Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nutrients ; 16(11)2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892723

RESUMEN

As accumulated evidence suggests that individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) encounter earlier and more frequent occurrences of cardiovascular diseases, the aim of this study was to ascertain the differences in lifestyle and cardiovascular risk between PTSD and complex PTSD patients. We enrolled 137 male war veterans with PTSD (89 had complex PTSD). The diagnosis was established based on 11th revision of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), and cardiovascular risk was estimated by the measurement of advanced glycation end products. Adherence to Mediterranean diet (MD) was lower in the complex PTSD group (2.2% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.015). Accordingly, patients with complex PTSD had lower healthy lifestyle scores in comparison to PTSD counterparts (50.6 ± 9.7 vs. 59.6 ± 10.1, p < 0.001), and a positive association was noted between MD adherence and a healthy lifestyle (r = 0.183, p = 0.022). On the other hand, differences were not noted in terms of physical activity (p = 0.424), fat % (p = 0.571) or cardiovascular risk (p = 0.573). Although complex PTSD patients exhibit worse adherence to MD and lower healthy lifestyle scores, these differences do not seem to impact physical activity, body composition, or estimated cardiovascular risk. More research is needed to clarify if this lack of association accurately reflects the state of the PTSD population or results from insufficient statistical power.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Dieta Mediterránea , Ejercicio Físico , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Dieta Mediterránea/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Masculino , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Adulto , Estilo de Vida , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estilo de Vida Saludable
2.
Clin Neuropsychiatry ; 20(6): 479-485, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344465

RESUMEN

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed numerous challenges on the mental health of the population of each affected country. The mental health of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 was particularly at risk. The goal of this research was to examine the occurrence of mental disorders in such patients and what were the risk factors for poorer mental health during hospital treatment for COVID-19. Method: We included 135 subjects treated for COVID-19 who were discharged during January 2022. We collected their sociodemographic data as well as data on somatic comorbidities and treatment during hospitalization. We monitored how many patients were hospitalized with a psychiatric diagnosis and therapy, and how many of them started using psychotropic drugs during hospitalization. Those data were recorded both at the time of discharge and again one year later. Results: Statistical analysis showed that the number of patients using psychotropic drugs increased 4x (n=11 (8.1%) at admission vs. n=44 (32.6%) in hospital) during hospital treatment due to COVID-19. There was an increase in the use of all psychotropic drugs except for antidepressants; specifically, there was a 3.3x increase in treatment with anxiolytics (5.2% at admission vs. 17.0% in hospital), a 3.4x increase in treatment with antipsychotics (5.2% vs. 17.8%), and an 8x increase in treatment with hypnotics (0.7% vs. 5.9%). Their use decreased close to baseline after discharge. Conclusions: Our research showed that hospitalization due to COVID-19 leads to deterioration of mental health. We assume that there is a fear of death in the background, which can be well explained by the "landscape of fear" theory.

3.
Eat Weight Disord ; 27(6): 2155-2163, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103950

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is an eating behavior where patients obsessively try to reach health through "purity" of food. Narcissism is a personality trait characterized with the self-belief of grandiosity, importance and need of appreciation. Both of these conditions are connected through self-image in way of reaching perfection through health and body image, whereas one of the ways for reaching it is exercising. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate ON and its possible association with narcissism in fitness center users. METHODS: The study included 1017 fitness center users and three questionnaires were used for the assessment: general information, ORTO-R and Narcissistic personality inventory-13 (NPI-13). RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation (r = - 0.467, p < 0.001) between the ORTO-R score and the NPI-13 score. Comparison of the ORTO-R score between different durations of using a fitness center showed statistically significant differences (H = 134.72, p < 0.001). The subjects who are using the fitness center for less than 1 year have the highest ORTO-R score, while those who are using it 1-3 years have the lowest ORTO-R score. Moreover, multiple linear regression showed that ORTO-R score retained significant association with NPI-13 (ß ± SE, - 0.416 ± 0.026, p < 0.001) and the duration of using a fitness center (0.576 ± 0.068, p < 0.001) after model adjustment for age and BMI. CONCLUSION: These results are implying that fitness center users could possibly be vulnerable of developing ON and that there is a strong association between ON and narcissism in this population. However, future larger-scale longitudinal studies are needed to address these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional survey-based study.


Asunto(s)
Centros de Acondicionamiento , Narcisismo , Ortorexia Nerviosa , Estudios Transversales , Conducta Alimentaria , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Ortorexia Nerviosa/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Clin Neuropsychiatry ; 19(6): 365-369, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627948

RESUMEN

Objective: The superiority of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) versus oral antipsychotics is often emphasized, even in terms of adherence and rehospitaliza-tion rates. As such, LAIs are particularly recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of our research was to determine whether there are differences in the number of rehospitalizations in patients treated for schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, and delusional states (psychotic disorders) with LAI antispychotics versus oral antispychotics. Method: Subjects with schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders and delusional states participated in our retrospective study. 124 subjects were treated with oral anti-psychotics, while 72 received LAIs along with oral antipsychotics. We collected their sociodemographic data and psychiatric history data. Our main outcome measure was the number of rehospitalizations. Results: Statistical analysis showed that the studied groups did not differ according to sociodemographic parameters, except that in the group of patients with LAIs there was a significantly higher percentage of men (65 (52.4) vs 50 (69.4), p=0.029)). Also, the groups do not differ according to the psychiatric history data. There is no difference in the duration of the current hospitalization nor in the composition of the patients, considering the order of the current hospitalization. The difference in the number of rehospitalizations is not significant neither in the first year of follow-up (p=0.144), nor in the second (p=0.142), nor after two years of follow-up (p=0.083). Conclusions: Our research has shown that there is no difference in the number of rehospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders and delusional states, considering whether they take oral antipsychotics or they also take LAIs along with them. We can therefore conclude that it is particularly important to work on improving patient adherence. We must make psychiatrists aware that the pandemic, like other threats, can be our ally in improving adherence ("perceived threat as a health belief").

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...