Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Spanish Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN: Translation and psychometric testing of a questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) to the Spanish language. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) has a clear impact on quality of life (QoL). The JOACMEQ is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess DCM-related disability and its impact on QoL. It is compound of five domains: Cervical Function, Upper Extremity Function, Lower Extremity Function, Blader Function, and QoL. Despite its increasing use, the JOACMEQ has not yet been translated and validated for Spanish-speaking patients. METHODS: A total of 180 patients completed the Spanish version. Of these, 145 (80%) had DCM (mean age: 62.53; SD: 9.92), while 35 had neck pain without DCM (age: 52.71; SD: 10.29). The psychometric properties measured were construct validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, concurrent validity, and discriminatory ability. RESULTS: We recruited 145 patients with DCM (mean age: 62.5) and 35 with cervical pain (mean age: 52.7). After factor analysis, our data showed very strong construct validity, with questions strongly loaded and clustered for five factors. Internal consistency proved high (Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.912). The intraclass correlation coefficient showed very good reproducibility for all domain (intraclass correlation coefficient range between 0.85 and 0.95). A high correlation between the JOACMEQ QoL domain and neck disability index was also found (Spearman's ρ=-0.847, P <0.01) confirming concurrent validity. The receiver operating characteristic curves proved to be significant in the upper (area under the curve=0.65, P =0.006) and lower (area under the curve=0.661, P =0.003) extremities, confirming discriminatory ability. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed Spanish version of the JOACMEQ retains the psychometric characteristics of the original JOACMEQ and could prove useful for the evaluation of patients with DCM in Spanish-speaking countries.

Myelopathy disability index: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

PURPOSE: To find the cut-off values in the Myelopathy Disability Index (MDI) that will allow us to classify the severity of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) into mild, moderate and severe. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with prospective data collection, with a total of 64 patients diagnosed with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM). Anthropometric, diagnostic, neurological, functional and quality of life variables were collected. A Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was performed. The cut-off points were validated by comparing the functional status of patients in the 3 groups and their Nurick scores. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (23 women) with a mean age of 61.97 (SD 11.57) participated in this study. The majority of patients were Nurick I (28.13%) and Nurick II (32.81%). The medium MDI was 7.36 (SD 6.66) and the mJOA was 14.08 (SD 2.57). The mild-moderate cut-off value was between 4 and 5, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.805, sensitivity of 0.853 and specificity of 0.6. For moderate-severe, the cut-off value obtained was between 7 and 8, with an AUC of 0.862, sensitivity of 0.857 and specificity of 0.684. Patients with greater severity had significantly lower functionality, with a P-value of 0.004 in the 30 Metre Walking Test and 0.005 in the Nine-Hole Peg Test. Established severity groups were also significantly related to the different categories of the Nurick score (P-value = 0.000). CONCLUSION: MDI values between 0 and 4 correspond to mild DCM, between 5 and 7 would be moderate DCM and from 8 to 30 indicate severe DCM.

Cervical paravertebral osteolipoma: case report and literature review.

Lipomas are the most frequent soft tissue tumors. Osteolipomas are a rare variant that can be difficult to diagnose. We report the case of a 66-year-old man consulting with a tumor of 2 years development in the right paravertebral cervical region. Neurologically, the patient had no sign of myelopathy or neurological focality. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass with a lipid component and calcifications inside within the right paravertebral musculature with a possible origin in the right C3 posterior root. A computed tomography scan and guided biopsy were performed, revealing hematic material and small bone spicules with no apparent neoplastic element. The tumor was totally removed, including the right C3 posterior branch, and was confirmed to be an osteolipoma on biopsy. The patient remains asymptomatic at 6-month follow-up. The osteolipoma is a benign tumor of soft tissue, characterized by lipoma areas with mature bone tissue differentiation, and even with hematopoietic marrow.

Should age be a contraindication for degenerative lumbar surgery?

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare disability, quality of life and satisfaction outcomes between young people and elderly who were operated on for degenerative lumbar disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A database of 263 patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions was collected. There were 74 patients who were 65 years old or above and 189 who were below 65 who had complete preoperative and 2-year postoperative HRQOL data measures: ODI, SF-36 and COMI. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the outcomes between the two age groups (p > 0.05). An improvement from baseline in all quality of life measures in the two age groups was observed. A median improvement of 6.0 points was found in the ODI in the younger patients versus 12.0 in older ones. A median improvement in the SF36 physical component score of 6.95 was seen in the younger group while improvement was reported at 6.36 points in patients over 65. The SF36 mental component score improved by 4.48 points and 4.96 points, respectively. COMI improved a median of 1.2 points in both groups. In terms of satisfaction, 66.9 % of the younger patients were pleased or very pleased whereas this was found to be 59.7 % for the older group. CONCLUSION: Older patients can see substantial clinical improvement after degenerative lumbar disease surgery similar to that obtained in younger patients in terms of quality of life and satisfaction. The improvement in terms of the disability is greater for older patients. Thus, age should not be a contraindication for this procedure.