Value of early second session shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of upper ureteric stones compared to laser ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of early second session shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) compared with laser ureteroscopy (URS) for the treatment of upper ureteric stones were evaluated. METHODS: From January to October 2019, 108 patients with upper ureteric stones (< 1.5 cm and ≤ 1000 Hounsfield unit (HU)) were randomized into SWL and laser URS groups. The second SWL session was performed within 48-72 h of the first session. Using plain abdominal X-ray and ultrasonography, patients were evaluated 48-72 h after the first SWL session and one week after the second and third SWL sessions or one week after URS. The procedure was considered a success when no additional procedures were needed to clear the stone. To determine the stone-free rate (SFR), noncontrast computed tomography of the urinary tract was performed three months postoperatively. RESULTS: In the SWL group, the success rates were 92.6% and 94.4% after the second and third sessions. The SFR was 96.2% in the laser URS group. The success rates were not significantly different between the second and third SWL sessions versus the laser URS (p = 0.418 and 0.660, respectively). Operative and fluoroscopy times were significantly longer in the SWL group (p = 0.001), and JJ stent insertions were needed after laser URS. CONCLUSION: Ultraslow full-power SWL treatment of patients with upper ureteric stones (< 1.5 cm and ≤ 1000 HU) with an early second session is safe and effective compared to laser URS. Patients who do not respond to early second SWL session should be shifted to another treatment modality.

Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol in the management of high attenuation value upper ureteric stones: A randomized comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol in the management of high attenuation value upper ureteric stones compared with slow-rate, power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy. METHODS: This was a randomized trial enrolling patients with a single high attenuation value (≥1000 HU) upper ureteric stones between January 2019 and July 2019. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy (54 patients) was applied at a rate of 30 shock waves/min with power ramping from 6 to 18 kV for 100 shock waves, then a safety pause for 2 min, followed by ramping 18-22 kV for 100 shock waves, then a safety pause for 2 min. Then, full power (22 kV) was maintained until the end of the session. Slow-rate, power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy (47 patients) was applied at a rate of 60 shock waves/min with power ramping from 6 to 10 kV during the first 500 shock waves, then from 11 to 22 kV during the next 1000 shock waves, then maintained on 22 kV in the last 1500 shock waves. Up to three sessions were carried out with a follow up 3 months after the last session. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Perioperative data of the two protocols were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative data. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy after single (92.6% vs 23.4%) and multiple (96.3% vs 63.8%) sessions. Most complications were mild, with no significant difference between both groups (9.3% vs 12.8%; P = 0.573). Logistic regression analysis identified ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol as the only significant independent factor for the stone-free rate (odds ratio 12.589, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy for high attenuation value upper ureteric stones is associated with a significantly higher stone-free rate, and with mild complications that are comparable to those of standard shock wave lithotripsy.

Relation of baseline prostate volume to improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms due to tamsulosin monotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: An exploratory, multicenter, prospective study.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between baseline prostate volume (PV) and the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) induced by tamsulosin monotherapy after 2-year follow-up in Egyptian benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective comparative multicenter study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-one BPH patients were included in the study from January 2014 to January 2017. The patients were divided according to their PV into two groups. Group A included patients with small-sized prostate (≤40 ml) and Group B included those with PV larger than 40 ml. Full evaluation was done at presentation. The patients are followed up at 6, 12, and 24 months of continued medical treatment with tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were coded and entered using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24. Data were summarized using mean and standard deviation in quantitative data. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using unpaired t-test or the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. A comparison between paired measurements in the same person was done using paired t-test (Chan, 2003). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age was 60.1 ± 7.2 years. The mean value of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was recorded for the 381 patients at presentation. In Group A, the mean value of IPSS was 20.44 ± 3.18, whereas in Group B, the mean value of IPSS was 21.23 ± 3.5. There was a significant improvement in symptoms (Qmax-IPSS) in both groups, but we found that this improvement was significantly better in Group A (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: PV is an important prognostic factor affecting the improvement of the LUTS by α1-blocker monotherapy. Tamsulosin monotherapy may not be enough for large prostate (>40 mg) to maintain adequate symptom relief, and it is better to start with other medical options such as combined therapy or early nonmedical therapy. Starting α1-blocker monotherapy in smaller prostates may be of benefit in symptomatic patients without considering watchful waiting.

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus JJ ureteric stent as the initial drainage method in kidney stone patients presenting with acute kidney injury: A prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare percutaneous nephrostomy tube versus JJ stent as an initial urinary drainage procedure in kidney stone patients presenting with acute kidney injury. METHODS: Between January 2017 and January 2019, 143 patients with acute kidney injury secondary to obstructive kidney stone were prospectively randomized into the percutaneous nephrostomy tube group (71 patients) and JJ stent group (72 patients) at Beni-Suef University Hospital, Beni-Suef, Egypt. Exclusion criteria included candidates for acute dialysis, fever (>38°C), pyonephrosis, pregnancy and uncontrolled coagulopathy. The period required for serum creatinine normalization, failure of insertion, operative and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Definitive stone management for proximal ureteral stones >1.5 cm consisted of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the percutaneous nephrostomy group and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for the JJ stent group. For stone size <1.5 cm, ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy was carried out for both groups. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was carried out for renal stones >2 cm, and shockwave lithotripsy for stones <2 cm. Distal and mid ureteral stones were treated by ureteroscopy. RESULTS: The percutaneous nephrostomy group had shorter operative time (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the recovery period for normalization of serum creatinine between both groups (P = 0.120). Procedural failure, ureteric mucosal injury and perforations increased in the case of male sex, stone size >1.5 cm and upper ureteric stones in the JJ stent group. Procedural failure, pelvic perforations and intraoperative bleeding increased in case of male sex, mild hydronephrosis and stone size >2.5 cm in the percutaneous nephrostomy group. Suprapubic pain, urethral pain and lower urinary tract symptoms were significant in the JJ stent group. The presence of a JJ stent directed us toward ureteroscopy (P = 0.002) and the presence of a percutaneous nephrostomy directed us toward percutaneous nephrolithotomy (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrostomy facilitates subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy, especially when carried out by a urologist, and it has a higher insertion success rate, a shorter operative time and a lesser incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection than a JJ stent. A JJ stent facilitates subsequent ureteroscopy, but operative complications can increase in the case of proximal ureteral stones >1.5 cm.

Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy versus slow power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy in stones with high attenuation value: A randomized comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ultraslow full-power versus slow rate, power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy in the management of stones with a high attenuation value. METHODS: This was a randomized comparative study enrolling patients with single high attenuation value (≥1000 Hounsfield unit) stones (≤3 cm) between September 2015 and May 2018. Patients with skin-to-stone distance >11 cm or body mass index >30 kg/m2 were excluded. Electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy was carried out at rate of 30 shock waves/min for group A versus 60 shock waves/min for group B. In group A, power ramping was from 6 to 18 kV for 100 shock waves, then a safety pause for 2 min, followed by ramping 18-22 kV for 100 shock waves, then a safety pause for 2 min. This full power (22 kV) was maintained until the end of the session. In group B, power ramping was carried out with an increase of 4 kV each 500 shock waves, then maintained on 22 kV in the last 1000-1500 shock waves. Follow up was carried out up to 3 months after the last session. Perioperative data were compared, including the stone free rate (as a primary outcome) and complications (secondary outcome). Predicting factors for success were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients in group A and 96 patients in group B were included. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in group A (76% vs 38.5%; P < 0.001). Both groups were comparable in complication rates (20% vs 19.8%; P = 0.971). The stone-free rate remained significantly higher in group A in logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 24.011, 95% confidence interval 8.29-69.54; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy for high attenuation value stones is associated with an improved stone-free rate without affecting safety. Further validation studies are required using other shock wave lithotripsy machines.

Predictive value of the immediate effect of first dose of tamsulosin on lower urinary tract symptoms improvement in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients.

OBJECTIVES: The objective is to study the effect of tamsulosin within hours after the first dose and its prediction of the future improvement of LUTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2016 until August 2017, 340 patients aged over 40 years with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related symptoms were prospectively enrolled; 0.4 mg tamsulosin for 3 months was given. The first visit was before beginning of tamsulosin; uroflowmetry (UFM), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL) were measured. The second visit was after 6 h from the administration of tamsulosin. UFM and PVR were measured. The third visit was after 1 month and the fourth visit was after 3 months, on which UFM, PVR, IPSS, and QoL were also measured. RESULTS: The mean patients' age was 63 ± 6.18 and the mean prostate volume was 52.23 ± 24.59 cc. The mean Qmax at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th visits was 10.28 ± 3.06 s, 14.58 ± 4.84 s, 14.46 ± 4.94 s, and 14.28 ± 5.07 s, respectively, P = 0.04. The mean voiding time at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th visits was 41.24 ± 27.18 s, 33.84 ± 18.14 s, 31.96 ± 22.02 s, and 30.14 ± 17.52 s, respectively, P = 0.03. The mean PVR at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th visits was 46.40 ± 22.14 ml, 27.76 ± 26.10 ml, 25.16 ± 28.36 ml, and 25.58 ± 28.10 ml, respectively, P = 0.001. The first dose of tamsulosin significantly increases Qmax and decreases voiding time and residual urine (RU); there was no statistical significant difference between 1st dose, 1 and 3 months in Qmax, voiding time, and RU. QOL and IPSS were significantly improved after 1 and 3 months, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The first dose of tamsulosin improves UFM and predicts the mid-term change in UFM as well as IPSS and QoL indices in the treatment of BPH-related LUTS.

Outcome of Botulinum Toxin-A intraprostatic injection for benign prostatic hyperplasia induced lower urinary tract symptoms: A prospective multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to determine the factors predicting the outcome of intraprostatic injection of Botulinum Toxin-A (BTX-A) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-induced lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and to evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Between September 2016 and May 2018, 45 Egyptian patients, with BPH-induced LUTS were included; the indication was a failure of medical treatment, unfit, or refusing surgical intervention. Measurements of prostate size by TRUS, total PSA level before and 12 weeks after injection. IPSS, uroflow, and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) were measured before injection, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks postinjection. 100 U BTX-A vial was diluted with 10 mL of saline then injected into the transition zone at base and midzone of the prostate by TRUS. RESULTS: The mean patients' age was 64.4 ± 6.6 years. Mean baseline IPSS 24.06 decreased to 18.75 at 2 weeks and progressively decreased to 16.37 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001), Q max of 9.08 mL/s. increased to 10.44 at 2 weeks and 11.44 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001), mean prostate volume was 67.44cc; decreased to 66.06cc (P < 0.001) at 12 weeks and mean residual urine was 82.62 mL and decreased to 57.66 mL at 12 weeks. DISCUSSION: Intraprostatic injection of BTX-A as modality treatment of LUTS/BPH significantly improve IPSS, Q max , PVR, and decrease prostate volume. We can suspect better results with this line of treatment in patients with IPSS ≤ 22 and Q max ≤ 10 mL/min and prostate volume ≤ 56.5cc.

Outcome of children with Hodgkin's disease. A 10-year experience from a single institution in Kuwait.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of children with Hodgkin's disease over a period of 10-years from a single institution in Kuwait. METHODS: Sixty-three children with previously untreated Hodgkin's disease, who were diagnosed at the Pediatric Oncology Unit of Kuwait Cancer Control Centre, Shuwaikh, Kuwait from January 1998 to December 2007 were included in the study. All cases were proved by histopathology, and staging was carried out according to the Ann Arbor system. RESULTS: Our series included 37 (59%) males and 26 (41%) females with a median age of 10 years (range 3-15 years). B symptoms were present in 20 (32%) children. Bulky disease was noted in 28 (44%) children, with stages III in 8 (13%) and IV in 12 (19%) children. Chemotherapy was administered as a primary treatment in 63 children. The median number of chemotherapy cycles given was 6 (range 2-8). Radiotherapy was used in 40 (63%) children. Grade III hematological toxicity was observed in 23 (37%) and grade IV in 14 (22%) children. Hypothyroidism was observed in 20 (32%) children. Fifty-five children achieved a complete remission (87%) and 2 children achieved a partial remission (3%) with an overall response rate of 90%. Three children achieved a progressive disease (5%) and response could not be evaluated in 3 (5%) children. At a median follow-up of 67 months (5.5 years), the overall survival was 91%. CONCLUSION: With moderate toxicity, combined modality therapy is effective in the treatment of childhood Hodgkin's disease.

Male fertility-implications of anticancer treatment and strategies to mitigate gonadotoxicity.

With the advent of the modern cancer treatment, survival rates have improved substantially raising new concerns towards quality of life issues such as future fertility and offspring welfare. Cancer researchers are expanding their focus beyond survival and recurrence rates to include maximization of fertility potential for young cancer patients. Despite promising cure rates with chemotherapy, studies have shown it to act as a double edge sword by adversely affecting male fertility. Chemotherapeutic agents act by hindering rapidly proliferating cells, hence exerting their gonadotoxic effect. The extent of damage to germ cells and eventual fecundity depends on the class of chemotherapeutic agent, dosage, spermatogenetic stage targeted as well as the original pretreatment fertility potential of the patient. In this review, we provide a contemporary overview of the effects of anticancer agents on male fertility. Gonadotoxicity caused by these agents will be analyzed followed by the contemporary measures to preserve future fertility. Both established and potential strategies of fertility preservation will be discussed with emphasis on cryopreservation and its efficacy in conjunction with assisted reproductive technologies in addition to the current recommendations for this preservation modality. Finally, contemporary research on the welfare of offspring of cancer survivors will be reviewed.

Male fertility after cancer.

The increasing incidence of cancer among the reproductive population, especially Hodgkin's disease (HD) and testicular cancer, has been paralleled by a substantial improvement in survival rates. In addition to survival and recurrence rates, preserving future fertility and subsequent offspring welfare have become a main focus of modern treatment modalities and current extensive research. This article reviews contemporary data on the effects of cancer and cancer treatment on male fecundity. Gonadotoxicity of cytotoxic therapy will be discussed together with the current measures to preserve fertility. Finally, recent data on potential harm to future offspring of cancer survivors will be addressed.

Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: treatment outcome.

Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma is the most common extranodal presentation of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In this retrospective study, all cases of primary gastrointestinal lymphoma registered at Kuwait Cancer Control Center between January 1992 and December 2001 were reviewed. Patients were diagnosed through an endoscopic biopsy or exploratory laparotomy. Staging procedures included computed axial tomography scan, bone marrow biopsy, barium and follow-through study, as well as routine chemistry (including lactate dehydrogenase) and hemography. There were 46 patients (30 men and 16 women); ages ranged from 16 to 82 years (median age, 43.6 years). The most common site of involvement was the stomach (70%), and the most common histology was large B cell. At least 50% of cases underwent primary radical surgery, and the majority of patients received subsequent chemotherapy and/or local radiation therapy. Chemotherapy consisted of the CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) regimen for large B-cell histology and CVP (cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone) or oral alkylating agents for low-grade histology. Of this cohort, only 12 cases (26%) have had local or distant relapse. Disease-free survival rates for low-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were 64% and 81%, respectively. Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma is a potentially curable malignancy.