RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurologically critically ill patients present with unique disease trajectories, prognostic uncertainties, and challenges to end-of-life (EOL) care. Acute brain injuries place these patients at risk for underrecognized symptoms and unmet EOL management needs, which can negatively affect their quality of care and lead to complicated grief in surviving loved ones. To care for patients nearing the EOL in the neurointensive care unit, health care clinicians must consider neuroanatomic localization, barriers to symptom assessment and management, unique aspects of the dying process, and EOL management needs. AIM: We aim to define current best practices, barriers, and future directions for EOL care of the neurologically critically ill patient.
RESUMEN
Background: Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) experience in older adults with stroke or how similar the EOL experience is in older adults with stroke when compared to those with cancer. Purpose: We utilized data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to compare symptoms, symptom management, and overall rating of care in the last month of life between older adults diagnosed with stroke and those diagnosed with cancer. Methods: Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between diagnosis and symptom prevalence, symptom management, and overall care quality, adjusting for care intensity, place of death, and demographic covariates. Results: A total of 747 NHATS participants diagnosed with stroke or cancer were identified. Diagnosis of stroke was associated with whether the symptoms of pain (OR .46, 95% CI .26-.83), dyspnea (OR .32, 95% CI .17-.64), and emotional distress were documented (OR .57, 95% CI .33-.98). Diagnosis was not associated with pain management (OR .85, 95% CI .48-1.48), dyspnea management (OR .97, 95% CI .47-2.03), or emotional distress management (OR 1.02, 95% CI .53-1.97). Correlates of overall care quality included place of death and diagnosis, with patients with stroke more likely to report poorer care quality (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.03-3.04) as well as those who died in the hospital (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.26-3.77). Conclusions: Older adults with stroke are at risk for inadequate symptom assessment and documentation, as well as poorer symptom management and poorer overall care quality.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of death globally, yet End-of-Life (EOL) symptoms and their management in these patients are not well understood. PURPOSE: This integrative review aims to critique and synthesize research on EOL symptoms and symptom management in adult patients with stroke in the last 2 years of life in all settings. METHODS: The Whittemore and Knafl integrative review methodology guided this review. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were used for the literature search. Included studies were published in English and quantitatively examined symptoms and symptom management. Quality appraisal was guided by the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) assessment tool. RESULTS: Seven studies, all rated weak, were included in this review. A total of 2175 adult patients from six countries were represented. Results are classified into three main themes: EOL symptom experience, symptom assessment, and symptom management. Commonly reported EOL symptoms among adults with stroke include both stroke-specific (dysphagia, dysarthria) and non-specific symptoms (pain, dyspnea, constipation, and psychological distress). However, communication difficulties and the infrequent use of standardized tools for symptom assessment limit what is known about the EOL symptom experience. Although the relief of pain is generally well-documented, dyspnea and anxiety are much more poorly controlled. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for better assessment and management of EOL symptoms in patients with stroke. Established palliative and EOL care guidelines need to be incorporated into clinical practice to ensure access to high-quality care.