A Systematic Review Comparing Emergency Resection and Staged Treatment for Curable Obstructing Right-Sided Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for obstructing colon cancer (OCC) is controversial because the outcome of acute resection is less favorable than for patients without obstruction. Few studies have investigated curable right-sided OCC, and patients with OCC usually undergo acute resection. This study aimed to better understand the outcome and best management of potentially curable right-sided OCC. METHODS: A systematic review of studies was performed with a focus on differences in mortality and morbidity between emergency resection and staged treatment for patients with potentially curable right-sided OCC. In March 2019, the study searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google scholar databases according to PRISMA guidelines using search terms related to "colon tumour," "stenosis or obstruction and surgery," and "decompression or stents." All English-language studies reporting emergency or staged treatment for potentially curable right-sided OCC were included in the review. Emergency resection and staged resection were compared for mortality, morbidity, complications, and survival. RESULTS: Nine studies were found to be eligible and comprised 600 patients treated with curative intent for their right-sided OCC by emergency resection or staged resection. The mean overall complication rate was 42% (range 19-54%) after emergency resection, and 30% (range 7-44%) after staged treatment. The average mortality rate was 7.2% (range 0-14.5%) after emergency resection and 1.2% (range 0-6.3%) after staged treatment. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were comparable for the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who received staged treatment for right-sided OCC had lower mortality rates, fewer complications, and fewer anastomotic leaks and stoma creations than the patients who had emergency resection.

Extrauterine adenomyoma located in the inguinal region: a case report of a 44-year-old woman.

Adenomyomas are benign tumours made of smooth muscle cells, endometrial glands and stroma. An extrauterine location is extremely rare with an unknown pathogenesis. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging and pathologic examination is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Here we present a case report of a 44-year-old woman with a painful non-reducible mass in the right inguinal region without fever or other alarming symptoms 2 months after a laparoscopic hysterectomy. She was treated with a surgical resection of the mass. Extrauterine adenomyoma is a very uncommon entity. Preoperative workup is challenging, as confirmation of the diagnosis can only be achieved by histopathological analysis following surgical excision.

Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer: the Optimal Interval for Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: Patients who have undergone curative surgery for colorectal cancer are at risk of developing a metachronous colorectal tumour or anastomotic recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of recurrent colorectal cancer in a cohort of patients who participated in a colonoscopy surveillance programme. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study included patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2015. All reports of postoperative colonoscopies were retrieved to calculate the incidence rates of recurrence and metachronous colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Of 2420 patients, 1644 (67.9%) underwent at least one postoperative colonoscopy and 776 (32.1%) did not. In 1087 patients, colonoscopy was performed in the first 18 months after surgery, which detected 34 (3.1%) instances of metachronous colorectal tumours or anastomotic recurrence. Thirty-three additional patients were also diagnosed with recurrent colorectal cancer, but the tumours were detected by other diagnostic modalities or detected perioperatively, rather than by colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of colorectal cancer have an increased risk for a second colorectal tumour. Therefore, we recommend a colonoscopic surveillance programme with the first colonoscopy performed 1 year after curative surgery, which is in accordance with national guidelines.

Differences in Metastatic Pattern in Patients Presenting With or Without Obstructing Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study of 2595 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about metastatic patterns in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if metastatic patterns in patients with CRC differ between patients with or without obstruction. METHODS: This single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study includes patients who underwent surgery for CRC between 2004 and 2015 in our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups-patients with or without obstructing CRC. All anatomic sites of distant metastases were reported. Differences in synchronous and metachronous metastases were compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 2595 patients were included for analysis, of whom 315 (12%) presented with obstructing CRC. Synchronous metastases were diagnosed in 483 patients (19%). Patients with obstructing CRC and synchronous metastases, were diagnosed with peritoneal metastases more often than patients without obstruction (37% vs. 16%; p < 0.01). With regard to the location of the tumor, obstructing right-sided CRC patients were diagnosed with peritoneal metastases more often than patients without obstruction (52% vs. 21%; p < 0.01). Additionally, metachronous metastases were found significantly more often in patients with obstructing CRC (27%) compared with patients without obstruction (15%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obstructing CRC have more advanced tumor stage compared with patients without obstructing CRC. Synchronous peritoneal metastases are more often encountered in patients with obstructing CRC compared with patients without obstruction. This difference is due to the raised presence of synchronous peritoneal metastases in patients with obstructed right-sided colonic cancer. Furthermore, metachronous metastases are more often found in patients with obstructing CRC.

Tumor Seeding During Colonoscopy as a Possible Cause for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients who have undergone surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), 3% have recurrence of (metachronous) CRC. We investigated whether tumor seeding during colonoscopy (iatrogenic implantation of tumor cells in damaged mucosa) increases risk for metachronous CRC. METHODS: In a proof of principle study, we collected data from the Dutch National Pathology Registry for patients with a diagnosis of CRC from 2013 through 2015, with a second diagnosis of CRC within 6 months to 3.5 years after surgery. We reviewed pathology reports to identify likely metachronous CRC (histologically proven adenocarcinoma located elsewhere in the colon or rectum from the surgical anastomosis). For 22 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, we ascribed the most likely etiology to tumor seeding when endoscopic manipulations, such as biopsies or polypectomy, occurred at the location where the metachronous tumor was subsequently detected, after endoscopic manipulation of the primary tumor. We collected clinical data from patients and compared molecular profiles of the primary and metachronous colorectal tumors using next-generation sequencing. We then examined the source of seeded tumor. We tested whether tumor cells stay behind in the working channel of the endoscope after biopsies of colorectal tumors, and whether these cells maintain viability in organoid cultures. RESULTS: In total, tumor seeding was suspected as the most likely etiology of metachronous CRC in 5 patients. Tumor tissues were available from 3 patients. An identical molecular signature was observed in the primary and metachronous colorectal tumors from all 3 patients. In 5 control cases with a different etiology of metachronous CRC, the molecular signature of the primary and metachronous tumor were completely different. Based on review of 2147 patient records, we estimated the risk of tumor seeding during colonoscopy to be 0.3%-0.6%. We demonstrated that the working channel of the colonoscope becomes contaminated with viable tumor cells during biopsy collection. Subsequent instruments introduced through this working channel also became contaminated. These cells were shown to maintain their proliferative potential. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of primary and secondary tumors from patients with metachronous CRC, we found that primary tumor cells might be seeded in a new location after biopsy of the primary tumor. Although our study does not eliminate other possibilities of transmission, our findings and experiments support the hypothesis that tumor seeding can occur during colonoscopy via the working channel of the endoscope. The possibility of iatrogenic seeding seems low. However, our findings compel awareness on this potentially preventable cause of metachronous CRC.

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen to predict recurrence in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) antigen is used as a diagnostic screening tool during follow-up in colorectal cancer patients. However, it remains unclear whether preoperative serum CEA is a reliable marker in the follow-up to predict recurrence. The aim of the study is to determine the value of elevated pre- and postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels (CEA > 5 µg/L) as an independent prognostic factor for locoregional and distant recurrence in patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This single center retrospective observational cohort study includes patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2015 and had pre- and postoperative serum CEA measurements. Five-year disease-free survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Preoperative serum CEA level was measured in 2093 patients with colorectal cancer. No significant association was found between an elevated preoperative serum CEA and locoregional recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91, 1.84; P=0.26)). However, a significant association was found between an elevated preoperative serum CEA and systemic recurrence (adjusted HR 1.58 (95% CI 1.25, 2.00; P<0.01)]. The five-year disease-free survival was lower in patients with elevated preoperative serum CEA levels ( P<0.01). Postoperative serum CEA level was the most sensitive for hepatic metastases during follow-up (73.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative serum CEA level is an independent prognostic factor for systemic metastasis after curative surgery for colorectal cancer in patients with stage I-III disease. The level is the most sensitive for hepatic metastasis compared to metastasis to other anatomic sites.

Stent graft treatment as a bridge to surgery for a secondary aortoduodenal fistula.

A secondary aortoduodenal fistula is a rare but a severe late complication after prosthetic abdominal aortic surgery. Currently, there is little consensus regarding the right treatment due to high mortality and morbidity rates. We report the case of a haemodynamically unstable patient with haematemesis on the basis of a secondary aortoduodenal fistula. He was successfully treated by staged stent graft placement followed by surgical graft excision and autogenous deep vein reconstruction. In haemodynamically unstable patients or in patients where open repair is not feasible in the acute setting of secondary aortoduodenal fistula, we advocate the use of a 2-staged endovascular and surgical approach to improve short- and long-term outcomes.

Oncologic outcome and recurrence rate following anastomotic leakage after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe early complications after colorectal surgery, and it is associated with a high reoperation rate-, and increased in short-term morbidity and mortality rates. It remains unclear whether anastomotic leakage is associated with poor oncologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impacts of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcomes, disease-free survival and overall mortality in patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study included patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2015 and who had a primary anastomosis. Survival- and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: A total of 1984 patients had a primary anastomosis after surgery. The overall incidence of anastomotic leakage was 7.5%; 19 patients were excluded because they were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 1965 patients, 41 (2.1%) developed local recurrence associated with anastomotic leakage [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-5.29; P = 0.03]. Distant recurrence developed in 291(14.8%) patients with no association with anastomotic leakage [adjusted HR = 1.30 (95% CI: 0.85-1.97) P = 0.23]. Anastomotic leakage was associated with increased long-term mortality [adjusted HR = 1.69 (95% CI 1.32-2.18) P < 0.01]. Five year disease-free survival was significantly decreased in patients with anastomotic leakage, (log rank test P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leakage was significantly associated with increased rates of local recurrence, disease free-survival and overall mortality. Associations of anastomotic leakage with distant recurrence was not found.

Sepsis caused by acute phlegmonous gastritis based on a group A Streptococcus.

We present a case of 45-year-old male with acute phlegmonous gastritis (APG) based on a hemolytic group A Streptococcus. APG is a rare and often a potentially fatal disease, which is characterized by a severe bacterial infection of the gastric wall. Because APG is a rapidly progressive disease, it comes with high mortality rates. Patients with an early diagnosis may undergo successful treatment and have a survival benefit. As soon as the diagnosis of APG is suspected, aggressive and adequate antibiotic treatment in combination with surgical intervention should be considered.

Ileus caused by obstructing colorectal cancer-impact on long-term survival.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether obstructing colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis than non-obstructing CRC. Of CRC patients, 10-28% present with symptoms of acute obstruction. Previous studies regarding obstruction have been primarily based on short-term outcomes, risk factors and treatment modalities. With this study, we want to determine the long-term survival of patients presenting with acute obstructive CRC. METHODS: This single-centre observational retrospective cohort study includes all CRC patients who underwent surgery between December 2004 and 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: ileus and no ileus. Survival analyses were performed for both groups. Additional survival analyses were performed in patients with and without synchronous metastases. The primary outcome was survival in months. RESULTS: A total of 1236 patients were included in the analyses. Ileus occurred in 178 patients (14.4%). The 5-year survival for patients with an ileus was 32% and without 60% (P < 0.01). In patients without synchronous metastases, survival with and without an ileus was 40.9 and 68.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). If ileus presentation was complicated by a colon blowout, 5-year survival decreased to 29%. No significant difference was found in patients with synchronous metastases. Survival at 5 years in this subgroup was 10 and 12% for patients with and without an ileus, respectively (P = 0.705). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obstructive CRC have a reduced short-term overall survival. Also, long-term overall survival is impaired in patients who present with acute obstructive CRC compared to patients without obstruction.

Tumour Characteristics of Patients with Colorectal Cancer after Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: The association between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear, though both share epidemiological characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is higher risk for CRC after an episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis. Furthermore, in cases of CRC, we sought to determine specific tumour characteristics. METHODS: This retrospective observational study includes patients with acute diverticulitis (Hinchey 0 and 1) who were conservatively treated with or without antibiotics between 2008 and 2013. Patients with endoscopic follow-up were included for analysis. Tumour characteristics of patients diagnosed with CRC during colonoscopic follow-up according to patients' presentation of alarm symptoms were considered to be the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 977 patients were conservatively treated for an episode of acute diverticulitis, 645 of whom underwent colonoscopy during follow-up. Ten patients were diagnosed with CRC, nine of whom exhibited alarm symptoms. One patient was diagnosed with stage I disease, 4 had stage II, and 5 had stage III disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests that even though CRC is rare after uncomplicated diverticulitis, in cases of alarm symptoms, a colonoscopy is indicated. In cases where CRC is diagnosed, it is often advanced with a higher TNM stage and poor prognosis.

Mycotic aneurysm caused by Clostridium septicum in a patient with colorectal cancer.

A mycotic aneurysm caused by a Clostridium septicum is a rare infection and has a strong association with colorectal cancer. If left untreated, the mortality rate of the first 24 h is high. This case report discusses the optimal treatment of emergency surgery combined with antibiotic treatment to improve survival. We present a fatal case of a 71-year-old male with abscedation of a caecal carcinoma who shortly after developed a mycotic aneurysm of the infrarenal aorta as a result of a C. septicum infection.

What is the Risk of Colorectal Cancer After an Episode of Acute Diverticulitis in Conservatively Treated Patients?

GOALS: The goal is to find the risk of colorectal cancer after an episode of acute diverticulitis in conservatively treated patients. Secondly, to determine the benefit of colonoscopy in these patients. BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, it is a common practice to routinely perform a colonoscopy after an episode of conservatively treated diverticulitis to exclude a malignancy. Yet according to the Dutch guidelines, these patients should not undergo a colonoscopy on a routine basis. The aim of this study is to determine the benefit of a colonoscopy in patients who have been treated for diverticulitis conservatively. STUDY: This retrospective study includes patients who were diagnosed with acute diverticulitis (Hinchey 0 and I) and were treated conservatively, with or without antibiotics. Only patients who underwent colonoscopy were included for analysis. In addition, the outcome (yes or no colorectal cancer) of colonoscopy was analyzed according to patients' presentation of alarm symptoms for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and June 2013, 977 patients were treated conservatively for an episode of acute diverticulitis. Of those, 645 underwent colonoscopy during follow-up. Alarm symptoms for colorectal cancer were present in 205 patients. Nine of them were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (4.4%) versus 1 patient (0.2%, P=0.0002) in the group without alarm symptoms (N=440). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that routine colonoscopy is not indicated after acute diverticulitis which has been treated conservatively in a large series. Only in case of alarm symptoms a colonoscopy is mandatory, but even then the actual finding of a colorectal cancer is rare.