Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(6): 2328-2335, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959756

RESUMEN

Nigeria changed its goal for onchocerciasis from control to transmission elimination. Under the control program, ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA) focused only on hyper/meso-endemic local government areas (LGAs) identified by Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis as having ≥ 20% nodule rates. Because transmission is likely in some LGAs where nodule rates are < 20%, the new elimination paradigm requires MDA expansion. Determining which hypoendemic areas require MDA, termed onchocerciasis elimination mapping, is a major challenge. In 2016, we studied 19 ivermectin-naive hypoendemic LGAs in southern Nigeria that bordered LGAs under MDA. Fifty adults and 50 children (aged 5-10 years) were tested in 110 villages for onchocerciasis IgG4 antibody using an Ov16 rapid diagnostic test (RDT). A 10% subset of subjects provided a blood spot for confirmatory Ov16 ELISA. The mean prevalence of RDT positives was 0.5% in the 5,276 children tested (village range, 0.0-4.0%) versus 3.3% in 5,302 adults (village range, 0.0-58.0%). There was 99.3% agreement between the Ov16 RDT and ELISA. Six different MDA launch thresholds were applied to the RDT results based on different recommendations by the Nigeria Onchocerciasis Elimination Committee and the Onchocerciasis Technical Advisory Subgroup of the WHO. Mass drug administration targets for the same area varied tenfold by threshold chosen, from one LGA (population to be treated 221,935) to 13 LGAs (population 2,426,987). Because the Ov16 threshold selected will have considerable cost and resource implications, the decision to initiate MDA should incorporate entomological data demonstrating onchocerciasis transmission.


Asunto(s)
Oncocercosis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antihelmínticos/inmunología , Antiparasitarios/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades Endémicas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Gobierno Local , Loiasis/epidemiología , Masculino , Administración Masiva de Medicamentos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Oncocercosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Oncocercosis/prevención & control , Oncocercosis/transmisión , Prevalencia
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 99(1): 116-123, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29761763

RESUMEN

Ivermectin treatment can cause central nervous system adverse events (CNS-AEs) in persons with very high-density Loa loa microfilaremia (≥ 30,000 mf/mL blood). Hypoendemic onchocerciasis areas where L. loa is endemic have been excluded from ivermectin mass drug administration programs (MDA) because of the concern for CNS AEs. The rapid assessment procedure for L. loa (RAPLOA) is a questionnaire survey to assess history of eye worm. If ≥ 40% of respondents report eye worm, this correlates with ≥ 2% prevalence of very high-density loiasis microfilaremia, posing an unacceptable risk of CNS-AEs after MDA. In 2016, we conducted a L. loa study in 110 ivermectin-naïve, suspected onchocerciasis hypoendemic villages in southern Nigeria. In previous RAPLOA surveys these villages had prevalences between 10% and 67%. We examined 10,605 residents using the LoaScope, a cell phone-based imaging device for rapidly determining the microfilaria (mf) density of L. loa infections. The mean L. loa village mf prevalence was 6.3% (range 0-29%) and the mean individual mf count among positives was 326 mf/mL. The maximum individual mf count was only 11,429 mf/mL, and among 2,748 persons sampled from the 28 villages with ≥ 40% RAPLOA, the ≥ 2% threshold of very high Loa mf density could be excluded with high statistical confidence (P < 0.01). These findings indicate that ivermectin MDA can be delivered in this area with extremely low risk of L. loa-related CNS-AEs. We also concluded that in Nigeria the RAPLOA survey methodology is not predictive of ≥ 2% prevalence of very high-density L. loa microfilaremia.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Endémicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Loa/aislamiento & purificación , Loiasis/epidemiología , Carga de Parásitos , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Ojo , Femenino , Filaricidas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Loa/patogenicidad , Loiasis/diagnóstico , Loiasis/parasitología , Masculino , Administración Masiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Población Rural , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Int Health ; 10(suppl_1): i71-i78, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29471334

RESUMEN

The Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA) is a regional initiative and international partnership that has made considerable progress toward its goal since it was launched in 1993. Its strategy is based on mass drug administration of ivermectin (Mectizan, donated by MSD, also known as Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA), twice or four times per year, with at least 85% coverage of eligible populations. From 1989 to 2016, 11 741 276 ivermectin treatments have been given in the Americas, eliminating transmission in 11 of 13 foci. The OEPA's success has had a great influence on programs in Africa, especially Sudan and Uganda, which moved from a control to an elimination strategy in 2006 and 2007, respectively. The successes in the Americas have also greatly influenced WHO guidelines for onchocerciasis transmission elimination. With four of the six originally endemic American countries now WHO verified as having eliminated onchocerciasis transmission, and 95% of ivermectin treatments in the region halted, the regional focus is now on the remaining active transmission zone, called the Yanomami Area, on the border between Venezuela and Brazil. Both countries have difficult political climates that hinder the elimination task in this remote and relatively neglected region. As with other elimination efforts, 'the final inch' is often the most difficult task of all.


Asunto(s)
Antiparasitarios/uso terapéutico , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/organización & administración , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Oncocercosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Oncocercosis/prevención & control , Antiparasitarios/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Ivermectina/provisión & distribución , América del Sur , Estados Unidos
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 5(10): e1346, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22022627

RESUMEN

The current strategy for interrupting transmission of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is annual mass drug administration (MDA), at good coverage, for 6 or more years. We describe our programmatic experience delivering the MDA combination of ivermectin and albendazole in Plateau and Nasarawa states in central Nigeria, where LF is caused by anopheline transmitted Wuchereria bancrofti. Baseline LF mapping using rapid blood antigen detection tests showed mean local government area (LGA) prevalence of 23% (range 4-62%). MDA was launched in 2000 and by 2003 had been scaled up to full geographic coverage in all 30 LGAs in the two states; over 26 million cumulative directly observed treatments were provided by community drug distributors over the intervention period. Reported treatment coverage for each round was ≥85% of the treatment eligible population of 3.7 million, although a population-based coverage survey in 2003 showed lower coverage (72.2%; 95% CI 65.5-79.0%). To determine impact on transmission, we monitored three LF infection parameters (microfilaremia, antigenemia, and mosquito infection) in 10 sentinel villages (SVs) serially. The last monitoring was done in 2009, when SVs had been treated for 7-10 years. Microfilaremia in 2009 decreased by 83% from baseline (from 4.9% to 0.8%); antigenemia by 67% (from 21.6% to 7.2%); mosquito infection rate (all larval stages) by 86% (from 3.1% to 0.4%); and mosquito infectivity rate (L3 stages) by 76% (from 1.3% to 0.3%). All changes were statistically significant. Results suggest that LF transmission has been interrupted in 5 of the 10 SVs, based on 2009 finding of microfilaremia ≥1% and/or L3 stages in mosquitoes. Four of the five SVs where transmission persists had baseline antigenemia prevalence of >25%. Longer or additional interventions (e.g., more frequent MDA treatments, insecticidal bed nets) should be considered for 'hot spots' where transmission is ongoing.


Asunto(s)
Filariasis Linfática/tratamiento farmacológico , Filariasis Linfática/epidemiología , Filaricidas/administración & dosificación , Wuchereria bancrofti/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Albendazol/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antígenos Helmínticos/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Filariasis Linfática/prevención & control , Filariasis Linfática/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA