The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus freehand ESPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial.

PURPOSE: Spine surgeries have experienced exponential growth over the past 2 decades. These surgeries are often accompanied by long and severe perioperative pain, presenting a significant management challenge. This study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of two techniques for postoperative pain (POP) management in lumbar spine surgeries: ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intraoperative freehand ESPB. METHODS: In this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial (Registration Number: IRCT20221107056427N1), adult patients who were candidates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly divided into two groups: ultrasound-guided ESPB (n = 29) and freehand ESPB (n = 29). The primary outcomes were the total amount of morphine consumed during the first 24 h following the surgery and the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at various time points within the first 24 h following the surgery. The secondary outcome was the fentanyl used during surgery. RESULTS: Participants in the intraoperative freehand approach had considerably higher total morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h. The trend of NRS changes in both the ultrasound-guided ESPB group and the freehand ESPB group during the first 24 h after surgery showed a significant decrease. Still, there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, the first analgesic demand time was significantly shorter in the intraoperative freehand ESPB group compared to the ultrasound-guided approach. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the ultrasound-guided approach of ESPB is more effective in POP management and opioid sparing in lumbar spinal fusion surgeries compared to the freehand approach. However, the data from this study are not sufficient to draw robust conclusions, and further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to validate our results.

Influencing demographic characteristics, comorbidities disease, and radiologic finding on mortality due to Covid-19 in Iran.

Introduction: Recognition of death risk factors is urgently needed, not only to identify the defining clinical and epidemiological characteristics with greater precision but also to facilitate the appropriate supportive care and prompt access to the intensive care unit (ICU) if necessary. This study aimed to investigate the influencing demographic characteristics, comorbidities disease, and radiologic finding on COVID-19 death. Method: Descriptive cross-sectional study included adult patients with COVID-19 from Imam Hossein. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities disease, chest CT scan findings, and outcome (death/survive) data were extracted from information health system (HIS), by using a data collection check list. To explore the influencing factors on mortality, logistic regression method was used. Result: Result demonstrated that most patients who died because of Covid-19 were men (63.4%), more than 60 years (86.4%), married (95.8%), and self-employed (37.1%) with a mean age of 72.1 ± 15.46 years ranging from 22 to 93 years. Having comorbidities disease such as cancer, cardiac disease, diabetes, age, and pathologic chest CT findings was associated with death. In contrast, gender, marital, job, cerebral vascular disease, and HTN were not correlated. Conclusion: Identification of demographic characteristics, comorbidities disease, and radiographic finding correlated with death of COVID-19 can help clinicians in order to with rapid diagnose and triages of high-risk patients to have a better plan for the care of these patients.