Clinical feasibility of a commercially available MRI-only method for radiotherapy treatment planning of the brain.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in deep-learning based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) image conversion methods have enabled the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only based radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) of the brain. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the clinical feasibility of a commercial, deep-learning based MRI-only RTP method with respect to dose calculation and patient positioning verification performance in RTP of the brain. METHODS: Clinical validation of dose calculation accuracy was performed by a retrospective evaluation for 25 glioma and 25 brain metastasis patients. Dosimetric and image quality of the studied MRI-only RTP method was evaluated by a direct comparison of the sCT-based and computed tomography (CT)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) images and treatment plans. Patient positioning verification accuracy of sCT images was evaluated retrospectively for 10 glioma and 10 brain metastasis patients based on clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. RESULTS: An average mean dose difference of Dmean = 0.1% for planning target volume (PTV) and 0.6% for normal tissue (NT) structures were obtained for glioma patients. Respective results for brain metastasis patients were Dmean = 0.5% for PTVs and Dmean =1.0% for NTs. Global three-dimensional (3D) gamma pass rates using 2%/2 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) criterion were 98.0% for the glioma subgroup, and 95.2% for the brain metastasis subgroup using 1%/1 mm criterion. Mean distance differences of <1.0 mm were observed in all Cartesian directions between CT-based and sCT-based CBCT patient positioning in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of dose calculation and patient positioning accuracy, the studied MRI-only method demonstrated its clinical feasibility for RTP of the brain. The results encourage the use of the studied method as part of a routine clinical workflow.

Assessment of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for MRI-Only Radiotherapy Treatment Planning of the Brain.

Magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy treatment planning (MRI-only RTP) and positron emission tomography (PET)-MRI imaging require generation of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images from MRI images. In this study, initial dosimetric evaluation was performed for a previously developed MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) method for use in MRI-only RTP of the brain. MRAC-based sCT images were retrospectively generated from Dixon MR images of 20 patients who had previously received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Bone segmentation performance and Dice similarity coefficient of the sCT conversion method were evaluated for bone volumes on CT images. Dose calculation accuracy was assessed by recalculating the CT-based EBRT plans using the sCT images as the base attenuation data. Dose comparison was done for the sCT- and CT-based EBRT plans in planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR). Parametric dose comparison showed mean relative differences of <0.4% for PTV and <1.0% for OARs. Mean gamma index pass rates of 95.7% with the 2%/2 mm agreement criterion and 96.5% with the 1%/1 mm agreement criterion were determined for glioma and metastasis patients, respectively. Based on the results, MRI-only RTP using sCT images generated from MRAC images can be a feasible alternative for radiotherapy of the brain.

Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. RESULTS: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naïve patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). CONCLUSION: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use.

Quality assurance measurements of geometric accuracy for magnetic resonance imaging-based radiotherapy treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the only imaging method for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) is becoming more common as MRI-only RTP solutions have evolved. The geometric accuracy of MR images is an essential factor of image quality when determining the suitability of MRI for RTP. The need is therefore clear for clinically feasible quality assurance (QA) methods for the geometric accuracy measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This work evaluates long-term stability of geometric accuracy and the validity of a 2D geometric accuracy QA method compared to a prototype 3D method and analysis software in routine QA. The long-term follow-up measurements were conducted on one of the 1.5 T scanners over a period of 19 months using both methods. Inter-scanner variability of geometric distortions was also evaluated in three 1.5 T and three 3 T MRI scanners from a single vendor by using the prototype 3D QA method. RESULTS: The geometric accuracy of the magnetic resonance for radiotherapy (MR-RT) platform remained stable within 2 mm at distances of <250 mm from isocenter. All scanners achieved good geometric accuracy with mean geometric distortions of <1 mm at <150 mm and <2 mm at <250 mm from the isocenter. Both measurement methods provided relevant information about geometric distortions. CONCLUSIONS: Geometric distortions are often considered a limitation of MRI-only RTP. Results indicate that geometric accuracy of modern scanners remain within acceptable limits by default even after many years of clinical use based on the 3D QA evaluation.

Assessment of dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-only solution for external beam radiotherapy of pelvic anatomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The clinical feasibility of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) planning have been studied and adopted into clinical use recently. This paper evaluates the dosimetric and positioning performance of a sCT approach for different pelvic cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients receiving EBRT at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland) were enrolled in the study. The sCT images were generated as part of a clinical MRI-simulation procedure. Dose calculation accuracy was assessed by comparing the sCT-based calculation with a CT-based calculation. In addition, we evaluated the patient position verification accuracy for both digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) -based image guidance using a subset of the cohort. Furthermore, the relevance of using continuous Hounsfield unit values was assessed. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) relative dose difference in the planning target volume mean dose computed over various cancer groups was less than 0.2 (0.4)% between sCT and CT. Among all groups, the average minimum gamma-index pass-rates were better than 95% with a 2%/2mm gamma-criteria. The difference between sCT- and CT-DRR-based patient positioning was less than 0.3 (1.4) mm in all directions. The registrations of sCT to CBCT produced similar results as compared with CT to CBCT registrations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sCT for clinical EBRT dose calculation and patient positioning in the investigated types of pelvic cancers was dosimetrically and geometrically accurate for clinical use.