Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 129: 109780, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31756661

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the relevance of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning regarding general anesthesia (GA) in children under 3 years of age for procedures lasting longer than 3 h, by surgical specialty and for otolaryngology specifically. METHODS: A one-year retrospective review was conducted at a tertiary-care medical center for all children younger than 3 years undergoing surgical procedures with durations greater than 3 h. De-identified data related to age, surgical service, procedure types, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and general anesthesia time were collected and examined. RESULTS: During 2017, 430 of 11,757 patients (3.7%) met the age and duration of anesthesia criteria. Procedures performed by the cardiothoracic surgery service were mostly likely to result in duration of surgery greater than 3 h (46.6%), followed by neurosurgery (12.9%), cardiology (9.3%), plastic surgery (7.1%), general surgery (6.6%), and urology (5.1%). Less than 2% of patients undergoing ophthalmology (1.9%), orthopedic surgery (1.7%), and otolaryngology (0.5%) procedures required anesthesia greater than 3 h. CONCLUSION: Less than 4% of patients younger than 3 years undergoing surgery required general anesthesia for longer than 3 h. The theoretical risks of general anesthesia per the FDA warning are discussed and must be balanced against the known functional and neurodevelopmental consequences of not performing critical and time-sensitive surgery on children in this age group. A strategy for addressing parental and provider concerns is discussed.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Otolaringología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Spine Deform ; 6(6): 662-668, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30348341

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective database review. OBJECTIVES: Determine if use of intraoperative 3D imaging of pedicle screw position provides clinical and cost benefit. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Injury or reoperation from malpositioned pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery occurs but is increasingly considered to be a never-event. To avoid complications, intraoperative 3D imaging of screw position may be obtained. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive AIS database at a high-volume pediatric spine center was examined three years before and after implementation of an intraoperative low-dose computed tomographic (CT) scan protocol. All screws were placed via freehand technique and corrected if found to be outside optimal trajectory on the postplacement CT scan. Demographic and outcome data were compared between cohorts, along with number, location, and reason for screw change. Cost analysis was based on the average cost of revision surgery for screw malposition versus intraoperative CT use. RESULTS: There were 153 patients in the pre-CT and 153 in the post-CT cohorts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two reoperations were needed for revision of improper screw placement in the pre-CT group and none in the post-CT group. Number of patients needed to harm was 76 (absolute risk increase = 1.31% [-0.49%, 3.11%]). Of those who had intraoperative CT scans, 80 (52.3%) needed on average 1.75 screw trajectories/lengths changed. Forty-three percent were medial breaches; of these, 39% were in the concavity. There were no differences between patients who did and did not need screw repositioning with regard to body mass index (BMI), age, curve size, surgeon/trainee side, screw density, or preoperative and one-year postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire (SRS-22) scores. The average cost of reoperation for malposition was $4,900, whereas the cost of a single intraoperative CT was $232. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative CT is an effective tool to prevent reoperation in AIS surgery for incorrect screw placement. Despite high volume, experience, and specialty training, incorrect trajectories occur and systems should be in place for preventable error. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Pediculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/economía , Escoliosis/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Adolescente , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Escoliosis/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...