Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 68(4): 2199-2208, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33021085

RESUMEN

Brucellosis in small ruminants caused mainly due to Brucella melitensis is an important zoonotic disease characterized by abortion, retained placenta, infertility, orchitis, epididymitis and rarely arthritis. Small ruminants are the main source of economy for the rural and marginally poor farmers and brucellosis is resulting in huge economic losses due to abortions and infertility and causing public health concern among the small ruminant keepers. Bovine brucellosis control programme has been implemented in India and small ruminants are left out of the programme mainly due to paucity of brucellosis status. The present cross-sectional study based on stratified random sampling was undertaken during 2017-18 to provide the nationwide brucellosis sero-prevalence in small ruminants. A total of 24,056 small ruminant serum samples (sheep samples = 8,103 [male-2,440 and female-5,663] and goat samples = 15,953 [male-4,331 and female-11,622]) sourced from 27 out of 29 states and two out of seven union territories (UTs), 350 districts of total 640 districts (54.68% of the Indian districts) and from 1,462 villages out of 6,40,867 villages (43.83% of the Indian villages). The serum samples were tested by indirect ELISA and overall brucellosis apparent and true prevalence of 7.45 (95% CI: 7.13-7.79) and 3.79 (95% CI: 3.44-4.17) was recorded. Significantly higher brucellosis sero-prevalence (p < .0001) was observed in sheep (11.55%) than goats (5.37%). Similarly, brucellosis seropositivity was highly significant in females compared to males in both sheep and goats. Countrywide, greater than 5% brucellosis sero-prevalence in sheep and goats was recorded in 14 and 10 states, respectively, indicating endemicity of the disease. The study provided the latest update on nationwide spatial sero-prevalence of small ruminant brucellosis which will aid government to strengthen regular surveillance and vaccination to reduce the disease burden and public health problems in the country.


Asunto(s)
Brucella , Brucelosis , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Enfermedades de las Cabras , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Bovinos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Cabras/epidemiología , Cabras , Masculino , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Rumiantes , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Ovinos
2.
J Microbiol Methods ; 170: 105858, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014437

RESUMEN

Brucellosis is an important zoonosis that constitutes a serious public health hazard which is caused by a bacterium belonging to the genus Brucella. In the present study, two highly specific serological tests for brucellosis diagnosis, fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) and competitive ELISA (cELISA) were standardized in the laboratory, evaluated and compared with rose bengal plate test (RBPT), indirect ELISA (iELISA) and commercial cELISA kit. For test evaluation, 1386 serum samples [apparently healthy animals (n = 260), samples from Brucella infected farms (n = 701) and B. abortus S19 vaccinated animals (n = 425)] were analyzed to assess suitable diagnostic test in B. abortus S19 post vaccinated bovine population. In apparently healthy brucellosis free farms, RBPT, iELISA, in-house FPA and cELISA were found to be highly specific than commercial cELISA. Commercial cELISA kit was comparatively more sensitive than other serological tests in samples collected from infected farms. The FPA showed sensitivity nearly equal to RBPT and in-house cELISA showed greater sensitivity than RBPT in infected farms. In animals with persistent vaccinal antibodies, only in-house FPA and cELISA recorded higher specificity of 87.64 and 90.27%, respectively. The other tests, RBPT and iELISA displayed similar reactivity with vaccine antibodies to that of infection antibodies whereas commercial cELISA kit showed an intermediate specificity of 47.69%. With these findings, RBPT, iELISA and cELISA are suggested for screening infected herds, and in-house developed FPA and cELISA tests with a proven specificity can be used for confirmatory diagnosis of brucellosis in B. abortus S19 post vaccinated animal populations.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Brucella abortus/inmunología , Brucelosis Bovina/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Inmunoensayo de Polarización Fluorescente/métodos , Pruebas Serológicas/veterinaria , Animales , Vacunas Bacterianas/inmunología , Brucella abortus/aislamiento & purificación , Bovinos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Vacunación/veterinaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...