The Emerging Treatment Options of Plasmablastic Lymphoma: Analysis of 173 Individual Patient Outcomes.

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a newly recognized aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its rarity hinders testing effective treatment options in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and our internal records to retrieve patients with a PBL diagnosis with evaluable treatment outcomes. Aggressive chemotherapy was defined as more intense regimens than CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). We compiled a meta-dataset of 173 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 48.5 years, 75% of patients were male, and stages III/IV accounted for 47% of the cohort. Of 138 patients with known response status after first-line chemotherapy, 63 (45%) achieved a complete response with a 2-year relapse-free survival of 71.6%. Sixty-nine (50%) patients received first-line CHOP. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate among the 2 most commonly used regimens, CHOP and DA-EPOCH (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) (69% vs. 79%; P = .4). The median follow-up was 9 months, and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 47.4%. A univariate analysis identified factors associated with worse OS, including stage III/IV (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82; P < .001), human herpes virus-8-positive (HR, 3.30; P = .01), bone marrow (HR, 1.07; P = .035), and cardiorespiratory involvement (HR, 2.26; P = .015). Meanwhile, Epstein-Varr virus-encoded small RNA-positivity (HR, 0.31; P < .001) and involvement of head and neck (HR, 0.44; P = .009) were associated with better OS. Multivariate analysis showed that aggressive chemotherapy was significantly associated with better OS (HR, 0.22; P = .016). Patients with PBL with high-risk features, such as advanced stage, human herpes virus-8-positivity, bone marrow, and cardiorespiratory involvement, require more aggressive chemotherapy. Bortezomib and lenalidomide are promising add-on agents.

Possible molecular and paracrine involvement underlying the pathogenesis of COVID-19 cardiovascular complications.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a pandemic on 11 March 2020 by the WHO. Despite being mainly a respiratory virus, cardiac complications have been described. These range from sudden cardiac death to subtle diastolic dysfunction after recovery from COVID-19. The commonest cardiac presentation to date is acute heart failure resulting from biventricular or left ventricular hypokinesis and elevation of cardiac troponins. It has been shown that COVID-19 downregulates angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, which has protective effects on the endothelium and cardiomyocytes. It has also been proven that COVID-19 induces a state of hypercytokinaemia, some cytokines such as interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 have an injurious effect on the myocardium and endothelium, respectively. Such pathogenic mechanisms might play a crucial role in induction of cardiomyocyte injury and impaired myocardial perfusion probably through coronary endothelial dysfunction. The understanding and linking of such mechanisms might help in tailoring drug repurposing for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19 cardiovascular complications.