Tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo femenina con minicintas MiniArc: resultados a 4 años / Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery With Sling Miniarc: A 4-year Results

Objetivos: El objetivo de esta publicación es describir de forma retrospectiva los resultados de la colocación de la cinta AMS MiniArc a 4 años de seguimiento como tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria (IU). Material y método: Presentamos un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de 135 pacientes, 110 (81,5%) tenían incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo y 25 (18,5%) incontinencia urinaria mixta. Todos los procedimientos se realizaron con anestesia local y en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria. Las pacientes fueron controladas en consultas externas a los 6 meses (control 1), al año (control 2) y una vez al año (control 3, 4 y 5). Se les realizó una historia clínica y el cuestionario ICIQ-SF, al que le añadimos una pregunta para cuantificar el grado de satisfacción, así como la exploración física. Consideramos curación objetiva que la paciente en la exploración física con vejiga llena presentara un test de esfuerzo negativo. Para valorar la curación subjetiva evaluamos las respuestas al cuestionario ICIQ-SF y la pregunta de satisfacción de los resultados de la cirugía. Para el estudio estadístico de los datos descriptivos y de los resultados se aplicó la comparación de media «t» de Student utilizando el programa SPSS (V 19.0). Resultados: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 59 meses (rango entre 33-72 meses). Observamos que el 86,7% de las pacientes presentaban curación objetiva a los 4 años. Si analizamos los resultados según el tipo de incontinencia que presentaban las pacientes, con incontinencia urinaria mixta estuvieron curadas en el 80,8% y las pacientes con incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo en el 89,2%. Con el cuestionario ICIQ-SF y la pregunta de satisfacción observamos un descenso medio en la puntuación de 12,7 puntos, con un 85,7% de las pacientes muy satisfechas. Conclusión: La colocación de AMS MiniArcs supone un dispositivo eficaz para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia urinaria femenina a medio plazo, pero los resultados deben interpretarse con precaución dadas las limitaciones del estudio

Objetives: The aim of this publication is to describe retrospectively the results of the surgical technique of AMS MiniArc for the treatment of female urinary incontinence, evaluate its results at 4 years follow-up. Material and methods: We present a retrospective cohort study of 135 patients, 110 (81.5%) had urinary incontinence and 25 (18.5%) mixed urinary incontinence. All these procedures were performed with local anesthesia and in «out patient surgery». Patients were monitored in the outpatient clinic at 6 months (control 1), one year (control 2) and annually (control 3, 4, and 5). During the following up, clinical history was made in every woman with ICIQ-SF questionnaire, that included a fourth question to evaluate the degree of satisfaction after surgery, as well as physical examination. We considered objective cure when negative stress with full bladder. We use the SPSS program (V19.0) for statiscal analysis of the results. Results: The mean follow-up was of 59 months (range from 33-72 months). When evaluating the success rate of anti-incontinence surgery,86.7% of patients showed objective cured (80.8% with MUI and 89.2% with SUI). The ICIQ-SF decreased average of 12.7 points, 85.7% patients were very or fairly satisfied. Conclusion: The AMS MiniArc is an optim anti-incontinence procedure a medium term. But the results should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of the study

Stress urinary incontinence surgery with sling MiniArc: a 4-year results.

OBJETIVES: The aim of this publication is to describe retrospectively the results of the surgical technique of AMS MiniArc for the treatment of female urinary incontinence, evaluate its results at 4 years follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a retrospective cohort study of 135 patients, 110 (81.5%) had urinary incontinence and 25 (18.5%) mixed urinary incontinence. All these procedures were performed with local anesthesia and in "out patient surgery". Patients were monitored in the outpatient clinic at 6 months (control 1), one year (control 2) and annually (control 3, 4, and 5). During the following up, clinical history was made in every woman with ICIQ-SF questionnaire, that included a fourth question to evaluate the degree of satisfaction after surgery, as well as physical examination. We considered objective cure when negative stress with full bladder. We use the SPSS program (V19.0) for statistical analysis of the results. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was of 59 months (range from 33 to 72 months). When evaluating the success rate of anti-incontinence surgery, 86.7% of patients showed objective cured (80.8% with MUI and 89.2% with SUI). The ICIQ-SF decreased average of 12.7 points, 85.7% patients were very or fairly satisfied. CONCLUSION: The AMS MiniArc is an optim anti-incontinence procedure a medium term. But the results should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of the study.

[Stress urinary incontinence surgery with MiniArc swing system: our experience]. / Nuestra experiencia con minicintas MiniArc en la cirugía de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical technique of AMS MiniArc swing system for the treatment of female urinary incontinence, evaluate its results and complications. METHOD: We performed a retrospective study of surgery with AMS Miniarc swing system. From august 2007 to march 2009, 135 patients with urinary incontinence (UI) underwent AMS MiniArc swing system surgery in hammock way. 110 patients (81.5%) suffered from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 25 (18.5) from mixed (MUI). The average age was 55 years-old. All these procedures were performed wigh local anesthesia and in <>. We evaluate every patient a month later, between 3-6 months later, and a year after surgery. During the following up, clinical history was made in every women with ICIQ-SF questionnaire, that included a fourth question to evaluate the degree of satisfaction after surgery, as well as physical examination. We considered objective cure when negative stress test with full bladder. We use the SPSS program (V 14.0) for statistical analysis of the results (Student's t-test). RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 495 days (range from 181 to 777), early complications included: 2 bladder perforations during sling placement, inguinal pain in 4 patients and one obturator hematoma (resolved spontaneously). The long-term postoperative complications were: 4 tape exposures in vagina (2.9%), urethral obstruction in 3 patients (2.2%) that required urethrolysis and net section, and irritative symptoms of frequency and urgency reported in 9 patients (6.6%), 5 out of 9 were temporary (between 2 and 6 months) whereas the remaining 4 required anticholinergic agents due to persistent symptoms. When evaluating the success rates of anti-incontinence surgery, 91.9% of patients showed objective cure (88% with MUI and 92.7% with SUI) since we demonstrated no loss of urine by physical examination with full bladder. The ICIQ-SF score (fourth question included) decreased an average of 12.7 points. 90% of patients were very or fairly satisfied. CONCLUSION: The AMS Minarc swing system is an optim anti-incontinence procedure. Its main advantage might be the possibility of performing this procedure under local anesthesia, in order to test and adjust the sling's tension according to the person's needs. Despite its promising results, further studies are required in order to arrive at more precise conclusions, taking into account that the TVT remains the gold standard surgical technique of SUI.

Nuestra experiencia con minicintas MiniArc® en la cirugía de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo / Stress urinary incontinence surgery with MiniArc swing system: Our experience

Objetivos: El objetivo de esta publicación es describir de forma retrospectiva la técnica quirúrgica y evaluar las complicaciones y los resultados de la colocación de la cinta AMS MiniArc® swing system para el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria. Material y método: Presentamos un estudio retrospectivo sobre la colocación de cinta AMS MiniArc® swing system. Entre agosto de 2007 y marzo de 2009 colocamos dicha cinta en hamaca a 135 pacientes, 110 (81,5%) tenían incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo y 25 (18,5%) incontinencia urinaria mixta con un edad mediana de 55 años (rango entre 27–82 años). Todos los procedimientos se realizaron con anestesia local y en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria. Las pacientes fueron controladas en consultas externas al mes (control 1), entre los 3–6 meses (control 2) y al año (control 3). Se les realizó una historia clínica y el cuestionario ICIQ-SF, al que le añadimos una pregunta para cuantificar el grado de satisfacción, así como la exploración física. Consideramos como curación objetiva que la paciente en la exploración física realizada en la consulta con la vejiga llena presentara un test de esfuerzo negativo. Analizamos los resultados y el análisis descriptivo y de comparación de medias con la t de student mediante el programa informático SPSS (V14.0). Resultados: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 495 días (rango entre 181–777 días). En las 135 pacientes intervenidas registramos como complicaciones intraoperatorias 2 perforaciones vesicales. Como complicaciones precoces registramos 1 paciente con hematoma en la fosa obturatriz que evolucionó espontáneamente a curación y 4 pacientes (2,9%) con dolor leve a nivel inguinal no incapacitante. Como complicaciones tardías, 4 pacientes (2,9%) presentaron extrusión de la malla y 3 pacientes (2,2%) necesitaron corte unilateral de la cinta por presentar obstrucción. En 9 pacientes (6,6%) se presentó urgencia de novo, 5 de las cuales (3,7%) fueron temporales entre 2–6 meses, y 4 (2,96%) persistentes y tratadas mediante anticolinérgicos. Observamos que el 91,9 % de las pacientes estaban curadas al año. Si analizamos los resultados según el tipo de incontinencia que presentaban, las pacientes con incontinencia urinaria mixta estuvieron curadas en el 88% y las pacientes con incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo en el 92,7%. Con el cuestionario ICIQ-SF y la pregunta de satisfacción, observamos un descenso medio en la puntuación de 12,7 puntos, con un 90% de las pacientes muy o bastante satisfechas. Conclusión: La colocación de esta minicinta AMS MiniArc® swing system es una herramienta más para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia urinaria, y la ventaja fundamental respecto a sus predecesoras es la posibilidad de realizar la cirugía con anestesia local consiguiendo dar la tensión adecuada a la cinta in situ. Pero debe demostrar sus resultados a largo plazo teniendo como referencia al «gold standard» de la TVT (AU)

Method: We performed a retrospective study of surgery with AMS Miniarc swing system. From august 2007 to march 2009, 135 patients with urinary incontinence (UI) underwent AMS MiniArc swing system surgery in hammock way. 110 patients (81.5%) suffered from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 25 (18.5) from mixed (MUI). The average age was 55 years-old. All these procedures were performed wigh local anesthesia and in «Out patient Surgery». We evaluate every patient a month later, between 3–6 months later, and a year after surgery. During the following up, clinical history was made in every women with ICIQ-SF questionnare, that included a fourth question to evaluate the degree of satisfaction after surgery, as well as physical examination. We considered objective cure when negative stress test with full bladder. We use the SPSS program (V 14.0) for statistical analysis of the results (Student′s t-test). Results: With a mean follow-up of 495 days (range from 181 to 777), early complications included: 2 bladder perforations during sling placement, inguinal pain in 4 patients and one obturator hematoma (resolved spontaneously). The long-term postoperative complications were: 4 tape exposures in vagina (2.9%), urethral obstruction in 3 patients (2.2%) that required urethrolysis and net section, and irritative symptoms of frequency and urgency reported in 9 patients (6.6%), 5 out of 9 were temporary (between 2 and 6 months) whereas the remaining 4 required anticholinergic agents due to persistent symtoms. When evaluating the success rates of anti-incontinence surgery, 91.9% of patients showed objective cure (88% with MUI and 92.7% with SUI) since we demonstrated no loss of urine by physical examination with full bladder. The ICIQ-SF score (fourth question included) decreased an average of 12.7 points. 90% of patients were very or fairly satisfied. Conclusion: The AMS Minarc swing system is an optim anti-incontinence procedure. Its main advantage might be the possibility of performing this procedure under local anesthesia, in order to test and adjust the sling′s tension according to the person′s needs. Dispite its promising results, further studies are required in order to arrive at more precise conclusions, taking into account that the TVT remains the gold standard surgical technique of SUI (AU)

Nuestra experiencia con minicintas (TVT Secur y MiniArc) en la cirugía de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo / Our experience with mini tapes (TVT secur and miniarc) in the surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Objetivos: El objetivo de esta publicación es describir la técnica quirúrgica, evaluar las complicaciones y los resultados a corto plazo de las cintas TVT secur y MiniArc. Material y Método: entre Octubre de 2006 y Agosto 2007 se realizó corrección quirúrgica con TVT SecurTM, Women’s Health & Urology, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, colocando la cinta en forma de hamaca, a 51 pacientes, 38 de ellas con incontinencia de esfuerzo pura y 13 con incontinencia mixta y con una edad media de 57 años.Entre Septiembre 2007 y Febrero de 2008 se intervino con cinta AMS MiniarcTM swing system, colocada en hamaca, a 41 pacientes, 33 pacientes con incontinencia de esfuerzo pura y 8 con incontinencia mixta, con une dad media de 58 años. Todos los procedimientos se realizan con sedoanalgesia y en régimen de Cirugía Mayor Ambulatoria. Las pacientes fueron controladas en consultas externas al mes, 3 meses y al año. Se les realizó historia clínica y cuestionario ICIQ- SF al que le añadimos una pregunta para cuantificar el grado de satisfacción, así como exploración física. Comparamos los resultados de ambas técnicas y realizamos estudio estadístico mediante test de Student. [Análisis con el programa informático SPSS (V14.0)]. Resultados: La mediana de seguimiento en el grupo TVT secur fue de 328 días (rango 163-522 días) y en el grupo MiniArc de 101 días (rango 41-209 días). De las 92 paciente intervenidas, 51 con TVT secur y 41 con MiniArc solo registramos una complicación quirúrgica con TVT secur que fue una perforación vesical. Considerando como curación objetiva que la paciente en la exploración física realizada en consulta con vejiga llena presente un test de esfuerzo negativo. En el grupo TVT secur el 80,4% de las pacientes están curadas y en el grupo de MiniArc el 90,2% no existiendo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos ( p 0,095). Para evaluar la curación subjetiva utilizamos el test ICIQ-SF y la pregunta de satisfacción y observamos como, en el control al mes y tercer mes no existen diferencias significativas, estando el 90% de las pacientes satisfechas. En el control anual, sólo realizado en el grupo TVT secur, el 80 % de las pacientes se encuentran muy satisfechas. Conclusión: Estas nuevas cintas presentan un número menor de complicaciones permiten la posibilidad de colocación con anestesia local pero todavía son necesarios estudios aleatorizados con un mayor seguimiento (AU)

Background: The purpose of this publication is to describe the surgical technique, assess complications and short-term results of TVT secur and MiniArc tapes. Materials and Methods: From October 2006 to August 2007 it was carried out the surgical correction with TVT SecurTM, Women’s Health & Urology, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, placing the tape as a hammock, to 51 patients, 38 of them with pure stress incontinence and 13 with mixed incontinence and with an average age of 57 years. From September 2007 to February 2008 41 patients, 33 of them with pure stress incontinence and 8 with mixed incontinence, with an average of age of 58 years were operated with AMS MiniarcTM swing system tape, posted on hammock. All procedures were performed with sedoanalgesia and Ambulatory Surgery regime. Patients were monitored in outpatient visits one month, 3 months and one year after surgical procedure .Medical history and questionnaire and ICIQ-SF, to which we added a question to quantify the degree of satisfaction, as well as physical examination, were done. We compared the results of both technical procedures and statistical survey was conducted by Student test. [Analysis with SPSS software (V14.0)]. Results: The median follow-up in TVT secur group was 328 days (range 163-522 days) and 101 days (range 41-209 days) in the MiniArc group. We only had one (TVT secur group) surgical complication in all the series (92 patients) being a bladder perforation. Taking in to account that we read a negative test effort as an objective cure in the TVT secur group, 80.4% patients are cured and 90.2% in the MiniArc group without significant difference between both groups (p 0095). To assess the subjective healing we utilized the ICIQ-SF test and the satisfaction extra-question and we noted that there is no significant difference between the first and third month controls. (90%of patients satisfied). 80% of patients were completely satisfied in the first year control that was only performed to TVT secur group. Conclusion: These new tapes show fewer complications that the TVT-O and TOT tapes and allow the possibility of placement with local anesthesia but further studies are needed (AU)

[Our experience with mini tapes (TVT Secur and MiniArc) in the surgery for stress urinary incontinence]. / Nuestra experiencia con minicintas (TVT Secur y MiniArc) en la cirugía de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this publication is to describe the surgical technique, assess complications and short-term results of TVT secur and MiniArc tapes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2006 to August 2007 it was carried out the surgical correction with TVT Secur,Women's Health & Urology, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, placing the tape as a hammock, to 51 patients, 38 of them with pure stress incontinence and 13 with mixed incontinence and with an average age of 57 years. From September 2007 to February 2008 41 patients, 33 of them with pure stress incontinence and 8 with mixed incontinence, with an average of age of 58 years were operated with AMS Miniarc swing system tape, posted on hammock. All procedures were performed with sedoanalgesia and Ambulatory Surgery regime. Patients were monitored in outpatient visits one month, 3 months and one year after surgical procedure. Medical history and questionnaire and ICIQ-SF, to which we added a question to quantify the degree of satisfaction, as well as physical examination, were done. We compared the results of both technical procedures and statistical survey was conducted by Student test. [Analysis with SPSS software (V14.0)]. RESULTS: The median follow-up in TVT secur group was 328 days (range 163-522 days) and 101 days (range 41-209 days) inthe MiniArc group. We only had one (TVT secur group) surgical complication in all the series (92 patients) being a bladder perforation. Taking into account that we read a negative test effort as an objective cure in the TVT secur group, 80.4% patients are cured and 90.2% inthe MiniArc group without significant difference between both groups (p 0095). To assess the subjective healing we utilized the ICIQ-SF test and the satisfaction extra-question and we noted that there is no significant difference between the first and third month controls. (90% of patients satisfied). 80% of patients were completely satisfied in the first year control that was only performed to TVT secur group. CONCLUSION: These new tapes show fewer complications that the TVT-O and TOT tapes and allow the possibility of placement with local anesthesia but further studies are needed.

TOT en el tratamiento de la incontinencia de esfuerzo: nuestra experiencia, comparándola con la TVT / TOT in the treatment of the stress urinary incontinence: our experience, comparing it with the TVT

Introducción: En el año 2004 iniciamos la técnica de TOT para el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo. En este estudio comparamos los resultados con las series publicadas de TOT y con la serie de TVT realizadas en nuestro servicio. Material y métodos: Hemos intervenido a 171 pacientes, con una edad media de 57,7 años. En el 167% de ellas, además de realizar TOT, asociamos reparación de defectos anatómicos pélvicos. Resultados: Con un seguimiento medio de 12 meses y mediana de 14 meses, el 87% de las pacientes están curadas. Los fracasos aparecieron de forma precoz en los 3 primeros meses de seguimiento. Como complicaciones aparecieron, retenciones post-operatorias de menos de 30 días en el 2,7%, retenciones a largo en el 4,8%, hematomas post-quirúrgicos en el 1,3%, extrusión de la malla en el 2% y urgencia de novo en el 2.3%. Conclusiones: La TOT es una técnica no exenta de complicaciones aunque la proporción de ellas es baja y con unos resultados que son alentadores. Se trata de una técnica quirúrgica sencilla, que como toda técnica, tiene una curva de aprendizaje. Requiere un corto tiempo quirúrgico (menor que la TVT) y puede ser realizada en régimen de Cirugía Mayor Ambulatoria. Las dos técnicas (TVT/TOT) han demostrado ser similares en cuanto a tasas de curación aunque en la serie de TOT es levemente más baja. Las diferencias de las complicaciones se dan en los porcentajes aunque siempre escasas

Introduction: In the year 2004 begin the technique of TOT for the treatment of the urinary incontinence of effort. In this study we compare the results with the published series of TOT and with the series of TVT carried out in our service. Material and methods: We have intervened to 171 patients, with a 57.7 year-old half age. In their 16%, besides carrying out TOT, we associate repair of anatomical pelvic defects. Results: After a follow-up of 12 months and a mean of 14, 87% of the cases succeeded. Failures arose during the first three months of therapy. As complications they appeared post-operative retentions of less than 30 days in 2.7%, retentions to long in 4.8%, post-surgical hematomas in 1.3%, extrusion of the mesh in 2% and novo urgency in 2.3%. Conclusions: TOT is a technique it doesn’t exempt of complications although their proportion is low and with some results that they are encouraging. It is about a surgical simple technique that as all technique, he/she has a learning curve. It requires a surgical (smaller than TVT) short time and it can be carried out in régime of bigger Ambulatory Surgery. The two techniques (TVT / TOT) have demonstrated to be similar as for cure rates although in the series of TOT it is slightly more baja. Las differences of the complications they are given in the percentages although always scarce

[TOT in the treatment of the stress urinary incontinence: our experience, comparing it with the TVT]. / TOT en el tratamiento de la incontinencia de esfuerzo: nuestra experiencia, comparándola con la TVT.

INTRODUCTION: In the year 2004 begin the technique of TOT for the treatment of the urinary incontinence of effort. In this study we compare the results with the published series of TOT and with the series of TVT carried out in our service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have intervened to 171 patients, with a 57.7 year-old half age. In their 16%, besides carrying out TOT, we associate repair of anatomical pelvic defects. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 12 months and a mean of 14, 87% of the cases succeeded. Failures arose during the first three months of therapy. As complications they appeared post-operative retentions of less than 30 days in 2.7%, retentions to long in 4.8%, post-surgical hematomas in 1.3%, extrusion of the mesh in 2% and novo urgency in 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: TOT is a technique it doesn't exempt of complications although their proportion is low and with some results that they are encouraging. It is about a surgical simple technique that as all technique, he/she has a learning curve. It requires a surgical (smaller than TVT) short time and it can be carried out in regime of bigger Ambulatory Surgery. The two techniques (TVT / TOT) have demonstrated to be similar as for cure rates although in the series of TOT it is slightly more baja. Las differences of the complications they are given in the percentages although always scarce.

[Ambulatory major surgery: our experience]. / Cirugía mayor ambulatoria: nuestra experiencia.

INTRODUCTION: The first Surgery Ambulatory Unit was created in 1990, at the Hospital de Viladecans although in 1982 Polo et al. had commenced a programme of strictly ambulatory surgery. The Spanish Services of Urology are going to be incorporated to this new style of labour, and, by the moment, with excellent results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We realize a description of the functioning of our service inside the Unit of Ambulatory Major Surgery, and a descriptive analysis of our activity in above mentioned unit since February 2000(creation date) to May 2001. RESULTS: 118 patients were operated, being 15% women and 85% men. The most frequent surgery done were: hydrocelectomy, orchiopexy, varicocelectomy, vesical distensions, Nesbit technique and internal urethrotomy. From the whole of the patients, none was increased, and the complication tax was similar to the conventional surgery patients. This kind of surgery suppose 17% in 2000 and 19% in 2001 of the whole of surgery, with clear increasing tendency in the last months. CONCLUSIONS: The Ambulatory Major Surgery is an effective and efficient care pattern in which Urology Services are included, so that the degree of satisfaction of the patients and the quality offered is similar to the inpatient surgery.

Cirugía mayor ambulatoria: nuestra experiencia / Ambulatory major surgery: Our experience

INTRODUCCIÓN: La primera Unidad de Cirugía sin Ingreso se creó en 1990 en el hospital de Villadecans, aunque ya en 1982 Polo y cols., comenzaron un programa de intervenciones estrictamente ambulatorias. Los servicios de Urología españoles se van incorporando poco a poco a este nuevo estilo de trabajo y de momento con excelentes resultados. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos una descripción del funcionamiento de nuestro servicio dentro de la Unidad de Cirugía Mayor Ambulatoria (CMA) y un análisis descriptivo de nuestra actividad en dicha unidad desde febrero de 2000 (fecha de creación) hasta mayo de 2001. RESULTADOS: Se intervienen a 118 pacientes. Siendo 15 per cent mujeres y el 85 per cent hombres. Las intervenciones realizadas más frecuentes fueron: hidrocelectomías, orquidopexias, varicocelectomías, distensiones vesicales, técnica de Nesbit y uretrotomías internas. De todos los pacientes intervenidos ninguno requirió ingreso y el índice de complicaciones fue similar a los pacientes operados en régimen de cirugía convencional. Estas intervenciones suponen el 17 per cent en el año 2000 y el 19 per cent en el 2001 con una clara tendencia a aumentar en los últimos meses. CONCLUSIONES: La CMA es un modelo asistencial eficaz y eficiente en el cual los servicios de urología tienen cabida dado que el grado de satisfacción de los pacientes y la calidad que ofrece es igual que la cirugía con ingreso. INTRODUCCIÓN: La primera Unidad de Cirugía sin Ingreso se creó en 1990 en el hospital de Villadecans, aunque ya en 1982 Polo y cols., comenzaron un programa de intervenciones estrictamente ambulatorias. Los servicios de Urología españoles se van incorporando poco a poco a este nuevo estilo de trabajo y de momento con excelentes resultados. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos una descripción del funcionamiento de nuestro servicio dentro de la Unidad de Cirugía Mayor Ambulatoria (CMA) y un análisis descriptivo de nuestra actividad en dicha unidad desde febrero de 2000 (fecha de creación) hasta mayo de 2001. RESULTADOS: Se intervienen a 118 pacientes. Siendo 15 per cent mujeres y el 85 per cent hombres. Las intervenciones realizadas más frecuentes fueron: hidrocelectomías, orquidopexias, varicocelectomías, distensiones vesicales, técnica de Nesbit y uretrotomías internas. De todos los pacientes intervenidos ninguno requirió ingreso y el índice de complicaciones fue similar a los pacientes operados en régimen de cirugía convencional. Estas intervenciones suponen el 17 per cent en el año 2000 y el 19 per cent en el 2001 con una clara tendencia a aumentar en los últimos meses. CONCLUSIONES: La CMA es un modelo asistencial eficaz y eficiente en el cual los servicios de urología tienen cabida dado que el grado de satisfacción de los pacientes y la calidad que ofrece es igual que la cirugía con ingreso (AU)