Diabetes is a major cause of influenza-associated mortality in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Influenza is a major cause of mortality worldwide. Most influenza-associated deaths are associated with cardiovascular or respiratory disorders. However, a large proportion of influenza-associated deaths do not have respiratory or cardiovascular disorders declared as the underlying cause of death. Diabetic individuals are at increased risk for influenza-mortality. In this study, we assessed the contribution of diabetes to influenza-associated mortality in Mexico. METHODS: Diabetes influenza-associated mortality was estimated for the Mexican population using National Mortality Databases from the Mexican Ministry of Health from 1998 through 2015. Diabetes influenza-associated mortality was calculated applying Serfling cyclical regression models to weekly mortality rates for persons 20-59 years, 60 and more years, and all ages, and by sex. RESULTS: There was a high correlation between weekly pneumonia and influenza mortality and diabetes-related mortality. Yearly influenza-associated diabetes mortality rates varied between 2.0 and 5.9/100,000. Up until the 2005-2006 season, diabetes-associated mortality rates were higher in females, while after that season rates were higher in males. Yearly influenza-associated diabetes mortality rates for adults 20-59 years of age ranged between 1.7 and 3.4/100,000, while estimates for adults 60 years and older ranged between 16.3 and 46.1/100,000. Approximately one third of estimated diabetes influenza-associated deaths occurred in adults 20-59 years of age. On average, diabetes deaths accounted for 19.6% of estimated influenza-associated all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Diabetes is a major cause of estimated influenza-associated mortality in Mexico. Health-care authorities and professionals in countries with high diabetes prevalence should be aware of the potential impact of influenza in individuals with this condition.

Cimetidine or ranitidine in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine.

While H2-receptor antagonists are commonly used in renal transplant patients to prevent peptic ulcer disease, they have been associated with immunostimulation, interference with cyclosporine (CsA) metabolism, and inhibition of tubular secretion of creatinine. In renal transplant patients, cimetidine in high doses has been shown to cause a sustained rise in serum creatinine (SCr) and to reduce creatinine clearance (CrCl) with no change in inulin clearance. In this short-term prospective study, we evaluated the effects of single daily doses of cimetidine or ranitidine on renal function, and CsA serum concentration. Fourteen renal transplant patients with stable renal function were assigned to receive either cimetidine 400 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg daily for 7 days. In patients who received cimetidine, a slight rise in SCr was observed at days 2 and 5 which was not statistically significant, but no significant change in CsA trough level was noted. No changes in SCr or CsA level were noted in the patients who received ranitidine. No changes in GFR were observed in either cimetidine- or ranitidine-treated patients. We conclude that, in our short-term study, cimetidine or ranitidine in the doses used in this study did not affect the GFR or CsA level, or SCr.

Evaluation of living renal donors. The current practice of US transplant centers.

To examine practice patterns regarding how living donors are evaluated and selected in the U.S., a survey was sent to all 231 United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS)-approved transplant centers. Respondents from 75% of centers completed the questionnaire, all of whom utilize living donors for renal transplantation. Although the use of living-unrelated donors is also widely accepted (in 92% of centers), only 31% of responding centers performed such transplants in 1992, indicating a discrepancy between acceptance and actual practice. Morbidity (0.23%) and mortality (0.03%) of kidney donation continue to be low. The long-term risk of renal insufficiency in kidney donors appears to be similar to, or lower than, that in the general population. There is substantial variability in how potential donors are evaluated and what they are told regarding the risk involved in renal donation. There is also variability in exclusion criteria such as the acceptance of older donors (> 55 years old); those with borderline-to-mild hypertension, and those with borderline low glomerular filtration rate. Larger centers tended to be less rigid in their exclusion criteria compared with smaller centers. While our results indicate widespread acceptance and use of living donors, they also highlight the need for future studies to examine the efficacy of tests used in the evaluation process and to determine the long-term risks of renal donation.

Hypomagnesemia in renal transplant patients: improvement over time and association with hypertension and cyclosporine levels.

Hypomagenesemia is frequently encountered early after kidney transplantation, especially in patients receiving cyclosporine (CsA). However, there have been no studies addressing the natural history of this disorder in adult transplant recipients. We conducted this investigation to study the change in the prevalence of hypomagnesemia over time in renal transplant patients as well as to determine the factors associated with this change. Three patient groups were studied: 24 CsA-treated patients followed longitudinally at 1, 3 and 6 months post-transplant (Group 1a, 1b, 1c); 33 CsA-treated patients at least 2 years post-transplant (Group 2; mean follow-up 55 +/- 25 months); and 31 non-CsA-treated patients at least 2 years post-transplant (Group 3; mean follow-up 132 +/- 57 months). The following parameters were monitored: serum and urine magnesium levels; serum potassium; creatinine clearance; fractional excretion of magnesium; and trough CsA levels. In group 1 patients, longitudinal follow-up showed a significant linear trend for improvement in the serum magnesium over time (1.6 +/- 0.3, 1.7 +/- 0.2, 1.8 +/- 0.2 mg/dl; p = 0.0015) as well as a decline in the whole blood CsA level (316 +/- 103, 251 +/- 82, 194 +/- 67 ng/ml; p = 0.0015) at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thromboxane synthase expression in renal transplant patients with rejection.

Thromboxane synthase (TS) catalyzes the formation of thromboxane (TxA2) in monocytes/macrophages, platelets, and various tissues. TxA2 is likely to play a role in graft dysfunction due to its vasoconstrictive and platelet aggregatory properties. We studied the expression of TS in 7 normal native kidneys, 29 consecutive renal allograft biopsies (performed for rising serum creatinine, n = 23, and delayed graft function, n = 6), and one transplant nephrectomy specimen with severe acute rejection. TS expression was determined by immunocytochemistry using a monoclonal antibody against human TS, Kon-7. Histologic grading of the transplant biopsy specimens was based on the Banff classification. The degree of TS staining was graded in the glomeruli, interstitium, tubules and vessels from 0 to 3+. Of 29 biopsies, 13 had chronic nephropathy (CN), 6 had acute rejection (AR) with chronic nephropathy (AR/CN), 4 had acute rejection (AR), and 6 had acute tubular necrosis (ATN). TS staining of native kidneys showed sporadic interstitial cells. The biopsy and transplant nephrectomy specimens showed significant staining, predominantly in the glomeruli and interstitium. Positively staining cells appeared to be of macrophage/monocyte lineage by morphology. The mean glomerular staining grade was significantly increased in specimens with AR (2.3 +/- 0.9) and the mean interstitial staining was increased in specimens with AR/CN (2.2 +/- 0.9). Follow-up renal function 6 months post-biopsy showed that patients with higher TS staining grades had a faster decline in graft function. In conclusion, TS expression is increased in patients with acute rejection with or without chronic nephropathy and is associated with more rapid deterioration in function.

Increased incidence of rejection in patients with delayed graft function.

Because of the difficulties in diagnosing rejection in patients with delayed graft function, such patients were routinely biopsied 7-10 days after kidney transplantation. We found histologic evidence of rejection in 48% of the cases during the lst month posttransplant, a proportion that was significantly higher than in patients with immediate graft function. Furthermore, the 2-year graft survival in patients with delayed graft function and rejection, but not in those without rejection, was significantly lower than in patients with immediate function. The results suggest that there is an association between delayed graft function and rejection and that rejection is the component responsible for the decreased graft survival previously reported for patients with delayed graft function.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The safety of long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients is not well understood. This drug may cause a progressive toxic nephropathy, but it also preserves renal function because it prevents rejection. To determine the effect of cyclosporine on renal function and graft rejection, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data on 1663 renal-transplant recipients at six centers. RESULTS: The rate of graft survival was 78 percent (median follow-up, 36 months). Grafts were was lost in 279 patients (17 percent), mostly because of acute rejection (68 patients) or chronic graft dysfunction that was unresponsive to a reduction in the dose of cyclosporine (125 patients); 92 patients died with functioning grafts. The median change in the serum creatinine concentration in all patients after transplantation was less than 0.001 mg per deciliter per month (< 0.09 mumol per liter per month). Patients who had episodes of rejection had decreased rates of long-term graft function and survival. Eight percent of patients with functioning grafts at one year had first episodes of rejection more than one year after transplantation. These late first rejections were associated with noncompliance with therapy (in 34 percent), blood cyclosporine concentrations that were marginally lower than those of patients who had no episodes of rejection, and a low rate of successful reversal of rejection (77 percent, vs. 97 percent in patients with rejection during the first year; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of renal-transplant patients tolerate long-term cyclosporine therapy without evidence of progressive toxic nephropathy. Graft failure is most often due to rejection.

Recurrent diseases in the kidney transplant.

Virtually all diseases affecting the native kidney recur in the kidney transplant with the exception of Alport syndrome, polycystic kidney disease, hypertension, chronic pyelonephritis, and chronic interstitial nephritis. Fortunately, in the majority of patients, recurrence of the original disease has minimal clinical impact, with only approximately 5% of all graft loss occurring as a result of recurrent disease. The primary renal diseases that commonly recur include membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II, IgA nephropathy, and focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis. The most common systemic disease that recurs is diabetic nephropathy. Living-related transplantation should be used with caution in patients with the hemolytic uremic syndrome, recurrent focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis, and membraneous glomerulonephritis. Fabry disease and primary hyperoxaluria type I are no longer absolute contraindications to kidney transplantation.

A preliminary report of diltiazem and ketoconazole. Their cyclosporine-sparing effect and impact on transplant outcome.

A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the effect of diltiazem (DILT) with ketoconazole (KETO) on sparing of cyclosporine dose and renal transplant outcome. Renal allograft recipients 18 years old and older were eligible for the study. Triple immunosuppression (TRIPLE) including prednisone, azathioprine, and CsA was administered to all patients. The maintenance CsA dose varied by study group. Patients were randomized to receive one of three treatment strategies: group 1-TRIPLE (CsA 8 mg/kg/day); group 2--TRIPLE (CsA 6 mg/kg/day) + DILT (60 mg b.i.d.); group 3--TRIPLE (CsA 3 mg/kg/day) + KETO (200 mg/day). Modification of the DILT dose was allowed as needed to effect blood pressure control in group 2 patients. Mean 1-month CsA dose reductions were 30% and 60% of controls in group 2 and 3, respectively. A continued effect over time was observed in patients administered KETO but not DILT. At 1 year patients taking KETO required an average of 77% less CsA than the average dose necessary to effect similar parent CsA blood levels when no enzyme inhibitor was used. The use of KETO and DILT for 1 year allowed for 53% and 14% reductions in CsA cost, respectively. These savings include the cost of the KETO or DILT. Serum creatinines, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and incidence of liver function abnormalities were similar throughout treatment groups. The rate of rejection, time to rejection onset, and survival (GS/PS) were not different among the groups. Fungal infections were fewer in patients treated with KETO (12%) than in controls (16%) and patients randomized to DILT (19%). KETO failed to prevent Aspergillus infection in one individual. The investigation failed to identify any harmful result of treating renal allograft recipients with either DILT or KETO for the purpose of reducing CsA expense.

The evaluation of candidates for renal transplantation. The current practice of U.S. transplant centers.

The criteria for acceptance of candidates for renal transplantation varies throughout the United States. The Patient Care and Education Committee of the American Society of Transplant Physicians conducted a survey of all U.S. centers that participate in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) concerning their evaluation of adult candidates for kidney transplantation. The response to each question was examined according to the specialty of the individual who filled out the questionnaire, as well as the type of transplant center (university or private) and the size of the center. The response rate to the survey was 81% (147/182). We found the following: (1) university-based and larger centers accepted more medically complicated patients; (2) 83% noted that attendance to dialysis was an important indicator of compliance after transplantation; (3) 79% did not require preoperative blood transfusions for cadaver kidney recipients; (4) 66% set no specific upper age limit for transplantation; (5) 56% excluded patients with chronic active hepatitis in the setting of hepatitis B antigenemia; (6) 50% had no specific policy for evaluating hepatitis C antibody-positive patients, while 54% excluded the use of hepatitis C antibody-positive donors, and (7) 15% obtained coronary angiography on all diabetic patients. U.S. transplant centers have a heterogeneous approach to the evaluation of patients for renal transplantation, particularly in the areas of viral hepatitis, cardiovascular disease, and noncompliance. University-based centers and centers that perform a larger number of transplants accept more medically complicated patients.

Immunosuppression without prophylactic antilymphocyte preparations.

1. Triple-drug immunosuppression following third party transfusion can result in graft survival equal to protocols that employ prophylactic antilymphocyte preparations. 2. T1/2 was statistically improved in cadaveric and living-related donor grafts in the CsA era. 3. Patients 65 years and older had an excessive death rate. Younger groups were admixed. Extreme youth was not a risk factor. 4. Black recipients had excessive late graft loss. 5. Diabetic recipients had only a slight decline in graft and patient survival rates. 6. First and multiple graft recipients had similar transplant survival rates. 7. Delayed graft function remains costly in this immunosuppressive scheme.