RESUMEN
Breast cancer continues to be a significant contributor to global cancer deaths, particularly among women. This highlights the critical role of early detection and treatment in boosting survival rates. While conventional diagnostic methods like mammograms, biopsies, ultrasounds, and MRIs are valuable tools, limitations exist in terms of cost, invasiveness, and the requirement for specialized equipment and trained personnel. Recent shifts towards biosensor technologies offer a promising alternative for monitoring biological processes and providing accurate health diagnostics in a cost-effective, non-invasive manner. These biosensors are particularly advantageous for early detection of primary tumors, metastases, and recurrent diseases, contributing to more effective breast cancer management. The integration of biosensor technology into medical devices has led to the development of low-cost, adaptable, and efficient diagnostic tools. In this framework, electrochemical screening platforms have garnered significant attention due to their selectivity, affordability, and ease of result interpretation. The current review discusses various breast cancer biomarkers and the potential of electrochemical biosensors to revolutionize early cancer detection, making provision for new diagnostic platforms and personalized healthcare solutions.
RESUMEN
Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), present significant clinical challenges due to the heightened cancer risks associated with these genetic conditions. This review explores genetic profiling impact on surgical decisions for hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC), assessing options, timing, and outcomes. Genotypes of different HCRCs are discussed, revealing a connection between genetic profiles, disease severity, and outcomes. For Lynch syndrome, mutations in the MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 genes guide the choice of surgery. Subtotal colectomy is recommended for patients with mutations in MLH1 and MSH2, while segmental colectomy is preferred for those with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations. In cases of metachronous colon cancer after segmental colectomy, subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is advised for all mutations. Surgical strategies for primary rectal cancer include anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection (APR), irrespective of the specific mutation. For rectal cancer occurring after a previous segmental colectomy, proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or APR with a permanent ileostomy is recommended. In FAP, surgical decisions are based on genotype-phenotype correlations. The risk of desmoid tumors post-surgery supports a single-stage approach, particularly for certain APC gene variants. Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome (JPS) surgical decisions involve genetic testing, polyp characteristics with attention to vascular lesions in SMAD4 mutation carriers. However, genetic profiling does not directly dictate the specific surgical approach for JPS. In conclusion this review highlights the critical role of personalized surgical plans based on genetic profiles to optimize patient outcomes and reduce cancer risk. Further research is needed to refine these strategies and enhance clinical guidelines.