Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann ICRP ; 47(3-4): 126-141, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29648458

RESUMEN

In the past few decades, it has become increasingly evident that sensitivity to ionising radiation is variable. This is true for tissue reactions (deterministic effects) after high doses of radiation, for stochastic effects following moderate and possibly low doses, and conceivably also for non-cancer effects such as cardiovascular disease, the causal pathway(s) of which are not yet fully understood. A high sensitivity to deterministic effects is not necessarily correlated with a high sensitivity to stochastic effects. The concept of individual sensitivity to high and low doses of radiation has long been supported by data from patients with certain rare hereditary conditions. However, these syndromes only affect a small proportion of the general population. More relevant to the majority of the population is the notion that some part of the genetic contribution defining radiation sensitivity may follow a polygenic model, which predicts elevated risk resulting from the inheritance of many low-penetrance risk-modulating alleles. Can the different forms of individual radiation sensitivities be inferred from the reaction of cells exposed ex vivo to ionising radiation? Can they be inferred from analyses of individual genotypes? This paper reviews current evidence from studies of late adverse tissue reactions after radiotherapy in potentially sensitive groups, including data from functional assays, candidate gene approaches, and genome-wide association studies. It focuses on studies published in 2013 or later because a comprehensive review of earlier studies was published previously in a report by the UK Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica , Tolerancia a Radiación , Radiación Ionizante , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Tolerancia a Radiación/genética
2.
Br J Cancer ; 115(9): 1105-1112, 2016 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although high-dose ionising radiation is associated with increased breast cancer risks, the association with protracted low-dose-rate exposures remains unclear. The US Radiologic Technologist study provides an opportunity to examine the association between low-to-moderate dose radiation and breast cancer incidence and mortality. METHODS: One thousand nine hundred and twenty-two self-reported first primary cancers were diagnosed during 1983-2005 among 66 915 female technologists, and 586 breast cancer deaths occurred during 1983-2008 among 83 538 female cohort members. Occupational breast dose estimates were based on work histories, historical data, and, after the mid-1970s, individual film badge measurements. Excess relative risks were estimated using Poisson regression with birth cohort stratification and adjustment for menopause, reproductive history, and other risk factors. RESULTS: Higher doses were associated with increased breast cancer incidence, with an excess relative risk at 100 mGy of 0.07 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.005 to 0.19). Associations were strongest for technologists born before 1930 (excess relative risk at 100 mGy=0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.39) with similar patterns for mortality among technologists born before 1930. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational radiation to the breast was positively associated with breast cancer risk. The risk was more pronounced for women born before 1930 who began working before 1950 when mean annual doses (37 mGy) were considerably higher than in later years (1.3 mGy). However, because of the uncertainties and possible systematic errors in the occupational dose estimates before 1960, these findings should be treated with caution.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Dosis de Radiación , Oncología por Radiación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Personal de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Radiación Ionizante , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Recursos Humanos
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 66: 153-61, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27573429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that the relationship between obesity and breast cancer (BC) risk may vary between ethnic groups. METHODS: A total of 1633 BC cases and 1504 controls were enrolled in hospital-based case-control study in Mumbai, India, from 2009 to 2013. Along with detailed questionnaire, we collected anthropometric measurements on all participants. We used unconditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for BC risk associated with anthropometry measurements, stratified on tumour subtype and menopausal status. RESULTS: Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) of ≥0.95 was strongly associated with risk of BC compared to WHR ≤0.84 in both premenopausal (OR = 4.3; 95% CI: 2.9-6.3) and postmenopausal women (OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 2.4-4.8) after adjustment for body mass index (BMI). Premenopausal women with a BMI ≥30 were at lower risk compared to women with normal BMI (OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4-0.8). A similar protective effect was observed in women who were postmenopausal for <10 years (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9) but not in women who were postmenopausal for ≥10 years (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.3). Overweight and obese women (BMI: 25-29.9 and ≥ 30 kg/m(2), respectively) were at increased BC risk irrespective of menopausal status if their WHR ≥0.95. Central obesity (measured in terms of WC and WHR) increased the risk of both premenopausal and postmenopausal BCs irrespective of hormone receptor (HR) status. CONCLUSIONS: Central obesity appears to be a key risk factor for BC irrespective of menopausal or HR status in Indian women with no history of hormone replacement therapy.


Asunto(s)
Menopausia/etnología , Obesidad Abdominal/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , India/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Abdominal/etnología , Receptor ErbB-2/fisiología , Receptores de Estrógenos/fisiología , Receptores de Progesterona/fisiología , Factores de Riesgo , Circunferencia de la Cintura/etnología , Adulto Joven
4.
Indian J Cancer ; 53(2): 304-308, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28071634

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Within India, the incidence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is characterized by marked geographical variation; however, the reasons for these differences are unclear. AIMS: To evaluate the role of place of birth, length of residence, and effect of migration from high- to low-risk region on GBC development. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs); case-control study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data of PBCRs were used to demonstrate geographical variation in GBC incidence rates. A case-control study data examined the role of birth place, residence length, and effect of migration in etiology of GBC. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Rate ratios for different PBCRs were estimated using Chennai Cancer Registry as the reference population. Odds ratios (ORs) for developing GBC in a high-risk region compared to a low-risk region and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated through unconditional logistic regression models using case-control study. RESULTS: GBC shows marked variation in incidence with risk highest in Northeast regions and lowest in South India. OR of 4.82 (95% CI: 3.87-5.99) was observed for developing GBC for individuals born in a high-risk region compared to those born in a low-risk region after adjusting for confounders. A dose-response relationship with increased risk with increased length of residence in a high-risk region was observed (OR lifetime 5.58 [95% CI: 4.42-7.05]; Ptrend ≤ 0.001). The risk persisted even if study participant migrated from high- to low-risk region (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.02-1.82). CONCLUSIONS: The present study signifies the importance of place of birth, length of stay, and effect of migration from high- to low-risk region in the development of GBC. The data indicate role of environmental and genetic factors in etiology of disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , India , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
5.
Health Phys ; 108(5): 551-6, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25811153

RESUMEN

The RERF International Low-Dose Symposium was held on 5-6 December 2013 at the RERF campus in Hiroshima, Japan, to discuss the issues facing the Life Span Study (LSS) and other low-dose studies. Topics included the current status of low-dose risk detection, strategies for low-dose epidemiological and statistical research, methods to improve communication between epidemiologists and biologists, and the current status of radiological studies and tools. Key points made by the participants included the necessity of pooling materials over multiple studies to gain greater insight where data from single studies are insufficient; generating models that reflect epidemiological, statistical, and biological principles simultaneously; understanding confounders and effect modifiers in the current data; and taking into consideration less studied factors such as the impact of dose rate. It is the hope of all participants that this symposium be used as a trigger for further studies, especially those using pooled data, in order to reach a greater understanding of the health effects of low-dose radiation.


Asunto(s)
Guerra Nuclear , Sobrevivientes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Japón
6.
Br J Cancer ; 112(1): 44-51, 2015 Jan 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25349972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominal radiotherapy for testicular cancer (TC) increases risk for second stomach cancer, although data on the radiation dose-response relationship are sparse. METHODS: In a cohort of 22,269 5-year TC survivors diagnosed during 1959-1987, doses to stomach subsites were estimated for 92 patients who developed stomach cancer and 180 matched controls. Chemotherapy details were recorded. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of second primary stomach cancer was 1.45% at 30 years after TC diagnosis. The TC survivors who received radiotherapy (87 (95%) cases, 151 (84%) controls) had a 5.9-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-20.7) increased risk of stomach cancer. Risk increased with increasing stomach dose (P-trend<0.001), with an OR of 20.5 (3.7-114.3) for ⩾50.0 Gy compared with <10 Gy. Radiation-related risks remained elevated ⩾20 years after exposure (P<0.001). Risk after any chemotherapy was not elevated (OR=1.1; 95% CI 0.5-2.5; 14 cases and 23 controls). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for TC involving parts of the stomach increased gastric cancer risk for several decades, with the highest risks after stomach doses of ⩾30 Gy. Clinicians should be aware of these excesses when previously irradiated TC survivors present with gastrointestinal symptoms and when any radiotherapy is considered in newly diagnosed TC patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiología , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Sobrevivientes , Adulto Joven
7.
Br J Cancer ; 110(1): 242-8, 2014 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24335921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking increase the risk of several cancers and certain components of cigarette smoke and alcohol can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, it remains unclear whether these exposures influence the risk of glioma. METHODS: We examined the associations between cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, and risk of glioma in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study, a prospective study of 477,095 US men and women ages 50-71 years at baseline. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using models with age as the time metric and adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, education, and marital status. RESULTS: During a median 10.5 person-years of follow-up, 492 men and 212 women were diagnosed with first primary glioma. Among men, current, heavier smoking was associated with a reduced risk of glioma compared with never smoking, but this was based on only nine cases. No associations were observed between smoking behaviours and glioma risk in women. Greater alcohol consumption was associated with a decreased risk of glioma, particularly among men (>2 drinks per day vs <1 drink per week: HR=0.67, 95% CI=0.51-0.90). CONCLUSION: Smoking and alcohol drinking do not appear to increase the risk of glioma.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Glioma/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiología , Femenino , Glioma/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Ann Oncol ; 23(12): 3081-3091, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22745217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for breast cancer may expose the esophagus to ionizing radiation, but no study has evaluated esophageal cancer risk after breast cancer associated with radiation dose or systemic therapy use. DESIGN: Nested case-control study of esophageal cancer among 289 748 ≥5-year survivors of female breast cancer from five population-based cancer registries (252 cases, 488 individually matched controls), with individualized radiation dosimetry and information abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: The largest contributors to esophageal radiation exposure were supraclavicular and internal mammary chain treatments. Esophageal cancer risk increased with increasing radiation dose to the esophageal tumor location (P(trend )< 0.001), with doses of ≥35 Gy associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-28]. Patients with hormonal therapy ≤5 years preceding esophageal cancer diagnosis had lower risk (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). Based on few cases, alkylating agent chemotherapy did not appear to affect risk. Our data were consistent with a multiplicative effect of radiation and other esophageal cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer is a radiation dose-related complication of radiotherapy for breast cancer, but absolute risk is low. At higher esophageal doses, the risk warrants consideration in radiotherapy risk assessment and long-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/radioterapia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , Sobrevivientes
9.
BMJ ; 344: e1147, 2012 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22403263

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In view of mobile phone exposure being classified as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), we determined the compatibility of two recent reports of glioma risk (forming the basis of the IARC's classification) with observed incidence trends in the United States. DESIGN: Comparison of observed rates with projected rates of glioma incidence for 1997-2008. We estimated projected rates by combining relative risks reported in the 2010 Interphone study and a 2011 Swedish study by Hardell and colleagues with rates adjusted for age, registry, and sex; data for mobile phone use; and various latency periods. SETTING: US population based data for glioma incidence in 1992-2008, from 12 registries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme (Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose-Monterey, Seattle, rural Georgia, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, and Utah). PARTICIPANTS: Data for 24,813 non-Hispanic white people diagnosed with glioma at age 18 years or older. RESULTS: Age specific incidence rates of glioma remained generally constant in 1992-2008 (-0.02% change per year, 95% confidence interval -0.28% to 0.25%), a period coinciding with a substantial increase in mobile phone use from close to 0% to almost 100% of the US population. If phone use was associated with glioma risk, we expected glioma incidence rates to be higher than those observed, even with a latency period of 10 years and low relative risks (1.5). Based on relative risks of glioma by tumour latency and cumulative hours of phone use in the Swedish study, predicted rates should have been at least 40% higher than observed rates in 2008. However, predicted glioma rates based on the small proportion of highly exposed people in the Interphone study could be consistent with the observed data. Results remained valid if we used either non-regular users or low users of mobile phones as the baseline category, and if we constrained relative risks to be more than 1. CONCLUSIONS: Raised risks of glioma with mobile phone use, as reported by one (Swedish) study forming the basis of the IARC's re-evaluation of mobile phone exposure, are not consistent with observed incidence trends in US population data, although the US data could be consistent with the modest excess risks in the Interphone study.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Teléfono Celular , Glioma/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiología , Femenino , Glioma/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
Br J Cancer ; 103(5): 727-9, 2010 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20648014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Xuanwei County, Yunnan Province, China, lung cancer mortality rates in both males and females are among the highest in China. METHODS: We evaluated differential effects of smoking on lung cancer mortality before and after household stove improvement with chimney to reduce exposure to smoky coal emissions in the unique cohort in Xuanwei, China. Effects of independent variables on lung cancer mortality were measured as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a multivariable Cox regression model that included separate time-dependent variables for smoking duration (years) before and after stove improvement. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found that the effect of smoking on lung cancer risk becomes considerably stronger after chimney installation and consequent reduction of indoor coal smoke exposure.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Carbón Mineral , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Fumar , China
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...