Integrated care van delivery of evidence-based services for people who inject drugs: A cluster-randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for adverse outcomes across multiple dimensions. While evidence-based interventions are available, services are often fragmented and difficult to access. We measured the effectiveness of an integrated care van (ICV) that offered services for PWID. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cluster-randomized trial, which took place in Baltimore, MD, USA. Prior to randomization, we used a research van to recruit PWID cohorts from 12 Baltimore neighborhoods (sites), currently served by the city's mobile needle exchange program. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: We randomized sites to receive weekly visits from the ICV (n = 6) or to usual services (n = 6) for 14 months. The ICV offered case management; buprenorphine/naloxone; screening for HIV, hepatitis C virus and sexually transmitted infections; HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis; and wound care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite harm mitigation score that captured access to evidence-based services, risk behaviors and adverse health events (range = 0-15, with higher numbers indicating worse status). We evaluated effectiveness by comparing changes in the composite score at 7 months versus baseline in the two study arms. FINDINGS: We enrolled 720 cohort participants across the study sites (60 per site) between June 2018 and August 2019: 38.3% women, 72.6% black and 85.1% urine drug test positive for fentanyl. Over a median of 10.4 months, the ICV provided services to 734 unique clients (who may or may not have been cohort participants) across the six intervention sites, including HIV/hepatitis C virus testing in 577 (78.6%) and buprenorphine/naloxone initiation in 540 (74%). However, only 52 (7.2%) of cohort participants received services on the ICV. The average composite score decreased at 7 months relative to baseline, with no significant difference in the change between ICV and usual services (difference in differences: -0.31; 95% confidence interval: -0.70, 0.08; P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This cluster-randomized trial in Baltimore, MD, USA, found no evidence that weekly neighborhood visits from a mobile health van providing injection-drug-focused services improved access to services and outcomes among people who injected drugs in the neighborhood, relative to usual services. The van successfully served large numbers of clients but unexpectedly low use of the van by cohort participants limited the ability to detect meaningful differences.

Management of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has been reported to occur in up to 23% of patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Currently, limited data exists to guide neurosurgical management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with an LVAD who develop ICH. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the mortality rate in these patients following medical and/or surgical management and to evaluate antithrombotic reversal and resumption strategies after hemorrhage. RESULTS: 17 studies reporting on 3869 LVAD patients and 545 intracranial hemorrhages spanning investigative periods from 1996 to 2019 were included. The rate of ICH in LVAD patients was 10.6% (411/3869) with 58.6% (231/394) being intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), 23.6% (93/394) subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and 15.5% (61/394) subdural hemorrhage (SDH). Total mortality rates for surgical management 65.6% (40/61) differed from medical management at 45.2% (109/241). There was an increased relative risk of mortality (RR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.91, p = 0.01) for ICH patients undergoing surgical intervention. The hemorrhage subtype most frequently managed with anticoagulation reversal was IPH 81.8% (63/77), followed by SDH 52.2% (12/23), and SAH 39.1% (18/46). Mean number of days until antithrombotic resumption ranged from 6 to 10.5 days. CONCLUSION: Outcomes remain poor, specifically for those undergoing surgery. As experience with this population increases, prospective studies are warranted to contribute to management and prognostication .