Risk factors and endoscopic treatment for anastomotic stricture after resection in patients with colorectal cancer. / Factores de riesgo y tratamiento endoscópico para estenosis de anastomosis posterior a resección en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal.

INTRODUCTION: Benign strictures are frequent complications following colorectal surgery, with an incidence of up to 20%. Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective but there is not enough evidence for establishing stricture management at that anatomic level. AIM: To determine the risk factors associated with the development of stricture in patients with colorectal cancer and describe endoscopic treatment in those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with colorectal cancer that underwent surgery and anastomosis, evaluated through colonoscopy, within the time frame of 2014 to 2019. RESULTS: Of the 213 patients included in the study, 18.3% presented with stricture that was associated with the type of surgery. Intersphincteric resection was a risk factor (OR = 18.81, 95% CI: 3.31-189.40, p < .001). A total of 69.2% patients with stricture had a stoma, identifying it as a risk factor for stricture (OR = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.10-16.57, p < .001). Mechanical anastomotic stapling was performed in 87.4% of the patients that did not present with stricture, identifying it as a protective factor (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.16-1.1, p = .04). Endoscopic treatment was required in 69.2% of the patients and provided favorable results in 83.3%. Only 2.6% of the patients had recurrence. No complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Intersphincteric resection and the presence of a stoma were independent risk factors for stricture, and mechanical anastomosis was a protective factor against stricture development. Endoscopic treatment was safe and effective.

Predictors of self-expanding metallic stent dysfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. / Predictores de disfunción del stent metálico autoexplandible en la obstrucción de salida gástrica maligna.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are the ideal treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) in patients with a short life expectancy, but stent dysfunction is frequent. The primary aim of our study was to identify the predictive factors of SEMS dysfunction in MGOO and the secondary aim was to determine the technical success, clinical success, and nutritional impact after SEMS placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted at the gastrointestinal endoscopy department of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City. Patients diagnosed with MGOO that underwent SEMS placement within the time frame of January 2015 to May 2018 were included. We utilized the gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) to determine clinical success and SEMS dysfunction. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients, technical success was 97.7% (n=42), and clinical success was 88.3% (n=38). SEMS dysfunction presented in 30.2% (n=13) of the patients, occurring in<6 months after placement in 53.8% (n=7) of them. In the univariate analysis, the histologic subtype, diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma (p=0.02) and the use of uncovered SEMS (p=0.02) were the variables associated with dysfunction. Albumin levels and body mass index did not increase after SEMS placement. Medical follow-up was a mean 5.8 months (1-24 months). CONCLUSIONS: SEMS demonstrated adequate technical and clinical efficacy in the treatment of MGOO. SEMS dysfunction was frequent and diffuse type gastric cancer and uncovered SEMS appeared to be dysfunction predictors.

Mantle cell lymphoma with involvement of the digestive tract. / Linfoma del manto con afección del tubo digestivo.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Mantle cell lymphoma is an aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and its incidence is 0.5/100,000 inhabitants. Gastrointestinal involvement at diagnosis is 15-30%. The aim of our study was to analyze the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of mantle cell lymphoma affecting the digestive tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, based on a case series of patients with mantle cell lymphoma affecting the gastrointestinal tract that were diagnosed over a 10-year period. RESULTS: Ten patients (11.7%) had gastrointestinal tract involvement. The upper endoscopic findings were polypoid lesions (66%), thickened folds (44%), and nonspecific changes in the mucosa (33%). At colonoscopy, polypoid lesions were viewed in 100% of the patients and ulcerated lesions in 40%. CONCLUSION: Polypoid lesions are the most common endoscopic characteristics in patients with mantle cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy should be carried out on patients with mantle cell lymphoma, even those with nonspecific symptoms, to check their gastrointestinal status. Gastrointestinal involvement has an impact on disease staging.

Fully covered stents versus partially covered stents for palliative treatment of esophageal cancer: Is there a difference? / Prótesis totalmente cubiertas versus parcialmente cubiertas para el tratamiento paliativo del cáncer de esófago: ¿hay alguna diferencia?

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Malignant dysphagia is difficulty swallowing resulting from esophageal obstruction due to cancer. The goal of palliative treatment is to reduce the dysphagia and improve oral dietary intake. Self-expandable metallic stents are the current treatment of choice, given that they enable the immediate restoration of oral intake. The aim of the present study was to describe the results of using totally covered and partially covered esophageal stents for palliating esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with inoperable esophageal cancer treated with self-expandable metallic stents. The 2 groups formed were: group A, which consisted of patients with a fully covered self-expandable stent (SX-ELLA®), and group B, which was made up of patients with a partially covered self-expandable stent (Ultraflex®). RESULTS: Of the 69-patient total, 50 were included in the study. Group A had 19 men and 2 women and their mean age was 63.6 years (range 41-84). Technical success was achieved in 100% (n=21) of the cases and clinical success in 90.4% (n=19). Group B had 24 men and 5 women and their mean age was 67.5 years (range 43-92). Technical success was achieved in 100% (n=29) of the cases and clinical success in 89.6% (n=26). Complications were similar in both groups (33.3 vs. 51.7%). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the 2 types of stent for the palliative treatment of esophageal cancer with respect to technical success, clinical success, or complications.

[Endoscopic inanimate biological simulators for training in endoscopic mucosal dissection]. / Entrenamiento en la disección endoscópica de la submucosa "mediante el uso de simuladores biológicos inanimados.

BACKGROUND: Simulators have been used as a training method; they allow training, skill development, standardization of techniques and the performance of a greater number of risk-free procedures. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric cancer since it allows en bloc resection of larger lesions however requires longer procedure time and has more complications than endoscopic mucosal resection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of biological inanimate simulators in endoscopic training for the development of skills required for ESD. METHODS: Experimental design using a biological inanimate simulator to evaluate the development of endoscopic skills. Five trained endoscopists with knowledge of the ESD technique, but without previous experience were selected. Technical success, complication rate and procedure time were evaluated. Each participant performed a self-evaluation. RESULTS: 18 lesions of 10-20 mm in diameter were dissected, with a mean area of 2.64 ± 2 cm2 and a mean procedure time of 21.08 ± 14.01 minutes (5.48 - 48.61). Self-evaluation and instructor's evaluation showed a strong positive correlation. There was no correlation between lesion size and procedure time. There was one perforation (5.8%), which was successfully managed with one endoclip. Complications such as bleeding could not be assed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inanimate biological simulators allows training in complex endoscopic procedures such as ESD with a wide safety margin. Lesion size did not correlate with procedure time. It is necessary to increase the number of procedures to improve the learning curve. This simulator does not allow evaluation of complications other than perforations.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach to place a polypropylene mesh on the abdominal wall: an experimental swine model of a technique that can be used for incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The placement of intraabdominal polypropylene mesh entails risks of adhesions and fistulas that can be avoided by preperitoneal placement. METHODS: This comparative, open, experimental, prospective, randomized, and transversal study randomized pigs into two groups of 11 each for intraperitoneal (IPOM) or preperitoneal (TAPP) polypropylene mesh placement by laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy and tissue en-bloc resection was performed 28 days postoperatively for histopathologic analysis. RESULTS: The following data were observed for the two study groups: surgical time (IPOM: 35.73 +/- 4.22 min; TAPP: 58.09 +/- 6.28 min; p = or < 0.0001); adhesions (IPOM: 81.81%; TAPP: 27.27%; p = 0.032), grade III for IPOM and grade II for TAPP (p = 0.001); and interloop adhesions (IPOM: 81.81%; TAPP: 9.09%; p = 0.003). No fistulas were found in either group. The TAPP procedure showed better integration of mesh, without lesion to abdominal organs. Two complications, occurred with IPOM, and one with TAPP (p = 1.0, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The perperitoneal technique requires more time, but has fewer adhesions and less intraabdominal inflammatory response. It is a feasible technique that may diminish risks in the laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh.