Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788803

RESUMEN

Objective: To analyze the safety and efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) via umbrella meta-analysis.Data Sources: Meta-analysis studies were searched in PubMed from inception to May 2021 using the keywords anxiety, depression, ADHD, schizophrenia, mood disorder, OCD, psychiatric disorders, GAD, bipolar disorders, ASD, PTSD, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial, magnetic, stimulation. PRISMA guidelines were followed.Study Selection: Abstracts and full-length articles were reviewed for meta-analysis studies with data on the safety and efficacy of rTMS and sham and were collected for quantitative analysis. The full texts of all identified studies were independently screened and assessed to determine eligibility. Any disagreement was resolved through consensus.Data Extraction: The descriptive variables extracted included the author names, study year, sample size, studies included in the meta-analysis, study period, and type of intervention.Results: 28 meta-analyses were included; 13 were on treatment-resistant depression, 9 on schizophrenia, and 6 on OCD. In treatment-resistant depression, the rTMS group had higher odds of response compared to sham (odds ratio [OR] = 3.27; 95% CI, 2.76-3.87; P < .00001) and higher odds of remission (secondary outcome) (OR = 2.83; 95% CI, 2.33-3.45; P < .00001). rTMS was superior to sham in the reduction of negative symptoms of schizophrenia (mean difference [MD]: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.7; P < .0001). However, no significant difference was found between the effects of rTMS and sham on auditory hallucinations (MD: 0.24; 95% CI, 0.26-0.74; P = .35), which resulted in 94% heterogeneity. TMS was better than sham in reducing the severity of OCD symptoms (MD: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10; P < .00001).Conclusions: The effectiveness of rTMS for symptom reduction in various psychiatric disorders is associated with differences in neuropathology, disease-specific target site, and frequency of rTMS.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2023;25(5):22r03423. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Depresión , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 314: 114635, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35640323

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and trend of identifying as a sexual minority among the American adolescent population. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and odds of substance abuse, hopelessness, and suicidality among the sexual minority adolescents compared to their heterosexual peers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study using Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) data from 2015 to 2019. YRBSS divides "Sexual identity" into three groups: heterosexuals, sexual minorities (gay or lesbian or bisexual), and unsure. We identified "hopelessness and suicidality" using the survey questions exploring if participants felt sad or hopeless for >2 weeks, considered suicide, made a suicide plan, and attempted suicide requiring medical care. Univariate and multivariable survey logistic regression analyses were performed to establish an association between hopelessness, suicidality, substance abuse, and identifying as a sexual minority. RESULTS: Out of 41,377 adolescents, 4055 (9.8%) identified as a sexual minority. An increasing percentage of adolescents identified themselves as a sexual minority between 2015 to 2019 (8% to 11.2%) (pTrend<0.0001). The sexual minority had a higher prevalence of feeling sad and hopeless (63.4 vs. 28.6%), considering suicide (46 vs. 14.2%), planning suicide (38.9 vs. 11.5%), attempting suicide, and having injurious suicide attempts compared to heterosexuals. (p<0.0001) Amongst sexual minorities, the prevalence of substance abuse was higher compared to their heterosexual peers, which includes cigarettes (15 vs 7.8%), e-cigarette (27.2 vs 23.2%), inhalants (14.1 vs 5.3%), cocaine (8.4 vs 3.9%), marijuana (31.2 vs 20.2%), alcohol (36.9 vs 30.3%), steroids (6.4 vs 2.2%), heroin (4.4 vs 1.2%), and injectable drugs (4.0 vs 1.1%) (p<0.0001). In regression analysis, the sexual minority had higher odds of substance abuse, feeling sad and hopeless (aOR:4.6; 95%CI:4.0-5.2; p<0.0001), considering suicide (3.2; 2.8-3.7; p<0.0001), planning suicide (2.0; 1.7-2.3; p<0.0001) compared to heterosexual. CONCLUSION: Sexual minorities not only have higher prevalence and odds of hopelessness and suicidality but also have higher prevalence and odds of substance abuse like cigarettes, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, inhalants, and steroids. Hence, early identification, risk stratification, and interventions to reduce mental health disparities are needed.


Asunto(s)
Cocaína , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adolescente , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Heroína , Humanos , Salud Mental , Estudios Retrospectivos , Asunción de Riesgos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...