Efficacy and safety of pamapimod in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving stable methotrexate therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomised to one of six dose groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind pamapimod (up to 300 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients with > or =20% improvement in RA based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at 12 weeks. Secondary measures were ACR50, Disease Activity Score (DAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses and the individual ACR core set of parameters. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing and immunology assessments. RESULTS: On a background of MTX, the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response at week 12 in the pamapimod groups (31% to 43%) was not significantly different from placebo (34%). Secondary efficacy end points showed a similar pattern. AEs were typically mild and included infections, gastrointestinal disturbances, dizziness and rashes; AEs resulting in discontinuation of study drug were primarily attributed to infections. CONCLUSION: In patients with active RA receiving stable doses of MTX, pamapimod showed non-significant improvement in efficacy outcomes compared to placebo.

Orlistat 120 mg improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with or without concurrent weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Both obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Published data suggest that orlistat 120 mg, a lipase inhibitor used to treat obesity, may improve glycaemic parameters through weight loss-independent effects. AIM: To investigate the effect of orlistat 120 mg on weight loss, and assess whether changes in glycaemic parameters [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)] are independent of weight loss. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of pooled data from seven multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies involved overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 18-70 years). Patients were required to have a body mass index of 27-43 kg/m2, HbA1c of 6.5 to <13%, and stable weight for > or =3 months. Subjects received orlistat 120 mg tid or placebo for 6 or 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 2550 overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled and randomized to treatment with orlistat 120 mg tid (n = 1279) or placebo (n = 1271). For the whole population, patients treated with orlistat 120 mg had significantly greater mean decreases in FPG compared with placebo-treated patients (-1.39 mmol/l vs. -0.47 mmol/l; p < 0.0001). In addition, orlistat 120 mg provided significantly larger mean decreases in HbA1c compared with placebo (-0.74% vs. -0.31%; p < 0.0001). For patients with minimal weight loss (< or =1% of baseline body weight), orlistat 120 mg still provided a significantly greater decrease in the least squares mean value for both FPG (-0.83 mmol/l vs. +/-0.02 mmol/l; p = 0.0052) and HbA1c -0.29% vs. +/-0.14%; p = 0.0008). This suggested that the improvement of glycaemic control with orlistat 120 mg was independent of weight loss. Using linear regression analysis, improvement in glycaemic control (FPG and HbA1c) with orlistat 120 mg was less strongly correlated with weight loss than for placebo. CONCLUSION: Orlistat 120 mg appears to improve glycaemic control more than would be predicted by weight loss alone in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Postulated mechanisms underlying this effect include an improvement of insulin sensitivity, a slower and incomplete digestion of dietary fat, reduction of postprandial plasma non-esterified fatty acids, decreased visceral adipose tissue, and stimulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in the lower small intestine.

Effect of tolcapone on the haemodynamic effects and tolerability of desipramine.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the changes in haemodynamics, tolerability and pharmacokinetics that may occur when a combination of tolcapone and levodopa/carbidopa are given with desipramine. METHODS: In a crossover study, 22 healthy subjects received desipramine during two 13-day treatment periods (25 mg t.i.d. for 3 days and 50 mg t.i.d. for 10 days), with a washout period of 10-15 days. Subjects received levodopa/carbidopa (100 mg/25 mg t.i.d. for 5 days, days 9-13) and concomitant, double-blind, randomized treatment with either tolcapone (200 mg t.i.d.) or placebo. RESULTS: No significant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between tolcapone and desipramine. Adverse events were predictable based on the known effects of the individual drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Tolcapone can be combined with levodopa/carbidopa and desipramine in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic effects of tolcapone withdrawal in levodopa-treated patients with parkinsonism.

The effect and clinical significance of tolcapone withdrawal on erythrocyte catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) activity, levodopa pharmacokinetics, and levodopa requirements were investigated in 59 patients with fluctuating parkinsonism who were randomized to receive placebo or tolcapone 100 or 200 mg three times daily for 6 weeks. Tolcapone withdrawal caused a transient elevation in COMT activity by 64% in patients receiving 100 mg three times daily and by 128% in those receiving 200 mg three times daily at approximately 1-2 weeks after discontinuation of drug. Thereafter, COMT activity was declining but did not reach baseline values by the 12-week study endpoint. However, this had no effect on plasma levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) concentrations or on levodopa requirements. During treatment, tolcapone increased "on" time and decreased "off" time; after discontinuation of study medication and levodopa dose adjustment, on and off times were similar to baseline. Withdrawal was generally well tolerated; no patients withdrew from the trial during the posttreatment period, and no serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, the transient increase in erythrocyte COMT activity observed after discontinuation oftolcapone is not associated with changes in peripheral levodopa metabolism and therefore has no significant clinical consequences in terms of levodopa requirements, clinical symptoms, or adverse events.