Intended delivery mode and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction.

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (FGR) by intended delivery mode.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with FGR that were delivered ≥34.0 weeks gestation. Neonatal outcomes were compared according to the intended delivery mode, which the attending obstetrician determined. Of note, none of the subjects had a contraindication to labor. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via logistic regression models to assess the potential association between intended delivery mode and neonatal morbidity defined as a composite outcome (i.e. umbilical artery pH ≤7.1, 5-min Apgar score ≤7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, hypoglycemia, intrapartum fetal distress requiring expedited delivery, and perinatal death). A sensitivity analysis excluded intrapartum fetal distress requiring emergency cesarean delivery from the composite outcome since only patients with spontaneous labor or labor induction could meet this criterion. Potential confounders in the adjusted effects models included maternal age, body mass index, hypertensive disorders, diabetes, FGR type (i.e. early or late), and oligohydramnios.Results: Seventy-two (34%) patients had an elective cesarean delivery, 73 (34%) had spontaneous labor and were expected to deliver vaginally, and 67 (32%) underwent labor induction. The composite outcome was observed in 65.3%, 89%, and 88.1% of the groups mentioned above, respectively (p < 0.001). Among patients with spontaneous labor and those scheduled for labor induction, 63% and 47.8% required an emergency cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal distress. Compared to elective cesarean delivery, spontaneous labor (OR 4.32 [95% CI 1.79, 10.42], p = 0.001; aOR 4.85 [95% CI 1.85, 12.66], p = 0.001), and labor induction (OR 3.92 [95% CI 1.62, 9.49] p = 0.002; aOR 5.29 [95% CI 2.01, 13.87], p = 0.001) had higher odds of adverse neonatal outcomes.Conclusion: In this cohort of FGR, delivering at ≥34 weeks of gestation, pregnancies with spontaneous labor, and those that underwent labor induction had higher odds of neonatal morbidity than elective cesarean delivery.

Amniocentesis learning curve using a low-cost simulation model to teach maternal-fetal medicine fellows.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the learning curve for amniocentesis among Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) fellows using a low-cost simulation model in Mexico. METHODS: Fourteen first- and second-year MFM fellows with no previous experience in amniocentesis participated in this single-center prospective study from March to June of 2019. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. After an introductory course based on a standardized technique for amniocentesis, each fellow performed this procedure using a low-cost simulation model; experienced operators supervised the procedures. Learning curves were then created using cumulative sum analysis. Thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable failure rates were defined as 10% and 25%, respectively. RESULTS: Experienced MFM specialists evaluated 3675 procedures. On average, MFM fellows performed 263 ± 53 procedures. The mean number to achieve competence was 255 ± 53. The overall failure rate among the trainees was 16%. CONCLUSION: We describe individual learning curves for amniocentesis among MFM fellows using a low-cost simulation model. This approach allows direct assessment of proficiency in amniocentesis before clinical practice.

Prenatal prevalence of skeletal dysplasias and a proposal ultrasonographic diagnosis approach.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of fetal bone dysplasias diagnosed at the Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine (UNIMEF) of the Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia (INPer); and to describe the most frequent skeletal dysplasias and to propose a diagnostic flow chart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a case series study including skeletal dysplasias cases from January 1995 until December 2009 at the UNIMEF Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 81,892 births were registered at the institution during the study period. The prevalence of bone dysplasia was 8.1 per 10,000 births. We used a diagnostic flow chart that was developed at our institution to diagnose skeletal dysplasias. Micromelia (n = 40, 59.7%) and both rhizomelia and mesomelia (n = 17, 25.3%) were highly prevalent. We found other structural anomalies in 40 cases (61.1%), which were associated with different skeletal dysplasias; these other anomalies were mainly congenital heart diseases (12 cases) with a predominance of ventricular septal defects. There was polyhydramnios in 43.2% of cases. The mean of the gestational age at diagnosis was 24.5 weeks (SD 5.66). The karyotype was obtained in 11.9% (8/67) of cases. A total of 7 stillbirths and 11 neonatal deaths were registered, of which only 10 cases received a necropsy. Births occurred in the third trimester for 88% of cases, of which 85% were born via Cesarean section, whereas in the second trimester, the vaginal approach was chosen in 100% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The prenatal diagnosis of bone dysplasias is challenging due to the late development of the diagnostic features. Nevertheless, using ultrasonography in a systematic approach, in conjunction with a multidisciplinary approach, is a key factor in the diagnosis of this disease during the fetal period.