Is Stone-free Status After Surgical Intervention for Kidney Stones Associated With Better Health-related Quality of Life? - A Multicenter Study From the North American Stone Quality of Life Consortium.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with residual fragments after surgical intervention for kidney stones to patients that are stone-free using the disease-specific Wisconsin stone quality of life (WISQOL) questionnaire. Kidney stones contribute to impaired HRQOL, which is increasingly recognized as an important healthcare outcome measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 313 adult patients who underwent surgical intervention for kidney stones at 4 sites completed a WISQOL questionnaire. We retrospectively collected surgical data including presence of residual fragments on post-operative imaging. We calculated standardized WISQOL total and domain scores (0-100), which included items related to social functioning (D1), emotional functioning (D2), stone-related impact (D3), and vitality (D4). Scores were compared between patients with residual fragments to those who were stone-free after surgical intervention. RESULTS: Demographics did not differ between groups, overall mean age 54.6 ± 13.5 and 55.4% female. There was no significant difference in total WISQOL score for patients with residual fragments (n = 124) compared to patients that were stone-free (n = 189), 110.5 ± 27.8 vs 115.4 ± 23.6 respectively, (P = .12). Interestingly, patients with residual fragments who underwent secondary surgery were found to have significantly lower total WISQOL score (88.4 ± 30.1 vs 116.6 ± 25.0, P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Stone-free status after surgical intervention is not associated with better HRQOL when compared with patients whose surgeries left residual fragments. Indeed, further surgical intervention on residual fragments to achieve stone-free status may actually result in worse HRQOL.

Outcomes of Conservative Management of Splenic Injury Incurred During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Purpose: Splenic injury is a rare complication after left-sided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although initial observation is often espoused, the natural history of nonoperative conservative management is not well established and the implications of splenic injury are not fully defined in this context. We sought to describe outcomes of conservative management of splenic injury incurred at PCNL. Patients and Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of individual patients who underwent PCNL complicated by trans-splenic nephrostomy access injury. Demographic info, intraoperative data, management strategies, and outcomes were reviewed. Results: Nine patients suffered splenic injury after left PCNL. All patients had supracostal upper pole access under fluoroscopic guidance. Splenic injury was identified by computed tomography (CT) in the eight of nine (89%) who had imaging on first postoperative day. All eight patients were managed conservatively with nephrostomy dwell time of 2-21 days, one of whom (11%) required blood transfusion. The remaining patient (11%)-who had tubeless PCNL without postoperative imaging presented 5 days postoperatively with a delayed bleed and underwent emergent splenectomy. Seven of the nine (78%) were managed nonoperatively and without need for transfusion or embolization. Conclusion: The majority of patients incurring splenic injury during PCNL can be managed conservatively with maintenance of nephrostomy tube for ≥2 days. Consequences of unrecognized splenic injury may include splenic bleed and may prompt transfusion and/or splenectomy, underscoring role of routine postoperative CT to allow timely diagnosis, particularly in those undergoing upper pole supracostal left-sided percutaneous renal access.

The Effect of Thiazide and Potassium Citrate Use on the Health Related Quality of Life of Patients with Urolithiasis.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge it is unknown whether the benefits of medical management of urolithiasis outweigh the potential side effects of the medications used, including potassium citrate and thiazide diuretics. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between potassium citrate or thiazides and overall stone related health related quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data were obtained on stone forming enrollees in the North American Stone Quality of Life Consortium. We used the WISQOL (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life) questionnaire to compare health related quality of life between patients treated and not treated with potassium citrate or thiazide type diuretics. Additionally, the likelihood of gastrointestinal complaints was compared between those prescribed and not prescribed potassium citrate. The likelihood of fatigue and sexual complaints was also compared in those prescribed and not prescribed thiazides. RESULTS: Of the 1,511 subjects, including 787 males and 724 females, 279 were on potassium citrate and 238 were on thiazides at study enrollment. Patients prescribed potassium citrate had higher health related quality of life in each domain vs those not prescribed potassium citrate (p <0.001). Patients prescribed thiazides had higher health related quality of life in each domain compared to those not prescribed thiazide (all p <0.01). Those prescribed potassium citrate were less likely than those not prescribed potassium citrate to report nausea, stomach upset or cramps (OR 0.57, p <0.001). Patients prescribed thiazides were less likely than those not prescribed thiazides to report fatigue (OR 0.63, p = 0.004) or reduced sexual interest and/or activity (OR 0.64, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Among stone formers the use of potassium citrate and thiazides was associated with better health related quality of life across all WISQOL domains without an increased likelihood of gastrointestinal complaints and fatigue or sexual complaints, respectively. These findings may be useful when counseling patients regarding the initiation of potassium citrate or thiazides for medical management of nephrolithiasis.

Acquired hemophilia presenting as gross hematuria following kidney stone - a case report and review of the literature

ABSTRACT A rare condition in itself, acquired hemophilia A, seldom presents as isolated gross hematuria. It is a serious condition with a high mortality rate and thus clinical suspicion followed by prompt diagnosis is imperative (1). In fact, only 8 cases of such presentation of this condition have been reported thus far in the literature. Of these, none describe the initial presentation of hematuria with the inciting event of a kidney stone. We present a case of a 67-year-old man with signs and symptoms of nephrolithiasis accompanied by profuse hematuria, who was subsequently found to have developed expression of factor VIII inhibitor leading to acquired hemophilia A.

Acquired Hemophilia presenting as Gross Hematuria following Kidney Stone - A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

A rare condition in itself, acquired hemophilia A, seldom presents as isolated gross hematuria. It is a serious condition with a high mortality rate and thus clinical suspicion followed by prompt diagnosis is imperative (1). In fact, only 8 cases of such presentation of this condition have been reported thus far in the literature. Of these, none describe the initial presentation of hematuria with the inciting event of a kidney stone. We present a case of a 67-year-old man with signs and symptoms of nephrolithiasis accompanied by profuse hematuria, who was subsequently found to have developed expression of factor VIII inhibitor leading to acquired hemophilia A.

Postpercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Not Associated With Unplanned Readmission.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and evaluate any association with unplanned 90-day readmission. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing PCNL in 2 dedicated endourologic practices between 2009 and 2013. We collected patient demographics, perioperative culture data, and operative characteristics. SIRS was defined as having 2 or more of the following: maximum white blood cell count >12,000 or <4000, temperature >38 or <34°C, heart rate >90, and respiratory rate >20 within the first 24 hours following PCNL. Proportions between groups were compared to identify significant associations. RESULTS: We identified 389 patients undergoing PCNL and 43% (167 of 389) met SIRS criteria, more commonly in patients with multiple PCNL accesses (OR 2.3; CI: 1.1-4.8, P = .025). Readmission was required in 8% (31 of 389), most commonly for infection (n = 21). Although possession of a struvite stone was associated with unplanned readmission (16% vs 4%, P < .01), SIRS in the absence of fever within 48 hours postoperative was not associated with readmission (29.4% vs 25.8%, P = .837). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the patients undergoing PCNL met the criteria for SIRS within the first postoperative day. There was no association between SIRS and unplanned readmission in the postoperative PCNL patient. Despite discharge during the first postoperative day, patients with SIRS (without fever or struvite stones) had no increased risk for unplanned return. Our findings suggest that the development of SIRS immediately following PCNL does not preclude safe discharge on the first postoperative day.

Occult Congenital Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Two Adults Presenting with Collecting System Rupture After Blunt Renal Trauma: A Case Report Series.

We report two adult cases of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction detected incidentally in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma. CT images are provided to describe the presentation, while review of the literature and management of renal trauma are discussed.