RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a challenging pathology in pediatric patients, carrying a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Treatment modalities include resection, endovascular embolization, and stereotactic radiosurgery. There is currently no consensus favoring one modality over another. Timing of multimodal therapy with embolization/stereotactic radiosurgery and resection is not well explored in the literature. We present a series of pediatric patients with AVMs, with special attention directed to the timing of treatment. METHODS: Electronic medical records of all pediatric patients (<18 years old at treatment) with AVMs treated at our institution were retrospectively reviewed after institutional review board approval. Demographic information, AVM characteristics, treatment variables, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: In our cohort of 27 patients, 21 (77.8%) presented with a ruptured AVM. Of these patients, 6 (28.6%) had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3-10 and underwent treatment within 24 hours of presentation, and 10 (47.6%) with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12-15 were treated between 24 and 120 hours after presentation. The remaining 5 patients (23.8%) were treated 3 weeks to 14 months after AVM rupture. Regardless of rupture status, 96% of our cohort had a modified Rankin Scale score of 1-2 at most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We present our institution's experience with pediatric AVMs, focusing on the timing of treatment. Based on our experience, early treatment of AVMs seems to be safe and effective regardless of rupture status.
RESUMEN
Dystonia characterizes a group of neurological movement disorders characterized by abnormal muscle movements, often with repetitive or sustained contraction resulting in abnormal posturing. Different types of dystonia present based on the affected body regions and play a prominent role in determining the potential efficacy of a given intervention. For most patients afflicted with these disorders, an exact cause is rarely identified, so treatment mainly focuses on symptomatic alleviation. Pharmacological agents, such as oral anticholinergic administration and botulinum toxin injection, play a major role in the initial treatment of patients. In more severe and/or refractory cases, focal areas for neurosurgical intervention are identified and targeted to improve quality of life. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets these anatomical locations to minimize dystonia symptoms. Surgical ablation procedures and peripheral denervation surgeries also offer potential treatment to patients who do not respond to DBS. These management options grant providers and patients the ability to weigh the benefits and risks for each individual patient profile. This review article explores these pharmacological and neurosurgical management modalities for dystonia, providing a comprehensive assessment of each of their benefits and shortcomings.
RESUMEN
Objective: Closed-suction drains are commonly placed after thoracolumbar surgery to reduce the risk of post-operative hematoma and neurologic deterioration, and may stay in place for a longer period of time if output remains high. Prolonged maintenance of surgical site drains, however, is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). The present study aims to examine the literature regarding extended duration (≥24 h) prophylactic antibiotic use in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar surgery with closed-suction drainage. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies reporting the use of 24-h post-operative antibiotics compared with extended duration post-operative antibiotics in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar surgery with closed-suction drainage were identified from a PubMed database query. Results: Six studies were included for statistical analysis, encompassing 1003 patients that received 24 h of post-operative antibiotics and 984 patients that received ≥24 h of post-operative antibiotics. The SSI rate was 5.16 % for the shorter duration group (24 h) and 4.44 % (p = 0.7865) for the longer duration group (≥24 h). Conclusions: There is no significant difference in rates of SSI in patients receiving 24 h of post-operative antibiotics compared with patients receiving ≥24 h of post-operative antibiotics. Shorter durations of post-operative antibiotics in patients with thoracolumbar drains have similar outcomes compared to patients receiving longer courses of antibiotics. Shorter durations of antibiotics could potentially help lead to lower overall cost and length of stay for these patients.
RESUMEN
There are several surgical approaches for vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. However, management has gradually shifted from microsurgical resection, toward surveillance and radiosurgery. One of the arguments against microsurgery via the middle fossa approach (MFA) is the risk of temporal lobe retraction injury or sequelae. Here, we sought to evaluate the incidence of temporal lobe retraction injury or sequela from a MFA via a systematic review of the existing literature. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies reporting temporal lobe injury or sequela during MFA for VS were identified. Data was aggregated and subsequently analyzed to evaluate the incidence of temporal lobe injury. 22 studies were included for statistical analysis, encompassing 1522 patients that underwent VS resection via MFA. The overall rate of temporal lobe sequelae from this approach was 0.7%. The rate of CSF leak was 5.9%. The rate of wound infection was 0.6%. Meningitis occurred in 1.6% of patients. With the MFA, 92% of patients had good facial outcomes, and 54.9% had hearing preservation. Our series and literature review support that temporal lobe retraction injury or sequelae is an infrequent complication from an MFA for intracanalicular VS resection.
Asunto(s)
Neuroma Acústico , Lóbulo Temporal , Humanos , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Fosa Craneal Media/cirugía , Microcirugia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The process surrounding application to the national residency matching program changed drastically because of COVID. Virtual interviews, pre-interview Zoom socials, and limitations on sub-internships are major changes that applicants worldwide have had to overcome. The available literature does not reflect the impact of major changes to the interview process. Here, we examine the neurosurgery resident cohort from 2021-2023 to investigate differences between United States medical schools pre- and post-COVID. METHODS: A database was constructed reporting the number of students matched to neurosurgery for U.S. medical schools (M.D. and D.O.) from 2021-2023. Percentage of total graduates matched to neurosurgery was calculated and institutions were ranked by this metric. This rank was compared to a rank reported in 2021. Variables were compared across the pre- and post-COVID cohorts. RESULTS: Case Western, Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, Vanderbilt, University of Illinois, and University of California San Francisco produced the most neurosurgical residents as a percentage of total graduates. There was a statistically significant difference in the post-COVID cohort between medical schools with a home program versus those without. For the top 20 ranked U.S. News and World Report medical schools, there was a statistically insignificant increase in the number of graduates matched to neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: With the data provided, there have not been many significant changes in which medical schools produce the most neurosurgery residents since COVID changes were implemented. The playing field has remained relatively stable in the setting of major changes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Internado y Residencia , Neurocirugia , Facultades de Medicina , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Neurocirugia/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although ventriculoperitoneal shunting is standard for hydrocephalus, shunting may not be ideal for aqueductal stenosis. A cohort of patients with aqueductal stenosis displayed symptoms of over- and underdrainage, despite a patent ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and optimized valve settings. Endoscopic third ventriculostomies (ETVs) were performed in a subset of these patients with successful treatment of their underlying hydrocephalus, despite a functioning shunt. OBSERVATIONS: All patients who had undergone ETV with a history of ventriculoperitoneal shunting were retrospectively reviewed. Patients experiencing over- or underdrainage symptoms despite a patent shunt were included. Cerebral aqueduct anatomy and third ventricle bowing were reviewed on preoperative imaging. Seven patients met the study criteria. All showed cerebral aqueductal stenosis and third ventricle bowing. After ETV, all patients demonstrated decreased third ventricle bowing and clinical improvement without the need for secondary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. LESSONS: Despite a functioning VPS, patients with aqueductal stenosis may not be adequately treated. The underlying reasons are not clearly understood but suggest abnormal CSF dynamics due to aberrant parenchymal compliance. The authors theorize that ETV can more effectively treat these patients. ETV can be considered a viable treatment option in aqueductal stenosis despite a patent VPS, challenging the traditional teaching that shunts ideally treat all types of hydrocephalus.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a prevalent ulcerative condition affecting oral mucosa. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the level of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between individuals with RAS and those who are healthy. METHODS: A systematic search for relevant publications before June 21, 2022, was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. The results were presented as the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled effects due to the presence of significant heterogeneity. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Overall, 13 article with were included in the analysis. NLR was higher among patients with RAS compared to healthy controls (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.79, P = 0.001, I2 = 91.5%). In the subgroup analysis based on the study design, it was found that retrospective studies showed higher levels of NLR in patients with RAS compared to healthy controls (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI= 0.16 to 1.08, P < 0.01), but these results were not applied to prospective studies (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.74, P < 0.07). CONCLUSION: Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio revealed crosstalk between systematic inflammation and RAS.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A major critique of the h-index is that it may be inflated by noncritical authorship. We propose a modified h-index (hm), incorporating critical authorship, complementary to the h-index. We analyze its relationship to the traditional h-index, and how each varies across professional categories relevant to academic neurosurgery. This analysis is not meant to critique authorship decisions, affect career development, alter academic legacy, or imply that the concepts of team science or midlevel authorship contributions are not valuable. METHODS: H-indices and hms were gathered and computed for clinical neurosurgical faculty at the top 32 ranked academic neurosurgical programs based on the current literature. Hm was computed for faculty at each program, using articles in which the individual was first, second, last, or co-corresponding author. Individuals were further identified based on chair status, leadership status, neurosurgical subspecialty, and National Institutes of Health funding status. Further analysis was performed to determine factors influencing h-index and hm. RESULTS: The median h-index for the 225 physicians included in the final dataset is 48 (interquartile range [IQR], 39-61), whereas the median hm was 32 (IQR, 24-43). The median difference between h-index and hm is 15 (IQR, 10-23). The median hm/h was 64% (IQR, 57-74). National Institutes of Health funding and subspecialty (neurosurgical oncology, neurocritical care, and cerebrovascular) were associated with significant change from h to hm. CONCLUSIONS: The h-index can be influenced by noncritical authorship, and hm, using critical contributions, can be used as a complement reflecting critical academic output in neurosurgery. Leaders deciding on hiring or promotion should consider disparities in productivity predicated on noncritical authorship contributions.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Humanos , Neurocirugia/educación , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Docentes , Instituciones Académicas , Eficiencia , BibliometríaRESUMEN
Many strides have been made in neurosurgery during times of war, helping to improve the outcomes of patients in dire circumstances. World War I introduced the concepts of early operation for trauma, forward-operating hospitals, and galeal sutures as well as techniques for careful debridement. It laid the groundwork for neurosurgery to become a specialty within medicine as well. World War II brought about the use of expedited medical evacuation, mobile neurosurgical units, improved resuscitation strategies, cranioplasty, and early laminectomy with decompression. The Korean and Vietnam Wars built on concepts from World Wars I and II, helping to establish the importance of watertight dural closure, external drainage systems after cranial trauma, multidisciplinary care, and infection prevention strategies. In the post-Vietnam period, we have seen significant technological advances allowing neurosurgeons to move farther ahead than most throughout history could have imagined. The significance of secondary brain injury, vascular injury, and the underlying pathophysiology of traumatic insults has been elucidated over the years since the Vietnam War, allowing for great advances in the care of our patients. Each major war throughout history has contributed greatly to the specialty of neurosurgery, each with its own innovations culminating in guidelines, strategies, and standards of practice that allow us to deliver the highest standard of care to our patients.
RESUMEN
Thoracolumbar fractures are a common consequence of trauma, often a result of motor vehicle accidents or falls. Burst fractures are a morphology of thoracolumbar fracture in which compressive force causes retropulsion of the posterior elements of the vertebral body, potentially leading to neurological deficits. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score is a decision-making tool to help surgeons decide between nonoperative and operative management. For assigned scores of 4, management is at the discretion of the surgeon, and for scores ≥ 5, operative treatment is recommended. Burst fracture patients that are neurologically intact are given a score of 5 if there is a posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury and are recommended to undergo operative management. Here we present a neurologically intact patient with an L4 burst fracture with PLC injury that was managed conservatively and demonstrated successful clinical, functional, and radiographic recovery.