Impact of Center Procedural Volume on Mortality and Readmission Rates Following Pericardiectomy in the United States.

Our study aimed to explore the national trends in the rates of perioperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and readmissions after pericardiectomy and the impact of center volume on these outcomes. Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, we identified patients who underwent isolated pericardiectomy from 2010 to 2019. In-hospital mortality and readmission rates were assessed using orthogonal polynomial contrasts, with the linear and nonlinear trends evaluated as needed. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify the independent predictors of mortality and readmission. All analyses accounted for the Nationwide Readmission Database sampling design and were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.) with p <0.05 used to indicate statistical significance. A total of 26,169 hospitalizations for pericardiectomy were identified during the study period. The median age was 59 years and 44% were female. In-hospital mortality was 5.2%, and the median length of stay was 7 days. Advanced age, higher co-morbidity index, and lower annual facility pericardiectomy volume were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The 30- and 90-day readmission rates after pericardiectomy were 18% and 28%, respectively. Previous cardiac surgery, diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, and greater co-morbidity score were independent predictors of readmission. In conclusion, isolated pericardiectomy rates have remained mostly constant, with relatively small changes in in-hospital mortality and 30- and 90-day readmission rates over the last decade. Advanced age, lower facility pericardiectomy volume, and higher Elixhauser co-morbidity index are independent predictors of surgical mortality.

Acute limb ischemia from embolization of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm thrombus: a rare case report.

Myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to a wide spectrum of mechanical complications. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm (LVP) is a rare but serious complication of MI. Case presentation: A 69-year-old woman with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and a remote history of inferolateral ST-elevation MI (STEMI) with failure to revascularize the left circumflex artery presented with gangrenous right toes that appeared 2 years after her STEMI. A computed tomography angiogram of the right lower extremity showed arterial occlusion and mild atherosclerotic disease. Echocardiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm with an adherent mural thrombus as the underlying cause of acute limb ischemia. The patient was started on heparin and cardiothoracic surgery was consulted but did not operate as the risk of surgery outweighed the benefit. On hospital day 3, the patient underwent amputation of her gangrenous toes as the tissue was nonviable. The patient remained stable during her hospital stay and was discharged on day 5 on long-term anticoagulation. Clinical discussion: LVPs have a wide spectrum of presentations, from asymptomatic or nonspecific symptoms to thromboembolism with end-organ damage, such as in our case. Therefore, early diagnosis and management are of paramount importance. Our patient's prior coronary artery bypass grafting most likely helped in forming a fibrous pericardium that sealed the pseudoaneurysm and prevented its rupture. Conclusions: STEMI requires close follow-up, especially in cases where revascularization is not achievable, as the risk of mechanical complications and mortality is high. Physicians should have a high suspicion for LVP in patients with prior MI, given its wide spectrum of presentations.

Comparison of Transfemoral versus Transsubclavian/Transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Femoral access is the gold standard for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Safe alternative access, that represents about 15 % of TAVR cases, remains important for patients without adequate transfemoral access. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing transfemoral (TF) access versus transsubclavian or transaxillary (TSc/TAx) access in patients undergoing TAVR. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Register, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through May 24, 2022) for studies comparing (TF) to (TSc/TAx) access for TAVR. A total of 21 studies with 75,995 unique patients who underwent TAVR (73,203 transfemoral and 2,792 TSc/TAx) were included in the analysis. There was no difference in the risk of in-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality between the two groups (RR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.36-1.13, P = 0.12) and (RR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.64-1.41, P = 0.81), while 1-year mortality was significantly lower in the TF TAVR group (RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.67-0.93, P = 0.005). No significant differences in major bleeding (RR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.65-1.03, P = 0.09), major vascular complications (RR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.75-1.72, P = 0.53), and stroke (RR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.42-1.02, P = 0.06) were observed. In patients undergoing TAVR, TF access is associated with significantly lower 1-year mortality compared to TSc/TAx access without differences in major bleeding, major vascular complications and stroke. While TF is the preferred approach for TAVR, TSc/TAx is a safe alternative approach. Future studies should confirm these findings, preferably in a randomized setting.

Outcomes of atherectomy in treating severely calcified coronary lesions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Severely calcified coronary lesions with reduced left ventricular (LV) function result in worse outcomes. Atherectomy is used in treating such lesions when technically feasible. However, there is limited data examining the safety and efficacy of atherectomy without hemodynamic support in treating severely calcified coronary lesions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy in patient with reduced LVEF. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Register and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through July 21, 2021) for studies evaluating the outcomes of atherectomy in patients with severe LV dysfunction. We used random-effect model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The endpoints were in-hospital and long term all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: A total of 7 studies consisting of 2,238 unique patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up duration was 22.4 months. The risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality using atherectomy in patients with severely reduced LVEF compared to the patients with moderate reduced or preserved LVEF was [2.4vs.0.5%; RR:5.28; 95%CI 1.65-16.84; P = 0.005], the risk of long term all-cause mortality was [21 vs. 8.8%; RR of 2.84; 95% CI 1.16-6.95; P = 0.02]. In-hospital TVR risk was 2.0 vs. 0.6% (RR: 4.15; 95% CI 4.15-15.67; P = 0.04) and long-term TVR was [6.0 vs. 9.9%; RR of 0.75; 95% CI 0.39-1.42; P = 0.37]. In-hospital MI was [7.1 vs. 5.4%; RR 1.63; 95% CI 0.91-2.93; P = 0.10], long-term MI was [7.5 vs. 5.7; RR 1.74; 95%CI 0.95-3.18; P = 0.07). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggested that the patients with severely reduced LVEF when using atherectomy devices experienced higher risk of clinical outcomes in the terms of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. As we know that the patients with severely reduced LVEF are inherently at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, this information should be considered hypothesis generating and utilized while discussing the risks and benefits of atherectomy in such high risk patients. Future studies should focus on the comparison of outcomes of different atherectomy devices in such patients. Adjusting for the inherent mortality risk posed by left ventricular dysfunction may be a strategy while designing a study.

Routine Invasive Strategy in Elderly Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

Invasive treatment with coronary angiography is preferred approach for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) compared to medical therapy alone. The results from the randomized clinical trials (RCT) that compared the invasive treatment strategy vs. conservative approach in the elderly (≥75 years) with NSTE-ACS has been inconsistent. To compare invasive and conservative strategies in the elderly (>75 years) with NSTE-ACS. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Register and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through July 10, 2021) for RCTs comparing invasive and conservative strategies in the elderly with NSTE-ACS. We used random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval(CI). A total of 6 RCT including 2,323 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The median follow-up duration was 13.5 months. When invasive approach was compared to conservative strategy, it showed no difference in all-cause mortality in patients aged ≥75 years with NSTE-ACS (RR of 0.85; 95% CI 0.70-1.04; P = 0.12; I2 = 0%). There was significant reduction in MI (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49 0.71; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and unplanned revascularization (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.53, P <0.001, I2 = 0%). Invasive strategy was associated with higher risk of major bleeding when compared to conservative treatment (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.21-3.74, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%). Comparison of both strategies showed no significant difference in stroke (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.38-1.46, P = 0.40; I2 = 0%). This updated meta-analysis suggests that in elderly patients (>75 years) with NSTE-ACS, a routine invasive strategy is associated with a reduction in MI and revascularization, while increasing the risk of major bleeding, but without difference in all-cause mortality and stroke.

Significance of indeterminate and abnormal stress electrocardiography despite normal imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease - An analysis of the PROMISE trial.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal and indeterminate electrocardiographic (ECG) changes during cardiac stress imaging are not uncommon. While the prognostic importance of abnormal ECG despite normal imaging has been previously studied, prognosis of indeterminate stress ECG changes is uncertain. METHODS: We studied the prognostic value of stress ECG changes in symptomatic patients without known CAD and normal stress imaging from the PROMISE trial. Patients with normal ECG (concordant), indeterminate ECG and abnormal ECG (discordant) were identified among those with negative exercise imaging stress test (EIST) and negative vasodilator nuclear stress test (PIST). Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular endpoint (MACE, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina hospitalization) and likelihood of coronary revascularization. RESULTS: In EIST, indeterminate stress ECG [1.1% vs. 0.2% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.2, (95% CI 1.11-15.6), p = 0.034] and discordant ECG [7.2% vs. 0.2% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 27.6, (95% CI 9.6-79.8), p < 0.0001] were associated with increased likelihood of revascularization compared to normal stress ECG. Similar findings were observed with PIST [indeterminate vs concordant [1.7% vs. 0.5% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 5.9, (95% CI 1.1-31.7), p = 0.041; discordant vs concordant 15.4% vs. 0.5% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 24.2, (95% CI 4.6-127.7), p = 0.0002]. MACE rates were similar between ECG subgroups, in both EIST and PIST. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients without known CAD undergoing stress imaging, indeterminate and discordant ECG changes results may indicate presence of obstructive CAD despite normal imaging results and predict increased likelihood of coronary revascularization despite no significant difference in MACE.

Major adverse cardiac events in symptomatic women with non-obstructive CAD on coronary CTA: pooled analysis from PROMISE and SCOT-HEART.

The presence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). However, factors associated with the development of MACE in symptomatic women with non-obstructive CAD on coronary CTA have not been fully elucidated. We sought to examine the influence of risk factors and coronary artery calcification on MACE in symptomatic women with non-obstructive CAD on coronary CTA. Women from PROMISE and SCOT-HEART trials with none or non-obstructive CAD on coronary CTA comprised the study cohort. Baseline characteristics and clinical presentation were assessed. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves was done to compare outcomes stratified by the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score and the Agatston score. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. 2597 women had non-obstructive CAD or normal coronary CTA, with a median follow-up of 32 months. Compared to women without MACE, women with MACE had lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and higher mean ASCVD risk scores. Further, women with non-obstructive CAD and ASCVD ≥ 7.5% had higher risk of MACE than those with ASCVD < 7.5% [3.2% vs. 1.1%, adjusted HR (aHR) of 3.1 (95% CI 1.32, 7.23), P-value 0.009]. The Agatston calcium score, on the other hand, was not independently associated with MACE among this population of symptomatic women. Symptomatic women with non-obstructive CAD on coronary CTA are at higher risk for MACE, with the ASCVD risk score being independently associated with the occurrence of adverse events.

Sex Differences in the Clinical Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a reasonable alternative to oral anticoagulation in a selective group of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). While women are known to have higher risk of AF-related stroke, the impact of sex differences on the clinical outcomes of LAAO has not been well-studied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a meta-analysis evaluating sex differences on the outcomes of patients undergoing LAAO. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (from inception to October 2021) for studies evaluating the impact of sex difference on LAAO procedural outcomes. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In-hospital all-cause mortality and ischemic stroke were the primary endpoints. In-hospital pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, major bleeding, technical success, device-related thrombus, and hospital length of stay were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies with 54,754 patients were included, of whom 22,461 (41%) were females. Female sex was associated with higher rates of in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR 2.18; 95% CI 1.46-3.26; P = 0.0001) and in-hospital ischemic stroke (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.06-2.61; P = 0.03) when compared with males. Females had higher rates of in-hospital major bleeding (RR 1.93; 95% CI 1.40-2.67; P < 0.0001) and hospital length of stay >1 day (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.33-1.45; P < 0.00001). There were no differences between females and males in terms of technical success (RR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.00; P = 1.00) and device-related thrombus and (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.31-2.82; P = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Women are more likely to experience worse periprocedural outcomes with longer hospital stay after LAA closure. Further efforts are needed to increase the participation of women in clinical studies and to assess these differences to properly address the discrepancy in outcomes between men and women.

Venovo Venous Stent in Treating Iliac Vein Compression: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The Venovo venous stent (BD/Bard Peripheral Vascular) is indicated to treat iliofemoral veno-occlusive disease. We present our own experience with the Venovo venous stent in treating iliac vein compression (ILVC). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, we included consecutive patients treated with the Venovo venous stent for ILVC at our center. Stent deployment and sizing were guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Minimal luminal areas at the compression before and after treatment were measured by IVUS. Clinical improvement was determined by symptoms reported by patients and the Clinical Etiologic Anatomic and Pathophysiologic (CEAP) score. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from acute venothromboembolic disease, stent migration, perforation, acute/subacute closure, and vascular complications. The primary safety endpoint was target-lesion revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 50 consecutive patients (57 Venovo stents, 36 women, mean age, 59.8 ± 16.3 years) were included. IVUS-measured mean percent stenosis at the compression site was 64.8% ± 12.8%. Mean total stent length and diameter were 78.0 ± 54.0 mm and 17.1 ± 1.9 mm, respectively. The primary safety endpoint was met in all subjects. Procedural technical success was 100% (successful deployment with no complications). At 1 year, 83.8% of patients reported improvement in their symptoms. Freedom from total occlusion at 1 year was 100% (data available for n = 30 patients). Target-lesion revascularization (TLR) was 2% at 1 year due to 1 patient who had stent explantation from worsening ipsilateral left leg and back pain. CONCLUSION: In this single-center experience, the Venovo venous stent was safe and effective in treating ILVC with 98% freedom from TLR at a follow-up of 1 year. Improvement in symptoms was reported in the majority of patients.

Medical and Revascularization Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: An Overview.

Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) affects approximately 10 million Americans with 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year. Patients with SIHD are primarily managed in the outpatient setting with aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modification via medical therapy and lifestyle changes. Currently, this approach is considered as the mainstay of treatment. The recently published ISCHEMIA trial has established the noninferiority of medical therapy in comparison to coronary revascularization in patients with moderate to severe ischemia. Percutaneous coronary intervention is currently recommended for patients with significant left main disease, large ischemic myocardial burden, and patients with severe refractory angina despite maximal medical therapy.

Initial optimal medical therapy with or without invasive strategy for stable coronary disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: There is a persistent controversy regarding the benefit and timing of angiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). With this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) the advantages of initial invasive strategy and medical therapy compared with only medical therapy. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of the following databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase. Data was collected from all the RCTs that compared early invasive approach with medical therapy alone in treating stable CAD which was conducted by two independent authors. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI), while the secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, hospitalization due to unstable angina and revascularization events. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 15 RCTs (13 916 patients, mean age 63.1, 78.9% men). The early invasive strategy, compared with medical therapy alone, did not reveal a significant reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05, P = 0.30) or MI (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.10, P = 0.42). Furthermore, the early invasive strategy did not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization or the revascularization rate compared with medical therapy alone (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of MACE and hospitalization due to unstable angina were lower in patients treated with early invasive strategy (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99, P = 0.04), and (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.67, P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early invasive strategy with medical therapy did not reduce the incidence of all-cause mortality and MI when compared with medical therapy alone among patients with stable CAD with significant stenosis. However, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of MACE and hospitalization due to unstable angina in the early invasive group.

Predicting Significant Iliac Vein Compression Using a Probability Scoring System Derived From Minimal Luminal Area on Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients 65 Years of Age or Younger.

BACKGROUND: The presence of 50% or more stenosis on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is considered diagnostic of iliac vein compression (ILVC) by most operators. We have previously developed a scoring system combining minimal luminal area (MLA) at the compression site and age to predict ILVC as seen on IVUS. We present a revised and improved scoring system following an additional number of patients and limited to patients 65 years of age and younger. METHODS: Patients were included from retrospective (n = 52) and prospective (n = 18) registries of consecutive patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the pelvis with venous filling and IVUS within a few weeks apart to evaluate for symptomatic ILVC at a single cardiovascular practice. Quantitative vascular analysis was performed on all images obtained. MLA and age were used to calculate a score derived from a previously published logistic regression formula. Patients >65 years in age were excluded. The predicted findings from the score were compared with the actual presence of compression on IVUS. The revised scoring system is based on a score of < or ≥ 0.533824 and MLA (mm²) of <140, ≥140 to <200, and ≥200. The negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (NPV and PPV) of each cut-off in predicting ILVC on IVUS were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 70 symptomatic patients were included (mean age, 52.6 ± 12.3 years). The model offered the following: accuracy = 54/70 (77.1%); sensitivity = 51/52 (98.1%); specificity = 3/18 (16.7%); PPV = 51/66 (77.3%); and NPV = 3/4 (75.0%). CONCLUSION: A scoring system using MLA on CTA and age provides a fairly accurate diagnostic test to predict the presence of significant ILVC as seen on IVUS.

Shockwave™ Lithoplasty in Combination With Atherectomy in Treating Severe Calcified Femoropopliteal and Iliac Artery Disease: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Calcium is a predictor of poor outcome in the treatment of infrainguinal arterial disease. Rotational atherectomy can effectively debulk atherosclerotic calcium but is less likely to significantly modify medial and adventitial calcinosis. Shockwave IVL provides circumferential sonic pressure waves capable of disrupting deeper calcium and theoretically complements the debulking process of atherectomy. We present acute and intermediate outcome data from patients with severe femoral or iliac artery calcified disease treated with the combination of rotational atherectomy and Shockwave IVL at a single center. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data on rotational atherectomy (Jetstream (Boston Scientific) and orbital atherectomy (CSI)) from a single operator at a single center with core laboratory analysis of angiographic imaging. All patients that received the combination treatment of rotational atherectomy and Shockwave IVL were included in this study. Patient follow-up was done from medical records with data extracted by an experienced research coordinator. Primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events including major dissection (NHLBI C or higher), perforation, distal embolization, or major amputation defined as amputation above the ankle. Primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success (≤ 30% residual at end of procedure). 23/24 (95.8%) patients were treated with drug coated balloons (DCB) post combination therapy. Secondary endpoint on follow-up was target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. Mean age was 70.7 ± 9.9 years. Lesions were in the femoropopliteal 79.1%, common femoral 12.5% and iliac 8.3% arteries. 87.0% were claudicants and 58.3% diabetics. Chronic total occlusion was 12.5%, severe calcium 100%, lesion length 84.5 ± 37.1 mm, baseline stenosis 57.1 ± 18.9% and baseline minimal luminal diameter (MLD) 2.2 ± 1.1 mm. Patients were treated with Jetstream (n = 19) or Orbital (n = 5) atherectomy. Embolic filter was used in 58.3% of cases. Post atherectomy stenosis was 36.4 ± 17.5%, post adjunctive IVL 21.1 + 15.7%, and final stenosis 13.0 ± 10.9%. Bailout stenting was 4.6% and primary stenting 13.6% (total stenting rate 18.2%). Final MLD was 4.7 ± 0.8 mm, resulting in an acute gain of 2.5 mm. No infrapopliteal embolization or amputation was noted. At a mean follow up of 591.4 ± 175.2 days, 2 patients died (unrelated to procedure or device). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months occurred in 2 patients or 2/22 (9%). At 18-month of follow up TLR occurred in 7/22 (31%) patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of atherectomy and shockwave IVL followed by adjunctive DCB is safe and appears to be effective in treating severe calcified disease with acceptable TLR on long term follow-up in a population of severe femoropopliteal disease.

Colchicine therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation is a substantial mediator of atherosclerosis. Colchicine has anti-inflammatory effects and has been investigated in many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and Embase databases (inception through 28 February 2020) for RCTs evaluating colchicine in CAD patients. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke. Estimates were pooled using inverse-variance random-effects model. We reported effect sizes as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of six RCTs with 6154 patients were included. The mean age ± SD for the patients in the colchicine group was 61.6 ± 10.8 and control group was 61.5 ± 10.7 years. At the median follow-up of 3.5 months, use of colchicine in patients with CAD was not associated with statistically significant reduction of MACE (RD -0.032; 95% CI -0.083 to 0.018; P = 0.15; I2 = 75%; low level of evidence), MI (RD -0.011; 95% CI -0.030 to 0.007; P = 0.16; I2 = 11.3%; low level of evidence), all-cause mortality (RD -0.001; 95% CI -0.009 to 0.006; P = 0.65; I2 = 0%; low level of evidence), cardiovascular mortality (RD -0.003; 95% CI -0.010 to 0.004; P = 0.34; I2 = 0%; low level of evidence), and stroke (RD -0.001, 95% CI -0.005 to 0.004; P = 0.69; I2 = 0%; very low level of evidence). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that colchicine was not associated with a significant decrease in cardiovascular endpoints and mortality in patients with CAD.

When Pedal Access Is the Only Way to Save a Limb!

Critical limb ischemia is associated with high rates of amputation and death. Endovascular revascularization prevents amputation in approximately 80 to 90% of patients. Traditional access, however, can be a problem in some patients and pedal access may be the only way to provide adequate revascularization and potentially prevents an amputation. We present three cases to illustrate how pedal access can be the last frontier to save a leg.

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Death and Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Inducible Myocardial Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: There has been a continuous debate about the survival benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and moderate to severe ischemia. In this study we aimed to summarize the currently available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PCI versus medical therapy (MT) for patients with SIHD. METHODS: An electronic database search was conducted for RCTs that compared PCI on top of MT versus MT alone. A random effects model was used to calculate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with 10,043 patients with a mean age of 62.54 ± 1.56 years and a median follow up of 3.9 years were identified. Among patients with SIHD and moderate to severe ischemia by stress testing, PCI didn't show any benefit for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality compared to MT(RR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.646-1.12; p = 0.639). There was also no benefit in cardiovascular (CV) death (RR = 0.88 ; 95% CI 0.71-1.09; p = 0.18) or myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.271; 95% CI 0.782-1.087; P = 0.327) in the PCI group as compared to MT. CONCLUSION: Among patients with SIHD and evidence of moderate to severe ischemia by stress testing, PCI on top of MT appears to add no mortality benefit as compared to with MT alone.

Safety and efficacy of short-term (1 to 3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Among patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is associated with increased risk of bleeding, but decreased stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction unrelated to the stent. As PCI techniques and devices have progressed, the optimal duration of DAPT has come into question. We identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients undergoing PCI, who received one or more drug eluting stents (DES) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and randomized to short (1-3 months) versus standard duration DAPT. The prespecified primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Important secondary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as MACE and major bleeding; any bleeding; major bleeding; all-cause death; cardiovascular death. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects model. Analysis included 7 RCTs, comprising 35,857 patients and 53,321 patient-years of follow-up. The mean (SD) age of patients was 64.4 (10.6) years, 49.6% of patients presented with ACS, and 25.5% were female. There was no difference between short and standard-length DAPT in regards to MACE (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.84-1.03; p = 0.19), NACE (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.02; p = 0.12), all-cause death (HR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.80-1.05; p = 0.21), or cardiovascular death (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.64-1.13; p = 0.26). However, short-term DAPT was associated with significantly reduced major bleeding events (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.95; p = 0.03) and any bleeding event (HR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90; p = 0.01) compared with standard-length DAPT. Among patients undergoing PCI for CAD, the use of short-term DAPT (1-3 months) followed by single antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding events, but with similar risk of MACE, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death compared with standard duration DAPT.

Optimal Vessel Sizing and Understanding Dissections in Infrapopliteal Interventions: Data From the iDissection Below the Knee Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate if imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) yields a more accurate estimate of vessel diameter and the presence of dissections than angiography after intervention in the infrapopliteal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-center study enrolled 20 consecutive patients (mean age 74.1±12.4 years; 12 women) with infrapopliteal disease who were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA; n=10) or orbital atherectomy (OA) followed by PTA (n=10). The majority of patients were hypertensive and half were diabetic. The overall lesion length was 7.3±6.3 cm, and the diameter stenosis was 80.3%±22.1%. The baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. Vessel diameters were measured using IVUS from the internal elastic lamina (IEL) to the IEL. IVUS was performed at baseline, post PTA or OA, and post OA+PTA. Quantitative vascular angiography (QVA) and IVUS were analyzed by a core laboratory. Dissections on cine images were categorized based on the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification, while the arc and depth were used to characterize dissections on IVUS images. RESULTS: Mean vessel diameter by QVA was 2.9±0.6 vs 4.0±1.0 mm by IVUS according to the core laboratory (mean difference 1.1±0.9, p<0.001). On angiography, there were 7 dissections after PTA (6 C, 1 D), 1 dissection after OA (1 B), and 2 dissections after OA+PTA (1 A, 1 B; p=0.028 vs post PTA). IVUS uncovered 3.8 times more dissections than seen on angiography. There were 23 dissections after PTA (18 intima, 3 media, 2 adventitia), 12 dissections after OA (8 intima, 1 media, 3 adventitia), and 11 dissections following OA+PTA (7 intima, 1 media, 3 adventitia; p=0.425 vs PTA). Bailout stenting (all due to angiographic dissections ≥C) was necessary in 6 of the PTA cohort and none of the OA+PTA group. CONCLUSION: In addition to underestimating the infrapopliteal vessel diameter by ~25%, angiography underappreciated the presence and severity of post-intervention dissections vs IVUS, particularly in the OA+PTA group.

Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded conflicting results about the impact of transradial access (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: We performed a trial sequential analysis (TSA) of RCTs comparing TRA and TFA in patients with STEMI. The outcomes of interest were 30-day mortality, major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and access site complications. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies with 11,992 patients were included in the current TSA. The TRA group had lower 30-day mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90, P = .003), major bleeding (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79, P = .0001), MACE (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.93, P = .01), and access site complications (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.48, P < .00001). There was no difference in MI and stroke between the 2groups. Applying TSA boundaries, the z-curve for 30-day mortality, major bleeding, MACE and access site complications crossed the conventional and the TSA boundaries, indicating firm evidence for better outcomes in the TRA group. For MI and stroke, the z-curve failed to cross the conventional and the TSA boundaries for both outcomes, indicating lack of signals of benefit or harm. CONCLUSIONS: In the current TSA, the available data from RCTs support improved 30-day mortality, major bleeding, MACE and access site complication rates in STEMI patients treated by PCI through the radial access.