Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 20(12): 1119-24, 2001 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11740316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida spp. are increasingly important pathogens in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Prior colonization is a major risk factor for candidemia, but few studies have focused on risk factors for colonization, particularly in NICU patients. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six NICUs to determine risk factors for Candida colonization. Infant gastrointestinal tracts were cultured on admission and weekly until NICU discharge and health care worker hands were cultured monthly for Candida spp. RESULTS: The prevalence of Candida spp. colonization was 23% (486 of 2157 infants); 299 (14%), 151 (7%) and 74 (3%) were colonized with Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis and other Candida spp., respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusting for length of stay, birth weight < or = 1000 g and gestational age < 32 weeks revealed that use of third generation cephalosporins was associated with either C. albicans (155 incident cases) or C. parapsilosis (104 incident cases) colonization. Use of central venous catheters or intravenous lipids were risk factors for C. albicans, whereas delivery by cesarean section was protective. Use of H2 blockers was an independent risk factor for C. parapsilosis. Of 2989 cultures from health care workers' hands, 150 (5%) were positive for C. albicans and 575 (19%) for C. parapsilosis, but carriage rates did not correlate with NICU site-specific rates for infant colonization. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that NICU patients acquire Candida spp., particularly C. parapsilosis, from the hands of health care workers. H2 blockers, third generation cephalosporins and delayed enteral feedings alter gastrointestinal tract ecology, thereby facilitating colonization.


Asunto(s)
Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/transmisión , Portador Sano/microbiología , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Candida/crecimiento & desarrollo , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Candidiasis/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Sistema Digestivo/microbiología , Mano/microbiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 19(4): 319-24, 2000 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10783022

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida species are important nosocomial pathogens in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in six geographically diverse NICUs from 1993 to 1995 to determine the incidence of and risk factors for candidemia, including the role of gastrointestinal (GI) tract colonization. Study procedures included rectal swabs to detect fungal colonization and active surveillance to identify risk factors for candidemia. Candida strains obtained from the GI tract and blood were analyzed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis to determine whether colonizing strains caused candidemia. RESULTS: In all, 2,847 infants were enrolled and 35 (1.2%) developed candidemia (12.3 cases per 1,000 patient discharges or 0.63 case per 1,000 catheter days) including 23 of 421 (5.5%) babies < or =1,000 g. After adjusting for birth weight and abdominal surgery, forward multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant risk factors, including gestational age <32 weeks, 5-min Apgar <5; shock, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, prior use of intralipid, parenteral nutrition, central venous catheters, H2 blockers, intubation or length of stay > 7 days before candidemia (P < 0.05). Catheters, steroids and GI tract colonization were not independent risk factors, but GI tract colonization preceded candidemia in 15 of 35 (43%) case patients. CONCLUSIONS: Candida spp. are an important cause of late onset sepsis in NICU patients. The incidence of candidemia might be decreased by the judicious use of treatments identified as risk factors and avoiding H2 blockers.


Asunto(s)
Candida/clasificación , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Fungemia/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Candidiasis/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Sistema Digestivo/microbiología , Femenino , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Adv Ther ; 17(6): 263-71, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11317829

RESUMEN

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs), the most common indication for outpatient antimicrobial therapy, impose a heavy medical and societal burden and present a difficult therapeutic challenge in the face of increasing pathogen resistance worldwide. Gatifloxacin is a new broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone with excellent activity against prevalent respiratory bacteria, including penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and atypical pathogens. A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative surveillance study carried out in Mexico evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral gatifloxacin 400 mg once daily in 17,923 adult outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (n = 3322), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) (n = 5885), and acute bacterial sinusitis (n = 8716). Voluntary, unpaid physician participation contributed to an unbiased study design. Physician-assessed global rate of cure or improvement was 96.3%; efficacy was 95.8% in CAP, 96.1% in AECB, and 96.4% in sinusitis. The incidences of relapse (1.5%) and therapeutic failure (0.7%) were low. The most commonly reported adverse events, nausea (2.76%), headache (2.20%), and dizziness (1.33%), were generally mild and self-limited. Oral gatifloxacin 400 mg once daily is effective and safe for patients with CAP, AECB, and acute sinusitis.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Seguridad , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración Oral , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Bronquitis/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Mareo/inducido químicamente , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Femenino , Gatifloxacina , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Neumonía/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Sinusitis/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Intensive Care Med ; 21(4): 302-9, 1995 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7650252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and severe sepsis in surgical ICU patients and define patient characteristics associated with their acquisition and outcome. DESIGN: One-month prospective study of critically ill patients with a 28 day in-hospital follow up. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at a tertiary care institution. METHODS: All patients (n = 170) admitted to the SICU between April 1 and April 30, 1992 were prospectively followed for 28 days. Daily surveillance was performed by two dedicated, specifically-trained research nurses. Medical and nursing chart reviews were performed, and follow up information at six and twelve months was obtained. RESULTS: The in-hospital surveillance represented 2246 patient-days, including 658 ICU patient-days. Overall, 158 patients (93%) had SIRS for an incidence of 542 episodes/1000 patients-days. The incidence of SIRS in the ICU was even higher (840 episodes/1000 patients-days). A total of 83 patients (49%) had sepsis; among them 28 developed severe sepsis. Importantly, 13 patients had severe sepsis after discharge from the ICU. Patient groups were comparable with respect to age, sex ratio, and type of surgery performed. Apache II score on admission to the ICU and ASA score at time of surgery were significantly higher (p < 0.05) only for patients who subsequently developed severe sepsis. The crude mortality at 28 days was 8.2% (14/170); it markedly differed among patient groups: 6% for those with SIRS vs. 35% for patients with severe sepsis. Patients with sepsis and severe sepsis had a longer mean length of ICU stay (2.1 +/- 0.2 and 7.5 +/- 1.5, respectively) than those with SIRS (1.45 +/- 0.1) or control patients (1.16 +/- 0.1). Total length of hospital stay also markedly differed among groups (35 +/- 9 (severe sepsis), 24 +/- 2 (sepsis), 11 +/- 0.8 (SIRS), and 9 +/- 0.1 (controls, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Almost everyone in the SICU had SIRS. Therefore, because of its poor specificity, SIRS was not helpful predicting severe sepsis and septic shock. Patients who developed sepsis or severe sepsis had higher crude mortality and length of stay than those who did not. Studies designed to identify those who develop complications of SIRS would be very useful.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Iowa/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/clasificación , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Terminología como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...