Development of a universal cutting guide for raising deep circumflex iliac artery flaps.

PURPOSE: The deep circumflex iliac crest flap (DCIA) is used for the reconstruction of the jaw. For fitting of the transplant by computer-aided planning (CAD), a computerized tomography (CT) of the jaw and the pelvis is necessary. Ready-made cutting guides save a pelvic CT and healthcare resources while maintaining the advantages of the CAD planning. METHODS: A total of 2000 CTs of the pelvis were divided into groups of 500 by sex and age (≤ 45 and > 45 years). Three-dimensional (3D) pelvis models were aligned and averaged. Cutting guides were designed on the averaged pelvis for each group and an overall averaged pelvis. The cutting guides and 50 randomly selected iliac crests (10 from each group and 10 from the whole collective) were 3D printed. The appropriate cutting guide was mounted to the iliac crest and a cone beam CT was performed. The thickness of the space between the iliac crest and the cutting guide was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall the mean thickness of the space was 2.137 mm and the mean volume of the space was 4513 mm3. The measured values were significantly different between the different groups. The overall averaged group had not the greatest volume, maximum thickness and mean thickness of the space. CONCLUSION: Ready-made cutting guides for the DCIA flap fit to the iliac crest and make quick and accurate flap raising possible while radiation dose and resources can be saved. The cutting guides fit sufficient to the iliac crest and should keep the advantages of a standard CAD planning.

Verification of a digital approach for three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Internal fit is an important aspect of indirect restorations, but methods for the 3-dimensional (3D) measurement of absolute marginal and intaglio fit are sparse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate an innovative 3D measurement method (AIXFit) based on intraoral scanning data for analyzing the fit of dental restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the evaluation of AIXFit, 12 monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated on typodont preparations. The fit was measured digitally with the AIXFit system and compared with the results obtained from an established 2-dimensional (2D) sectional procedure. To compare the values of both methods at identical locations, a common reference system was developed, with each die fixed in a gypsum stand with reference points. Using an intraoral scanner (True Definition), each die with its reference points and the intaglio surface of the finished crown were digitalized as standard tessellation language files. The AIXFit software program, with a specially developed best-fit algorithm, was used to match the intaglio surface of the crown with the surface of the preparation. The virtual cement gap was calculated over the entire surface and returned values for x≥0 µm. A 2D comparison method involved adhesively fixing the crown to the die and sectioning it into 4 parts with a diamond band saw. The thickness of the cement gap was determined under a light microscope at ×100 magnification at 5 defined measuring points per quarter, so that a total of 240 measurements were available for comparison. A software program (Blender Foundation) was used to superimpose the data from the AIXFit system with the data from the 2D method and to compare the cement gaps at the same locations. The agreement between these methods was verified using paired t tests and determine correlation coefficients (α=.05). RESULTS: The mean ±standard deviation difference between the AIXFit and 2D methods was 6.7 ±29 µm). Two 1-sided tests showed statistical equivalence between the methods of measurement when considering an interval between -20 and +20 µm. The correlation coefficients showed a positive association for both methods (r=.931). CONCLUSIONS: The AIXFit software program appeared to be accurate for the digital measurement of internal fit when using the True Definition scanner. It enabled a cast-free workflow and allowed the analysis of the entire intaglio surface.

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks.

OBJECTIVES: Due to advancing digitalisation, it is of interest to develop standardised and reproducible fully automated analysis methods of cranial structures in order to reduce the workload in diagnosis and treatment planning and to generate objectifiable data. The aim of this study was to train and evaluate an algorithm based on deep learning methods for fully automated detection of craniofacial landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in terms of accuracy, speed, and reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 931 CBCTs were used to train the algorithm. To test the algorithm, 35 landmarks were located manually by three experts and automatically by the algorithm in 114 CBCTs. The time and distance between the measured values and the ground truth previously determined by an orthodontist were analyzed. Intraindividual variations in manual localization of landmarks were determined using 50 CBCTs analyzed twice. RESULTS: The results showed no statistically significant difference between the two measurement methods. Overall, with a mean error of 2.73 mm, the AI was 2.12% better and 95% faster than the experts. In the area of bilateral cranial structures, the AI was able to achieve better results than the experts on average. CONCLUSION: The achieved accuracy of automatic landmark detection was in a clinically acceptable range, is comparable in precision to manual landmark determination, and requires less time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Further enlargement of the database and continued development and optimization of the algorithm may lead to ubiquitous fully automated localization and analysis of CBCT datasets in future routine clinical practice.

In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow.

This in-vitro study was designed to investigate whether conventionally produced casts and printed casts for orthodontic purposes show comparable full-arch accuracy. To produce casts, either a conventional impression or a digital data set is needed. A fully dentate all ceramic master cast was digitized with an industrial scanner to obtain a digital reference cast [REF]. Intraoral scans [IOS] and alginate impressions were taken from the master cast so that ten printed and ten gypsum casts were obtained. The printed casts [DLP] were digitized by an industrial scanner and as well as the gypsum casts [GYPSUM]. The following absolute mean trueness evaluations by superimposition were accomplished: [REF vs. GYPSUM]; [REF vs. DLP]; [REF vs. IOS]; [IOS vs. DLP]. For precision analysis the data sets of [GYPSUM], [IOS] and [DLP] were available. The absolute mean trueness values were 68 µm ± 15 µm for [REF vs. GYPSUM], 46 µm ± 4 µm for [REF vs. DLP], 20 µm ± 2 µm for [REF vs. IOS] and 41 µm ± 4 µm for [IOS vs. DLP]. [REF vs. GYPSUM] and [REF vs. DLP], [REF vs. IOS], [REF vs. DLP] and [IOS vs. DLP] showed statistically significant differences. The precision values were 56 µm ± 17 µm for [GYPSUM], 25 µm ± 9 µm for [DLP] and 12 µm ± 2 µm for [IOS] and differed significantly among each other. In the present study the print workflow revealed superior results in comparison to the conventional workflow. Due to contrary deviations in the [REF vs. IOS] and the [IOS vs. DLP] data sets the overall trueness deviations was enhanced.

Mandible segmentation from CT data for virtual surgical planning using an augmented two-stepped convolutional neural network.

PURPOSE: For computer-aided planning of facial bony surgery, the creation of high-resolution 3D-models of the bones by segmenting volume imaging data is a labor-intensive step, especially as metal dental inlays or implants cause severe artifacts that reduce the quality of the computer-tomographic imaging data. This study provides a method to segment accurate, artifact-free 3D surface models of mandibles from CT data using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: The presented approach cascades two independently trained 3D-U-Nets to perform accurate segmentations of the mandible bone from full resolution CT images. The networks are trained in different settings using three different loss functions and a data augmentation pipeline. Training and evaluation datasets consist of manually segmented CT images from 307 dentate and edentulous individuals, partly with heavy imaging artifacts. The accuracy of the models is measured using overlap-based, surface-based and anatomical-curvature-based metrics. RESULTS: Our approach produces high-resolution segmentations of the mandibles, coping with severe imaging artifacts in the CT imaging data. The use of the two-stepped approach yields highly significant improvements to the prediction accuracies. The best models achieve a Dice coefficient of 94.824% and an average surface distance of 0.31 mm on our test dataset. CONCLUSION: The use of two cascaded U-Net allows high-resolution predictions for small regions of interest in the imaging data. The proposed method is fast and allows a user-independent image segmentation, producing objective and repeatable results that can be used in automated surgical planning procedures.

Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the complete arch accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOS) on two different ceramic surfaces. METHODS: Two maxillary master cast samples were prepared. The bases of both the master casts were made from zirconium oxide. The difference between the two casts was that the teeth of the [ZR] cast were produced from zirconium oxide and that of the [LD] cast were made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Unlike the zirconia teeth of the [ZR] cast, the lithium disilicate teeth of the [LD] cast were glazed. The two master casts were digitized using a high-resolution scanner (Atos Compact Scan 5 M, GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany) to obtain digital reference casts. Subsequently, each master cast was scanned 15 times using four IOSs. The IOSs were the Cerec Omnicam [OM], Primescan [PR], Trios 4 [TR4], and VivaScan [VS]. On surface comparison, the absolute mean deviation values were obtained for trueness and precision. For multiple comparisons, statistically significant differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The p-value was adjusted to control for the increased risk of type I error (p < 0.0083). To compare the two means, the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Trueness values for [ZR] ranged from 24.6 (±6.3) µm for [PR] and 77.1 (±8.3) µm for [OM]. Trueness values for [LD] were between 28.3 (±6.3) µm for [PR] and 72.8 (±15.6) µm for [OM]. Precision values for [ZR] ranged from 17.6 (±3.7) µm for [PR] to 37.3 (±9.9) µm for [OM]. Precision values for [LD] ranged from 17.5 (±3.6) µm for [PR] to 41.8 (±8.7) µm for [OM]. Statistically significant differences were found among all the IOSs (p < 0.0083). The trueness values of the four IOSs did not differ significantly (p < 0.05) with respect to either the [ZR] or [LD] cast. The precision values of [OM] and [VS] differed significantly with respect to the scanned surface. CONCLUSIONS: Complete arch scans achieved with the four IOSs showed significantly different trueness and precision results. [VS] and [OM] were more sensitive in terms of the scanned material. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The latest IOSs showed the required accuracy for complete arch digital impressions in-vitro investigations. These findings should be implemented under conditions relevant to complete arch deviations, such as the construction of occlusal splints, analysis of occlusal relationships, and long-span restorations. Clinicians should be aware that the clinically acceptable threshold varies depending on the purpose of the IOS.

Guided discovery learning: A follow-up study of try-it-yourself surgery and subsequent video-assisted teaching for oral surgical skills training.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this follow-up study was to assess the effects of discovery learning and subsequent standardised teaching on students' advanced dental surgical skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 dental students who had no theoretical education on the Rehrmann flap were included in the skills training programme. Without prior teaching, the students were initially asked to perform a discovery surgery with a subsequent multiple-choice test (MCT) on the first day. This was followed by a video-assisted teaching lecture. On the same day and after 122 days, the surgery and MCT were repeated. Aside from the practical and theoretical assessment forms, the training was evaluated by the students themselves. RESULTS: Regarding the evaluation of surgery (EOS), significant improvements were measured between the first surgery and the second and third surgeries (p > .001). In addition, the theoretical test scores showed significant improvements after the first test when compared with the second (p = .004) and third tests (p < .001). For both assessments, no significant difference was found between the second and third attempts. The MCT and EOS in the second and third attempts strongly correlated (r = .77 and r = .71 respectively). CONCLUSION: The dental students in this study successfully learned a complex oral surgical procedure, the Rehrmann flap technique, for closing oro-antral communications. The participants indicated their high satisfaction with the teaching approach. After 122 days of follow-up, their practical and theoretical test scores remained high and presented no significant difference, which suggests that the newly learnt individual skills were retained.

Twenty-four months in vivo wear of enamel antagonists to lithium disilicate implant crowns - a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether there is a significant difference between the ratio of wear of lithium disilicate implant crowns and their enamel antagonists and adjacent enamel/enamel antagonist contacts. Additionally, the movement of the adjacent teeth was determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intraoral scans of the occlusal surfaces of 41 patients were performed after insertion of the implant restoration (baseline), after 12 and 24 months. From the initial study cohort, eleven implant crown/enamel antagonist pairs with adjacent enamel antagonist pairs could be analyzed in nine patients after 12 months. After 24 months, ten implant crowns of eight patients were available due to one decementation of an implant crown. A semiautomatic specifically developed iterative closest point algorithm was used to superimpose the surfaces of the baseline scan with the follow-up scans to measure the maximum height loss of each identified wear side. The mean maximum tooth wear and the standard deviation (SD) were calculated per unit. The ratio of wear of enamel/enamel antagonist teeth and the wear ratio of adjacent lithium disilicate implant crowns and their enamel antagonist surfaces were evaluated. Tooth movements were described by translations and rotations using a separate measurement procedure. The surfaces of the scans were superimposed setting the implant as a reference structure for registration. RESULTS: After 12 months the wear ratio between the enamel antagonist pairs was 0.95 ± 0.27 µm and the ratio between lithium disilicate/enamel was 0.73 ± 0.49 µm. After 24 months the ratio of enamel antagonist pairs was 1.04 ± 0.28 µm and the ratio of lithium disilicate/enamel was 0.73 ± 0.51 µm. The ratios did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral scanning and computer analysis showed that the two-years wear ratios between enamel/enamel and enamel/lithium disilicate implant crowns did not differ significantly. STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The methodology described in this study could measure tooth wear and detect long-term wear performance. In the future, digital monitoring of prosthetic restorations should be integrated into clinical workflow to identify potential factors affecting longevity.

Augmented Reality-Based Surgery on the Human Cadaver Using a New Generation of Optical Head-Mounted Displays: Development and Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Although nearly one-third of the world's disease burden requires surgical care, only a small proportion of digital health applications are directly used in the surgical field. In the coming decades, the application of augmented reality (AR) with a new generation of optical-see-through head-mounted displays (OST-HMDs) like the HoloLens (Microsoft Corp) has the potential to bring digital health into the surgical field. However, for the application to be performed on a living person, proof of performance must first be provided due to regulatory requirements. In this regard, cadaver studies could provide initial evidence. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to develop an open-source system for AR-based surgery on human cadavers using freely available technologies. METHODS: We tested our system using an easy-to-understand scenario in which fractured zygomatic arches of the face had to be repositioned with visual and auditory feedback to the investigators using a HoloLens. Results were verified with postoperative imaging and assessed in a blinded fashion by 2 investigators. The developed system and scenario were qualitatively evaluated by consensus interview and individual questionnaires. RESULTS: The development and implementation of our system was feasible and could be realized in the course of a cadaver study. The AR system was found helpful by the investigators for spatial perception in addition to the combination of visual as well as auditory feedback. The surgical end point could be determined metrically as well as by assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The development and application of an AR-based surgical system using freely available technologies to perform OST-HMD-guided surgical procedures in cadavers is feasible. Cadaver studies are suitable for OST-HMD-guided interventions to measure a surgical end point and provide an initial data foundation for future clinical trials. The availability of free systems for researchers could be helpful for a possible translation process from digital health to AR-based surgery using OST-HMDs in the operating theater via cadaver studies.

Dimensions of perforator flaps on the lower leg depending on localization.

INTRODUCTION: The soleus perforator flap and the peroneal perforator flap could be alternatives to the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstruction. However, their flap dimensions remain unknown. This study aims to determine the dimensions of both flaps and allow preoperative planning for reconstruction based on clinical parameters. MATERIALS & METHODS: Computed tomography records of 296 patients dated from 2009 through 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Virtual three-dimensional flap models of the soleus perforator flap and peroneal perforator flap were aligned to segmented leg models, and flap thickness and volume were determined. Associations of flap thickness and volume with clinical parameters were evaluated, and a calculation method was derived. RESULTS: The soleus perforator flap had an average thickness of 8.7 mm (4.8 mm) and an average volume of 0.9 cm³ (0.5 cm³) per square centimeter surface area. The peroneal perforator flap had an average thickness of 6.4 mm (3.8 mm) and an average volume of 0.8 cm³ (0.4 cm³) per square centimeter surface area. The soleus perforator flap was thicker and more voluminous than the peroneal perforator flap (both p<0.001). For both flaps, leg circumference was the strongest predictor of flap thickness (ß=0.524, p<0.001 and ß=0.700, p<0.001, respectively) and flap volume (ß=0.535, p<0.001 and ß=0.712, p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Dimensions of the soleus perforator and the peroneal perforator flaps are similar to those of the radial forearm flap. Preoperative planning of flap dimensions, such as flap thickness and volume, can help the surgeons select the appropriate flap.

Comparison of augmented reality and cutting guide technology in assisted harvesting of iliac crest grafts - A cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: Harvesting vascularized bone grafts with computer-assisted surgery represents the gold standard for mandibular reconstruction. However, current augmented reality (AR) approaches are limited to invasive marker fixation. This trial compared a markerless AR-guided real-time navigation with virtually planned and 3D printed cutting guides for harvesting iliac crest grafts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two commonly used iliac crest transplant configurations were virtually planned on 10 cadaver hips. Transplant harvest was performed with AR guidance and cutting guide technology. The harvested transplants were digitalized using cone beam CT. Deviations of angulation, distance and volume between the executed and planned osteotomies were measured. RESULTS: Both AR and cutting guides accurately rendered the virtually planned transplant volume. However, the cumulative osteotomy plane angulation differed significantly (p = 0.018) between AR (14.99 ± 11.69°) and the cutting guides (8.49 ± 5.42°). The cumulative osteotomy plane distance showed that AR-guided navigation had lower accuracy (2.65 ± 3.32 mm) than the cutting guides (1.47 ± 1.36 mm), although without significant difference. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the clinical usability of markerless AR-guided navigation for harvesting iliac crest grafts. Further improvement of accuracy rates might bring clinical implementation closer to reality.

Navigation of iliac crest graft harvest using markerless augmented reality and cutting guide technology: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Defects of the facial skeleton often require complex reconstruction with vascularized grafts. This trial elucidated the usability, visual perception and accuracy of a markerless augmented reality (AR)-guided navigation for harvesting iliac crest transplants. METHODS: Random CT scans were used to virtually plan two common transplant configurations on 10 iliac crest models, each printed four times. The transplants were harvested using projected AR and cutting guides. The duration and accuracies of the angulation, distance and volume between the planned and executed osteotomies were measured. RESULTS: AR was characterized by the efficient use of time and accurate rendition of preoperatively planned geometries. However, vertical osteotomies and complex anatomical settings displayed significant inferiority of AR guidance compared to cutting guides. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the usability of a markerless AR setup for harvesting iliac crest transplants. The visual perception and accuracy of the AR-guided osteotomies constituted remaining weaknesses against cutting guide technology.

Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of biological and technical complications of cemented and screw-retained monolithic lithium-disilicate implant-supported posterior single crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one subjects with a total of 56 implants received randomly allocated 28 cemented and 28 screw-retained crowns. In the screw-retained group, monolithic lithium-disilicate restorations were luted to titanium bases extraorally. In the cemented group, monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns were cemented on individualized titanium abutments intraorally. All restorations were examined according to modified FDI criteria within 2 weeks of inserting the crowns (baseline) and after 12 (n = 46) and 24 (n = 43) months. Bone loss was evaluated by standardized radiographs at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: After 12 months, the incidence of mucositis (positive bleeding on probing) was 14.2% (screw-retained) and 17.9% (cement-retained). The gingival and plaque index and a mean marginal bone loss between 0.03-0.15 mm showed no significant difference between the groups. In the cemented group, cement residues were detected at baseline at two restorations (6.9%) by radiographic examination. A complete digital workflow was realized in most cases (85.7%). At 24 months, no restoration had failed, and no chipping of the ceramic had occurred. In the screw-retained group, screw loosening occurred in one implant. In both groups, there was obvious deterioration in the quality of 32% of the occlusal and of 18% of the proximal contact points. CONCLUSIONS: The type of retention mode of monolithic implant-retained lithium-disilicate posterior crowns had no influence on the biological and technical complication rate.

Trueness evaluation of digital impression: The impact of the selection of reference and test object.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the importance of defining the reference and the test object during 3D surface comparisons to assess the trueness of an intraoral scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary complete-arch cast with interdental spaces was digitized with a high-resolution scanner to obtain the ground truth dataset [GT]. Fifteen intraoral scanning datasets [IOS] were obtained with an intraoral scanner. The trueness of the [IOS] datasets were evaluated by two different comparison procedures using a 3D analysis software: In the first comparison [REF-GT], the [GT] dataset was set as reference object and the [IOS] dataset was defined as test object. In the second comparison [REF-IOS], the [IOS] dataset were set as reference object and the [GT] dataset was defined as test object. The mean trueness of both comparisons was calculated with absolute mean deviation, (90-10)/2 percentile, and root-mean-squared (RMS) error method. Statistical significance was analyzed using the t-test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean trueness values of [REF-GT] were 31.4(±6.1) µm for (90-10)/2 percentile, 77.0(±5.3) µm for absolute mean deviation, and 203.1(±4.8) µm for RMS error method. [REF-IOS] revealed 23.9(±4.8) µm, 28.3(±6.3) µm, and 39.6(±9.5) µm, respectively. The results differed significantly. CONCLUSION: The datasets obtained from the intraoral scanner captured more adequately interproximal spaces in comparison to the [GT] dataset. Therefore, the [GT] dataset defined as reference object in the analysis software for 3D comparisons revealed misleading results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The selection of the reference object and of the areas to be compared have to be defined carefully regarding complete arch scanning accuracy analysis.

Objective and Subjective Comparisons of Split Thickness Skin Graft and Full Thickness Skin Graft for Radial Forearm Flap Donor Sites Using a New Measuring Method.

ABSTRACT: A split thickness skin graft (STSG) or a full thickness skin graft (FTSG) are commonly used for donor site closure after raising a radial forearm flap. The aesthetic outcome of the donor site is frequently not satisfying for the patient. This study evaluated the aesthetic outcome of the donor site of a radial forearm flap covered with an STSG or FTSG using an objective measurement method. The forearms of 30 patients (15 FTSG, 15 STSG) were scanned with an optical three-dimensional scanner. The surface of the forearm at the skin transplant was cut out and filled by an automatic hole-filling algorithm. The mean surface deviation between the original and the filled forearm was acquired. This method was validated with a control group of 15 volunteers. A questionnaire investigating aesthetical and healing satisfaction, postoperative pain and scarring was filled in by the patients. The mean surface difference in the STSG group was 0.9907 ±â€Š0.3120 and 0.6177 ±â€Š0.2245 mm in the FTSG group. The difference in the surface deviation between STSG and FTSG groups was significant (P = 0.0009). Correlations between the surface deviation and the subjective aesthetical satisfaction of the patient were not significant. In the questionnaires no significant differences between STSG and FTSG group were measured. Both FTSGs and STSGs resulted in good aesthetical outcomes after closure of a radial forearm flap donor site. Scanning the radial forearm flap donor site with an optical three-dimensional scanner supplied an objective, fast, and reliable measuring method of aesthetical outcomes.

Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The software programs of digital intraoral scanners typically offers the option to cut out areas from 3D casts, to do rescans, and to merge them with the initial scan. However, evidence of whether this procedure has an impact on the accuracy of the scan is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether "cut out-rescan" procedures change the accuracy of a 3D cast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A maxillary master cast was digitized with an industrial structured light scanner to obtain a digital reference cast. This master cast was repeatedly scanned by 3 intraoral scanners: TRIOS 3 [TR], Cerec Primescan [PR], and Cerec Omnicam [OM]. The scan data were duplicated, and the posterior area from the right lateral incisor was cut out and rescanned to obtain complete-arch casts containing the rescanned data [TR_rs], [PR_rs], and [OM_rs]. The trueness and precision of the scans were evaluated by superimposing procedures of the relevant data sets. To evaluate statistical differences, either the Mann-Whitney U test or the t test was used (α=.05). RESULTS: The median precision values of the complete-arch scan data was 19 µm for [OM] and [TR], whereas the median for [PR] was 14 µm. In the "cut out-rescanned" data group, the values were 25 µm for [OM_rs], 16 µm for [TR_rs], and 14 µm for [PR_rs]. Statistically significant differences were found among the scanners [OM]/[PR], [OM_rs]/[TR_rs], and [TR_rs]/[PR_rs]. The mean ± standard deviation values of trueness for the complete-arch scan data were 54 ±4 µm for [OM], 42 ±5 µm for [TR], and 30 ±2 µm for [PR]. In the group of the "cut out-rescanned" data, the mean trueness results were 55 ± 6 µm for [OM_rs], 38 ±5 µm for [TR_rs], and 31 ±5 µm for [PR_rs]. Significant differences were found among the complete-arch scan data and the "cut out-rescanned" data of the different scanners, but not between the complete-arch scan data and the "cut out-rescanned" data within one scanning system. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found among the scanners, but "cut out-rescan" procedures did not affect the accuracy within each scanning system.

From a CAD/CAM-milled, allogeneic bone block to an implant-supported fixed partial denture with angulated screw channel: a case report.

Augmentation of alveolar ridge defects is a technique-sensitive procedure in dental implantology. Depending on the size of the defect, it may be necessary to use autogenous bone blocks. However, patients may be against these blocks as these procedures are surgically invasive.
Case report: This report describes the restoration of a partially edentulous mandible, which suffered a major bone defect from the right canine to the third molar site after multiple implant losses. The use of a CAD/CAM allogeneic cancellous bone block from a living donor bone was planned for the reconstruction of the alveolar ridge at the defected site. A CBCT scan was taken and the virtual planning of the bone augmentation and placement of four implants was performed. The milled bone block was fixed for augmentation and the implants were placed using a CBCT-generated surgical guide. After osseointegration, a CAD/CAM-fabricated screw-retained metal-ceramic implant fixed partial denture with angulated screw channels was delivered.
Results: The use of CAD/CAM-milled, allogeneic bone block resulted in a time-efficient and simplified reconstruction of the defect because no donor site was used, and the fit of the block on the native bone was uneventful and fast. At the 1-year follow-up, an average peri-implant vertical soft tissue decrease of 1 mm on buccal and 0.3 mm on lingual sites was observed and the peri-implant tissues were healthy.
Conclusions: The long-term success of this CAD/CAM cancellous bone block needs to be evaluated in well-designed clinical studies.

Cross-sectional analysis of spatial distribution and total amount of harvestable calvarian split bone.

BACKGROUND: Bone resorption of the jaw leads to challenging implant placement. Frequently, augmentation of the jaw is necessary. Is calvarian split bone an alternative to other extraoral donor sites and what volume of bone is harvestable? The aim was to evaluate the spatial distribution and the total amount of harvestable calvarian split bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computerized tomographies of 600 patients were divided into four groups (male and female: ≤45 years and >45 years). The skull was segmented and cut into the harvestable compartments (Os frontale, Ossa parietalia). The volume and thickness of the harvestable bone were calculated. RESULTS: The overall harvestable bone was 110.644 ± 25.429 cm³. The bone from the Os frontale was significantly less than harvestable bone from the Os parietale (p < 0.001). More bone could be harvested from the right Os parietale. In younger males, significantly more bone could be harvested than in females (females ≤45 years: p = 0.001; females >45 years: p = 0.003). A weak negative correlation existed between the participants' age and the harvestable bone volume of the left Os parietale (r = -0.087; p = 0.033). The thickness of the harvestable bone from the Ossa parietalia is greater in females than in males. CONCLUSION: A great amount of calvarian bone can be harvested to augment the jaw. Surgeons must acknowledge that more bone is harvestable from males than females while the female bone is thicker. Calculating the volume leads to accurate results of the available bone.

Effect of the pterygomaxillary disjunction on surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion in context of orthodontic treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study analyzed the dentoalveolar effects of pterygomaxillary disjunction (PMD) in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) after orthodontic treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Virtual study casts before and after orthodontic treatment involving SARPE were analyzed in 12 patients without (-) PMD and 15 patients with (+) PMD. Linear and angular measurements and maximum deviations on the alveolar ridge and hard palate were determined. RESULTS: Dental arch widths in the first molars of the (-) and (+) PMD groups increased to 6.07 ± 2.11 mm and 6.61 ± 2.33 mm (P = .96) and the corresponding axial angles increased to 0.34 ± 9.45 degrees and 2.39 ± 9.59 degrees (P = .58), respectively. The palatal angles changed by about 0.10 ± 11.50 degrees and 1.74 ± 14.56 degrees (P = .75) in the (-) and (+) PMD groups and the maximum labial deviations at the alveolar ridge were 3.04 ± 0.76 mm and 3.22 ± 1.16 mm (P = .65) for the (-) and (+) PMD groups, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found before and after surgery (P < .04), but no significant differences were observed in PMD after orthodontic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: SARPE led to a significant transverse expansion, and the dental effects were more than the skeletal effects. We did not find a significant difference between both surgical techniques with regard to the anterior and posterior parts of the maxilla or the corresponding dentition.