreased from 4.2 to 1.1 g/24 h (range 0.2-3 g/24 h), serum Creatinina (sCr) levels declined or stabilized. Severe renal failure at diagnosis was found to directly influence patient survival, while the Staging System for Renal Outcome in AL Amyloidosis did not associate with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge this is the first case series in which the whole cohort of patients with urinary or functional abnormalities underwent a histological evaluation. None of the patients were eligible for bone marrow transplantation. Hematologic response was 57.1%, while renal response was much lower (35%). Of note, the Staging System did not completely apply to this peculiar setting of patients in whom renal involvement was not presumptive but biopsy-proven. More aggressive approaches may be needed in these patients to avoid the inexorable progression of the disease.