Task-based automatic keV selection: leveraging routine virtual monoenergetic imaging for dose reduction on clinical photon-counting detector CT.

Objective. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables routine virtual-monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstruction. We evaluated the performance of an automatic VMI energy level (keV) selection tool on a clinical PCD-CT system in comparison to an automatic tube potential (kV) selection tool from an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT system from the same manufacturer.Approach.Four torso-shaped phantoms (20-50 cm width) containing iodine (2, 5, and 10 mg cc-1) and calcium (100 mg cc-1) were scanned on PCD-CT and EID-CT. Dose optimization techniques, task-based VMI energy level and tube-potential selection on PCD-CT (CARE keV) and task-based tube potential selection on EID-CT (CARE kV), were enabled. CT numbers, image noise, and dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRd) were compared.Main results. PCD-CT produced task-specific VMIs at 70, 65, 60, and 55 keV for non-contrast, bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular settings, respectively. A 120 kV tube potential was automatically selected on PCD-CT for all scans. In comparison, EID-CT used x-ray tube potentials from 80 to 150 kV based on imaging task and phantom size. PCD-CT achieved consistent dose reduction at 9%, 21% and 39% for bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular tasks relative to the non-contrast task, independent of phantom size. On EID-CT, dose reduction factor for contrast tasks relative to the non-contrast task ranged from a 65% decrease (vascular task, 70 kV, 20 cm phantom) to a 21% increase (soft tissue with contrast task, 150 kV, 50 cm phantom) due to size-specific tube potential adaptation. PCD-CT CNRdwas equivalent to or higher than those of EID-CT for all tasks and phantom sizes, except for the vascular task with 20 cm phantom, where 70 kV EID-CT CNRdoutperformed 55 keV PCD-CT images.Significance. PCD-CT produced more consistent CT numbers compared to EID-CT due to standardized VMI output, which greatly benefits standardization efforts and facilitates radiation dose reduction.

Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Versus Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Calcium Quantitation.

OBJECTIVES: Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) offers improved spatial and contrast resolution, which can impact quantitative measurements. This work aims to determine in human subjects the effect of dual-source PCD-CT on the quantitation of coronary artery calcification (CAC) compared with dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in both 1- and 3-mm images. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients receiving a clinical EID-CT CAC examination to undergo a research PCD-CT CAC examination. Axial images were reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix, 200-mm field of view, 3-mm section thickness/1.5-mm interval using a quantitative kernel (Qr36). Sharper kernels (Qr56/QIR strength 4 for PCD and Qr49/ADMIRE strength 5 for EID) were used to reconstruct images with 1-mm section thickness/0.5-mm interval. Pooled analysis was performed for all calcifications with nonzero values, and volume and Agatston scores were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 21 subjects (median age, 58 years; range, 50-75 years; 13 male [62%]) with a total of 42 calcified arteries detected at 3 mm and 46 calcified arteries at 1-mm images, EID-CT CAC volume and Agatston scores were significantly lower than those of PCD-CT ( P ≤ 0.001). At 3-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and Agatston score for EID-CT were 55.5 (63.4) mm 3 and 63.8 (76.9), respectively, and 61.5 (69.4) mm 3 and 70.4 (85.3) for PCD-CT ( P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0013). At 1-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and score for EID-CT were 50.0 (56.3) mm 3 and 61.1 (69.3), respectively, and 59.5 (63.9) mm 3 and 72.5 (79.9) for PCD-CT ( P < 0.0001 for both). The applied radiation dose (volume CT dose index) for the PCD-CT scan was 2.1 ± 0.6 mGy, which was 13% lower than for the EID-CT scan (2.4 ± 0.7 mGy, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to EID-CT, PCD-CT demonstrated a small but significant increase in coronary artery calcium volume and Agatston score.

Comparison of Photon-counting Detector and Energy-integrating Detector CT for Visual Estimation of Coronary Percent Luminal Stenosis.

Background Compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, the improved resolution of photon-counting detector (PCD) CT coupled with high-energy virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) has been shown to decrease calcium blooming on images in phantoms and cadaveric specimens. Purpose To determine the impact of dual-source PCD CT on visual and quantitative estimation of percent diameter luminal stenosis compared with dual-source EID CT in patients. Materials and Methods This prospective study recruited consecutive adult patients from an outpatient facility between January and March 2022. Study participants underwent clinical dual-source EID coronary CT angiography followed by a research dual-source PCD CT examination. For PCD CT, multienergy data were used to create VMIs at 50 and 100 keV. Two readers independently reviewed EID CT images followed by PCD CT images after a washout period. Readers visually graded the most severe stenosis in terms of percent diameter luminal stenosis for the left main, left anterior descending, right, and circumflex coronary arteries, unblinded to scanner type. Quantitative measures of percent stenosis were made using commercial software. Visual and quantitative estimates of percent stenosis were compared between EID CT and PCD CT using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results A total of 25 participants (median age, 59 years [range, 18-78 years]; 16 male participants) were enrolled. On EID CT images, readers 1 and 2 identified 39 and 32 luminal stenoses, respectively, with a percent diameter luminal stenosis greater than 0%. Visual estimates of percent stenosis were lower on PCD CT images than EID CT images (reader 1: median 20.6% [IQR, 8.8%-61.2%] vs 31.8% [IQR, 12.9%-69.7%], P < .001; reader 2: 6.5% [IQR, 0.4%-54.1%] vs 22.9% [IQR, 1.8%-67.4%], P = .002). No difference was observed between EID CT and PCD CT for quantitative measures of percent stenosis (median difference, -1.5% [95% CI: -3.0%, 2.5%]; P = .51). Conclusion Relative to using EID CT, using PCD CT led to decreases in visual estimates of percent stenosis. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Murphy and Donnelly in this issue.

Characterization of single- and multi-energy CT performance of an oral dark borosilicate contrast media using a clinical photon-counting-detector CT platform.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of oral dark contrast media is under exploration in abdominal computed tomography (CT) applications. One of the experimental contrast media in this class is dark borosilicate contrast media (DBCM), which has a CT attenuation lower than that of intra-abdominal fat. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performances of DBCM using single- and multi-energy CT imaging on a clinical photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT). METHODS: Five vials, three with iodinated contrast agent (5, 10, and 20 mg/mL; Omnipaque 350) and two with DBCM (6% and 12%; Nextrast, Inc.), and one solid-water rod (neutral contrast agent) were inserted into two multi-energy CT phantoms, and scanned on a clinical PCD-CT system (NAEOTOM Alpha) at 90, 120, 140, Sn100, and Sn140 kV (Sn: tin filter) in multi-energy mode. CARE keV IQ level was 180 (CTDIvol: 3.0 and 12.0 mGy for the small and large phantoms, respectively). Low-energy threshold images were reconstructed with a quantitative kernel (Qr40, iterative reconstruction strength 2) and slice thickness/increment of 2.0/2.0 mm. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were reconstructed from 40 to 140 keV at 10 keV increments. On all images, average CT numbers for each vial/rod were measured using circular region-of-interests and averaged over eight slices. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of iodine (5 mg/mL) against DBCM was calculated and plotted against tube potential and VMI energy level, and compared to the CNR of iodine against water. Similar analyses were performed on iodine maps and VNC images derived from the multi-energy scan at 120 kV. RESULTS: With increasing kV or VMI keV, the negative HU of DBCM decreased only slightly, whereas the positive HU of iodine decreased across all contrast concentrations and phantom sizes. CT numbers for DBCM decreased from -178.5 ± 9.6 to -194.4 ± 6.3 HU (small phantom) and from -181.7 ± 15.7 to -192.1 ± 11.9 HU (large phantom) for DBCM-12% from 90 to Sn140 kV; on VMIs, the CT numbers for DBCM decreased minimally from -147.1 ± 15.7 to -185.1 ± 9.2 HU (small phantom) and -158.8 ± 28.6 to -188.9 ± 14.7 HU (large phantom) from 40 to 70 keV, but remained stable from 80 to 140 keV. The highest iodine CNR against DBCM in low-energy threshold images was seen at 90 or Sn140 kV for the small phantom, whereas all CNR values from low-energy threshold images for the large phantom were comparable. The CNR values of iodine against DBCM computed on VMIs were highest at 40 or 70 keV depending on iodine and DBCM concentrations. The CNR values of iodine against DBCM were consistently higher than iodine to water (up to 460% higher dependent on energy level). Further, the CNR of iodine compared to DBCM is less affected by VMI energy level than the identical comparison between iodine and water: CNR values at 140 keV were reduced by 46.6% (small phantom) or 42.6% (large phantom) compared to 40 keV; CNR values for iodine compared to water were reduced by 86.3% and 83.8% for similar phantom sizes, respectively. Compared to 70 keV VMI, the iodine CNR against DBCM was 13%-79% lower on iodine maps and VNC. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluated at different tube potentials and VMI energy levels using a clinical PCD-CT system, DBCM showed consistently higher CNR compared to iodine versus water (a neutral contrast).

Ex vivo coronary calcium volume quantification using a high-spatial-resolution clinical photon-counting-detector computed tomography.

Purpose: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an important indicator of coronary disease. Accurate volume quantification of CAC is challenging using computed tomography (CT) due to calcium blooming, which is a consequence of limited spatial resolution. Ex vivo coronary specimens were scanned on an ultra-high-resolution (UHR) clinical photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner, and the accuracy of CAC volume estimation was compared with a state-of-the-art conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, a previous-generation investigational PCD-CT, and micro-CT. Approach: CAC specimens (n=13) were scanned on EID-CT and PCD-CT using matched parameters (120 kV, 9.3 mGy CTDIvol). EID-CT images were reconstructed using our institutional routine clinical protocol for CAC quantification. UHR PCD-CT data were reconstructed using a sharper kernel. An image-based denoising algorithm was applied to the PCD-CT images to achieve similar noise levels as EID-CT. Micro-CT images served as the volume reference standard. Calcification images were segmented, and their volume estimates were compared. The CT data were further compared with previous work using an investigational PCD-CT. Results: Compared with micro-CT, CT volume estimates had a mean absolute percent error of 24.1%±25.6% for clinical PCD-CT, 60.1%±48.2% for EID-CT, and 51.1%±41.7% for previous-generation PCD-CT. Clinical PCD-CT absolute percent error was significantly (p<0.01) lower than both EID-CT and previous generation PCD-CT. The mean calcification CT number and contrast-to-noise ratio were both significantly (p<0.01) higher in clinical PCD-CT relative to EID-CT. Conclusions: UHR clinical PCD-CT showed reduced calcium blooming artifacts and further enabled improved accuracy of CAC quantification beyond that of conventional EID-CT and previous generation PCD-CT systems.

Photon Counting Detector Computed Tomography: A New Frontier of Myeloma Bone Disease Evaluation.

Photon counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) is a paradigm-shifting innovation in CT imaging which was recently granted approval for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration. PCD-CT allows the generation of multi-energy images with increased contrast and scanning speed or ultra-high spatial resolution (UHR) images with lower radiation doses, compared to the currently used energy integrating detector (EID) CT. Since the recognition of bone disease related to multiple myeloma is important for the diagnosis and management of patients, the advent of PCD-CT heralds a new era in superior diagnostic evaluation of myeloma bone disease. In a first-in-human pilot study, patients with multiple myeloma were imaged with UHR-PCD-CT to validate and establish the utility of this technology in routine imaging and clinical care. We describe 2 cases from that cohort to highlight the superior imaging performance and diagnostic potential of PCD-CT for multiple myeloma compared to clinical standard EID-CT. We also discuss how the advanced imaging capabilities from PCD-CT enhances clinical diagnostics to improve care and overall outcomes for patients.

Establishing a quality assurance program for photon counting detector (PCD) CT: Tips and caveats.

PURPOSE: To determine the suitability of a quality assurance (QA) program based on the American College of Radiology's (ACR) CT quality control (QC) manual to fully evaluate the unique capabilities of a clinical photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT system. METHODS: A daily QA program was established to evaluate CT number accuracy and artifacts for both standard and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan modes. A complete system performance evaluation was conducted in accordance with the ACR CT QC manual by scanning the CT Accreditation Phantom with routine clinical protocols and reconstructing low-energy-threshold (T3D) and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) between 40 and 120 keV. Spatial resolution was evaluated by computing the modulation transfer function (MTF) for the UHR mode, and multi-energy performance was evaluated by scanning a body phantom containing four iodine inserts with concentrations between 2 and 15 mg I/cc. RESULTS: The daily QA program identified instances when the detector needed recalibration or replacement. CT number accuracy was impacted by image type: CT numbers at 70 keV VMI were within the acceptable range (defined for 120 kV). Other keV VMIs and the T3D reconstruction had at least one insert with CT number outside the acceptable range. The limiting resolution was nearly 40 lp/cm based on MTF measurements, which far exceeds the 12 lp/cm maximum capability of the ACR phantom. The CT numbers in the iodine inserts were accurate on all VMIs (3.8% average percentage error), while the iodine concentrations had an average root mean squared error of 0.3 mg I/cc. CONCLUSION: Protocols and parameters must be properly selected on PCD-CT to meet current accreditation requirements with the ACR CT phantom. Use of the 70 keV VMI allowed passing all tests prescribed in the ACR CT manual. Additional evaluations such an MTF measurement and multi-energy phantom scans are also recommended to comprehensively evaluate PCD-CT scanner performance.

Improvements in dose efficiency with high resolution scan modes in photon counting CT.

For the detection of very small objects, high resolution detectors are expected to provide higher dose efficiency. We assessed this impact of increased resolution on a clinical photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) by comparing its detectability in high resolution and standard resolution (with 2×2 binning and larger focal spot) modes. A 50µm-thin metal wire was placed in a thorax phantom and scanned in both modes at three exposure levels (12, 15, and 18 mAs); acquired data were reconstructed with three reconstruction kernels (Br40, Br68, and Br76, from smooth to sharp). A scanning nonprewhitening model observer searched for the wire location within each slice independently. Detection performance was quantified as area under the exponential transform of the free response ROC curve. The high-resolution mode had the mean AUCs at 18 mAs of 0.45, 0.49, and 0.65 for Br40, Br68, and Br76, respectively, which were 2 times, 3.6 times, and 4.6 times those of the standard resolution mode. The high-resolution mode achieved greater AUC at 12 mAs than the standard resolution mode at 18 mAs for every reconstruction kernel, but improvements were larger at sharper kernels. The results are consistent with the greater suppression of noise aliasing expected at higher frequencies with high resolution CT. This work illustrates that PCD-CT can provide large dose efficiency gains for detection tasks of small, high contrast lesions.

The technical development of photon-counting detector CT.

Since 1971 and Hounsfield's first CT system, clinical CT systems have used scintillating energy-integrating detectors (EIDs) that use a two-step detection process. First, the X-ray energy is converted into visible light, and second, the visible light is converted to electronic signals. An alternative, one-step, direct X-ray conversion process using energy-resolving, photon-counting detectors (PCDs) has been studied in detail and early clinical benefits reported using investigational PCD-CT systems. Subsequently, the first clinical PCD-CT system was commercially introduced in 2021. Relative to EIDs, PCDs offer better spatial resolution, higher contrast-to-noise ratio, elimination of electronic noise, improved dose efficiency, and routine multi-energy imaging. In this review article, we provide a technical introduction to the use of PCDs for CT imaging and describe their benefits, limitations, and potential technical improvements. We discuss different implementations of PCD-CT ranging from small-animal systems to whole-body clinical scanners and summarize the imaging benefits of PCDs reported using preclinical and clinical systems. KEY POINTS: • Energy-resolving, photon-counting-detector CT is an important advance in CT technology. • Relative to current energy-integrating scintillating detectors, energy-resolving, photon-counting-detector CT offers improved spatial resolution, improved contrast-to-noise ratio, elimination of electronic noise, increased radiation and iodine dose efficiency, and simultaneous multi-energy imaging. • High-spatial-resolution, multi-energy imaging using energy-resolving, photon-counting-detector CT has been used in investigations into new imaging approaches, including multi-contrast imaging.

Clinical applications of photon counting detector CT.

The X-ray detector is a fundamental component of a CT system that determines the image quality and dose efficiency. Until the approval of the first clinical photon-counting-detector (PCD) system in 2021, all clinical CT scanners used scintillating detectors, which do not capture information about individual photons in the two-step detection process. In contrast, PCDs use a one-step process whereby X-ray energy is converted directly into an electrical signal. This preserves information about individual photons such that the numbers of X-ray in different energy ranges can be counted. Primary advantages of PCDs include the absence of electronic noise, improved radiation dose efficiency, increased iodine signal and the ability to use lower doses of iodinated contrast material, and better spatial resolution. PCDs with more than one energy threshold can sort the detected photons into two or more energy bins, making energy-resolved information available for all acquisitions. This allows for material classification or quantitation tasks to be performed in conjunction with high spatial resolution, and in the case of dual-source CT, high pitch, or high temporal resolution acquisitions. Some of the most promising applications of PCD-CT involve imaging of anatomy where exquisite spatial resolution adds clinical value. These include imaging of the inner ear, bones, small blood vessels, heart, and lung. This review describes the clinical benefits observed to date and future directions for this technical advance in CT imaging. KEY POINTS: • Beneficial characteristics of photon-counting detectors include the absence of electronic noise, increased iodine signal-to-noise ratio, improved spatial resolution, and full-time multi-energy imaging. • Promising applications of PCD-CT involve imaging of anatomy where exquisite spatial resolution adds clinical value and applications requiring multi-energy data simultaneous with high spatial and/or temporal resolution. • Future applications of PCD-CT technology may include extremely high spatial resolution tasks, such as the detection of breast micro-calcifications, and quantitative imaging of native tissue types and novel contrast agents.

Seeing More with Less: Clinical Benefits of Photon-counting Detector CT.

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is an emerging technology that has led to continued innovation and progress in diagnostic imaging after it was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in September 2021. Conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT measures the total energy of x-rays by converting photons to visible light and subsequently using photodiodes to convert visible light to digital signals. In comparison, PCD CT directly records x-ray photons as electric signals, without intermediate conversion to visible light. The benefits of PCD CT systems include improved spatial resolution due to smaller detector pixels, higher iodine image contrast, increased geometric dose efficiency to allow high-resolution imaging, reduced radiation dose for all body parts, multienergy imaging capabilities, and reduced artifacts. To recognize these benefits, diagnostic applications of PCD CT in musculoskeletal, thoracic, neuroradiologic, cardiovascular, and abdominal imaging must be optimized and adapted for specific diagnostic tasks. The diagnostic benefits and clinical applications resulting from PCD CT in early studies have allowed improved visualization of key anatomic structures and radiologist confidence for some diagnostic tasks, which will continue as PCD CT evolves and clinical use and applications grow. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Ananthakrishnan in this issue.

Quantifying lumen diameter in coronary artery stents with high-resolution photon counting detector CT and convolutional neural network denoising.

BACKGROUND: Small coronary arteries containing stents pose a challenge in CT imaging due to metal-induced blooming artifact. High spatial resolution imaging capability is as the presence of highly attenuating materials limits noninvasive assessment of luminal patency. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the effective lumen diameter within coronary stents using a clinical photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT in concert with a convolutional neural network (CNN) denoising algorithm, compared to an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT system. METHODS: Seven coronary stents of different materials and inner diameters between 3.43 and 4.72 mm were placed in plastic tubes of diameters 3.96-4.87 mm containing 20 mg/mL of iodine solution, mimicking stented contrast-enhanced coronary arteries. Tubes were placed parallel with or perpendicular to the scanner's z-axis in an anthropomorphic phantom emulating an average-sized patient and scanned with a clinical EID-CT and PCD-CT. EID scans were performed using our standard coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) protocol (120 kV, 180 quality reference mAs). PCD scans were performed using the ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode (120 × 0.2 mm collimation) at 120 kV with tube current adjusted so that CTDIvol was matched to that of EID scans. EID images were reconstructed per our routine clinical protocol (Br40, 0.6 mm thickness), and with the sharpest available kernel (Br69). PCD images were reconstructed at a thickness of 0.6 mm and a dedicated sharp kernel (Br89) which is only possible with the PCD UHR mode. To address increased image noise introduced by the Br89 kernel, an image-based CNN denoising algorithm was applied to the PCD images of stents scanned parallel to the scanner's z-axis. Stents were segmented based on full-width half maximum thresholding and morphological operations, from which effective lumen diameter was calculated and compared to reference sizes measured with a caliper. RESULTS: Substantial blooming artifacts were observed on EID Br40 images, resulting in larger stent struts and reduced lumen diameter (effective diameter underestimated by 41% and 47% for parallel and perpendicular orientations, respectively). Blooming artifacts were observed on EID Br69 images with 19% and 31% underestimation of lumen diameter compared to the caliper for parallel and perpendicular scans, respectively. Overall image quality was substantially improved on PCD, with higher spatial resolution and reduced blooming artifacts, resulting in the clearer delineation of stent struts. Effective lumen diameters were underestimated by 9% and 19% relative to the reference for parallel and perpendicular scans, respectively. CNN reduced image noise by about 50% on PCD images without impacting lumen quantification (<0.3% difference). CONCLUSION: The PCD UHR mode improved in-stent lumen quantification for all seven stents as compared to EID images due to decreased blooming artifacts. Implementation of CNN denoising algorithms to PCD data substantially improved image quality.

Feasibility of photon-counting CT for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome evaluation: lower radiation dose and improved diagnostic confidence.

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of low-dose photon-counting detector (PCD) CT to measure alpha and acetabular version angles of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: FAI patients undergoing an energy-integrating detector (EID) CT underwent an IRB-approved prospective ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCD-CT between 5/2021 and 12/2021. PCD-CT was dose-matched to the EID-CT or acquired at 50% dose. Simulated 50% dose EID-CT images were generated. Two radiologists evaluated randomized EID-CT and PCD-CT images and measured alpha and acetabular version angles on axial image slices. Image quality (noise, artifacts, and visualization of cortex) and confidence in non-FAI pathology were rated on a 4-point scale (3 = adequate). Preference tests of standard dose PCD-CT, 50% dose PCD-CT, and 50% dose EID-CT relative to standard dose EID-CT were performed using Wilcoxon Rank test. RESULTS: 20 patients underwent standard dose EID-CT (~ CTDIvol, 4.5 mGy); 10 patients, standard dose PCD-CT (4.0 mGy); 10 patients, 50% PCD-CT (2.6 mGy). Standard dose EID-CT images were scored as adequate for diagnostic task in all categories (range 2.8-3.0). Standard dose PCD-CT images scored higher than the reference in all categories (range 3.5-4, p < 0.0033). Half-dose PCD-CT images also scored higher for noise and cortex visualization (p < 0.0033) and equivalent for artifacts and visualization of non-FAI pathology. Finally, simulated 50% EID-CT images scored lower in all categories (range 1.8-2.4, p < 0.0033). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-matched PCD-CT is superior to EID-CT for alpha angle and acetabular version measurement in the work up of FAI. UHR-PCD-CT enables 50% radiation dose reduction compared to EID while remaining adequate for the imaging task.

Measurement of enhanced vasa vasorum density in a porcine carotid model using photon counting detector CT.

Purpose: The onset of atherosclerosis is preceded by changes in blood perfusion within the arterial wall due to localized proliferation of the vasa vasorum. The purpose of this study was to quantify these changes in spatial density of the vasa vasorum using a research whole-body photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) scanner and a porcine model. Approach: Vasa vasorum angiogenesis was stimulated in the left carotid artery wall of anesthetized pigs ( n = 5 ) while the right carotid served as a control. After a 6-week recovery period, the animals were scanned on the PCD-CT prior to and after injection of iodinated contrast. Annular regions of interest were used to measure wall enhancement in the injured and control arteries. The exact Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to determine whether a significant difference in contrast enhancement existed between the injured and control arterial walls. Results: The greatest arterial wall enhancement was observed following contrast recirculation. The wall enhancement measurements made over these time points revealed that the enhancement was greater in the injured artery for 13/16 scanned arterial regions. Using an exact Wilcoxon-signed rank test, a significantly increased enhancement ratio was found in injured arteries compared with control arteries ( p = 0.013 ). Vasa vasorum angiogenesis was confirmed in micro-CT scans of excised arteries. Conclusions: Whole-body PCD-CT scanners can be used to detect and quantify the increased perfusion occurring within the porcine carotid arterial wall resulting from an increased density of vasa vasorum.

High-Pitch Multienergy Coronary CT Angiography in Dual-Source Photon-Counting Detector CT Scanner at Low Iodinated Contrast Dose.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the high-helical pitch, multienergy (ME) scanning mode of a clinical dual-source photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) and the benefit of virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) for low-contrast-dose coronary CT angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-pitch (3.2) ME coronary CTA was performed in PCD-CT in 27 patients using low contrast dose (30 mL of iohexol 350 mg/mL) and in 26 patients at routine contrast dose (60 mL). Low-energy-threshold 120 kV images (also known as T3D images) and 50 kiloelectron volts (50 keV) and 100 kiloelectron volts (100 keV) VMIs were reconstructed using a 1024 × 1024 matrix and 0.6-mm slices. The CT numbers, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured in the ascending aorta (AA), left main coronary artery (LMCA), and distal left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Confidence in grading luminal stenosis with calcific plaque, noncalcific plaque, and stent was evaluated by 2 independent readers on a 0-100 scale (0 the lowest), and a CAD-RADS score was assigned. Image contrast enhancement, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall image quality were rated using a 5-point ordinal scale (1 the lowest). RESULTS: The radiation doses (CTDI) in low- and routine-contrast cohorts were 2.5 ± 0.6 mGy and 3.1 ± 1.7 mGy, respectively ( P = 0.12). At all measured locations, the mean CT number was >300 HU in 120 kV (LMCA 382.9 ± 76.2, distal LAD 341.0 ± 53.9, AA 399.5 ± 76.1) and 50 keV images (LMCA 667.5 ± 139.9, distal LAD 578.1 ± 121.5, AA 700.8 ± 142.5) in the low-contrast cohort, with a 96% increase in CT numbers for 50 keV over 120 kV. The CT numbers were significantly higher ( P < 0.0001) in 50 keV than 120 kV and 100 keV VMI. The CNR was also significantly ( P < 0.0001) higher in 50 keV than 120 kV and 100 keV images in all vessels. Confidence in the assessment of luminal stenosis in the presence of calcific plaque was significantly higher ( P = 0.001) with the addition of 100 keV VMI (median score, 100) than using 50 keV alone (median score, 70) and 120 kV (median score, 70) for reader 1, but no significant differences were seen for reader 2 who had same median scores of 100 for all image types. The confidence in the assessment of luminal stenosis within a stent improved with the use of 100 keV images for both readers (reader 1: median scores for 50 + 100 keV = 100, 50 keV = 82.5, 120 kV = 82.5; reader 2: 50 + 100 keV = 100, 50 keV = 90, 120 kV = 90). There were no significant differences in confidence scores for assessment of luminal stenosis from noncalcific plaques for both readers. The reader-averaged qualitative scores for vascular enhancement and overall image quality were significantly higher for 50 keV VMI than for 120 kV images in both low- and routine-contrast dose cohorts. The image sharpness was nonsignificantly higher at 50 keV VMI than 120 kV images, and the artifact score was comparable for 50 keV VMI and 120 kV images. The noise was higher in 50 keV VMI than in 120 kV images. CONCLUSIONS: High-pitch ME PCD-CT mode produced diagnostic quality coronary CTA images at low radiation and iodinated contrast doses. The availability of ME VMIs significantly improved the CNR, overall image quality, and confidence in assessment of luminal stenosis in the presence of calcific plaques and stents, and resulted in change of CAD-RADS categories in 9 patients.

Optimal Virtual Monoenergetic Photon Energy (keV) for Photon-Counting-Detector Computed Tomography Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the optimal photon energy for virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) in computed tomography angiography (CTA) using photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT. METHODS: Under institutional review board approval, 10 patients (abdominal, n = 4; lower extremity, n = 3; head and neck, n = 3) were scanned on an investigational PCD-CT (Count Plus, Siemens Healthcare) at 120 or 140 kV. All images were iteratively reconstructed with Bv48 kernel and 2-mm slice thickness. Axial and coronal VMI maximum-intensity projections were created in the range 40 to 65 keV (5-keV steps). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for major arteries in each VMI series. Two radiologists blindly ranked each VMI series for overall image quality and visualization of small vessels and pathology. The median and SD of scores for each photon energy were calculated. In addition, readers identified any VMIs that distinguished itself from others in terms of vessel/pathology visualization or artifacts. RESULTS: Mean iodine CNR was highest in 40-keV VMIs for all evaluated arteries. Across readers, the 50-keV VMI had the highest combined score (2.00 ± 1.11). Among different body parts, the 45-keV VMI was ranked highest for the head-and-neck (1.75 ± 0.68) and lower extremity (2.00 ± 1.41) CTA. Meanwhile, 50- and 55-keV VMIs were ranked highest for abdominal (2.50 ± 1.35 and 2.50 ± 1.56) CTA. The 40-keV VMI received the highest score for iodine visualization in vessels, and the 65-keV VMI for reduced metal/calcium-blooming artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitatively, VMIs at 40 keV had the highest CNR in major arterial vasculature using PCD-CTA. Based on radiologists' preference, the 45- and 50-keV VMIs were optimal for small body parts (eg, head and neck and lower extremity) and large body parts (eg, abdomen), respectively.

Standardization and Quantitative Imaging With Photon-Counting Detector CT.

ABSTRACT: Computed tomography (CT) images display anatomic structures across 3 dimensions and are highly quantitative; they are the reference standard for 3-dimensional geometric measurements and are used for 3-dimensional printing of anatomic models and custom implants, as well as for radiation therapy treatment planning. The pixel intensity in CT images represents the linear x-ray attenuation coefficient of the imaged materials after linearly scaling the coefficients into a quantity known as CT numbers that is conveyed in Hounsfield units. When measured with the same scanner model, acquisition, and reconstruction parameters, the mean CT number of a material is highly reproducible, and quantitative applications of CT scanning that rely on the measured CT number, such as for assessing bone mineral density or coronary artery calcification, are well established. However, the strong dependence of CT numbers on x-ray beam spectra limits quantitative applications and standardization from achieving robust widespread success. This article reviews several quantitative applications of CT and the challenges they face, and describes the benefits brought by photon-counting detector (PCD) CT technology. The discussed benefits of PCD-CT include that it is inherently multienergy, expands material decomposition capabilities, and improves spatial resolution and geometric quantification. Further, the utility of virtual monoenergetic images to standardize CT numbers is discussed, as virtual monoenergetic images can be the default image type in PCD-CT due to the full-time spectral nature of the technology.

Improved visualization of the wrist at lower radiation dose with photon-counting-detector CT.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the image quality of ultra-high-resolution wrist CTs acquired on photon-counting detector CT versus conventional energy-integrating-detector CT systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were scanned on a photon-counting-detector CT system after clinical energy-integrating detector CTs. Energy-integrating-detector CT scan parameters: comb filter-based ultra-high-resolution mode, 120 kV, 250 mAs, Ur70 or Ur73 kernel, 0.4- or 0.6-mm section thickness. Photon-counting-detector CT scan parameters: non-comb-based ultra-high-resolution mode, 120 kV, 120 mAs, Br84 kernel, 0.4-mm section thickness. Two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to CT system, scored specific osseous structures using a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores. Paired t-test was used to compare volume CT dose index, bone CT number, and image noise between CT systems. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twelve wrists (mean participant age 55.3 ± 17.8, 6 females, 6 males) were included. The mean volume CT dose index was lower for photon-counting detector CT (9.6 ± 0.1 mGy versus 19.0 ± 6.7 mGy, p < .001). Photon-counting-detector CT images had higher Likert scores for visualization of osseous structures (median score = 4, p < 0.001). The mean bone CT number was higher in photon-counting-detector CT images (1946 ± 77 HU versus 1727 ± 49 HU, p < 0.001). Conversely, there was no difference in the mean image noise of the two CT systems (63 ± 6 HU versus 61 ± 6 HU, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Ultra-high-resolution imaging with photon-counting-detector CT depicted wrist structures more clearly than conventional energy-integrating-detector CT despite a 49% radiation dose reduction.