Predicting Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial.

Progression of intracranial hemorrhage is a common, potentially devastating complication after moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Clinicians have few tools to predict which patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on their initial head computed tomography (hCT) scan will progress. The objective of this investigation was to identify clinical, imaging, and/or protein biomarkers associated with progression of intracranial hemorrhage (PICH) after moderate/severe TBI and to create an accurate predictive model of PICH based on clinical features available at presentation. We analyzed a subset of subjects from the phase II double-blind, multi-center, randomized "Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Use for TBI" trial. This subset was limited to the placebo arm of the parent trial with evidence of hemorrhage on the initial hCT and a follow-up hCT 6 h after. PICH was defined as an increase in hemorrhage size by 30% or more, or the development of new hemorrhage in the intra- and extra-axial intracranial vault between the initial and the follow-up hCT. Two independent radiologists evaluated each hCT, and conflicts were adjudicated by a third. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were collected, along with plasma protein biomarkers at admission. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, and each principal component (PC) was interrogated for its association with PICH. Finally, expert opinion and recursive feature extraction (RFE) were used to select input features for the construction of several supervised classification models. Their ability to predict PICH was quantified and compared. In this subset of subjects (n = 104), 46% (n = 48) demonstrated PICH. Univariate analyses showed no association between PICH and age, sex, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), GCS motor subscore, presence of midline shift, admission platelet count or admission INR. Radiographic severity scores (Marshall score [p = 0.007], Rotterdam score [p = 0.004]), and initial hematoma volume [p = 0.005] were associated with PICH. Higher levels of admission glial fibrillary acidic protein (p < 0.001) and MAP (p = 0.011) were also associated with PICH. Of the PCs, PC1 was significantly associated with PICH (p = 0.0125). Using multimodal data input, machine learning classifiers successfully discriminated patients with or without PICH. Models composed of machine-selected features performed better than models composed of expert-selected variables (reaching an average of 77% accuracy, AUC = 0.78 versus AUC = 0.68 for the expert-selected variables). Predictive models utilizing variables measured at admission can accurately predict PICH, confirmed by the 6-hour follow-up hCT. Our best-performing models must now be externally validated in a separate cohort of TBI patients with low GCS and initial hCT positive for hemorrhage.

Improving rigor and reproducibility in western blot experiments with the blotRig analysis software.

Western blot is a popular biomolecular analysis method for measuring the relative quantities of independent proteins in complex biological samples. However, variability in quantitative western blot data analysis poses a challenge in designing reproducible experiments. The lack of rigorous quantitative approaches in current western blot statistical methodology may result in irreproducible inferences. Here we describe best practices for the design and analysis of western blot experiments, with examples and demonstrations of how different analytical approaches can lead to widely varying outcomes. To facilitate best practices, we have developed the blotRig tool for designing and analyzing western blot experiments to improve their rigor and reproducibility. The blotRig application includes functions for counterbalancing experimental design by lane position, batch management across gels, and analytics with covariates and random effects.

Increasing Rigor of Preclinical Research to Maximize Opportunities for Translation.

The use of animal models in pre-clinical research has significantly broadened our understanding of the pathologies that underlie traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced damage and deficits. However, despite numerous pre-clinical studies reporting the identification of promising neurotherapeutics, translation of these therapies to clinical application has so far eluded the TBI research field. A concerted effort to address this lack of translatability is long overdue. Given the inherent heterogeneity of TBI and the replication crisis that continues to plague biomedical research, this is a complex task that will require a multifaceted approach centered around rigor and reproducibility. Here, we discuss the role of three primary focus areas for better aligning pre-clinical research with clinical TBI management. These focus areas are (1) reporting and standardization of protocols, (2) replication of prior knowledge including the confirmation of expected pharmacodynamics, and (3) the broad application of open science through inter-center collaboration and data sharing. We further discuss current efforts that are establishing the core framework needed for successfully addressing the translatability crisis of TBI.

A combined therapeutic regimen of citalopram and environmental enrichment ameliorates attentional set-shifting performance after brain trauma.

Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) have led to lasting deficits for an estimated 5.3 million American patients. Effective therapies for these patients remain scarce and each of the clinical trials stemming from success in experimental models has failed. We believe that the failures may be, in part, due to the lack of preclinical assessment of cognitive domains that widely affect clinical TBI. Specifically, the behavioral tasks in the TBI literature often do not focus on common executive impairments related to the frontal lobe such as cognitive flexibility. In previous work, we have demonstrated that the attentional set-shifting test (AST), a task analogous to the clinically-employed Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), could be used to identify cognitive flexibility impairments following controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury. In this study, we hypothesized that both the administration of the antidepressant drug citalopram (CIT) and exposure to a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation, environmental enrichment (EE), would attenuate cognitive performance deficits on AST when provided alone and lead to greater benefits when administered in combination. Adult male rats were subjected to a moderate-severe CCI or sham injury. Rats were randomly divided into experimental groups that included surgical injury, drug therapy, and housing condition. We observed that both CIT and EE provided significant cognitive recovery when administered alone and reversal learning performance recovery increased the most when the therapies were combined (p < 0.05). Ongoing studies continue to evaluate novel ways of assessing more clinically relevant measurements of high order cognitive TBI-related impairments in the rat model.

Development and Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Recovery Prediction after Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability yet treatment strategies remain elusive. Advances in machine learning present exciting opportunities for developing personalized medicine and informing laboratory research. However, their feasibility has yet to be widely assessed in animal research where data are typically limited or in the TBI field where each patient presents with a unique injury. The Operation Brain Trauma Therapy (OBTT) has amassed an animal dataset that spans multiple types of injury, treatment strategies, behavioral assessments, histological measures, and biomarker screenings. This paper aims to analyze these data using supervised learning techniques for the first time by partitioning the dataset into acute input metrics (i.e. 7 days post-injury) and a defined recovery outcome (i.e. memory retention). Preprocessing is then applied to transform the raw OBTT dataset, e.g. developing a class attribute by histogram binning, eliminating borderline cases, and applying principal component analysis (PCA). We find that these steps are also useful in establishing a treatment ranking; Minocycline, a therapy with no significant findings in the OBTT analyses, yields the highest percentage recovery in our ranking. Furthermore, of the seven classifiers we have evaluated, Naïve Bayes achieves the best performance (67%) and yields significant improvement over our baseline model on the preprocessed dataset with borderline elimination. We also investigate the effect of testing on individual treatment groups to evaluate which groups are difficult to classify, and note the interpretive qualities of our model that can be clinically relevant.Clinical Relevance- These studies establish methods for better analyzing multivariate functional recovery and understanding which measures affect prognosis following traumatic brain injury.

Chronic treatment with galantamine rescues reversal learning in an attentional set-shifting test after experimental brain trauma.

Approximately 10 million new cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are reported each year worldwide with many of these injuries resulting in higher order cognitive impairments. Galantamine (GAL), an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor (AChEI) and positive allosteric modulator of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), has been reported to ameliorate cognitive deficits after clinical TBI. Previously, we demonstrated that controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury to rats resulted in significant executive function impairments as measured by the attentional set-shifting test (AST), a complex cognitive task analogous to the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). We hypothesized that chronic administration of GAL would normalize performance on the AST post-TBI. Isoflurane-anesthetized adult male rats were subjected to moderate CCI (2.8 mm tissue deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury. Rats were then randomized into one of three treatment groups (i.e., 1 mg/kg GAL, 2 mg/kg GAL, or 1 mL/kg saline vehicle; VEH) or their respective sham controls. GAL or VEH was administered intraperitoneally daily commencing 24 hours post-surgery and until AST testing at 4 weeks post-injury. The AST data revealed significant impairments in the first reversal stage after TBI, seen as increased trials to reach criterion and elevated total errors (p < 0.05). These behavioral flexibility deficits were equally normalized by the administration of both doses of GAL (p < 0.05). Additionally, the higher dose of GAL (2 mg/kg) also significantly reduced cortical lesion volume compared to TBI + VEH controls (p < 0.05). In summary, daily GAL administration provides an efficacious treatment for cognitive deficits and histological recovery after experimental brain trauma. Clinically, these findings are promising considering robust results were attained using a pharmacotherapy already used in the clinic to treat mild dementia.

Aripiprazole and environmental enrichment independently improve functional outcome after cortical impact injury in adult male rats, but their combination does not yield additional benefits.

Typical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) with D2antagonistic properties impede functional outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) and reduce the effectiveness of environmental enrichment (EE). Here we test the hypothesis that aripiprazole (ARIP), an atypical APD with partial D2and 5-HT1Areceptor agonist activities will improve recovery after TBI and when combined with EE will further enhance the benefits. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing and once daily intraperitoneal injections of ARIP (0.1 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg) beginning 24 h after injury for 19 days. Motor (beam-walking time and beam-walk score) and cognitive (acquisition of spatial learning and memory) outcomes were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. There were no statistical differences among the sham groups, regardless of housing or treatment, so the data were pooled. The SHAM group performed better than all TBI groups on motor and spatial learning (p < 0.05) but did not differ from either EE group on memory retention. Regarding TBI, both EE groups improved motor and cognitive outcomes vs. the VEH-treated STD group (p < 0.05) but did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). The ARIP-treated STD group performed better than the VEH-treated STD group on beam-walk score and spatial learning (p < 0.05), but not beam-walking time or memory retention (p > 0.05). Cortical lesion volume was smaller in all treated groups compared to the TBI + STD + VEH group (p < 0.05). The data replicate previous work and extend the findings by demonstrating that 1) ARIP promotes recovery after TBI, but combining treatments does not yield additional benefits, which is contrary to the hypothesis, and 2) unlike APDs that exhibit D2 receptor antagonism, ARIP does not impede rehabilitation (i.e., EE).

Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment.

The administration of haloperidol (HAL) once-daily for 19 days after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) impedes recovery and attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment (EE). However, it is unknown how intermittent administration of HAL affects the recovery process when paired with EE. Addressing the uncertainty is relevant because daily HAL is not always warranted to manage TBI-induced agitation in the clinic, and indeed intermittent therapy may be a more common approach. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent HAL would neither impair recovery in standard (STD)-housed controls nor attenuate the efficacy of EE. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were housed in STD or EE conditions. Beginning 24 h later, HAL (0.5 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) was administered either once-daily for 19 days or once every other day, whereas vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) was administered once daily. Motor performance and cognition were assessed on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. SHAM controls performed better than all TBI groups on motor and spatial learning [p < 0.05], but did not differ from the TBI + EE + daily VEH group on memory retention [p > 0.05]. The TBI + EE + daily VEH and TBI + EE + intermittent HAL groups did not differ from one another on beam-walk or spatial learning [p > 0.05], and both performed better than all other TBI groups [p < 0.05]. In contrast, the TBI + STD + daily HAL group performed worse than all TBI groups on spatial learning [p < 0.05]. No difference in any endpoint was revealed between the TBI + STD + intermittent HAL and TBI + STD + daily VEH groups [p > 0.05]. The results support the hypothesis that HAL is not detrimental when provided intermittently. If translatable to the clinic, intermittent HAL may be used to control TBI-induced agitation without negatively affecting spontaneous recovery or rehabilitative efficacy.

Delayed and Abbreviated Environmental Enrichment after Brain Trauma Promotes Motor and Cognitive Recovery That Is Not Contingent on Increased Neurogenesis.

Environmental enrichment (EE) confers motor and cognitive recovery in pre-clinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and neurogenesis has been attributed to mediating the benefits. Whether that ascription is correct has not been fully investigated. Hence, the goal of the current study is to further clarify the possible role of learning-induced hippocampal neurogenesis on functional recovery after cortical impact or sham injury by utilizing two EE paradigms (i.e., early + continuous, initiated immediately after TBI and presented 24 h/day; and delayed + abbreviated, initiated 4 days after TBI for 6 h/day) and comparing them to one another as well as to standard (STD) housed controls. Motor and cognitive performance was assessed on post-operative Days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively, for the STD and early + continuous EE groups and on Days 4-8 and 17-22, for the delayed + abbreviated EE groups. Rats were injected with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, 500 mg/ kg; intraperitoneally) for 3 days (12 h apart) before cognitive training and sacrificed 1 week later for quantification of BrdU+ and doublecortin (DCX+) labeled cells. Both early + continuous and delayed + abbreviated EE promoted motor and cognitive recovery after TBI, relative to STD (p < 0.05), and did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). However, only early + continuous EE increased DCX+ cells beyond the level of STD-housed controls (p < 0.05). No effect of EE on non-injured controls was observed. Based on these data, two novel conclusions emerged. First, EE does not need to be provided early and continuously after TBI to confer benefits, which lends credence to the delayed + abbreviated EE paradigm as a relevant pre-clinical model of neurorehabilitation. Second, the functional recovery observed after TBI in the delayed + abbreviated EE paradigm is not contingent on increased hippocampal neurogenesis. Future studies will elucidate alternate viable mechanisms mediating the benefits induced by EE.

Spontaneous recovery after controlled cortical impact injury is not impeded by intermittent administration of the antipsychotic drug risperidone.

Several preclinical studies have reported that daily administration of the antipsychotic drug (APD) risperidone (RISP) impedes recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, it is not known whether intermittent dosing would produce similar deleterious effects. The relevance of providing APDs intermittently is that not all patients in rehabilitation require daily treatments to manage TBI-induced agitation. Hence, the goal of the current study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent (vs. daily) administration of RISP would be less disturbing to motor and cognitive recovery after TBI. Anesthetized adult male rats were subjected to either a cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to groups receiving intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg) or RISP (0.45 mg/kg) 1x, 3x, or 7x per week until the completion of behavioral testing, which consisted of motor and cognitive assessments on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. The group receiving RISP 7x week exhibited greater motor and cognitive impairment compared to those receiving RISP 1x or 3x per week, or VEH [p<0.05]. Moreover, no differences were observed between the intermittent RISP groups vs. VEH [p>0.05], which supports the hypothesis. A potential clinical ramification is that RISP may be safe to manage agitation after TBI, but only when used sparingly.

Intermittent treatment with haloperidol or quetiapine does not disrupt motor and cognitive recovery after experimental brain trauma.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced agitation and aggression pose major obstacles to clinicians in the acute hospital and rehabilitation settings. Thus, management of these symptoms is crucial. Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are a common treatment approach for alleviating these symptoms. However, previous preclinical TBI studies have indicated that daily and chronic administration of these drugs (e.g., haloperidol; HAL) can exacerbate cognitive and motor deficits. Quetiapine (QUE) is an atypical APD that differs from many typical APDs, such as HAL, in its relatively rapid dissociation from the D2 receptor. The goal of this study was to test the hypotheses that intermittent HAL and QUE would not hinder recovery of cognitive and motor function following TBI and that daily QUE would also not impair functional recovery, which would be in contrast to HAL. Seventy anesthetized male rats received either a controlled cortical impact or sham injury and were then randomly assigned to TBI and sham groups receiving HAL (0.5mg/kg) or QUE (10mg/kg) intraperitoneally once per day or once every other day and compared to each other and vehicle (VEH) controls. Motor function was assessed by beam balance/walk tests on post-operative days 1-5 and cognitive function was evaluated with a Morris water maze task on days 14-19. No differences were revealed among the sham groups in any task, and hence the data were pooled. No overall differences were detected among the TBI groups, regardless of treatment or administration paradigm [p>0.05], but all were impaired vs. SHAM controls [p<0.05]. The SHAM controls also performed significantly better in the cognitive test vs. all TBI groups [p<0.05]. Moreover, the TBI+continuous HAL group performed worse than the TBI+continuous VEH, TBI+continuous QUE, and TBI+intermittent QUE groups [p<0.05], which did not differ from one another. Overall, the data suggest that QUE does not exacerbate TBI-induced cognitive and motor deficits, which supports the hypothesis. QUE may prove useful as an alternative APD treatment for management of agitation and aggression after clinical TBI. HAL may also be safe, but only if used sparingly.

Refining environmental enrichment to advance rehabilitation based research after experimental traumatic brain injury.

The typical environmental enrichment (EE) paradigm, which consists of continuous exposure after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI), promotes behavioral and histological benefits. However, rehabilitation is often abbreviated in the clinic and administered in multiple daily sessions. While recent studies have demonstrated that a once daily 6-hr bout of EE confers benefits comparable to continuous EE, breaking the therapy into two shorter sessions may increase novelty and ultimately enhance recovery. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that functional and histological outcomes will be significantly improved by daily preclinical neurorehabilitation consisting of two 3-hr periods of EE vs. a single 6-hr session. Anesthetized adult male rats received a controlled cortical impact of moderate-to-severe injury (2.8mm tissue deformation at 4m/s) or sham surgery and were then randomly assigned to groups receiving standard (STD) housing, a single 6-hr session of EE, or two 3-hr sessions of EE daily for 3weeks. Motor function (beam-balance/traversal) and acquisition of spatial learning/memory retention (Morris water maze) were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. Both EE conditions improved motor function and acquisition of spatial learning, and reduced cortical lesion volume relative to STD housing (p<0.05), but did not differ from one another in any endpoint (p>0.05). The findings replicate previous work showing that 6-hr of EE daily is sufficient to confer behavioral and histological benefits after TBI and extend the findings by demonstrating that the benefits are comparable regardless of how the 6-hrs of EE are accrued. The relevance of the finding is that it can be extrapolated to the clinic and may benefit patients who cannot endure a single extended period of neurorehabilitation.

The Therapeutic Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment and Methylphenidate Alone and in Combination after Controlled Cortical Impact Injury.

Environmental enrichment (EE) and methylphenidate (MPH) independently confer significant benefit to behavioral recovery after controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury. Given that combinational therapies may be more clinically translatable than monotherapies, the aim of the current study was to test the hypothesis that a combined treatment regimen of EE and MPH would provide greater therapeutic efficacy than either one alone. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a CCI of moderate severity or sham injury and were then randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing where they received either intraperitoneal (ip) MPH (5 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg; ip) beginning 24 h after injury and once daily for 19 days. Motor and cognitive assessments were conducted on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. No differences were observed in sham controls regardless of treatments, and thus their data were pooled. The traumatic brain injury (TBI)+EE+VEH and TBI+EE+MPH groups exhibited enhanced beam balance and beam walk performance relative to the TBI+STD+VEH group (p < 0.05), but did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). No effect of MPH treatment alone was observed in either motor task. In contrast, MPH improved spatial learning and memory when presented alone and also when combined with EE relative to VEH-treated STD controls (p < 0.05). In addition, both EE groups performed significantly better than the TBI+STD+MPH group (p < 0.05), but did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). These data replicate previous findings that both EE and MPH confer cognitive benefits after TBI and extend the findings by revealing that combining EE and MPH does not produce effects greater than either treatment alone, which does not support the hypothesis. The lack of an additive effect may be because of the robustness of the EE.

Combining the Antipsychotic Drug Haloperidol and Environmental Enrichment after Traumatic Brain Injury Is a Double-Edged Sword.

Environmental enrichment (EE) confers significant benefits after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). In contrast, the antipsychotic drug (APD) haloperidol (HAL) exerts deleterious effects on neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery. Neurorehabilitation and management of agitation, however, are integral components of the treatment strategy for patients with TBI. Hence, the goal of this study was to determine how the two therapeutic approaches interact and influence motor and cognitive recovery. Anesthetized adult male rats received a controlled cortical impact (2.8 mm tissue deformation at 4 m/sec) or sham injury and then were provided HAL (0.5 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [IP]) or vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; IP) commencing 24 h after surgery and once daily for 19 days while housed in EE or standard (STD) conditions. Beam balance/walk and Morris water maze performance were assessed on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively, followed immediately by quantification of cortical lesion volumes. The data revealed both expected and unexpected findings. It was not surprising that the TBI groups receiving EE performed significantly better than those in STD housing and that the TBI + STD + HAL group performed worse than the TBI + STD + VEH group (p < 0.05). What was surprising was that the therapeutic effects of EE were greatly reduced by concomitant administration of HAL. No differences in cortical lesion volumes were observed among the groups (p > 0.05). The potential clinical implications of these findings suggest that administering HAL to patients undergoing neurorehabilitation may be a double-edged sword because agitation must be controlled before rehabilitation can be safely initiated and executed, but its use may compromise therapeutic efficacy.

Galantamine and Environmental Enrichment Enhance Cognitive Recovery after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury But Do Not Confer Additional Benefits When Combined.

Environmental enrichment (EE) enhances cognition after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Galantamine (GAL) is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that also may promote benefits. Hence, the aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of GAL alone (standard [STD] housing) and in combination with EE in adult male rats after TBI. The hypothesis was that both therapies would confer motor, cognitive, and histological benefits when provided singly, but that their combination would be more efficacious. Anesthetized rats received a controlled cortical impact or sham injury, then were randomly assigned to receive GAL (1, 2, or 3 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) or saline vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) beginning 24 h after surgery and once daily for 21 days (experiment 1). Motor (beam-balance/walk) and cognitive (Morris water maze [MWM]) assessments were conducted on post-operative Days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volumes were quantified on Day 21. Sham controls were better versus all TBI groups. No differences in motor function or lesion volumes were observed among the TBI groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, GAL (2 mg/kg) enhanced MWM performance versus VEH and GAL (1 and 3 mg/kg; p < 0.05). In experiment 2, GAL (2 mg/kg) or VEH was combined with EE and the data were compared with the STD-housed groups from experiment 1. EE alone enhanced motor performance over the VEH-treated and GAL-treated (2 mg/kg) STD-housed groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, both EE groups (VEH or GAL) facilitated spatial learning and reduced lesion size versus STD + VEH controls (p < 0.05). No additional benefits were observed with the combination paradigm, which does not support the hypothesis. Overall, the data demonstrate that EE and once daily GAL (2 mg/kg) promote cognitive recovery after TBI. Importantly, the combined therapies did not negatively affect outcome and thus this therapeutic protocol may have clinical utility.

Abbreviated environmental enrichment confers neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in brain-injured female rats.

Environmental enrichment (EE) promotes behavioral recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the chronic rehabilitation provided in the laboratory is not analogous to the clinic where physiotherapy is typically limited. Moreover, females make up approximately 40% of the clinical TBI population, yet they are seldom studied in brain trauma. Hence, the goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that abbreviated EE would confer neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in brain injured female rats. Anesthetized rats received a cortical impact of moderate-to-severe injury (2.8mm tissue deformation at 4m/s) or sham surgery and then were randomly assigned to groups receiving standard (STD) housing or 4h, 6h, or 24h of EE daily. Motor function (beam-balance/walk and rotarod) was assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and every other day from 1 to 19, respectively. Spatial learning/memory (Morris water maze) was evaluated on days 14-19, and cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. No statistical differences were appreciated among the sham controls in any assessment and thus the data were pooled. All EE conditions improved motor function and memory retention, but only 6h and 24h enhanced spatial learning relative to STD (p<0.05). Moreover, EE, regardless of duration reduced cortical lesion volume (p<0.05). These data confirm that abbreviated EE confers robust neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in TBI female rats, which supports the hypothesis and strengthens the utility of EE as a pre-clinical model of neurorehabilitation.

Combination therapies for neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury: Is more better?

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant health care crisis that affects two million individuals in the United Sates alone and over ten million worldwide each year. While numerous monotherapies have been evaluated and shown to be beneficial at the bench, similar results have not translated to the clinic. One reason for the lack of successful translation may be due to the fact that TBI is a heterogeneous disease that affects multiple mechanisms, thus requiring a therapeutic approach that can act on complementary, rather than single, targets. Hence, the use of combination therapies (i.e., polytherapy) has emerged as a viable approach. Stringent criteria, such as verification of each individual treatment plus the combination, a focus on behavioral outcome, and post-injury vs. pre-injury treatments, were employed to determine which studies were appropriate for review. The selection process resulted in 37 papers that fit the specifications. The review, which is the first to comprehensively assess the effects of combination therapies on behavioral outcomes after TBI, encompasses five broad categories (inflammation, oxidative stress, neurotransmitter dysregulation, neurotrophins, and stem cells, with and without rehabilitative therapies). Overall, the findings suggest that combination therapies can be more beneficial than monotherapies as indicated by 46% of the studies exhibiting an additive or synergistic positive effect versus on 19% reporting a negative interaction. These encouraging findings serve as an impetus for continued combination studies after TBI and ultimately for the development of successful clinically relevant therapies.