The Ethics and Responsibilities of Social Media Usage by Plastic Surgeons: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Social media has revolutionised how plastic surgeons advertise their work and promote their services, but concerns have been raised regarding the ethics of these practices. This review aims to identify said concerns and develop measures to address them. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Medline were searched for studies assessing the ethics of social media use by plastic surgeons. Five search terms were used and 23 studies identified. Results were catalogued according to which principle of medical ethics was infringed. RESULTS: Autonomy: Patients must not be coerced into allowing their operative media to be shared and content anonymised by removing identifiable features and scrubbing metadata. Beneficence: It is difficult to balance the benefit to patients of posting photographs for educational purposes with the risk of identifiable features being present, particularly within craniofacial surgery. Non-maleficence: Taking operative media could be a distraction from the patient and lengthen the procedure which could lead to harm. Any content posted on social media should be adapted to avoid trivialisation or sexualisation. Justice: Surgeons should not entertain their audience to increase their following at the expense of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Greater oversight of social media use by plastic surgeons is required to avoid patient harm and tarnishing of the specialty's professional standing. Professional bodies should be tasked with devising a course dedicated to the responsible use of these platforms. This should ensure the public's trust in the specialty does not become eroded and patients are not harmed by unethical social media use. This review highlights the relevant shortfalls of SoMe use by plastic surgery Several proposals are made to reduce the incidence of these shortfalls and to ensure SoMe is used in a professional and responsible manner It also lists areas of the specialty where SoMe is underused and could be of help, such as academia LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparing the safety profiles of implants and autologous fat grafting in gluteal augmentation: A systematic review.

Gluteal augmentation has become a popular esthetic procedure since its inception. The main methods are augmentation using implants or autologous fat grafting, which is the harvesting and grafting of patients' own fat tissue. The last review comparing the safety of these methods was written 7 years ago, which warrants the writing of a new one. PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline were searched for studies focusing on the methods of gluteal augmentation listed previously. Five search terms were used and 15 studies fulfilled the criteria. The data were cataloged according to the method described and outcomes compared. Seven articles focused on gluteal implants and another seven assessed autologous fat grafting, whereas one detailed both. The most common complications in 524 implant procedures were wound dehiscence (9.16%), excessive implant palpability (5.92%), and seroma (3.82%), with an overall complication rate of 25%. The most common complications in 1788 gluteal fat augmentation procedures were seroma (6.9%), infection (3.0%), and transient sciatic paresthesia (1.0%), with an overall complication rate of 13%. Several articles listed satisfaction figures, but these were not assessed because this article was not powered to assess this outcome. Overall, gluteal augmentation using autologous fat grafting leads to fewer postoperative complications than implants and allows greater contouring of the buttocks and the surrounding areas. However, it can also be a far more dangerous procedure if certain recommendations are not followed.

Management of a rare, giant multicompartmental lipoma of the hand: a case report and review of the literature.

Lipomas are the commonest benign tumour, made up exclusively of adipose tissue, and can arise anywhere in the body. However, giant lipomas of the hand, defined as >5 cm in diameter, are rare. They have the potential to invade into surrounding areas and cause a multitude of symptoms due to the compression and proximity of underlying structures. We describe a case of a 64-year-old woman who presents with a swelling of the left thenar eminence, associated with numbness and tingling in all fingers. Magnetic resonance imaging and nerve conduction studies confirmed the diagnosis of a lipoma causing median nerve compression. The patient underwent elective surgical excision with good postoperative recovery. The excised lesion, measuring 12 × 7 × 2.4 cm, is one of the largest giant lipomas of the hand reported in literature, and the first to demonstrate invasion from the mid palmar space into both the dorsal sub-aponeurotic space and carpal tunnel.

The use of secure anonymised data linkage to determine changes in healthcare utilisation following severe open tibial fractures.

Severe open fractures of the lower limbs are complex injuries requiring expert multidisciplinary management in appropriate orthoplastic centres. This study aimed to assess the impact of open fractures on healthcare utilisation and test the null hypotheses that there is no difference in healthcare utilisation between the year before and year after injury, and that there is no difference in healthcare utilisation in the year post-injury between patients admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre in keeping with the joint BOA/BAPRAS standards and those having initial surgery elsewhere. This retrospective cohort study utilising secure anonymised information linkage (SAIL), a novel databank of anonymised nationally pooled health records, recruited patients over 18 years of age sustaining severe open lower limb fractures managed primarily or secondarily at our centre and who had data available in the SAIL databank. 101 patients met inclusion criteria and 90 of these had records in the SAIL databank. The number of days in hospital, number of primary care attendances, number of outpatient attendances and number of emergency department attendances in the years prior and subsequent to injury were recorded. Patients sustaining open fractures had significantly different healthcare utilisation in the year after injury when compared with the year before, in terms of days spent in hospital (23.42 vs. 1.70, p=0.000), outpatient attendances (11.98 vs. 1.05, p=0.000), primary care attendances (29.48 vs. 11.99, p=0.000) and emergency department presentations (0.2 vs. 0.01, p=0.025). Patients admitted directly to orthoplastic centres had significantly fewer operations (1.78 vs. 3.31) and GP attendances (23.6 vs. 33.52) than those transferred in subsequent to initial management in other units. There is a significant increase in healthcare utilisation after open tibial fracture. Adherence to national standards minimises the impact of this on both patients and health services.

Clinical and histological resolution of a basal cell carcinoma in a patient undergoing concurrent treatment of B-cell lymphoma with systemic R-CHOP.

Surgical resection is the definitive treatment modality for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, not all patients may be suitable for surgery. We describe a patient with a BCC, which resolved clinically and histologically when he underwent systemic R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) for treatment of a high grade B-cell lymphoma. Although topical and intra-lesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used as an adjunct to treatment, more recent reports have illustrated the treatment of BCC with systemic 5-FU in combination with bleomycin and cisplatin. We postulate that the combination of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin with rituximab and prednisolone, which has not been previously reported in the literature, contributed to remission in this case.

The use of mouth brushings for screening girls who present with inguinal hernia for complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Published guidance recommends that all girls with inguinal hernia should be screened for complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS). We report a novel, noninvasive screening technique. METHODS: Retrospective review of all girls undergoing inguinal herniotomy from April 2009 to October 2010. Those screened using the novel technique of extraction of Y chromosome specific DNA from a buccal mucosal sample obtained by mouth brushing are reported. RESULTS: A total of 29 girls were screened by mouth brushing at median age 2.9 years (range 29 days to 9.3 years). Of the 29 samples, 25 were adequate for DNA extraction; 4 were inadequate and screening was repeated (3 repeat mouth brushing, 1 perioperative blood test). Mouth brushing was well tolerated by children and acceptable to parents. A preoperative blood test was avoided in all girls who had a mouth brushing. None of the girls in this study had CAIS. Turn-around time for mouth brushing was mean 4.9 days compared with a minimum of 10 days for a karyotype. This technique is cheaper than a karyotype (£ 87 vs. £ 205). CONCLUSION: Extraction of Y chromosome specific DNA from a mouth brushing sample is effective for screening girls with inguinal hernia for CAIS. It is acceptable, cheaper, and quicker than alternatives.